饲料营养 Feed Science and Technology

约氏乳杆菌对0~17周龄蛋鸡生产性能、脏器指数及血清抗体水平和生化指标的影响

  • 陈焱 ,
  • 汪攀 ,
  • 董晓芳 ,
  • 王安如 ,
  • 佟建明 ,
  • 张军 ,
  • 胡婷
展开
  • 1. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所,北京 100193;
    2. 北京大北农科技集团股份有限公司, 饲用微生物工程国家重点实验室,北京 100080

收稿日期: 2012-12-03

  网络出版日期: 2013-05-15

基金资助

国家蛋鸡产业技术体系建设专项经费(CARS-41-K16);"973"计划资助项目(2010CB35703)

Lactobacillus johnsonii: Effects on Production Performance, Organ Indices, Serum Antibody Levels and Biochemical Indices of Growing Pullets Aged 0 to 17 Weeks

  • CHEN Yan ,
  • WANG Pan ,
  • DONG Xiaofang ,
  • WANG Anru ,
  • TONG Jianming ,
  • ZHANG Jun ,
  • HU Ting
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Direct-Fed Microbiology Egineering, Beijing Dabeinong Technology Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100080, China

Received date: 2012-12-03

  Online published: 2013-05-15

摘要

本试验旨在研究不同剂量约氏乳杆菌对0~17周龄蛋鸡生产性能、脏器指数及血清抗体水平和生化指标的影响。选用1日龄京红蛋雏鸡540只,随机分成6组,每组6个重复,每个重复15只鸡。Ⅰ组为对照组,饲喂基础饲粮,Ⅱ~Ⅵ组为试验组,饲喂在基础饲粮中分别添加1.0×104、1.0×105、1.0×106、1.0×107和1.0×108 CFU/g约氏乳杆菌的试验饲粮,试验期120 d。结果表明:1)0~17周龄,Ⅳ、Ⅴ、Ⅵ组蛋鸡采食量显著低于对照组(P<0.05),Ⅳ组和Ⅵ组蛋鸡料重比显著低于对照组(P<0.05),各组蛋鸡体增重无显著差异(P>0.05)。2)Ⅵ组蛋鸡心脏、肺脏、肾脏指数显著低于对照组(P<0.05),Ⅳ组蛋鸡肾脏指数显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。3)13周龄,Ⅳ、Ⅴ、Ⅵ组蛋鸡血清免疫球蛋白A水平和新城疫抗体水平显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。4)各组蛋鸡血清生化指标(碱性磷酸酶、谷草转氨酶和谷丙转氨酶活性及葡萄糖、尿素氮、总蛋白、白蛋白、肌酐、总胆红素含量)差异不显著(P>0.05)。综合考虑约氏乳杆菌对0~17周龄蛋鸡生产性能、脏器指数和血清抗体水平的影响可知,饲粮中约氏乳杆菌的最佳添加剂量为1.0×108 CFU/g。

本文引用格式

陈焱 , 汪攀 , 董晓芳 , 王安如 , 佟建明 , 张军 , 胡婷 . 约氏乳杆菌对0~17周龄蛋鸡生产性能、脏器指数及血清抗体水平和生化指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2013 , 25(6) : 1299 -1306 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.06.022

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to determine the effects of Lactobacillus johnsonii (L. johnsonii) on production performance, organ indices, serum antibody levels and biochemical indices of growing pullets. Five hundred and forty 1-day-old Jinghong chicks were randomly allocated to a control group and five experimental groups. Each group had six replicates and fifteen chicks in each replicate. Chicks were fed diets supplemented with 0 (control, group Ⅰ), 1.0×104 (group Ⅱ), 1.0×105 (group Ⅲ), 1.0×106 (group Ⅳ), 1.0×107 (group Ⅴ) and 1.0×108 CFU/g L. johnsonii (group Ⅵ), respectively. The experiment lasted for 120 days. Results showed as follows: 1) at the age of 0 to 17 weeks, the feed intake in groups Ⅳ, Ⅴ and Ⅵ was significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05), and the feed to gain ratio in groups Ⅳ and Ⅵ was significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in body weight gain(P>0.05). 2) The indices of heart, lungs and kidney in group Ⅵ were significantly lower than those in control group (P<0.05), and the kidney index in group Ⅳwas significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05). 3) At the age of 13 weeks, the serum IgA and ND-Ab levels in groups Ⅳ, Ⅴ and Ⅵ were significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05). 4) There were no significant differences in serum biochemical indices (such as the activities of alkaline phosphatase, glutamic oxalacetic transaminase and glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, and the contents of glucose, urea nitrogen, total protein, albumin, creatinine and total bilirubin) (P>0.05). Considering the effects of L. johnsonii on production performance, organ indices and serum antibody levels of growing pullets aged 0 to 17 weeks, the proper dosage of the L. johnsonii is 1.0×108 CFU/g.

参考文献

[1] GEIER M S,MIKKELSEN L L,TOROK V A,et al.Comparison of alternatives to in-feed antimicrobials for the prevention of clinical necroticenteritis[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology,2010,109(4):1329-1338.  

[2] PAGNINI C,SAEED R,BAMIAS G,et al.Probiotics promote gut health through stimulation of epithelial innate immunity[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2010,107(1):454-459.  

[3] REID G,JASS J,SEBULSKY M T,et al.Potential uses of probiotics in clinical practice[J].Clinical Microbiology Reviews,2003,16(4):658-672.  

[4] OUWEHAND A C,SALMINEN S,ISOLAURI E,et al.Probiotics:an overview of beneficial effects[J].Antonie van Leeuwenhoek,2002,82(1/2/3/4):279-289.

[5] 倪学勤,曹西亮,曾东,等.猪源约氏乳酸杆菌和JJB3枯草芽孢杆菌对仔猪肠道分泌型免疫球蛋白和菌群的影响[J].动物营养学报,2008,20(3):275-280.

[6] European Food Safety Authority.Scientific opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2010 update)[J].European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Journal,2010,8(12):1944.

[7] 孙晓雯,刘庆,闫轶洁,等.一株新饲用乳杆菌的分离鉴定及益生性研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2011,38(9):30-33.

[8] INOUE R,NISHIO A,FUKUSHIMA Y,et al.Oral treatment with probiotic Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC533 (La1) for a specific part of the weaning period prevents the development of atopic dermatitis induced after maturation in model mice, NC/Nga[J].British Journal of Dermatology,2007,156(3):499-509.  

[9] KABURAGI T,YAMANO T,FUKUSHIMA Y,et al.Effect of Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 on immune function and serum albumin in aged and malnourished aged mice[J].Nutrition,2007,23:342-350.

[10] LA RAGIONE R M,NARBAD A,GASSON M J,et al.In vivo characterization of Lactobacillus johnsonii FI9785 for use as a defined competitive exclusion agent against bacterial pathogens in poultry[J].Letters in Applied Microbiology,2004,38:197-205.

[11] COILLIE E V,GORIS J,CLEENWERCK I,et al.Identification of Lactobacilli isolated from the cloaca and vagina of laying hens and characterization for potential use as probiotics to control Salmonella enteritidis[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology,2007,102:1095-1106.

[12] JERNIGAN M A,MILES R D,ARAFA A S.Probiotics in poultry nutrition—a review[J].World's Poultry Science Journal,1985,41(2):99-107.  

[13] NAHASHON S N,NAKAUE H S,MIROSH L W.Performance of Single Comb White Leghorn layers fed a diet with a live microbial during the growth and egg laying phases[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1996,57:25-38.

[14] MURRY A C,HINTON A,BUHR R J.Effect of botanical probiotic containing Lactobacilli on growth performance and populations of bacteria in the ceca,cloaca, and carcass rinse of broiler chickens[J].International Journal of Poultry Science,2006,5(4):344-350.  

[15] TAHERI H R,MORAVEJ H,TABANDEH F,et al.Efficacy of combined or single use of Lactobacillus crispatus LT116 and L.johnsonii LT171 on broiler performance[J].British Poultry science,2010,51(5):580-585.  

[16] KALAVATHY R,ABDULLAH N,JALALUDIN S.Effects of Lactobacillus cultures on growth performance,abdominal fat deposition,serum lipids and weight of organs of broiler chickens[J].British Poultry Science,2003,44:139-144.

[17] ZHOU J S,SHU Q,RTHERFURD K J,et al.Safety assessment of potential probiotic lactic acid bacterial strains Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001,Lb.acidophilus HN017, and Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 in BALB/c mice[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology,2000,56:87-96.

[18] PERDIGON G,DE JORRAT W E B,DE PETRINO S F,et al.Effect of oral administration of Lactobacillus casei on various biological functions of the host[J].Food and Agricultural Immunology,1991,3:93-102.

[19] YANG J,LI W,SUN R,et al.The effect of Lactobacillus johnsonii Ncc533 (La1) on the balance of Th1/Th2 cells in BALB/c mice[J].Clinical and Investigative Medicine-Medecine Clinique et Experimentale,2011,34(4):E254-E258.

[20] HALLER D,BODE C,HAMMES W,et al.Non-pathogenic bacteria elicit a differential cytokine response by intestinal epithelial cell/leucocyte co-cultures[J].Gut,2000,47(1):79-87.  

[21] KINGMA S D,LI N,SUN F,et al.Lactobacillus johnsonii N6.2 stimulates the innate immune response through Toll-like receptor 9 in Caco-2 cells and increases intestinal crypt Paneth cell number in biobreeding diabetes-prone rats[J].The Journal of Nutrition,2011,141(6):1023-1028.  

[22] MARTEAU P,VAERMAN J P,DEHENNIN J P,et al.Effects of intrajejunal perfusion and chronic ingestion of Lactobacillus johnsonii strain La1 on serum concentrations and jejunal secretions of immunoglobulins and serum proteins in healthy humans[J].Gastroenterol Clinique et Biologique,1997,21:293-298.

[23] SGOURAS D N,PANAYOTOPOULOU E G,MARTINEZ-GONZALEZ B,et al.Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 attenuates Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis and reduces levels of proin-fiammatory chemokines in C57BL/6 mice[J].Clinical and Vaccine Immunology,2005,12:1378-1386.

[24] LINK-AMSTER H,ROCHAT F,SAUDAN K Y,et al.Modulation of a specific humoral immune response and changes in intestinal flora mediated through fermented milk intake[J].FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology,1994,10(1):55-63.  

[25] 滑静,郭玉琴,张淑萍,等.肉仔鸡日粮中添加枯草芽孢杆菌对平均日增质量和血液生化指标的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2003(2):14-15.

[26] 陈家祥,张仁义,王全溪.地衣芽孢杆菌对肉鸡生长性能、抗氧化指标和血液生化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2010,22(4):1019-1023.

[27] 王全溪,林滉,贾洪强.乳酸菌素对肉鸡血清生化指标和抗氧化功能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(1):131-136.

[28] FRANCISCO T,JUAN R,ERENIA F,et al.Response of piglets to oral administration of lactic acid bacteria[J].Journal of Food Protection,1995,58:1369-1374.
文章导航

/