反刍动物营养 Ruminant Nutrition

亚麻籽对肉羊瘤胃液pH、纤毛虫数量和养分表观消化率的影响

  • 敖力格日玛 ,
  • 双金 ,
  • 黎明 ,
  • 侯先志 ,
  • 闫素梅
展开
  • 内蒙古农业大学动物科学学院, 呼和浩特 010018

收稿日期: 2013-11-01

  网络出版日期: 2014-05-05

基金资助

内蒙古牧区生态高效牧养技术模式研究与示范项目(201003061)

Effects of Flaxseed on Rumen Fluid pH, Ciliate Number and Nutrient Apparent Digestibility of Meat Sheep

  • AO Ligerima ,
  • SHUANG Jin ,
  • LI Ming ,
  • HOU Xianzhi ,
  • YAN Sumei
Expand
  • College of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China

Received date: 2013-11-01

  Online published: 2014-05-05

摘要

本试验旨在研究亚麻籽对肉羊瘤胃液pH、纤毛虫数量和养分表观消化率的影响。选取12只体重相近的1岁羯羊,随机分成4组,每组3个重复,每个重复1只羊,对照组饲喂基础饲粮(无亚麻籽),试验组饲喂的亚麻籽分别采用生粒、炒粒、粉碎3种不同的加工方式。试验包括3个连续的4×4拉丁方试验,亚麻籽添加水平分别为75、150和225 g/d。试验期180 d,每个拉丁方试验60 d,其中分为4期,每期15 d。结果表明:1)亚麻籽瘤胃降解率,各发酵时间点粉碎组各养分的瘤胃降解率均极显著高于炒粒组和生粒组(P<0.01)。2)随着饲喂后时间的推移,瘤胃液pH变化基本都经历下降上升再下降再上升的过程;粉碎组>生粒组>炒粒组>对照组;各添加水平的结果呈现225 g/d>150 g/d>75 g/d。3)随着饲喂后时间的推移,瘤胃纤毛虫数量均下降;炒粒组>对照组>生粒组>粉碎组;随着添加水平的增加,总体呈均下降态势。4)饲粮粗脂肪表观消化率为炒粒组>对照组>粉碎组>生粒组,最高为炒粒组,添加水平为225 g/d,而最低的则是生粒组,添加水平为225 g/d;饲粮粗蛋白质、中性洗涤纤维和干物质表观消化率为炒粒组>对照组>生粒组>粉碎组,最高均为炒粒组,添加水平为225 g/d,最低均为粉碎组,添加水平为225 g/d。结果提示,肉羊饲粮中添加亚麻籽,影响瘤胃微生态系统的平衡,从而引起微生物生物氢化率的改变,最终使瘤胃液pH出现波动,而瘤胃液pH的波动反过来也会引起瘤胃微生物(包括纤毛虫)数量及结构的变化,最终改变了瘤胃发酵功能和饲粮养分表观消化率。炒粒处理的亚麻籽在改善肉羊瘤胃发酵环境和提高饲粮养分表观消化率上效果较好。

本文引用格式

敖力格日玛 , 双金 , 黎明 , 侯先志 , 闫素梅 . 亚麻籽对肉羊瘤胃液pH、纤毛虫数量和养分表观消化率的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2014 , 26(5) : 1203 -1213 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2014.05.010

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of flaxseed on rumen fluid pH, ciliate number and nutrient apparent digestibility of meat sheep. Twelve 1-year-old wethers with similar body weight were randomly divided into four groups with three replicates in each group and 1 sheep per replicate. Sheep in control group were fed a basal diet (without flaxseed), and the flaxseed for sheep in experimental groups were processed under three different modes, which were uncooked grain, saute grain and grounding, respectively. The experiment was consisted of three successive 4×4 Latin square tests, and the supplemental levels of flaxseed were 75, 150 and 225 g/d, respectively. The experiment lasted for 180 days with 60 days and four stages (15 days per stage) in each Latin square test. The results showed as follows: 1) considering ruminal flaxseed degradation rate, grinding group at different fermentation time points was all significantly higher than uncooked grain group and saute grain group (P<0.01). 2) Considering rumen fluid pH, with the increase of time after feeding, it showed a tendency of ‘down-up-down-up’; grinding group > uncooked grain group > saute grain group > control group; the supplemental levels showed 225 g/d > 150 g/d > 75 g/d. 3) Considering ciliate number, with the increase of time after feeding, it was decreased; saute grain group > control group > uncooked grain group > grinding group; with the increase of supplemental level, it showed a decreasing tendency. 4) Considering dietary ether extract (EE) apparent digestibility, saute grain group > control group > grinding group > uncooked grain group; the highest value appeared in saute grain group, while the lowest value appeared in uncooked grain group when the supplemental level was 225 g/d; considering the apparent digestibility of dietary crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and dry matter, saute grain group > control group>uncooked grain group > grinding group; the highest values appeared in saute grain group, while the lowest values appeared in grinding group when the supplemental level was 225 g/d. The results indicate that dietary supplementation of flaxseed can affect rumen micro-ecosystem balance, and change microbial organisms' bio-hydrogenation rate, eventually cause the fluctuation of rumen fluid pH, which will affect ruminal microorganisms (including ciliate) number and structure, and all these changes can affect ruminal fermentation function and dietary nutrient apparent digestibility. The treatment of saute grain of flaxseed has better effects on improved ruminal fermentation environment and dietary nutrient apparent digestibility of meat sheep.

参考文献

[1] LANDBLOM D G,OLSON D K,WACHENHEIM C J.Effect of fieldpea and flaxseed inclusion in receiving calf diets and carryover effect on finishing performance,immune response,carcass quality,and economics[J].American Society of Animal Science,2007,58(2):56-58.

[2] MADDOCK T D,BAUER M L,KOCH K,et al.Effect of processing flax in beef feedlot diets on performance,carcass characteristics,and trained sensory panel ratings[J].Journal of Animal Science,2006,84(6):1544-1551.

[3] DROUILLARD J S,SEYFERT M A,GOOD E J,et al.Flaxseed for finishing beef cattle:effects on animal performance,carcass quality and meat composition[C]//Proceedings of the 60th Flax Institute,Fargo:Flax Institute,2004:108-117.

[4] MADDOCK T D,BAUER M L,KOCH K,et al.The effect of processing flax in beef feedlot rations on performance,carcass characteristics and trained sensory panel ratings[C]//Proceedings of the 60th Flax Institute,Fargo:Flax Institute,2004:72-87.

[5] WAYLAN A T,DURRA J D,JOHNSON B J,et al.Effect of flax supplementation and grow the promo ants on lipoprotein lipase and glycogen in messenger RNA concentration in finishing cattle[J].Journal of Animal Science,2004,82:1868-1875.

[6] 孙涛.日粮添加复合预混料及亚麻籽和大豆对奶牛产奶量和乳脂组成的影响[D].硕士学位论文.保定:河北农业大学,2005.

[7] 许蕾蕾,李秋凤,李建国,等.亚麻籽对育肥期肉牛生长性能和血液指标的影响[J].中国牛业科学,2012,38(1):5-9.

[8] 吴灵英.亚麻籽及其饼粕在鸡饲料中的应用[J].饲料工业,2002,22(3):32-34.

[9] SCHOLLJEGERDES E J,KRONBERG S L,肖健康.亚麻籽对放牧肉牛瘤胃特性和生产性能的影响[J].饲料与畜牧,2012(7):28-31.

[10] 褚海义,富俊才,韩英强,等.日粮中添加亚麻籽对肉羊消化代谢的影响[J].畜牧与兽医,2007,39(7):14-16.

[11] KLUSMEYER T H,CLAEK J H.Effects of dietary fat and protein on fatty acid flow to the duodenum and in milk produced by dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(9):3055-3067.  

[12] BICDKERSTAFFE R,NOAKES D E,ANNISON E F.Quantitative aspects of fatty acid biohydrogenation,absorption and transfer of milk fat in the lactating goat,with special reference to the cis-and trans-isomers of octadecenoate and linoleate[J].Biochemical Journal,1972,130(2):607-617.

[13] MATTOS W,PALMQUIST D L.Biohydrogenation and availability of linoleic acid in lactating cows[J].The Journal of Nutrition,1977,107(9):1755-1761.

[14] NRC.Nutrient requirements of sheep[S].6th ed.Washington,D.C.:National Academy of Sciences,1985:45-73.

[15] 佐佐木,高桥敏能,萱场猛夫.ヒッジのル-メン内微生物および无细胞ル-メン液区分における长锁脂肪酸の量と组成に及ぼす浓厚饲料と粗饲料の给与割合の影响[J].日本畜产学报,2000,71(7):26-38.

[16] 双金.富含α-亚麻酸油料籽实对肉羊瘤胃微生物及其机体脂肪代谢影响的研究[D].博士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2014.

[17] 龟高正夫,堀口雅昭,石桥晃,古谷修.基础家畜饲养学[M].2版.东京:养贤堂,1987:78.

[18] ZINN R A,SHEN Y.Interaction of dietary calcium and supplemental fat on digestive function and growth performance of feedlot steers[J].Journal of Animal Science,1996,74(10):2303-2309.

[19] PALMQUIST D L,CONRAD H R.High fat rations for dairy cows.Effects on feed intake,milk and fat production,and plasma metabolites[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1978,61(7):890-901.  

[20] POLAN C E,MCNEIL J J,TOVE S B.Biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids by rumen bacteria[J].Journal of Bacteriology,1964,88(4):1056-1064.

[21] HARFOOT C G,CROUCHMAN M L,NOBLE R C,et al.Competition between food particles and rumen bacteria in the uptake of long-chain fatty acids and triglycerides[J].Journal of Applied Bacteriology,1974,37(4):633-641.  

[22] FIRKINS J L,EASTRIDGE M L.Assessment of the effects of iodine value on fatty acid digestibility,feed intake,and milk production[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1994,77(8):2357-2366.  

[23] PALMQUIST D L,JENKINS T C.Fat in lactation rations:review[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):1-14.  

[24] 王平,王加启,龚月生.反刍动物脂肪补充料的研究进展[J].饲料工业,2002,23(8):13-19.
文章导航

/