反刍动物营养 Ruminant Nutrition

C3和C4植物粗料及底物精粗比对山羊瘤胃体外发酵特性的影响

  • 陈安 ,
  • 吴建平 ,
  • 周传社 ,
  • 谭支良
展开
  • 1. 甘肃农业大学, 兰州 730070;
    2. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室, 湖南省畜禽健康养殖工程技术中心, 农业部中南动物营养与饲料科学观测实验站, 长沙 410125

收稿日期: 2014-07-08

  网络出版日期: 2015-01-10

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(31372342);国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BAD14B17);中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所青年人才领域项目(ISACX-LYQY-QN-1105);中国科学院科技服务网络计划课题(KFJ-EW-STS-071)

Effects of C3 and C4 Plants of Roughage and Concentrate to Roughage Ratio of Substrate on in Vitro Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics of Goats

  • CHEN An ,
  • WU Jianping ,
  • ZHOU Chuanshe ,
  • TAN Zhiliang
Expand
  • 1. Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hunan Research Center of Livestock & Poultry Sciences, and South-Central Experimental Station of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China

Received date: 2014-07-08

  Online published: 2015-01-10

摘要

本试验研究了C3和C4植物粗料及底物精粗比对山羊瘤胃体外发酵特性的影响。采用完全随机区组试验设计,选择不同来源的C3(水稻秸秆和苜蓿)和C4植物(玉米秸秆和宽叶雀稗)为粗料,并分别设计3种不同精粗比(40: 60、45: 55和50: 50)的底物,进行48 h的瘤胃体外发酵试验,测定体外产气参数、发酵特性参数、营养物质降解率。结果表明:1)底物粗料选用苜蓿时,理论最大产气量极显著高于其余3种粗料(P<0.01),且以精粗比为45: 55和50: 50时较高;底物粗料选用水稻秸秆时,甲烷(CH4)产量分别比苜蓿、玉米秸秆和宽叶雀稗降低53.79%、24.30%和3.29%,且以精粗比为45: 55时最低。2)C3植物粗料的发酵液pH和氨态氮(NH3-N)浓度均极显著高于C4植物粗料(P<0.01);精粗比对发酵液pH和NH3-N浓度均没有显著影响(P>0.05)。3)底物粗料选用水稻秸秆时,发酵液乙酸、丙酸和总挥发性脂肪酸浓度均极显著高于玉米秸秆和宽叶雀稗(P<0.01),而与苜蓿没有显著差异(P>0.05);精粗比为50: 50时水稻秸秆和玉米秸秆发酵液乙酸/丙酸均显著高于精粗比为40: 60(P<0.05),而与精粗比为45: 55时没有显著差异(P>0.05)。4)各底物体外干物质和中性洗涤纤维降解率均以选用水稻秸秆为底物粗料时最低,分别比苜蓿、玉米秸秆、宽叶雀稗低18.84%、4.37%、3.84%和11.12%、17.78%、15.56%。结果提示,以苜蓿为粗料,精粗比为50: 50的底物瘤胃体外发酵降解率最高,CH4产量也最高;以水稻秸秆为粗料时,精粗比为45: 55的底物瘤胃体外发酵降解率最低,CH4产量也最低。

本文引用格式

陈安 , 吴建平 , 周传社 , 谭支良 . C3和C4植物粗料及底物精粗比对山羊瘤胃体外发酵特性的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015 , 27(1) : 112 -123 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.01.015

Abstract

This experiment was designed to study the effects of C3 and C4 plants of roughage and concentrate to roughage ratio (C: R) of substrate on in vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics of goats. The study was conducted in a completely randomized block design of experiment, different sources of C3 (rice straw and alfalfa) and C4 plants (maize stover and broadleaf paspalum) were selected as roughages, and three C: Rs (40: 60, 45: 55 and 50: 50) were set for each fermentation substrates, respectively. By employing the method of in vitro ruminal fermentation (48 hours), gas production parameters, fermentation characteristic parameters and nutrient degradability were measured. The results showed as follows: 1) using alfalfa as roughage of substrate, theological maximum gas production was significantly higher than the other three roughages (P<0.01), and it was higher when C: Rs were 45: 55 and 50: 50; using rice straw as roughage of substrate, methane production was decreased by 53.79%, 24.30% and 3.29%, respectively, compared with alfalfa, maize stover and broadleaf paspalum, and it was lowest when C: R was 45: 55. 2) The pH and NH3-N concentration of fermentation fluid of C3 plants (rice straw and alfalfa) was significantly higher than those of C4 plants (maize stover and broadleaf paspalum) (P<0.01), but C: R did not significantly affect those two indices (P>0.05). 3) Using rice straw as roughage of substrate, the concentrations of acetic acid, propionic acid and total volatile fatty acid was significantly higher than those of maize stover and broadleaf paspalum (P<0.01), while there were no significant differences between rice straw and alfalfa (P>0.05); acetic acid/propionic acid of rice straw and maize stover for C: R at 50: 50 was significantly higher than that at 40: 60 (P<0.05), while there were no significant differences between C: Rs of 50: 50 and 45: 55 (P>0.05). 4) in vitro dry matter degradability and in vitro neutral detergent fiber degradability of substrates were the lowest when using rice straw as roughage, and were decreased by 18.84%, 4.37% and 3.84%, and 11.12%, 17.78% and 15.56%, respectively, compared with those of alfalfa, maize stover and broadleaf paspalum. It is concluded that when alfalfa is selected as roughage and C: R is 50: 50, the in vitro ruminal degradability and methane production are both the highest. However, when rice straw is selected as roughage and C: R is 45: 55, the in vitro ruminal degradability and methane production are both the lowest.

参考文献

[1] 闫贵龙,曹春梅,刁其玉,等.日粮中C3、C4植物含量对牛肉品质和主要化学成分的影响[J].草业学报,2010,19(3):139-147.

[2] 管理,胡耀武,汤卓炜,等.通化万发拨子遗址猪骨的C,N稳定同位素分析[J].科学通报,2007,52(14):1678-1680.

[3] 梁斌,王全伟,阚泽忠.四川盆地中侏罗统沙溪庙组钙质结核的碳、氧同位素特征[J].矿物岩石,2007,27(2):54-58.

[4] 田晓四,朱诚,许信旺,等.牙釉质碳和氧同位素在重建中坝遗址哺乳类过去生存模式中的应用[J].科学通报,2008,53(增刊Ⅰ):77-83.

[5] BOTHA M S,STOCK W D.Stable isotope composition of faeces as an indicator of seasonal diet selection in wild herbivores in southern Africa[J].South African Journal of Science,2005,101(7/8):371-374.

[6] 邓涛,李玉梅.西藏吉隆盆地的植被生态类型及其在哺乳动物牙齿釉质稳定碳同位素组成上的响应[J].科学通报,2005,50(11):1109-1113.

[7] FRASER R A,GRVN R,PRIVAT K,et al.Stable-isotope microprofiling of wombat tooth enamel records seasonal changes in vegetation and environmental conditions in eastern Australia[J].Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology,2008,269(1/2):66-77.

[8] 杨胜,朱玉琴,锡林,等.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1993.

[9] MENKE K H,STEINGASS H.Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid[J].Animal Research and Development,1988,28(1):7-55.

[10] MENKE K H,RAAB L,SALEWSKI A,et al.The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,93(1):217-222.  

[11] WANG M,TANG S X,TAN Z L.Modeling in vitro gas production kinetics:derivation of Logistic-Exponential(LE)equations and comparison of models[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2011,165(3/4):137-150.

[12] WANG M,SUN X Z,TANG S X,et al.Deriving fractional rate of degradation of logistic-exponential (LE) model to evaluate early in vitro fermentation[J].Animal,2013,7(6):920-929.  

[13] 冯宗慈,高民.通过比色测定瘤胃液氨氮含量方法的改进[J].畜牧与饲料科学,2010,31(6/7):37.

[14] HALL M B,PELL A N,CHASE L E.Characteristics of neutral detergent-soluble fiber fermentation by mixed ruminal microbes[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1998,70(1/2):23-39.

[15] METZLER-ZEBELI B U,SCHERR C,SALLAKU E,et al.Evaluation of associative effects of total mixed ration for dairy cattle using in vitro gas production and different rumen inocula[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2012,92(12):2479-2485.  

[16] 孙云章,毛胜勇,姚文,等.不同精粗比底物下瘤胃真菌和纤维降解细菌共培养发酵特性及菌群变化[J].微生物学报,2006,46(3):422-426.

[17] 张洁,王洪荣.用体外产气法评价精粗饲料的组合效应[J].家畜生态学报,2007,28(4):30-35.

[18] 王仁杰,薛白,阎天海,等.不同精粗比饲粮中添加异位酸对体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(6):1181-1188.

[19] 娜仁花,董红敏,陈永杏,等.日粮精粗比对瘤胃发酵特性的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2011,47(9):49-54.

[20] 刘树军.不同饲草的体外发酵甲烷产生量研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2011.

[21] 郑文思,赵广永,张婷婷,等.应用体外发酵法研究高精料饲粮NSC/NDF与甲烷产量之间的关系[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(10):2315-2324.

[22] 张元庆,魏吉安,孟庆翔.不同植物细胞壁的体外发酵特征及其对甲烷产生的贡献[J].畜牧兽医学报,2006,37(10):992-998.

[23] 韩继福,冯仰廉,张晓明,等.阉牛不同日粮的纤维消化、瘤胃内VFA对甲烷产生量的影响[J].中国兽医学报,1997,17(3):278-280.

[24] CHANDRAMONI,JADHAO S B,TIWARI C M,et al.Energy metabolism with particular reference to methane production in Muzaffarnagari sheep fed rations varying in roughage to concentrate ratio[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2000,83(3/4):287-300.

[25] 冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.

[26] BROWN M S,PONCE C H,PULIKANTI R,et al.Adaptation of beef cattle to high-concentrate diets:performance and ruminal metabolism[J]Journal of Animal Science,2006,84(13):E25-E33.

[27] 段红伟.N-羟甲基蛋氨酸钙的过瘤胃效果及其对瘤胃环境和饲料养分消化的影响[D].硕士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2000.

[28] MCDONALD I.A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1981,96(1):251-252.  

[29] OWENS F N,BERGEN W G.Nitrogen metabolism of ruminant animals:historical perspective,current understanding and future implications[J].Journal of Animal Science,1983,57(Suppl.2):498-518.

[30] 张爱忠,卢德勋,王立志,等.不同精粗比日粮条件下绒山羊瘤胃内环境和发酵指标动态变化的研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2005(12):23-25.

[31] SUTTON J D.Symposium:energy nutrition and metabolism of the lactating cow-digestion and absorption of energy substrates in the lactating cow[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1985,68(12):3376-3393.  

[32] BERGMAN E N,REID R S,MURRAY M G,et al.Interconversions and production of volatile fatty acids in the sheep rumen[J].The Biochemical Journal,1965,97(1):53-58.

[33] 王吉峰,王加启,李树聪,等.不同日粮对奶牛瘤胃发酵模式及泌乳性能的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2005,36(6):569-573.

[34] 李亚学,王佳堃,孙华,等.不同精粗比下添加维生素B12对体外瘤胃发酵和微生物酶活力的影响[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(10):1888-1896.

[35] GRISWOLD K E,APGAR G A,BOUTON J.Effects of urea infusion and ruminal degradable protein concentration on microbial growth,digestibility,and fermentation in continuous culture[J].Journal of Animal Science,2003,81(1):329-336.

[36] 王加启,冯仰廉.瘤胃持续模拟技术的研究[J].动物营养学报,1995,7(1):29-35.
文章导航

/