猪营养 Swine Nutrition

我国不同地区棉籽粕的猪氨基酸标准回肠消化率的测定

  • 张铖铖 ,
  • 张石蕊 ,
  • 贺喜 ,
  • 李敏 ,
  • 文慧 ,
  • 沈俊 ,
  • 朱良 ,
  • 崔志杰
展开
  • 湖南农业大学动物营养研究所, 饲料安全与高效利用教育部工程研究中心, 长沙 410128

收稿日期: 2013-06-28

  网络出版日期: 2013-11-19

基金资助

公益性行业(农业)专项(200903006)

Amino Acid Standardized Ileal Digestibility of Cottonseed Meals from Different Areas of China for Swine

  • ZHANG Chengcheng ,
  • ZHANG Shirui ,
  • HE Xi ,
  • LI Min ,
  • WEN Hui ,
  • SHEN Jun ,
  • ZHU Liang ,
  • CUI Zhijie
Expand
  • Engineering Research Center for Feed Safety and Efficient Utilization of Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China

Received date: 2013-06-28

  Online published: 2013-11-19

摘要

本试验旨在测定我国不同地区棉籽粕的猪氨基酸标准回肠消化率,并用化学分析法建立棉籽粕的猪主要4种氨基酸标准回肠消化率预测模型。试验选用体重40 kg左右的"杜×长×大"三元杂交公猪12头,采用2个6×6拉丁方试验设计,每个拉丁方试验6头猪,包括5种棉籽粕试验饲粮和1个无氮饲粮。每个试验分为Ⅰ~Ⅵ期,每期为7 d,前5 d为预试期,后2 d为回肠末端食糜收集期。采用简单T型瘘管法测定棉籽粕的猪氨基酸标准回肠消化率。结果表明:棉籽粕的猪必需氨基酸标准回肠消化率平均值范围为69.42%~94.50%,具体为:赖氨酸74.63%、蛋氨酸69.42%、色氨酸77.95%、苏氨酸81.43%、缬氨酸83.26%、异亮氨酸81.97%、亮氨酸84.65%、苯丙氨酸89.97%、组氨酸87.89%、精氨酸94.50%。不同地区棉籽粕的猪必需氨基酸标准回肠消化率平均值范围为长江流域65.02%~95.96%、黄河流域68.02%~93.15%、西北内陆74.70%~95.76%。棉籽粕的猪主要4种氨基酸标准回肠消化率预测模型为:赖氨酸标准回肠消化率=-63.372+2.783×粗蛋白质(R2=0.499,RSD=5.119,P<0.05);蛋氨酸标准回肠消化率=98.861-1.623×粗纤维(R2=0.402,RSD=5.274,P<0.05);色氨酸标准回肠消化率=48.863-0.031×游离棉酚+1.001×粗蛋白质(R2=0.707,RSD=2.492,P<0.05);苏氨酸标准回肠消化率=114.937-0.050×游离棉酚(R2=0.449,RSD=5.443,P<0.05)。本试验研究表明,我国棉籽粕的猪氨基酸标准回肠消化率平均值差异较大,综合评价,长江流域棉籽粕多数必需氨基酸标准回肠消化率较高,西北内陆次之,黄河流域较低。依据棉籽粕化学成分,建立了棉籽粕的猪氨基酸标准回肠消化率预测模型。

关键词: 棉籽粕; 氨基酸; 消化率;

本文引用格式

张铖铖 , 张石蕊 , 贺喜 , 李敏 , 文慧 , 沈俊 , 朱良 , 崔志杰 . 我国不同地区棉籽粕的猪氨基酸标准回肠消化率的测定[J]. 动物营养学报, 2013 , 25(12) : 2844 -2853 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.12.010

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to determine the amino acid standardized ileal digestibility of cottonseed meals from different areas of China and establish the predicating models of amino acid standardized ileal digestibility of cottonseed meals through analyzing the chemical composition of cottonseed meals. Twelve crossed-bred swine (Duroc×Landrace×Yorkshine) with an average body weight of 40 kg were randomly assigned to two Latin square design treatments with 6 swine per treatment, and each treatment included five cottonseed meal diets and a N-free diet. Each Latin square treatment had Ⅰ to Ⅵ periods, each period lasted for seven days, the first five days were pre-feeding period, and the final two days were sample collection period. The T-type fistula method was used to determinate the amino acid standardized ileal digestibility of cottonseed meals. The results showed as follows: the mean range of essential amino acid standardized ileal digestibility of cottonseed meals was from 69.42% to 94.50%, and the essential amino acid standardized ileal digestibility was Lys 74.63%, Met 69.42%, Trp 77.95%, Thr 81.43%, Val 83.26%, Ile 81.97%, Leu 84.65%, Phe 89.97%, His 87.89% and Arg 94.50%. According to the different areas, the mean range of essential amino acid standardized ileal digestibility of cottonseed meal from Yangtze River basin was from 65.02% to 95.96%, that from Yellow River basin was from 68.02% to 93.15%, and that from Inland northwest was from 74.70% to 95.76%. The predicating models for amino acid standardized ileal digestibility were as follows: SLys=-63.372+2.783×CP (R2=0.499, RSD=5.119, P<0.05); SMet=98.861-1.623×CF (R2=0.402, RSD=5.274, P<0.05); STrp=48.863-0.031×FG+1.001×CP (R2=0.707, RSD=2.492, P<0.05); SThr=114.937-0.050×FG (R2=0.449, RSD =5.443, P<0.05). The results indicate that the amino acid standardized ileal digestibility of cottonseed meals is different. Most essential amino acid standardized ileal digestibility of cottonseed meals from Yangtze River basin is the highest among the three ares, and the Inland northwest is better than Yellow River basin. The predicating models for amino acid standardized ileal digestibility are established according to the chemical composition of cottonseed meals.

参考文献

[1] 汪若梅.中国棉花科技进步30年[J].中国棉花,2009,36:1-6.

[2] 别墅,张献龙,周明炎.中国棉业科技进步30年——湖北省[J].中国棉花,2009,36:41-74.

[3] 邓祥顺,秦新敏,刘敏彦.中国棉业科技进步30年——河北篇[J].中国棉花,2009,36:7-11.

[4] 董何忠,王留明,赵洪亮,等.中国棉业科技进步30年——山东篇[J].中国棉花,2009,36:12-17.

[5] 董哲生,李跃先,石跃进,等.中国棉业科技进步30年——山西篇[J].中国棉花,2009,36:63-67.

[6] 贺桂仁,谢德意,马宗斌,等.中国棉业科技进步30年——河南篇[J].中国棉花,2009,36:18-23.

[7] 王子胜,李心宽,徐敏.中国棉业科技进步30年——辽宁篇[J].中国棉花,2009,36:76-81.

[8] 杨芳荃,吴若云,朱景明.中国棉业科技进步30年——湖南篇[J].中国棉花,2009,36:52-56.

[9] 叶鹏盛,刘朝晖,毛正轩.中国棉业科技进步30年——四川篇[J].中国棉花,2009,36:57-62.

[10] 郑曙峰,路曦结.中国棉业科技进步30年——安徽篇[J].中国棉花,2009,36:41-46.

[11] 张永成.我国不同品种与不同加工条件棉籽粕猪回肠氨基酸消化率的研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2001:68-77.

[12] 王安平,吕云峰,张军民,等.我国棉粕和棉籽蛋白营养成分和棉酚含量调研[J].华北农学报,2010,25(增刊): 301-304.

[13] 胡迎利,李梦云,郭金玲,等.不同来源和批次饲料原料营养成分的差异比较[J].郑州牧业工程高等专科学校学报,2010,30(1):5-7.

[14] 黄俊程.热处理程度对棉粕猪回肠末端氨基酸消化率的影响[D].硕士学位论文.武汉:华中农业大学,2011:28-30.

[15] 席鹏彬.中国地方菜籽粕组成特点及猪回肠氨基酸消化率的研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2002:70-85.

[16] 李明.菜籽饼粕饲料猪消化能及养分消化率预测模型的研究[D].硕士学位论文.雅安:四川农业大学,2011:42-50.

[17] 黄滋康,崔读昌.中国棉花生态区划[J].棉花学报,2002,14(3):185-109.

[18] STEIN H H,SEVE B,FULLER M F,et al.Invited review:amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredients:terminology and application[J].Journal of Animal Science,2007,85(1):172-180.  

[19] 张晋辉,李德发,谯仕彦,等.使用猪T型瘘管法测定饲料原料氨基酸回肠末端表观消化率[J].中国畜牧杂志,2001(4):5-7.

[20] PAHM A A,PEDERSEN C,HOEHLER D,et al.Factors affecting the variability in ileal amino acid digestibility in corn distillers dried grains with solubles fed to growing pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science,2008,86(9):2180-2189.  

[21] 胡小中.制油工艺对饲用棉粕生物学效价的影响[J].粮油食品科技,2001,9(1):26-28.
文章导航

/