动物营养学报 >

2013 , Vol. 25 >Issue 8: 1836 - 1842

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.08.021

饲料营养 Feed Science and Technology

黄腐酸对生长猪生长性能、血清生化指标、血常规参数和免疫功能的影响

  • 常启发 ,
  • 白会新 ,
  • 石宝明 ,
  • 单安山 ,
  • 魏传玉 ,
  • 于长青 ,
  • 仝宝生
展开
  • 1. 东北农业大学动物营养研究所,哈尔滨 150030;
    2. 内蒙古永业农丰生物科技有限责任公司 北京分公司,北京 100083

收稿日期: 2013-03-15

  网络出版日期: 2013-07-15

基金资助

现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金(CARS-36);内蒙古永业农丰生物科技有限责任公司合作项目

收起

Effects of Fulvic Acid on Growth Performance, Serum Biochemical Parameters, Blood Routine Parameters and Immunity Function of Growing Pigs

  • CHANG Qifa ,
  • BAI Huixin ,
  • SHI Baoming ,
  • SHAN Anshan ,
  • WEI Chuanyu ,
  • YU Changqing ,
  • TONG Baosheng
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Animal Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China;
    2. Beijing Branch, Inner Mongolia Yongye Nongfeng Biotechnology Co. , Ltd. , Beijing 100083, China

Received date: 2013-03-15

  Online published: 2013-07-15

Fold

摘要

本试验主要通过对生长猪生长性能、血清生化指标、血常规参数和免疫功能的研究,确定黄腐酸(FA)是否能促进生长猪的健康和生长,以及其适宜添加量.试验选取健康的平均体重为(30.0±2.5) kg的"长×大"二元杂交生长猪180头,随机分为5个组,每个组6个重复,每个重复6头猪.对照组饲喂基础饲粮,试验组在基础饲粮中分别添加0.2%、0.4%、0.6%和0.8% FA.试验期45 d.结果表明:1)与对照组相比,饲粮中添加0.8% FA显著提高了生长猪平均日增重(P<0.05);添加0.2%和0.6% FA显著降低了料重比(P<0.05).2)与对照组相比,饲粮中添加FA没有对生长猪血清生化指标产生显著的影响(P>0.05).3)与对照组相比,饲粮中添加FA可以显著提高生长猪血液中淋巴细胞数量和血清中免疫球蛋白M的含量(P<0.05).综上所述,对于生长猪来说,FA是一种安全的促生长添加剂;依据回归分析结果,建议生长猪饲粮中FA的适宜添加量为0.5%.

关键词： 黄腐酸; 生长猪; 生长性能; 血清生化指标; 血常规参数; 免疫功能

本文引用格式

常启发 , 白会新 , 石宝明 , 单安山 , 魏传玉 , 于长青 , 仝宝生 . 黄腐酸对生长猪生长性能、血清生化指标、血常规参数和免疫功能的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2013 , 25(8) : 1836 -1842 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.08.021

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to determine growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, blood routine parameters and immunity function of growing pigs ,which was for study whether the fulvic acid (FA) could promote health and growth of growing pigs, and its appropriate supplemental level. A total of 180 crossbred (Landrace譟orkshire) pigs with an average body weight of (30.0±2.5) kg were randomly allotted to 5 groups with 6 replicates per group and 6 pigs per replicate. The control group was fed a basal diet and the experimental groups were fed the basal diets supplemented with 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6% and 0.8% FA, respectively. The trial lasted for 45 days. Results showed as follows: 1) compared with the control group, the supplementation of FA tended to improve the growth performance of growing pigs. The supplementation of 0.8% FA significantly increased average daily gain (P<0.05) and the supplementation of 0.4% and 0.8% FA significantly decreased feed/gain (P<0.05). 2) Compared with the control group, dietary FA had no effects on serum biochemical parameters (P>0.05). 3) Compared with the control group, the supplementation of FA significantly increased the number of lymphocyte in blood and the content of immune globulin M in serum (P<0.05). In conclusion, FA is a safe growth-promoting additive for growing pigs, and the appropriate supplemental level of FA for growing pigs is 0.5%.

Key words： fulvic acid; growing pigs; growth performance; serum biochemical parameters; blood routine parameters; immunity function

参考文献

[1] HENDRICKSON J B,GRAM D T,HAMMOD G S.Oragnic chemistry[M].Boston:Willard Grant Press,1970:287-288.

[2] STEPCHENKO L M,ZHORINA L V,KRAVTSOVA L V.The effect of sodium humate on metabolism and resistance in highly productive poultry[J].Nauchnye Doklady Vysshei Shkoly Biologicheskie Nauki,1991(10):90-95.

[3] SCHEPETKIN I,KHLEBNIKOV A,KWON B S.Medical drugs from humus matter:focus on mumie[J].Drug Development Research,2002,57(3):140-159.  

[4] SHERMER C L,MACIOROWSKI K G,BAILEY C A,et al.Caecal metabolites and microbial populations in chickens consuming diets containing a mined humate compound[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1998,77(4):479-486.  

[5] ÇELIK K,UZATRCI A,AKM A E.Effects of dietary humic acid and saccharomyces cerevisiae on performance and biochemical parameters of broiler chickens[J].Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances,2008,3(5):344-350.  

[6] ŠAMUDOVSKÁ A,DEMETEROVÁ M.Effect of diet supplemented with natural humic compounds and sodium humate on performance and selected metabolic variables in broiler chickens[J].Acta Veterinaria Brno,2010,79(3):385-393.  

[7] KVÇVKYILMAZ K,BOZKURT M,ÇATLI A U,et al.The effect of dietary supplementation of yeast and humate on broiler performance and some slaughter characteristics[J].Süleyman Demirel Vniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi,2012,7(1):83-92.

[8] TEPE O,AYHAN V.Possibilities of using fulvic acid based organic liquid for quail[J].Nutrition Tarｌm Bilimleri Ara ?瘙 塂 tｌrma Dergisi,2012,5(2):81-86.

[9] AKSU T,BOZKURT A S.Effect of dietary essential oils and/or humic acids on broiler performance microbial population of intestinal content and antibody titres in the summer season[J].Kafkas Vniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi,2009,15(2):185-190.

[10] TAKLIMI S M,GHARI H,ISAKAN M A.Influence of different levels of humic acid and esterified glucomannan on growth performance and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,2012,3(5):663-668.  

[11] TOHID T,HASAN G,ALIREZA T.Efficacy of mannanoligosaccharides and humate on immune response to Avian Influenza (H9) disease vaccination in broiler chickens[J].Veterinary Research Communications,2010,34(8):709-717.  

[12] OZTURK E,OCAK N,TURAN A,et al.Performance carcass gastrointestinal tract and meat quality traits and selected blood parameters of broilers fed diets supplemented with humic substances[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2012,92(1):59-65.  

[13] AKSU M,KARAOLU M,KAYA M,et al.Effect of dietary humate on the pH TBARS and microbiological properties of vacuumand aerobic-packed breast and drumstick meats of broilers[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2005,85(9):1485-1491.  

[14] ?AHIN T,ELMALI D A,KAYA I,et al.The effect of single and combined use of probiotic and humate in quail (Coturnix coturnix Japonica) diet on fattening performance and carcass parameters[J].Kafkas Vniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi,2011,17(1):1-5.

[15] WANG Q,CHEN Y J,YAO J S,et al.Effects of supplemental humic substances on growth performance blood characteristics and meat quality in finishing pigs[J].Livestock Science,2008,117(2):270-274.

[16] JI F,MCGLONE J J,KIM S W.Effects of dietary humic substances on pig growth performance carcass characteristics and ammonia emission[J].Journal of Animal Science,2006,84(9):2482-2490.  

[17] ADIYAMAN E,BAYHAN A K,AYHAN V,et al.The effect of an organic liquid based on the principle of fulvic acid on the performance egg yield and incubation results of quails[J].Vniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Dergisi,2012(1):253-266.

[18] 白会新,常启发,石宝明,等.黄腐酸对生长育肥猪生长性能、胴体性状和肉品质的影响[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(1):133-139.

[19] 王晶,张海军,武书庚,等.饲粮中添加黄腐酸对肉仔鸡生产性能和血液生化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(1):140-147.

[20] KUNAVUE N,LIEN T F.Effects of fulvic acid and probiotic on growth performance nutrient digestibility blood parameters and immunity of pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science Advances,2012,2(8):711-721.

[21] 姜剑平,孙明强,严玉娟,等.腐植酸系列专用肥的开发与利用[J].磷肥与氮肥,2001,16(2):70-71.

[22] HUCK J A,PORTER N,BUSHED M E.Effect of humates on microbial activity[J].Journal of General Microbiology,1991,137:2321-2329.

[23] ISLAM K M S,SCHUHMACHER A,GROPP J M.Humic acid substances in animal agriculture[J].Pakistan Journal of Nutrition,2005,4(3):126-134.  

[24] AVCI M,DENEK N,KAPLAN O.Effects of humic acid at different levels on growth performance carcass yields and some biochemical parameters of quails[J].Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances,2007,6(1):1-4.

[25] ABDEL-MAGEED M A A.Effect of dietary humic substances supplementation on performance and immunity of Japanese quail[J].Egypt Poultry Science,2012,32(3):645-660.

[26] 岑小波,王瑞淑,吴兆锋.锌促进体外培养大鼠成骨细胞的增殖及分化[J].中华预防医学杂志,1999,33(4):221-223.

[27] 郑昌学,刘建欣.现代免疫学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2002:72.

[28] ÇETÍN N,ÇETÍN E,GVÇLV B K.Effect of humate and organic acids supplementation to ration on some haematological parameters in laying hens[J].Ankara Vniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi,2006,53:165-168.

[29] RATH N C,HUFF W E,HUFF G R.Effects of humic acid on broiler chickens[J].Poultry Science,2006,85(3):410-414.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2