动物营养学报 >

2013 , Vol. 25 >Issue 9: 2059 - 2066

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.09.019

实验方法 Experimental Methods

排空强饲法测定鸡饲粮表观代谢能值的灵敏度与置信限

  • 王美琴 ,
  • 赵峰 ,
  • 贾刚 ,
  • 刘成玲 ,
  • 王钰明 ,
  • 张宏福
展开
  • 1. 四川农业大学动物营养研究所, 雅安 625014;
    2. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所 动物营养学国家重点实验室, 北京 100193

收稿日期: 2013-03-12

  网络出版日期: 2013-08-18

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(30901037);动物营养学国家重点实验室自主课题(2004DA125184F1203);北京市科技新星计划项目(2011098)

收起

Sensitivity and Confidence Limit of Empting-Force Feeding Method for Determining Apparent Metabolizable Energy of Diets in Rooster

  • WANG Meiqin ,
  • ZHAO Feng ,
  • JIA Gang ,
  • LIU Chengling ,
  • WANG Yumin ,
  • ZHANG Hongfu
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an 625014, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2013-03-12

  Online published: 2013-08-18

Fold

摘要

本研究旨在通过探讨排空强饲法测定鸡饲粮表观代谢能(AME)值的灵敏度及样品间显著差异的置信限,为国家标准方法GB/T 26437—2010的应用提供参考。试验1采用2×5两因素完全随机设计,即2个基础饲粮和5个稀释剂水平(2%、4%、6%、8%和10%),检验排空强饲法测定的AME值对计算值的线性反应量。试验2通过分析上述10个饲粮样品、4次空白样品测试中AME值的方差,计算2个样品间AME值差异显著时所对应的置信限。结果表明:在2个基础饲粮条件下,稀释剂的水平与稀释后饲粮的AME值呈显著的线性关系(P<0.01),而二次函数关系与线性失拟检验均不显著(P>0.05)。以饲粮AME计算值为依变量,以排空强饲法AME实测值为应变量,作线性回归分析,得出斜率为0.987(P<0.01),这表明排空强饲法的灵敏度很高。排空强饲法测定4次空白样品及10个饲粮样品的AME值方差无显著差异(P>0.05)。根据排空强饲法测定饲粮AME值标准差的平均值,计算出2个饲粮样品间AME值显著性差异的置信限为0.27 MJ/kg DM。综上所述,排空强饲法测定饲粮的 AME值具有满意的灵敏度。0.27 MJ/kg DM的置信限将为检测饲粮样品间AME值是否有显著差异提供参考。

关键词： 排空强饲法; 公鸡; 表观代谢能值; 灵敏度; 置信限

本文引用格式

王美琴 , 赵峰 , 贾刚 , 刘成玲 , 王钰明 , 张宏福 . 排空强饲法测定鸡饲粮表观代谢能值的灵敏度与置信限[J]. 动物营养学报, 2013 , 25(9) : 2059 -2066 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.09.019

Abstract

The sensitivity and confidence limit of empting-force feeding method for determining the apparent metabolizable energy (AME) values of diets in rooster were investigated to make a reference for the national standard method of GB/T 26437—2010. In experiment 1, a 2×5 completely randomized design with 2 basal diets and 5 diluent levels (2%, 4%, 6%, 8% and 10% of peanut hull in the basal diets) was adopted to determine the response of determined AME values using empting-force feeding method to the calculated AME values. In experiment 2, according to the variances of the AME values of 10 diets in experiment 1 and 4 batches of blank samples, the confidence limit was determined for empting-force feeding method to differentiate the AME values between two samples. The results showed that in two groups of experimental diets composed of the basal diet and peanut hull, there was a significant linear effect of peanut hull content on the AME values of the diets (P<0.01), whereas the quadratic effects and lack-of-fit of linearity were not significant (P>0.05). A linear regression with a slope of 0.987 was observed between the independent variable of calculated AME values and dependent variable of measured AME values of the diets (P<0.01), indicating there was a high sensitivity of empting-force feeding method. There was no significant difference in the variances of the AME values of the 10 diets and the blank sample (P>0.05). According to the mean of standard deviation of dietary AME values, 0.27 MJ/kg DM of confidence limit was calculated for empting-force feeding method to differentiate the AME values between two samples. In conclusion, the sensitivity of empting force-feeding is satisfactory. The 0.27 MJ/kg DM of confidence limits is a critical parameter for the determination of significant difference among diets.

Key words： empting-force feeding method; rooster; apparent metabolizable energy; sensitivity; confidence limit

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员.GB/T 26437—2010畜禽饲料有效性与安全性评价强饲法测定鸡饲料表观代谢能技术规程[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2010.

[2] DALE N M,FULLER H L.Repeatability of true metabolizable energy versus nitrogen corrected true metabolizable energy values[J].Poultry Science,1986,65:352-354.  

[3] 夏伦志,吴东,钱坤,等.小麦型干酒糟及其可溶物在淮南麻黄鸡上能量及氨基酸代谢率的测定[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(2):364-371.

[4] BOURDILLON A,CARRE B,CONON L,et al.European reference method for the in vivo determination of metabolisable energy with adult cockerels:reproducibility,effect of food intake and comparison with individual laboratory methods[J].British Poultry Science,1990,31(3):557-565.  

[5] BOURDILLON A,CARRE B,CONON L,et al.European reference method of in vivo determination of metabolisable energy in poultry:reproducibility,effect of age,comparison with predicted values[J].British Poultry Science,1990,31(3):566-576.

[6] 米宝民,赵峰,谭会泽,等.排空强饲法测定鸡饲料表观代谢能值变异程度及其来源[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(11):2172-2180.

[7] ALFONSO T H D,MANBECK H B,ROUSH W B.Partitioning of variance in true metabolizable energy determinations:an example using wheat data[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1999,80:29-41.  

[8] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员.GB/T 6435—2006饲料中水分和其他挥发性物质含量的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.

[9] KAPS M,LAMBERSON W R.Biostatistics for animal science[M].Cambridge:CABI Publishing,2004.

[10] BALTHROP J,BENEDIKT B,RICHARD A C,et al.Quality assurance for animal feed analysis laboratories[M].Rome:FAO Animal Production and Health Manual No.14,2011.

[11] SIBBALD I R.A test of the additivity of true metabolizable energy values of feedingstuffs[J].Poultry Science,1977,56:363-366.  

[12] HONG D,RAGLAND D,ADEOLA O.Additivity and associative effects of metabolizable energy and amino acid digestibility in barley and canola meal for White Pekin ducks[J].Poultry Science,2001,80:1600-1606.

[13] HONG D,RAGLAND D,ADEOLA O.Additivity and associative effects of metabolizable energy and amino acid metabolizability of corn,soybean meal and wheat red dog for White Pekin ducks[J].Journal of Animal Science,2002,80:3222-3229.

[14] DALE N M,FULLER H L.Additivity of true metabolizable energy values as measured with roosters,broiler chicks and poults[J].Poultry Science,1980,59:1941-1942.  

[15] 霍启光.饲料生物学评定技术[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1996.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2