饲料营养

不同类型芽孢杆菌制剂对肉鸡生长性能和排泄物氨逸失的影响

  • 谭莉 ,
  • 袁栋 ,
  • 张云兵 ,
  • 占秀安
展开
  • 1. 浙江大学饲料科学研究所, 杭州 310058;
    2. 浙江欣欣饲料股份有限公司, 嘉兴 314005

收稿日期: 2011-12-08

  网络出版日期: 2012-04-29

基金资助

现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金资助(CARS-42-G19)

Different Bacillus Probiotics Affect Growth Performance and Ammonia Emission from Excreta of Broilers

  • TAN Li ,
  • YUAN Dong ,
  • ZHANG Yunbing ,
  • ZHAN Xiu
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Feed Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
    2. Zhejiang Xinxin Feed Co., Ltd., Jiaxing 314005, China

Received date: 2011-12-08

  Online published: 2012-04-29

摘要

本试验旨在研究不同类型芽孢杆菌制剂对肉鸡生长性能和排泄物氨逸失的影响,并探讨其可能的作用机理。将840只1日龄岭南黄肉用公鸡按试验要求随机分为4组,每组3个重复,每个重复70只鸡。对照组在基础饲粮中添加维吉尼亚霉素和洛克沙胂,试验组分别在基础饲粮中添加丁酸梭菌(丁酸梭菌组,CBG)、地衣芽孢杆菌(地衣芽孢杆菌组,BLG)和枯草芽孢杆菌制剂(枯草芽孢杆菌组,BSG)。试验期为50 d,分1~21日龄和22~50日龄2个阶段。结果表明:1)地衣芽孢杆菌制剂和枯草芽孢杆菌制剂能显著提高1~21日龄肉鸡平均日采食量和平均日增重(P<0.05),却有增加料重比的趋势(P>0.05);试验组肉鸡1~50日龄和22~50日龄的各生长性能指标与对照组均无显著差异(P>0.05),但在试验组中以CBG效果最优。2)试验组盲肠大肠菌群数、需氧菌总数、厌氧菌总数、pH与对照组均无显著差异(P>0.05),但丁酸梭菌制剂能显著提高21日龄和50日龄时的乳酸杆菌数(P<0.05);盲肠内容物和粪便中pH均以CBG最低。3)与对照组相比,试验组血清黄嘌呤氧化酶活性和尿酸含量不同程度地提高,血清尿素氮含量不同程度地降低;盲肠和粪便中尿酸含量也不同程度地降低,而粪便尿素氮含量不同程度地升高;50日龄时BLG和BSG粪便中氨态氮含量显著升高(P<0.05),CBG与对照组无显著差异(P>0.05)。4)各组肉鸡12、19和26日龄排泄物氨逸失差异不显著(P>0.05),33、40和47日龄以BSG排泄物氨逸失最高,CBG较对照组有降低排泄物氨逸失的趋势(P>0.05)。结果提示,芽孢杆菌制剂能调节肠道菌群,影响体内氮代谢,并降低盲肠与粪便pH,在本试验条件下以丁酸梭菌制剂效果最优,能在一定程度上降低排泄物氨的逸失。

本文引用格式

谭莉 , 袁栋 , 张云兵 , 占秀安 . 不同类型芽孢杆菌制剂对肉鸡生长性能和排泄物氨逸失的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2012 , (5) : 877 -885 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2012.05.012

Abstract

A comparative study was conducted to investigate the effects of different Bacillus probiotics on growth performance and ammonia emission from excreta of broilers and discussed its possible mechanism. Eight hundred and forty 1-day-old Lingnan yellow-feathered broilers were randomly allotted to 4 groups with 3 replicates. The broilers in the control group were fed a basal diet supplemented with virginiamycin and roxarsone, and those in experimental groups were fed the basal diet supplemented with Clostridium butyricum (Clostridium butyricum group, CBG), Bacillus licheniformis (Bacillus licheniformis group, BLG) or B. subtilis (B. subtilis group, BSG), respectively. The experiment lasted for 50 days, including a starter period (1 to 21 days of age) and a finisher period (22 to 50 days of age). The results showed as follows: 1) compared with the control group, average daily feed intake and average daily gain of broilers in BLG and BSG were significantly increased (P<0.05) and there was an increasing trend in the ratio of feed to gain (P>0.05) during the starter period. There were no significant differences in all the indices about growth performance during the whole and finisher period between experimental groups and the control group (P>0.05), but those in CBG were the best. 2) The number of Coliforms, total aerobe, total anaerobe and pH of caecum in the experimental groups were not affected (P>0.05), but the number of Lactobacillus was increased significantly in CBG at 21 and 50 days of age (P<0.05); pH of caecum and feces in CBG was the lowest among all groups. 3) Anthine oxidase activity and uric acid content in serum in experimental groups were increased whereas the serum urea nitrogen content was decreased to a certain extent, furthermore, uric acid content in caecum and feces in experimental groups were decreased whereas urea nitrogen content in feces was increased to a certain extent; fecal ammonia nitrogen content in BLG and BSG was significantly increased at 50 days of age (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found in that between CBG and the control group (P>0.05). 4) There was no significant difference in ammonia emission from excreta among all groups at 12, 19 and 25 days of age (P>0.05), and the NH3 loss in BSG was the highest of all groups and that in CBG tended to reduce at 33, 40 and 47 days of age compared with the control group (P>0.05). In conclusion, Bacillus probiotics can regulate the intestinal miroflora, affect the nitrogen metabolism in vivo and decrease pH of caecum and feces, and C. butyricum can reduce the ammonia emission from excreta and come out to be the best probiotic in the present study.

参考文献

[1] 呙于明.家禽营养[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2004:5-14.  
[2] 董尚智,王国霞,陈远凤,等.饲用地衣芽孢杆菌的生物学特性研究[J].饲料研究,2009(7):14-18.  
[3] WANG Y,GU Q.Effect of probiotic on growth performance and digestive enzyme activity of Arbor Acres broilers[J].Research in Veterinary Science,2010,89(2):163-167.  
[4] LEE K W,LILLEHOJ H S,JANG S I,et al.Effect of Bacillus-based direct-fed microbials on Eimeria maxima infection in broiler chickens[J].Comparative Immunology,Microbiology and Infectious Diseases,2010,33(6):e105-e110.  
[5] OPALINSKI M,MAIORKA A,DAHLKE F,et al.On the use of a probiotic (Bacillus subtilis- strain DSM 17299) as growth promoter in broiler diets[J].Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science,2007,9(2):99-103.
[6] EHSANI M,BARATIAN V,TORKI M.Performance of broilers fed barley-based diets supplemented by two sourses of commercial probiotics[J].World Applied Sciences Journal,2011,14:9-14.  
[7] 谢贵树,戴青,赵述淼,等.丁酸梭菌对动物致病菌的拮抗作用研究[J].湖北农业科学,2007,46(3):424-426.
[8] 王晓霞,易中华,计成,等.果寡糖和枯草芽孢杆菌对肉鸡肠道菌群数量、发酵粪中氨气和硫化氢散发量及营养素利用的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2006,37(4):337-341.
[9] SANTOSO U,TANAKA K,OHTANI S,et al.Effect of fermented product from Bacillus subtilis on feed conversion efficiency,lipid accumulation and ammonia production in broiler chicks[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2001,14(3):333-337.
[10] 步长英.丝兰皂甙、芽孢杆菌对肉鸡生产性能、氮代谢和排泄物氨气散发量的影响.硕士学位论文.泰安:山东农业大学,2008:28.  
[11] 袁涛,管恩平,何桂华,等.砷制剂作为畜禽促生长剂的作用及危害分析[J].中国家禽,2010,32(22):51-53.
[12] CAVAZZONI V,ADAMI A,CASTROVILLI C.Performance of broiler chickens supplemented with Bacillus coagulans as probiotic[J].British Poultry Science,1998,39:526-529.  
[13] 王洪燕.地衣芽孢杆菌制剂对肉仔鸡、断奶仔猪生产性能的影响及机理.硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2005:16.  
[14] 王永军.动物微生态制剂酪酸菌的研究与发展[J].中国饲料添加剂,2006(3):18-19.  
[15] TEO A Y,TAN H M.Evaluation of the performance and intestinal gut microflora of broilers fed on corn-soy diets supplemented with Bacillus subtilis PB6 (CloSTAT)[J].The Journal of Applied Poultry Research,2007,16(3):296-303.
[16] 陈家祥,张仁义,王全溪,等.地衣芽孢杆菌对麻羽肉鸡肠道组织结构及盲肠微生物区系的影响[J].动物营养学报,2010,22(3):757-761.
[17] KASHKET E R.Bioenergetics of lactic acid bacteria:cytoplasmic pH and osmotolera-nce[J].FEMS Microbiology Letters,1987,46(3):233-244.  
[18] 徐海燕,曹斌,张志焱,等.芽孢杆菌发酵代谢产物的研究[J].饲料广角,2006(9):22-23.  
[19] 张跃群,曹军,王勇军.动物体尿囊酸酶的研究进展[J].生物学通报,2008,43(6):13-14.
[20] MACHIDA Y,NAKANISHI T.Purification and properties of uricase from Enterobacter cloacae[J].Agricultural and Biological Chemistry,1980,44:2811-2815.  
[21] KITAI K,ARAKAWA A.Effect of antibiotics and caprylohydroxamic acid on ammonia gas from chicken excreta[J].British Poultry Science,1979,20(1):55-60.  
[22] 焦洪超,张洪芳,林海.铝盐对鸡粪中氨气释放的影响及其机理研究[J].畜牧兽医学报,2009,40(4):522-527.
[23] CANH T T,AARNINK A J A,VERSTEGEN M W,et al.Influence of dietary factors on the pH and ammonia emission of slurry from growing-finishing pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science,1998,76:32-36.  
[24] BURGESS R P,CAREY J B,SHAFER D J.The impact of pH on nitrogen retention in laboratory analysis of broiler litter[J].Poultry Science,1998,77(11):1620-1622.
[25] ZHU J.A review of microbiology in swine manure odor control[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2000,78:93-106.  
文章导航

/