研究简报 Short Communications

生长猪对国产双低菜籽粕与进口普通菜籽粕营养价值的比较

  • 王风利 ,
  • 刘岭 ,
  • 臧建军 ,
  • 赖长华
展开
  • 中国农业大学动物科技学院,北京 100193

收稿日期: 2012-12-11

  网络出版日期: 2013-05-15

基金资助

公益性行业(农业)科研专项——畜禽营养价值与饲料标准研究(200903006)

Comparison of Nutritional Value in Domestic Double-Low Rapeseed Meal and Imported Common Rapeseed Meal for Growing Pigs

  • WANG Fengli ,
  • LIU Ling ,
  • ZANG Jianjun ,
  • LAI Changhua
Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2012-12-11

  Online published: 2013-05-15

摘要

本研究旨在比较国产双低菜籽粕与进口普通菜籽粕营养价值的不同,共分为2个试验。试验1:选取18头初始体重[(48.3±2.4) kg]相近的健康去势公猪,采用全收粪法进行消化代谢试验,随机分为3组(每组6个重复,每个重复1头猪),分别饲喂基础饲粮和2种试验饲粮。分别以国产双低菜籽粕和进口普通菜籽粕替代基础饲粮中能量饲料的20%配制2种试验饲粮。试验期14 d(前9天为适应期,后5天为收集期)。试验2:选取18头初始体重[(35.3±3.8) kg]相近的装有简单T型瘘管的健康去势公猪,采用指示剂法进行氨基酸回肠末端消化率试验,随机分为3组(每组6个重复,每个重复1头猪),分别饲喂无氮饲粮和2种试验饲粮。分别以国产双低菜籽粕和进口普通菜籽粕作为唯一蛋白质和氨基酸来源配制2种试验饲粮。试验期7 d(前5天为适应期,后2天为收集期)。结果表明:国产双低菜籽粕的表观消化能和能量的表观消化率极显著低于进口普通菜籽粕(P<0.01),国产双低菜籽粕的表观代谢能显著低于进口普通菜籽粕(P<0.05);国产双低菜籽粕的氨基酸标准回肠末端消化率较低。由此可见,国产双低菜籽粕的营养价值较进口普通菜籽粕低。

本文引用格式

王风利 , 刘岭 , 臧建军 , 赖长华 . 生长猪对国产双低菜籽粕与进口普通菜籽粕营养价值的比较[J]. 动物营养学报, 2013 , 25(6) : 1324 -1331 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.06.025

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to compare the nutritional value in domestic double-low rapeseed meal and imported common rapeseed meal. Two experiments were conducted in this study. Experiment 1: eighteen castrated barrows with similar initial body weight of (48.3±2.4) kg were used in a completely randomized design. The total collection method was used. The barrows were randomly allocated to 3 groups with 6 replicates per group and 1 pig per replicate. The barrows in 3 groups were fed a basal diet or two other experimental diets. The basal diet was formulated to meet requirements of growing pigs and two other experimental diets were formulated by substituting 20% of the basal diet with domestic double-low rapeseed meal or imported common rapeseed meal, respectively. The test lasted for 14 days (9 day for adaptation and 5 day for collection). Experiment 2: eighteen castrated barrows (fitted with simple T-cannulas) with similar initial body weight of (35.3 ± 3.8) kg were used in this experiment. The indicator method was used. The barrows were randomly allocated to 3 groups with 6 replicates per group and 1 pig per replicate. The barrows in 3 groups were fed a N-free diet or two other experimental diets. The two experimental diets were formulated with domestic double-low rapeseed meal or imported common rapeseed meal as the sole source of protein and amino acids. The test lasted for 7 days (5 day for adaptation and 2 day for collection). The results showed that the apparent digestible energy and the apparent digestibility of energy in domestic double-low rapeseed meal were significantly lower than those in imported common rapeseed meal (P<0.01), and the apparent metabolizable energy in domestic double-low rapeseed meal was significantly lower than that in imported common rapeseed meal (P<0.05). The standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in domestic double-low rapeseed meal was lower. In conclusion, the nutritional value in domestic double-low rapeseed meal is lower than that in imported common rapeseed meal.

参考文献

[1] 赵青松,郭万正,魏金涛,等.油菜籽的营养价值及养殖应用分析[J].养殖与饲料,2011(10):41-44.

[2] 陈付琴,徐福海.双低油菜的推广与产业化开发[J].现代农业科技,2009(14):63-64.

[3] 谢伦定,陆齐波.双低菜籽粕在中国饲料业应用前景展望[J].中国油脂,2000,25(6):163-166.

[4] 袁莉,马英,李爱科.双低菜籽饼粕在饲料中的应用[J].粮油食品科技,2003,11(2):34-36.

[5] 彭健,CAMPBELL L D,GUENTER W,等.品种和加工方式对双低菜粕有效能和氨基酸有效性的影响[J].中国粮油学报,2002,17(3):22-26.

[6] NRC.Nutrient requirements of swine[S].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,1998.

[7] ADEOLA O.Digestion and balance techniques in pigs[M]//LEWIS A J,SOUTHERN L L.Swine nutrition.Washington,D.C.:CRC Press,2001:903-916.

[8] BELL J M,KEITH M O,HUTCHESON D S.Nutritional evaluation of very low glucosinolate canola meal[J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1991,73:679-697.

[9] WOYENGO T A,KIARIE E,NYACHOTI C M.Energy and amino acid utilization in expeller-extracted canola meal fed to growing pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science,2010,88:1433-1441.

[10] 唐春艳,齐德生.双低菜粕在饲料中的研究[J].畜牧与兽医,2006,38(5):48-50.

[11] 中华人民共和国农业部.NY/T 65—2004猪饲养标准[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.

[12] BELL J M.Factors affecting the nutritional value of canola meal:a review[J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1993,73:679-697.

[13] NOBLET J,GOFF G L.Effect of dietary fiber on the energy value of feeds for pigs[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2001,90:35-52.

[14] STEIN H H,KIM S W,NIELSEN T T,et al.Standardized ileal protein and amino acid digestibility by growing pigs and sows[J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,79:2113-2122.

[15] FAN M Z,SAUER W C,GABERT V M.Variability of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in canola meal for growing-finishing pigs[J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1996,76:563-569.

[16] DE LANGE C F,GABERT V M,GILLIS D,et al.Digestible energy contents and apparent ileal amino acid digestibilities in regular or partial mechanically dehulled canola meal samples fed to growing pigs[J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1998,78:641-648.

[17] CLASSEN H L,NEWKIRK R W,MAENZ D D.Effects of conventional and novel processing on the feed value of canola meal for poultry[J].Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium,2004,16:1-8.
文章导航

/