实验方法

鸭空肠液中全消化酶与主要消化酶体外总消化能力的比较研究

展开
  • 1.扬州大学动物科学与技术学院,扬州225009; 2.中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所动物营养学国家重点实验室,北京100193
谢木林(1984—),男,湖北十堰人,硕士研究生,从事饲料营养价值评定的研究。E-mail: xiemulin2004@163.com

网络出版日期: 2011-06-17

基金资助

基本科研业务费专项(2010jc-3-3);科技部创新方法工作专项(2009IM033100)

A Comparative Study on in vitro Digestibility of All and Main Digestive Enzymes in the Duck Jejunal Fluid

Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China ; 2. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China

Online published: 2011-06-17

摘要

本试验旨在研究北京鸭空肠液中淀粉酶,脂肪酶,胰蛋白酶和糜蛋白酶的总消化能力占所有酶总消化能力的比例,及其他未知酶发生变化后对测试结果的影响。采用单因素完全随机设计,根据肠液酶组成设3个处理,处理间4种主要酶的活性一致。处理1为鸭内源肠液(4种酶+其他酶),处理2为鸭肠液干粉剂+试剂酶(4种酶+其他酶),处理3为试剂酶(4种酶)。每个处理设置5个重复,每个重复1根模拟消化管。分别测定4种饲料原料(玉米、豆粕、棉粕、小麦麸)和4种饲粮的干物质和能量消化率。结果表明:1)不同处理对饲料原料与饲粮干物质、能量消化率有显著影响(P<0.05),影响程度因试验材料不同而有所差异;2)处理2对饲料原料和饲粮的干物质和能量消化率分别为处理1的100.09%~101.76%和100.82%~103.52%;3)处理3对饲料原料和饲粮的干物质和能量消化率分别为处理1的89.38%~110.85%和86.39%~115.63%。结果提示:在鸭空肠液中,淀粉酶,胰蛋白酶,糜蛋白酶和脂肪酶4种主要酶的消化能力占肠液所有酶消化能力的比例86.39%以上,其中其他未知酶发生改变后对测试结果的干扰为1.72%;以鸭肠液干粉剂为主体,采用试剂酶调节4种主要消化酶活性与内源肠液活性等同制备鸭模拟小肠液,是比较理想的制备方法。

关键词: ; 肠液; 消化率; 消化酶

本文引用格式

谢木林,赵峰,张宏福,章世元 . 鸭空肠液中全消化酶与主要消化酶体外总消化能力的比较研究[J]. 动物营养学报, 2011 , 23(06) : 991 -997 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2011.06.016

Abstract


Abstract:  This study was conducted to investigate the percentage of the total digestibility of amylase, trypsin, chymotrypsin and lipase to that of all enzymes in jejunal fluid in Beijing ducks in vitro, as well as the influence of the other enzymes changing on the test results. A single-factor completely randomized design was used. Three treatments with same activities of the four main digestive enzymes were set according to the digestive enzymes composition of intestinal fluid. Treatment 1 was endogenous intestinal fluid of ducks (4 main digestive enzymes+the other digestive enzymes), treatment 2 was a mixture of intestinal fluid dry powder and reagent enzymes (4 main digestive enzymes+the other digestive enzymes), and treatment 3 was reagent enzymes (4 main digestive enzymes). Each treatment contained 5 replicates and 1 simulative digestive tube per replicate. The dry matter and energy digestibility of 4 feed ingredients (corn, soybean meal, cottonseed meal and wheat bran) and 4 diets were determined. The results showed as follows: 1) there were significant effects of different treatments on the dry matter and energy digestibility of feed ingredients and diets (P<0.05), but the effects on different experimental material were not coincident; 2) the dry matter and energy digestibility in treatment 2 ranged from 100.09% to 101.76% and 100.82% to 103.52% of those in treatment 1, respectively; 3) the dry matter and energy digestibility in treatment 3 ranged from 89.38% to 110.85% and 86.39% to 115.63% of those in treatment 1, respectively. The results indicate that the percentage of the total digestibility of the four main digestive enzymes to that of all the digestive enzymes in duck intestinal fluid was over 86.39%, and the interference of the other enzymes’ changing was 1.72%; the preparation of simulative intestinal fluid is an ideal method that using the endogenous intestinal fluid purification powder as the main ingredient, and adjusting the activities of the four main enzymes to the same levels as endogenous intestinal fluid with regent enzymes.[Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2011, 23(6):991 -997]

参考文献

[1]胡光源.生长猪小肠仿生消化试剂设计依据的研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2010.

[2]BOISEN S, FERNHDEZ J A. Prediction of the total tract digestibility of energy in feedstuffs and pig diets by in vitro analyses[J]. Animal Feed Science Technology, 1997, 68:277-286.

[3]BOISEN S. A new concept for practical feed evaluation systems[M]. Aarhus: Aarhus University, 2007.

[4]张子仪,李小亭,张蔚云,等.猪的离体消化实验方法的研究,第四报:猪小肠液所含两种蛋白水解酶活的变异因数及其与离体消化率的关系分析[R]//中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所科学研究年报.北京:北京畜牧兽医研究所,1983:100-105.

[5]张子仪,李小亭,张蔚云,等.猪的离体消化实验方法的研究,第八报:用不同工艺所得PIF测出的离体消化率及其与常法消化率的比较[R]//中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所科学研究年报.北京:北京畜牧兽医研究所,1984a:122-130.

[6]张子仪,张蔚云,李文英.猪的离体消化实验方法的研究,第十一报:不同加工条件及不同保存条件下PIF冻干粉效价的变化[R]//中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所科学研究年报.北京:北京畜牧兽医研究所,1984:144-148.

[7]郑卫宽.用仿生消化仪测定棉粕真代谢能值的研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2009.

[8]DAHLQVIST A. A method for the determination of amylase inintestinal content[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1962, 14:145-151.

[9]WIRNT R. Tyrpsin, measurement with N α-p-tolue-nesulfony-L-arginine methyl ester as substrate[M]//BERGMEYER H U. Methods of enzymatic analysis. Weinheinm: Verlag Chemie, 1974:1021-1024.

[10]WIRNT R. Chymotrypsin, measurements with N-benzoyl-L-tyrosin methyl ester as substrate[M]//BERGMEYER H U. Methods of enzymatic analysis. Weinheinm: Verlag Chemie, 1974:1009-1012.

[11]Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis[M]. Washington, D. C.: AOAC International, 2001.

[12]SAS Institute. SAS/STAT user’s guide: statistics[CP/CD]. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute Inc., 2003.

[13]MCDONALD P, EDWARDS R A, GREENHALGH J F D, et al. Animal nutrition[M]. 6th ed. Essex: Pearson Education Linited, 2002:165-167.

[14]PUBOLS M H. Ratio of enzymes in the chick pancreas[J]. Poultry Science, 1991, 70:337-342.

[15]赵峰.用酶法评定鸭代谢能的方法学研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2006.

[16]李辉.单胃动物仿生消化系统(SDS-Ⅰ)测定鸭饲料代谢能值的精度、变异因素及可加性研究[D].硕士学位论文.安徽:安徽农业大学,2010.
文章导航

/