特种经济动物营养

饲粮蛋白质水平对育成期母貂生长性能、营养物质消化代谢及血清生化指标的影响

  • 张铁涛 ,
  • 崔虎 ,
  • 杨颖 ,
  • 吴学壮 ,
  • 高秀华 ,
  • 杨福合 ,
  • 邢秀梅
展开
  • 1. 中国农业科学院饲料研究所, 北京 100081;
    2. 吉林省特种经济动物分子生物学重点实验室, 吉林 132109;
    3. 中国农业科学院特产研究所, 吉林 132109

收稿日期: 2011-11-07

  网络出版日期: 2012-04-29

基金资助

公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200903014)

Effects of Dietary Protein Levels on Growth Performance, Digestibility of Nutrients, and Serum Biochemical Parameters in Growing Female Minks

  • ZHANG Tietao ,
  • CUI Hu ,
  • YANG Ying ,
  • WU Xuezhuang ,
  • GAO Xiuhua ,
  • YANG Fuhe ,
  • XING Xiumei
Expand
  • 1. Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100081, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Special Economic Animal Molecular Biology, Jilin 132109, China;
    3. Institute of Special Economic Animal and Plant Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Jilin 132109, China

Received date: 2011-11-07

  Online published: 2012-04-29

摘要

本文旨在探讨饲粮蛋白质水平对育成期母貂生长性能、营养物质消化代谢及血清中与氮代谢相关的生化指标的影响。选择健康(50±3)日龄断奶的雌性水貂60只,平均体重为(0.577±0.073) kg,随机分成6组,每组10个重复,每个重复1只,单笼饲养。6组水貂分别饲喂蛋白质水平为28%、30%、32%、34%、36%、38%的试验饲粮。在水貂65、80、95、110日龄时各进行1次消化代谢试验,分析各日龄水貂的蛋白质消化率、脂肪消化率、氮沉积、蛋白质生物学价值、饲料转化率及体增重等指标。结果表明:50~65日龄,38%蛋白质组体增重极显著高于28%和32%蛋白质组(P<0.01),38%蛋白质组饲料转化率极显著优于28%和32%蛋白质组(P<0.01);50~110日龄,32%和34%蛋白质组体增重显著高于28%蛋白质组(P<0.05)。95日龄时,32%、34%和38%蛋白质组的蛋白质消化率极显著高于28%和30%蛋白质组(P<0.01)。110日龄时,34%蛋白质组蛋白质生物学价值和净蛋白质利用率极显著低于其他试验组(P<0.01)。110日龄时,38%蛋白质组尿素氮含量极显著高于其他各组(P<0.01);34%和36%蛋白质组总氨基酸含量显著高于28%蛋白质组(P<0.05)。综合试验中的测定指标,建议50~65日龄,水貂饲粮蛋白质水平为36%~38%;66~80日龄,水貂饲粮蛋白质水平为34%~36%;81~110日龄,水貂饲粮蛋白质水平为32%~34%。

本文引用格式

张铁涛 , 崔虎 , 杨颖 , 吴学壮 , 高秀华 , 杨福合 , 邢秀梅 . 饲粮蛋白质水平对育成期母貂生长性能、营养物质消化代谢及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2012 , (5) : 835 -844 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2012.05.007

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to study the regularity of growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and serum biochemical parameters with different dietary protein levels in growing female minks (Mustela vison). Sixty aged (50?3) days female minks were randomly divided into six groups according to a single-factor design. Each group included ten replications in which one mink fed in a single cage. The minks were fed experimental diets with protein levels of 28%, 30%, 32%, 34%, 36% and 38%, respectively. The metabolism trial was used to analyze the digestibility of protein and fat, nitrogen deposition, protein biological value, feed conversion ratio, and body weight gain of minks at 65, 80, 95 and 110 days of age. The results showed as follows: at 50 to 65 days of age, body weight gain and feed conversion ratio of minks fed diet with 38% protein were significantly higher than those of minks fed diets with 28% and 32% protein (P<0.01). At 50 to 110 days of age, body weight gain of minks fed diets with 32% and 34% protein was significantly higher than that of minks fed diet with 28% protein (P<0.05). Compared with the 28% and 30% protein groups, the minks in 32%, 34% and 38% protein groups had greatly significant digestibility of crude protein (P<0.01) at 95 days of age. The protein biological value and net protein utilization in 34% protein group were the lowest among all the groups (P<0.01) at 110 days of age. At 110 days of age, the serum urea nitrogen content in 38% protein group was significantly higher than that in the other groups (P<0.01), and the total amino acid content in 34% and 36% protein groups was significantly higher than that in 28% protein group (P<0.05). Considering the determination of indexes, it is recommended that dietary protein levels are 36% to 38% for minks aged 50 to 65 days; dietary protein levels are 34% to 36% for minks aged 66 to 80 days; dietary protein levels are 32% to 34% for minks aged 81 to 110 days.

参考文献

[1] WAMBERG S,TAUSON A H.Daily milk intake and body water turnover in suckling mink (Mustela vison) kits[J].Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology,1998,119(4):931-939.  
[2] STUBBE M.Mustela vison schreber,1777-mink,Amerikanischer Nerz[M]//NIETHAMMER J,KRAPP F.Handbuch der sugetiere Europas.Wiesbaden:AULA-Verlag,1993:654-698.  
[3] EUROPEAN COMMISSION.The welfare of animals kept for fur production.Report of the scientific committee on animal health and animal welfare.Brussels:Commission of the European Communities,2001:12-13.  
[4] SARI H,JAAKKO M,SANNA H,et al.Effects of family housing on some behavioural and physiological parameters of juvenile farmed mink (Mustela vison)[J].Applied Animal Behaviour Science,2008,109(2):384-395.  
[5] BØRSTING C F,BACH K,SANNA S,et al.The nutritive value of decorticated mill fractions of wheat.3.Digestibility experiments with boiled and enzyme treated fractions fed to mink[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1995,53(3/4):317-336.
[6] GLEMHANSE N.The requirement for sulphur containing amino acids of mink during the growth period[J].Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica,1980,30(3):349-356.  
[7] GRAHAM H,HESSELMAN K,JONSSON E,et al.Influence of β-glucanase supplementation on digestion of a barley-based diet in the pig gastrointestinal tract[J].Nutrition Reports International,1986,34(6):1089-1096.
[8] TAUSON A H.Varied energy concentration in mink diets.Ⅱ.Effects on kit growth performance,female weight changes and water turnover in the lactation period[J].Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica,1988,38(2):231-242.  
[9] NRC.Nutrient requirements of mink and foxes[S].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,1982.  
[10] Hansen B K.The lactating mink (Mustela vison).Genetic and metabolic aspects.Ph.D.Thesis.Copenhagen:The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University,1997.  
[11] WAMBERG S,CLAUSEN T N,OLESEN C R,et al.Nursing sickness in lactating mink (Mustela vison).Ⅱ.Pathophysiology and changes in body fluid composition[J].Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research,1992,56(2):95-101.
[12] ZHAROVA G K,NAUMOVA E I.Structural and functional adaptations of the sable digestive tract to plant food[J].Doklady Biological Sciences,2002,382:31-33.  
[13] AHLSTRØMH Ø.Fat as an energy source in fur animal diets.Effects of dietary fat:carbohydrate ratio and fat source on physiological parameters and production performance.Ph.D.Thesis.Norway:Agricultural University of Norway,1994.  
[14] SZYMECZKO R,SKREDE A.Protein digestion in fistulated polar foxes[J].Scientifur,1991,15(3):227-232.
[15] MUSTONEN A M,PUUKKA M,SAARELA S,et al.Adaptations to fasting in a terrestrial mustelid,the sable (Martes zibellina)[J].Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology,2006,144(4):444-450.  
[16] SUN Y B,ZHAO G Y.The relationship between the volatile fatty acids supply and the nitrogen retention in growing sheep nourished by total intragastric infusions[J].Small Ruminant Research,2009,81(1):8-12.  
[17] BAKER D H.Advances in protein-amino acid nutrition of poultry[J].Amino Acids,2009,37(1):29-41.  
[18] PFEIFFER A,HENKEL H,VERSTEGEN M A.The influence of protein intake on water balance,flow rate and apparent digestibility of nutrition at the distal ileum in growing pigs[J].Livestock Product Science,1995,44:179-187.  
[19] KERR B J,MCKEITH F K,EASTER R A.Effect on performance and carcass characteristics of nursery to finisher pigs fed reduced crude protein amino acid-supplemented diet[J].Journal of Animal Science,1995,73(2):433-440.
[20] NEWELL C W.Nutrient floe and manure management in the mink industry.Ph.D.Thesis.Halifax,N.S.:Truro and Dalhousie University,1999.  
[21] CHIKHOU F H,MOLONEY A P,ALLEN P,et al.Long-term effects of cimaterol in friesian steers:I.Growth,feed efficiency,and selected traits[J].Journal of Animal Science,1993,71(4):906-913.
[22] WANG X,QIAO S Y,LIU M.Effects of graded levels of true ileal digestible threonine on performance,serum parameters and immune function of 10 to 25 kg pigs[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2006,129(3/4):264-278.
[23] MUSTONEN A M,PYYKONEN T,PAAKONEN T,et al.Adaptations to fasting in the American mink(Mustela vison):carbohydrate and lipid metabolism[J].Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology,2005,140:195-202.  
[24] TUITOEK K,YOUNG L G,DELANGE C F M,et al.The effect of reducing excess dietary amino acids on growing-finishing pig performance:an evaluation of the ideal protein concept[J].Journal of Animal Science,1997,75:1575-1583.  
文章导航

/