利用酿酒酵母表面展示系统表达产琥珀酸丝状杆菌S85纤维素结合域家族2（CBD2），分析其纤维黏附位点。将CBD2基因插入质粒pYD1的AGA2 3′端，构建pMCBD2重组质粒，化学转化pMCBD2至酿酒酵母EBY100中，2%半乳糖诱导CBD2表达于酿酒酵母表面。利用免疫组化技术检测重组酵母细胞在稻草茎细胞壁上的黏附位点。结果表明：利用酿酒酵母表面展示系统可成功表达产琥珀酸丝状杆菌S85的CBD2基因；重组CBD2的pMCBD2-EBY100与稻草茎孵育后，经抗V5异硫氰酸荧光素标记抗体处理可在稻草茎的薄壁、厚壁和维管组织均检测到荧光。产琥珀酸丝状杆菌S85的CBD2黏附稻草多个组织。结果提示：酿酒酵母表面展示技术与免疫组化技术联用研究瘤胃细菌CBD的黏附位点是可行的。
To analyze the adhesion sites of cellulose binding domain (CBD) family 2 of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 on fiber using a cell surface display system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain EBY100, the CBD2 encoding fragment was inserted into the 3′ terminal of AGA2 fragment in pYD1 vector to construct a recombinant plasmid, pMCBD2. Then pMCBD2 was transformed into strain EBY100 chemically. The 2% galactose was used to induce the expression of CBD2 on the cell surface of EBY100. The adhesion sites of the recombinant strain EBY100 to cell wall of rice straw stem were detected using immunohistochemistry. The results showed that CBD2 can potentially be expressed on the surface of strain EBY100. After incubating EBY100-pMCBD2 with rice straw stem slice, fluorescence was detected on the sclerenchyma, parenchyma and vascular tissues of rice straw stem with Anti-V5-FITC. It suggests that CBD2 can potentially adhere to most tissues of rice straw stem. Cell surface display system of S. cerevisiae along with immunohistochemistry can be suitable for the study on the adhesion sites of rumen bacterial CBD.［Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition， 2011， 23（6）：976 -982］
［1］GONG J, FORSBERG C W. Factors affecting adhesion Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 and adherence defective mutant to cellulose[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1989, 55:3039-3044.
[2]FORSBERG C W, FORANO E, CHESSON A. Microbial adherence to the plant cell wall and enzymatic hydrolysis[C]//CRONJE P D. Ruminant physiology: digestion, metabolism, growth and reproduction. Proceeding of the 9th ISRP. UK: CAB International, 2000, 79-97.
[3]MIRON J, BEN-GHEDALIA D, MORRISON M. Invited review: adhesion mechanisms of rumen cellulolytic bacteria[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2001, 84:1294-1309.
[4]FUJITA Y, KATAHIRA S, UEDA M, et al. Construction of whole-cell biocatalyst for xylan degradation through cell-surface xylanase display in Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 2002, 17:189-195.
[5]FUKUDA T, ISHIKAWA T, OGAWA M, et al. Enhancement of cellulase activity by clones selected from the combinatorial library of the cellulose-binding domain by cell surface engineering[J]. Biotechnology Progress, 2006, 22:933-938.
[6]MURAI T, UEDA M, KAWAGUCHI T, et al. Assimilation of cellooligosaccharides by a cell surface-engineered yeast expressing β-glucosidase and xarboxymethylcellulase from Aspergillus aculeatus[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1998, 64:4857-4861.
[7]NAM J M, FUJITA Y, ARAI T, et al. Construction of engineered yeast with the ability of binding to cellulose[J]. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 2002, 17:197-202.
[8]BORASTON A B, BOLAM D N, GILBERT H J, et al. Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition[J]. Biochemical Journal, 2004, 382:769-781.
[9]FORSBERG C W, CHENG K J, WHITE B A. Polysaccharide degradation in the rumen and large intestine[M]//MACKIE R I, BRUCE A. WHITE R E, et al. Isaacson gastrointestinal microbiology. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1997, 319-379.
[10]LATHAM M J, BROOKER B E, PETIPHER G L, et al. Ruminococcus flavefaciens cell coat and adhesion to cotton cellulose and cell walls in leaves of perennial ryegrass[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1978, 35:156-165.
[11]DINSDALE D, MORRIS E J, BACON J S D. Electron microscopy of the microbial populations present and their modes of attack on various cellulosic substrates undergoing digestion in the sheep rumen[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1978, 36:160-168.
[12]KONDO A, UEDA M. Yeast cell-surface display-applications of molecular display[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2004, 64:28-40.
[13]SHIBASAKI S, MAEDA H, UEDA M. Molecular display technology using yeast-arming technology[J]. Analytical Sciences January, 2009, 25:41-49.
[14]SAMBROOK J, RUSSELL D W. 分子克隆实验指南[M].3版.黄培堂,王栋樑,周晓巍,等,译.北京：科学出版社,2002.
[15]ITO H, FUKUDA Y, MURATA K, et al. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations[J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 1983, 153(1):163-168.
[16]WANG J K, LIU J X, LI J Y, et al. Histological and rumen degradation changes of rice straw stem epidermis as influenced by chemical pretreatment[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2007, 136:51-62.
[17]MCCARTNEY L, BLAKE A W, FLINT J E, et al. Differential recognition of plant cell walls bymicrobial xylan-specific carbohydrate-binding modules[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(2):4765-4770.
[18]WANG J K, CHEN X L, LIU J X, et al. Histological changes of tissues and cell wall of rice straw influenced by chemical pretreatments[J]. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008, 21:824-830.
[19]王佳堃,叶丹妮,李文婷,等.化学预处理对稻草硅化程度的影响及其与稻草降解率的关系研究[J].动物营养学报,2008,20(2):170-175.
[20]ARNOLD K, BORDOLI L, KOPP J, et al. The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modeling[J]. Bioinformatics, 2006, 22:195-201.
[21]SCHWEDE T, KOPP J, GUEX N, PEITSCH M C. SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, 31:3381-3385.
[22]GUEX N, PEITSCH M C. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling[J]. Electrophoresis, 1997, 18:2714-2723.
[23]SIMPSON P J, XIE H, BOLAM D N, et al. The structural basis for the ligand specificity of family 2 carbohydrate-binding modules[J]. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2000, 275:41137-41142.
[24]BLAKE A W, MCCARTNEY L, FLINT J E, et al. Understanding the biological rationale for the diversity of cellulose-directed carbohydrate-binding modules in prokaryotic enzymes[J]. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2006, 281:29321-29329.
京公网安备 11010802041926号