反刍与草食动物营养 Ruminants and Herbivorous Animal Nutrition

日粮中氨化稻草水平对体外培养发酵甲烷和挥发性脂肪酸产量的影响

  • 王满红 ,
  • 赵广永
展开
  • 中国农业大学动物科技学院,动物营养学国家重点实验室,北京 100193

收稿日期: 2013-02-18

  网络出版日期: 2013-07-15

基金资助

现代农业产业技术体系北京市奶牛创新团队项目和国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD26B03-4)

Effects of Levels of Ammoniated Rice Straw Included in Rations on Rumen Methane and Volatile Fatty Acids Production in in Vitro Incubation

  • WANG Manhong ,
  • ZHAO Guangyong
Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2013-02-18

  Online published: 2013-07-15

摘要

本试验旨在研究日粮中不同氨化稻草水平对瘤胃甲烷(CH4)和挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)产量的影响.以2头安装有永久性瘤胃瘘管的成年西门塔尔牛作为瘤胃液供体,以未处理稻草、4%尿素氨化稻草和6%尿素氨化稻草为粗料,分别与精料混合料以6种比例配合日粮,其中精料与粗料的混合比例分别为0:100、20:80、40:60、60:40、80:20、100:0.应用Menke等(1979)的体外培养发酵技术进行培养发酵并测定日粮48 h的总产气量、CH4和VFA产量.结果表明:日粮精料/粗料为0:100时,4%尿素氨化稻草组和6%尿素氨化稻草组总VFA(TVFA)产量显著高于未氨化稻草组(P<0.05);随着日粮精料比例增加,乙酸、丙酸和TVFA产量显著增加(P<0.05),乙酸/TVFA和乙酸/丙酸显著下降(P<0.05);当日粮精料/粗料为40:60时,4%尿素氨化稻草组和6%尿素氨化稻草组48 h CH4产量显著高于未氨化稻草组(P<0.05),并且4%尿素氨化稻草组48 h总产气量显著高于未氨化稻草组(P<0.05),在一定程度上高于6%尿素氨化稻草组(P>0.05);随着日粮精料比例增加,CH4产量和总产气量显著增加(P<0.05);48 h总产气量和CH4产量的组合效应值最高的组为日粮精料/粗料40:60的4%尿素氨化稻草组;各组48 h总产气量均产生正组合效应,4%尿素氨化稻草组中CH4/TVFA均产生负组合效应.由此可知,CH4产量与日粮精料/粗料和日粮中粗料的品质有关.当日粮精料/粗料为40:60时,4%尿素氨化稻草组48 h总产气量和CH4产量最高,但CH4/TVFA最低.

本文引用格式

王满红 , 赵广永 . 日粮中氨化稻草水平对体外培养发酵甲烷和挥发性脂肪酸产量的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2013 , 25(8) : 1775 -1784 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.08.017

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to study the effects of different proportions of untreated and ammoniated rice straw in mixed rations on methane and volatile fatty acids (VFA) production. Two Simmental cattle fitted with rumen cannulas were used as the donors of rumen fluid. Three levels of urea, i.e. 0% (untreated), 4% and 6% were used for ammoniation treatment of rice straw, respectively. The untreated and ammoniated rice straws were mixed with concentrate mixture at the ratios of 0:100, 20:80, 40:60, 60:40, 80:20 and 100:0, respectively, as experimental treatments. The gas production technique of Menke et al. (1979) was used for in vitro fermentation and the measurement of 48 h VFA, methane and total gas production. The results showed that 48 h total VFA (TVFA) production of the groups with 4% urea ammoniated rice straw and 6% urea ammoniated rice straw was significantly higher than that of the group with non-ammoniated rice straw when concentrate/roughage ratio was 0:100 (P<0.05). The production of acetate, propionate and TVFA was significantly increased with the increase of concentrate/roughage ratio in the ration (P<0.05), and acetate/propionate and acetate/TVFA were gradually reduced (P<0.05). The 48 h methane production of the groups with 4% urea ammoniated rice straw and 6% urea ammoniated rice straw was significantly higher than that of the group with non-ammoniated rice straw when concentrate/roughage ratio was 40:60 (P<0.05), but 48 h total gas production of the group with 4% urea ammoniated rice straw was significantly higher than that of the group with non-ammoniated rice straw (P<0.05), and was higher than that of the group with 6% urea ammoniated rice straw to some extent (P>0.05). The 48 h methane and total gas production was significantly increased with the increase of concentrate/roughage ratio in the ration (P<0.05). The best associative effect of 48 h total gas and methane production was found in the group with 4% urea ammoniated rice straw and concentrate/roughage ratio of 40:60. The 48 h total gas production in each group had a positive associative effect, but CH4/TVFA in the group with 4% urea ammoniated rice straw had a negative associative effect. This study supports that methane production is affected by both concentrate/roughage ratio and quality of forage in the ration. The 48 h total gas and the methane production are highest, but CH4/TVFA is the lowest when the ratio of concentrate/4% urea ammoniated rice straw is 40:60.

参考文献

[1] JOHNSON K A,JOHNSON D E.Methane emissions from cattle[J].Journal of Animal Science,1995,73:2483-2492.

[2] TAKAHASHI J B,MWENYA B,SANTOSO C,et al.Mitigation of methane emission and energy recycling in animal agricultural systems[J].Asian-Aust Journal of Animal Science,2005,18:1199-1208.

[3] WANAPAT M,POLYORACH S,BOONNOP K,et al.Effects of treating rice straw with urea or urea and calcium hydroxide upon intake,digestibility,rumen fermentation and milk yield of dairy cows[J].Livestock Science,2009,125:238-243.

[4] VADIVELOD J,FADEL J G.The response of rice straw varieties to urea treatment[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2009,151:291-298.

[5] KHEJORNSART P,WANAPAT M.Effect of chemical treatment of rice straw on rumen fermentation characteristic,anaerobic fungal diversity in vitro[J].Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances,2010,9(24):3070-3076.  

[6] 李兵.不同尿素水平氨化稻草堆体外发酵产气量和甲烷产量的影响 .硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2011.

[7] MENKE K H,RAAB L,SALEWSKI A,et al.The estimation of the digestibility and metabolisable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor[J].Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,93:217-222.

[8] ZHAO G Y,LI Y X,REN J B,et al.The influence of associative effects on the in vitro-estimated utilizable crude protein (uCP) of feeds for ruminants[J].Archives of Animal Nutrition,2005,59(2):149-154.  

[9] 冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.

[10] 张洁,王洪荣.用体外产气法评价精粗饲料的组合效应[J] .家畜生态学报,2007(4):30-35.

[11] MURPHY M,AKERLIND M,HOLTENIUS K.Rumen fermentation in lactating cows selected for milk fat content fed two forage to concentrate ratios with hay or silage[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83:756-764.

[12] DRACHEY D J,BEAULIEU A D,ELLIOTT J P.Responses of milk fat composition to dietary fat or nonstructural in Holstein and Jersey cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2001,84:1231-1237.

[13] SELIM A S,PAN J,TAKANO T,et al.Effect of ammonia treatment on physical strength of rice straw,distribution of straw particles and particle-associated bacteria in sheep rumen[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2004,115:117-127.

[14] CHRISTOPHERSEN C T,WRIGHT A G,VERCOE P E.In vitro methane emission and acetate:propionate ratio are decreased when artificial stimulation of the rumen wall is combined with increasing grain diets in sheep[J].Journal of Animal Science,2007,86:384-389.

[15] ROMOS S,YANEZ-RUIZ D,CARRO M D,et al.Shifts in rumen microbial communities in sheep fed either alfalfa hay or grass hay after an abrupt change to a high-concentrate diet //6th INRA-RRI symposium.Gut microbiome:functionality,interaction with the host and impact on the environment. Clermont-Ferrand, France: ,2008:30-31.

[16] MARTINEZ M E,RANILLA M J,TEJIDO M L,et al.The effect of the diet fed to donor sheep on in vitro methane production and ruminal fermentation of diets of variable composition[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2010,158(4):126-135.

[17] MOSS A R,GIVENS D I,GARNSWORTHY P C.The effect of supplementing grass silage with barley on digestibility,in sacco degradability,rumen fermentation and methane production in sheep at two levels of intake[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1995,55:9-33.

[18] LOVETT D,LOVELL S,STACK L,et al.Effect of forage/concentrate ratio and dietary coconut oil level on methane output and performance of finishing beef heifers[J].Livestock Production Science,2003,84:135-146.

[19] RUSSELL J B.The importance of pH in the regulation of ruminal acetate to propionate ratio and methane production in vitro[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1998,81:3222-3230.

[20] LIU J X,SUSENBETH A,SUDEKUM K H.In vitro gas production measurements to evaluate interactions between untreated and chemically treated rice straws,grass hay,and mulberry leaves[J].Journal of Animal Science,2002,80:517-524.

[21] SANDOVAL-CASTRO C A,CAPETILLO-LEAL C,CETINA-GONGORA R,et al.A mixture simplex design to study associative effects with an in vitro gas production technique[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2002,101:191-200.

[22] HUUSKONEN A,KHALILI H,JOKI-TOKOLA E.Effects of three different concentrate proportions and rapeseed meal supplement to grass silage on animal performance of dairy-breed bulls with TMR feeding [J].Livestock Science,2007,110(1/2):154-165.

[23] HOOVER W H.Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69:2755-2766.

[24] 陈伟健.蛋白能量平衡对反刍动物饲料组合效应的影响及其机理研究 .硕士学位论文.杭州:浙江大学,2008.
文章导航

/