研究简报

日本鳗鲡及其僵鳗消化酶活性的比较研究

  • 黄永春
展开
  • 集美大学水产学院, 厦门 361021

收稿日期: 2011-11-11

  网络出版日期: 2012-04-29

基金资助

李尚大集美大学学科建设基金(ZC2010001)

Comparison of Digestive Enzyme Activities in Normal and Growth Retarded Japanese Eels (Anguilla japonics)

  • HUANG Yongchun
Expand
  • Fishery College, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China

Received date: 2011-11-11

  Online published: 2012-04-29

摘要

本试验旨在比较不同反应温度下日本鳗鲡(Anguilla japonics)及其僵鳗消化酶活性的差异。试验选取正常生长的日本鳗鲡(126.4~140.2 g/尾)以及生长缓慢的僵鳗(3.5~8.6 g/尾)各20尾,取肝胰脏、胃、肠,分别在5、15、25、30、35、40、45和55 ℃反应温度下测定肝胰脏、胃、肠中蛋白酶、淀粉酶、脂肪酶活性。结果表明:正常鳗和僵鳗肝胰脏、胃、肠蛋白酶活性均在45 ℃时达到最高值,且蛋白酶活性(除5、15、55 ℃时的僵鳗蛋白酶活性外)均表现为肠>胃>肝胰脏;僵鳗肝胰脏、肠、胃蛋白酶活性分别为正常鳗的29.5%、15.7%和25.2%(P<0.05)。正常鳗和僵鳗淀粉酶活性均在30 ℃时达到最高值,正常鳗淀粉酶活性(除5 ℃时的淀粉酶活性外)表现为肝胰脏>肠>胃,僵鳗淀粉酶活性表现为肠>肝胰脏>胃;僵鳗肝胰脏、肠、胃淀粉酶活性分别为正常鳗的42.4%、73.7%和43.8%(P<0.05)。正常鳗和僵鳗脂肪酶活性均在35 ℃时达到最高值,正常鳗脂肪酶活性表现为肝胰脏>胃>肠,僵鳗脂肪酶活性(除35 ℃时的脂肪酶活性外)表现为肝胰脏>肠>胃;僵鳗肝胰脏、肠、胃脂肪酶活性分别为正常鳗的41.5%、45.6%和23.2%(P<0.05)。由此可见,日本鳗鲡僵鳗肝胰脏、胃、肠中蛋白酶、淀粉酶及脂肪酶活性均显著低于正常鳗,从而直接影响其生长发育。

本文引用格式

黄永春 . 日本鳗鲡及其僵鳗消化酶活性的比较研究[J]. 动物营养学报, 2012 , (5) : 977 -982 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2012.05.025

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of temperatures on the activities of digestive enzymes in Japanese eels Anguilla japonics (n=20) and growth retarded eels (n=20). The weight of the normal eels was from 126.4 to 140.2 g per eel, and that of growth retarded eels was from 3.5 to 8.6 g per eel. The activities of protease, amylase, and lipase in the normal eels and growth retarded eels under the condition of different temperatures (5, 10, 15, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 55 ℃) were studied. The results showed as follows: with the increasing of temperature, the digestive enzyme activities were increased at first, and then decreased. The optimum temperature of the protease in hepatopancreas, intestine and stomach was 45 ℃. In the same experimental temperature, the order of protease activity was intestine>stomach>hepatopancreas except growth retarded eels at 5, 15 and 55 ℃. The protease activity in hepatopancreas, intestine and stomach of growth retarded eels was only 29.5%, 15.7% and 25.2% of that of the normal eels, respectively (P<0.05). The optimum temperature of amylase activity was 30 ℃, and the order of amylase activity of the normal eels was hepatopancreas>intestine>stomach in experimental temperatures except at 5 ℃, but the order of amylase activity of growth retarded eels was intestine>hepatopancreas>stomach in experimental temperatures. The amylase activity in hepatopancreas, intestine and stomach of growth retarded eels was only 42.4%, 73.7% and 43.8% of that of the normal eels, respectively (P<0.05). The optimum temperature of lipase activity was 35 ℃, and the order of lipase activity of the normal eels was hepatopancreas>stomach>intestine in experimental temperatures, but the order of lipase activity of growth retarded eels was hepatopancreas>intestine>stomach in experimental temperatures except at 35 ℃; the lipase activity in hepatopancreas, intestine and stomach of growth retarded eels was only 41.5%, 45.6% and 23.2% of that of the normal eels, respectively (P<0.05). These results indicate that the activities of protease, amylase and lipase in hepatopancreas, intestine and stomach of growth retarded eels are significantly lower than those of normal eels, which directly affect their growth and development.

参考文献

[1] 尾崎久雄.鱼类消化生理学[M].吴尚忠,译.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1983.  
[2] 梅景良,马燕梅.温度和pH对黑鲷主要消化酶活性的影响[J].集美大学学报:自然科学版,2004,9(3):221-225.
[3] 马燕梅,梅景良.温度对黑鲷消化酶活性的影响[J].福建畜牧兽医,2005,27(1):3-4.
[4] 赵东海.黄鳝消化酶活性与温度的关系[J].河北大学学报:自然科学版,2005,25(3):323-325.
[5] 陈芳,杨代勤,阮国良,等.温度对黄鳝消化酶活性的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2005(5):102-105.  
[6] 李希国,李加儿,区又君.黄鳍鲷主要消化酶活性在消化道不同部位的比较研究[J].海洋水产研究,2005,26(5):34-38.
[7] 沈文英,祝尧荣,钱科亮.温度和pH对澳洲宝石鱼消化酶活性的影响[J].大连水产学院学报,2006,21(2):189-192.
[8] 寿建昕,沈文英,吴颖芳,等.温度对翘嘴红鲌消化酶活力的影响[J].水利渔业,2006,26(2):6-7,25.  
[9] 杨元昊,周继术,吉红,等.温度对兰州鲇消化酶活性的影响[J].动物学杂志,2006,41(6):104-108.
[10] 沈文英,祝尧荣,胡建伟.温度对沙塘鳢消化酶活力的影响[J].淡水渔业,2007,37(3):37-40.
[11] 王咏星,范镇明,冯新忠,等.温度和pH对白斑狗鱼消化酶活性的影响[J].生物技术,2008,18(1):49-51.
[12] 范镇明,钱龙,王咏星.温度和pH值对河鲈消化酶活性的影响[J].淡水渔业,2008,38(2):36-39.
[13] 方永强,戴燕玉,陈蕾.欧洲鳗鲡的性分化和僵鳗成因的探讨[J].台湾海峡,1998,17(1):100-103.
[14] 陈螺眉,郭金森.僵鳗的成因与对策[J].福建畜牧兽医,1995(2):17.  
[15] 王雪虹,陈颂军.黄霉素对欧洲鳗鱼僵鳗促生长初探[J].中国水产,1999(1):28-29.  
[16] 刘建诚.僵鳗促长饲料对日本僵鳗及欧鳗的效果[J].台湾海峡,1998,17(12):109-111.
[17] 黄永春,刘登.温度对不同规格欧鳗消化器官蛋白酶和淀粉酶活性影响的初步研究[J].台湾海峡,2004,23(2):138-143.
[18] 胡庚东,陈家长,尤洋.澳洲鳗和日本鳗鲡、欧洲鳗消化酶活性的比较[J].湛江海洋大学学报,2006,26(4):85-87.
[19] KENJI T,SADAO S.The effect of feeding stimulant in diet on digestive enzyme activities of eel[J].Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries,1986,52(8):1449-1454.  
[20] 桂远明,吴垠.温度对草鱼、鲤、鲢、鳙主要消化酶活性的影响[J].大连水产学院学报,1993,8(4):1-8.
[21] 叶元土,林仕海,罗莉.温度、pH值对南方大口鲶、长吻鮠蛋白酶和淀粉酶活力的影响[J].大连水产学院学报,1998,13(2):17-23.
[22] 方之平,潘黔生,何瑞国,等.温度对彭泽鲫主要消化酶活力的影响[J].水利渔业,1998(2):15-17.  
[23] 韩庆,刘良国,张建平,等.温度和pH对洞庭鲇鱼消化酶活性的影响[J].水生生物学报,2011,35(1):22-19.
[24] FANGE R,GROVE D.Digestion[M]//HOAR W S,RANDALL D J,BRETT J R.Fish physiology,volume 8.New York:Academic Press,1979:162-260.  
[25] 吴婷婷,朱晓鸣.鳜、青鱼、草鱼、鲤、鲫、鲢消化酶活性的研究[J].中国水产科学,1994,1(2):10-16.
[26] 中国水产科学研究院珠江水产研究所.养殖条件下日本鳗鲡个体生长差异及解决途径研究[J].农业科技通讯,2000(2):37.  
文章导航

/