研究简报 Short Communications

菌糠与奶牛常用粗饲料瘤胃降解特性的对比研究

  • 宫福臣 ,
  • 韩梅琳 ,
  • 杨琼 ,
  • 李杰 ,
  • 孙晓红
展开
  • 1. 北京市农林科学院,北京 100097;
    2. 东北农业大学动物科学技术学院,哈尔滨 150030

收稿日期: 2012-12-17

  网络出版日期: 2013-05-15

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(51278050)

Comparison of Rumen Degradation Characteristics between Spent Mushroom Substrate and Commonly Used Roughages for Dairy Cows

  • GONG Fuchen ,
  • HAN Meilin ,
  • YANG Qiong ,
  • LI Jie ,
  • SUN Xiaohong
Expand
  • 1. Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China;
    2. College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China

Received date: 2012-12-17

  Online published: 2013-05-15

摘要

为了系统研究菌糠用作反刍动物饲料的饲用价值,选用3只安装永久性瘤胃瘘管的荷斯坦奶牛为试验动物,采用3×3拉丁方设计,通过尼龙袋法对菌糠、羊草、玉米秸的干物质(DM)、粗蛋白质(CP)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)和酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)的瘤胃降解率进行测定。粗饲料样品在瘤胃中的培养时间分别为0、6、12、24、36、48、72 h。结果表明:3种粗饲料72 h的DM降解率差异不显著(P>0.05),而其有效降解率由高到低依次为菌糠(29.33%)、羊草(27.41%)、玉米秸(23.39%),且前两者显著高于玉米秸(P<0.05)。72 h的CP降解率及其有效降解率以羊草最高,菌糠次之,二者与玉米秸之间差异显著(P<0.05)。玉米秸72 h的NDF降解率虽高于羊草和菌糠(P<0.05),但3种粗饲料的有效降解率均较低,由高到低依次为玉米秸(26.12%)、菌糠(25.72%)、羊草(23.73%),无显著差异(P>0.05)。而72 h的ADF降解率和有效降解率由高到低也依次为玉米秸(25.36%)、菌糠(24.23%)、羊草(21.83%),变化趋势和差异性与NDF降解规律相一致。由此可见,从3种粗饲料在奶牛瘤胃的消化特性来看,本试验中菌糠的饲用价值与羊草接近,优于玉米秸,因此菌糠作为新型反刍动物粗饲料资源切实可行。

本文引用格式

宫福臣 , 韩梅琳 , 杨琼 , 李杰 , 孙晓红 . 菌糠与奶牛常用粗饲料瘤胃降解特性的对比研究[J]. 动物营养学报, 2013 , 25(6) : 1366 -1374 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.06.031

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rumen degradation characteristics of spent mushroom substrate (SMS) as a type of roughage for ruminants. Three Holstein cows with ruminal cannulas were assigned to 3 treatments in a 3?3 Latin square design, and the rumen degradation rates of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) of Chinese wildrye (CW), corn stover (CS) and SMS were measured using nylon bag method. The culture time of roughages in the rumen was 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h, respectively. The results showed that there were no differences in DM degradation rate among roughages at 72 h, the effective degradability (ED) of DM ranked in the following order: SMS (29.33%)>CW (27.41%)>CS (23.39%), and the ED of SMS and CW was significantly higher than that of CS (P<0.05). Both the CP degradation rate at 72 h and the ED of CP ranked in the following order: CW>SMS>CS, and the CP degradation rate of CW and SMS was significantly higher than that of CS (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in NDF degradation rate at 72 h between CS and other treatments (P<0.05). The ED of NDF in treatments was low, ranked in the following order: CS (26.12%)>SMS (25.72%)>CW (23.73%), and there was no significant difference among three treatments (P>0.05). The trend and difference of ADF degradability in treatments were similar to those of NDF, and the ED of ADF ranked in the following order: CS( 25.36%)>SMS (24.23%)>CW (21.83%). In conclusion, seeing from the rumen degradation characteristics of roughages, in this experiment the feeding value of SMS is equivalent with that of CW, but better than that of CS. It is concluded that SMS has a high potential as a new non-conventional feed resource for ruminants.

参考文献

[1] 徐延生,雷雪芹,赵顺才,等.菌糠饲料在奶牛生产中的应用效果[J].中国饲料,2001(1):35-36.

[2] 米青山,王尚堃,宋建华.食用菌废料的综合利用研究[J].生态农业科学,2005,21(2):284-287.

[3] BAE J S,KIM Y I,JUNG S H,et al.Evaluation on feed-nutritional value of spent mushroom (Pleurotus osteratus,Pleurotus eryngii,Flammulina velutupes) substrates as a roughage source of ruminants[J].Journal of Animal Science and Technology,2006,48(2):237-246.  

[4] KIM Y I,BAE J S,JUNG S H,et al.Yield and physicochemical characteristics of spent mushroom (Pleurotus eryngii,Pleurotus osteratus and Ammulina velutipes) substrates according to mushroom species and cultivation types[J].Journal of Animal Science and Technology,2007,49(1):79-88.  

[5] KAKKAR V K,DHANDA S.Comparative evaluation of wheat and paddy straws for mushroom production and feeding residual straws to ruminants[J].Bioresource Technology,1998,66:175-177.

[6] ADAMOVIC M,GRUBI G,MILENKOVIC L,et al.The biodegradation of wheat straw by Pleurotus osteratus mushrooms and its use in cattle feeding[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1998,71:357-362.

[7] 刘建昌,潘廷国,苏水金,等.菌糠替代麸皮喂猪的饲养试验[J].中国畜牧杂志,1998,34(2):26-27.

[8] 吕作舟.添加不同比例菌糠饲喂生长猪的效果[J].中国畜牧杂志,1995,31(6):34.

[9] 周宗旺.金针菇菌糠喂猪效果观察[J].中国畜牧杂志,1991,27(2):42-47.

[10] 刘敏雄.反刍动物消化生理学[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1991.

[11] KAUR R,GARCIA S C,FULKERSON W J,et al.Degradation kinetics of leaves,petioles and stems of forage rape(Brassica napus)as affected by maturity[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2011,168:165-178.

[12] 杨信,黄勤楼,夏友国,等.反刍动物瘤胃物质降解研究进展[J].家畜生态学报,2010(1):8-9.

[13] AJEBU N,LARS O E,ADUGNA T,et al.Chemical composition and in sacco dry matter degradability of different morphological fractions of 10 enset (Ensete ventricosum) varieties[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2008,146:55-73.

[14] PAGN R S,MUIR J P,LAMBERT B D,et al.Phosphorus and other nutrient disappearance from plants containing condensed tannins using the mobile nylon bag technique[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2010,156:19-25.

[15] FATHI N M H,FRANCE J,DANESH M M,et al.Effect of heat processing on ruminal degradability and intestinal disappearance of nitrogen and amino acids in Iranian whole soybean[J].Livestock Science,2008,113:43-51.

[16] 卢德勋,谢祟文.现代反刍动物营养研究和技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1991:8-11.

[17] 冯仰廉,周建民,张晓明,等.我国奶牛饲料产奶净能值测算方法的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,1987(1):6-7.

[18] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.

[19] ÁRSKOV E R,MC DONALD I.The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,92,499-503.

[20] 颜品勋,冯仰廉,王燕兵,等.青粗饲料通过牛瘤胃外流速度的研究[J].动物营养学报,1994,6(2):20-22.

[21] SAS Institute Inc.SAS online doc 9.1.3[D].Cary (NC):SAS Institute Inc.,2004.

[22] 张纯,晏家友,张锦秀,等.平菇菌糠的营养价值研究[J].中国饲料,2012(3):13-15.

[23] 李颖丽,金曙光,王小梅,等.反刍动物饲料蛋白质瘤胃降解概述[J].畜牧与饲料学,2009,30(5):35-36.

[24] 刁其玉,屠焰.奶牛常用饲料蛋白质在瘤胃的降解参数[J].乳业科学与技术,2005(2):70-74.

[25] 乔良,郝俊玺,闫素梅,等.2008奶牛主要饲料原料蛋白质瘤胃降解率的研究[J].中国奶牛,2008(6):18-19.

[26] 刘海霞,刘大森,隋美霞,等.羊常用粗饲料干物质和粗蛋白的瘤胃降解特性研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2010,46(21):37-42.

[27] 刘大林,赵国琦,王学峰,等.豆科与禾本科牧草在山羊瘤胃内的降解率比较试验[J].中国草食动物,2000,2(4):9-11.

[28] AGBAGLA-DOHNANI A,NOZIERE P,CLEMENT G,et al.In sacco degradability,chemical and morphological composition of 15 varieties of European rice straw[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2001,94:15-27.

[29] 萨其仍贵,李九月,乔永明,等.奶牛几种常用粗饲料干物质和纤维物质瘤胃降解率的研究[J].当代畜禽养殖业,2009(4):18-20.

[30] 夏科,姚庆,李富国,等.奶牛常用粗饲料的瘤胃降解规律[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(4):769-777.

[31] 邹青霞,张浩.几种菌糠营养成分及其瘤胃降解率[J].福建农业大学学报,1999,28(4):477-482.

[32] 赵天章,李慧英,闫素梅.反刍动物饲料纤维物质瘤胃降解规律研究进展[J].饲料工业,2010,31(1):28-31.
文章导航

/