动物营养学报 >

2015 , Vol. 27 >Issue 2: 655 - 662

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.02.039

研究简报 Short Communications

贮藏时间对沙柳混合发酵饲料营养成分及体外消化率的影响

展开
  • 内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院, 呼和浩特 010031
李满双(1989-), 男, 黑龙江大庆人, 硕士研究生, 研究方向为反刍动物营养与饲料开发.E-mail:limanshuang521@126.com

收稿日期: 2014-08-22

  网络出版日期: 2015-02-09

基金资助

农业部国家现代肉羊产业技术体系(CARS-39);公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费项目"牧区饲草饲料资源开发利用技术研究与示范"(201203042)

收起

Effects of Storage Time on the Nutrient Composition and in Vitro Digestibility in Salix Mixed Fermentation Feed

Expand
  • Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China

Received date: 2014-08-22

  Online published: 2015-02-09

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在探讨贮藏时间对沙柳混合发酵饲料营养成分及体外消化率的影响,为沙柳的利用开辟新途径.试验按不同沙柳比例(36.44%和67.08%)调制成2组混合发酵饲料,分别用FF1和FF2表示,在各组中添加等量的复合菌剂,考察发酵饲料在贮藏1、3、5、7、10、12、15、22、30、45和60 d时,沙柳混合发酵饲料营养成分和体外消化率随时间的变化规律.结果表明:1)随着贮藏时间的延长,沙柳混合发酵饲料的干物质、有机物和可溶性碳水化合物含量显著下降(P<0.05),并显著降低了中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤木质素含量(P<0.05);粗脂肪含量显著提高(P<0.05);粗蛋白质含量在贮藏过程中略有上升,但差异不显著(P>0.05).2)随着贮藏时间的延长,沙柳混合发酵饲料的干物质、有机物、粗蛋白质、中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维的体外消化率均显著升高(P<0.05).2组发酵饲料之间的营养物质体外消化率均差异显著(P<0.05).由此可见,按沙柳不同比例调制的2种发酵饲料配方,经发酵处理可以有效提高沙柳混合发酵饲料的营养价值.综合各项指标,确定在贮藏30 d后沙柳混合发酵饲料营养成分趋于稳定,且FF1组的营养品质优于FF2组.

关键词： 沙柳; 贮藏时间; 混合发酵饲料; 营养成分; 体外消化率

本文引用格式

李满双, 薛树媛, 郭天龙, 王超, 金海 . 贮藏时间对沙柳混合发酵饲料营养成分及体外消化率的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015 , 27(2) : 655 -662 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.02.039

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of storage time on the nutrient composition and in vitro digestibility in salix mixed fermentation feed, in order to provide a new ways for better utilization of salix. In this experiment, according to the different proportion of salix (36.44% and 67.08%), two groups of mixed fermentation feed were made, represented by FF1 and FF2, respectively. Each group added the same number of compound bacteria preparation. The variation law of nutrient composition and in vitro digestibility of salix mixed fermentation feed at different storage periods of 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, 15, 22, 30, 45 and 60 days were analyzed. The results showed as follows: 1) with the extension of storage time, the contents of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) were significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the contents of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) were significantly decreased (P<0.05); the content of ether extract (EE) was significantly increased (P<0.05); the content of crude protein (CP) was increased during storage, but the difference was no significant (P>0.05). 2) With the extension of storage time, the in vitro digestibilities of DM, OM, CP, NDF and ADF were significantly increased (P<0.05). The nutrient component in vitro digestibility had significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). In conclusion, according to the two kinds of fermented feed formulation of adding different proportions of salix, the nutritional value of salix mixed fermentation feed is increase with different storage periods. Comprehensive indicators, salix mixed fermentation feed gradually stabilize after 30 days, and FF1 nutritional quality is superior to FF2.

Key words： salix; storage time; mixed fermentation feed; nutrient component; in vitro digestibility

参考文献

[1] 曹国军,文亦芾.我国灌木类饲用植物资源及其可持续利用对策[J].草业与畜牧,2006(10):26-29.

[2] 林瑄.重要的木本饲料树种--沙柳[J].饲料研究,1986(9):13-14.

[3] 李会科,王忠林,邹厚远.榆林沙区主要人工固沙灌丛营养成分及对放牧羊只生育影响的研究[J].草业科学,2000,17(4):17-20.

[4] 薛树媛,李九月,金海,等.荒漠地区几种牧草和灌木中营养成分含量的动态变化[J].饲料工业,2011,32(1):44-47.

[5] 王晗生.黄土高原几种灌木的叶营养成分分析[J].西北林学院学报,1997,12(1):53-56.

[6] 安保,白永祥,田志.沙柳生物学特性与造林技术研究[J].内蒙古林业科技,2003(Suppl.):24-26.

[7] 高永,邱国玉,丁国栋,等.沙柳沙障的防风固沙效益研究[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(3):365-370.

[8] 王蕾,王志,刘连友,等.沙柳灌丛植株形态与气流结构野外观测研究[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(11):2007-2011.

[9] 熊本海,庞之洪,罗清尧.中国饲料成分及营养价值表(2013年第24版)制订说明[J].中国饲料,2013(21):33-33.

[10] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].3版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007.

[11] MCDONALD P,HENDERSON A R.Determination of water-soluble carbohydrates in grass[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1964,15(6):395-398.  

[12] TILLEY J M A,TERRY R A.A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops[J].Grass and Forage Science,1963,18(2):104-111.  

[13] 辜澜涛,董仲玺,赵玉梅,等.EM发酵豆渣、鱼杂、鸡血及其粗蛋白含量测定分析[J].广西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2012,30(1):111-114.

[14] 王旭明,倪永珍,李维烔,等.有效微生物群(EM)对饲料pH值及营养价值的影响[J].浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版,2002,28(4):431-434.

[15] 许庆方,张翔,崔志文,等.不同添加剂对全株玉米青贮品质的影响[J].草地学报,2009,17(2):157-161.

[16] 王加启,周凌云,刘辉.青贮过程中饲料营养价值降低的机理及其控制新技术[J].中国奶牛,2005(1):28-30.

[17] 公美玲.玉米秸秆青贮过程中的营养动态研究[D].硕士学位论文.泰安:山东农业大学,2013.

[18] 张吉鹍,卢德勋.试述反刍动物日粮中的纤维问题[J].中国乳业,2003(7):21-24.

[19] 杨效民.种植苜蓿与饲养奶牛[J].黄牛杂志,2003,29(3):53-58.

[20] 闫峻.玉米青贮饲料开窖后贮存期营养成分及霉菌变化规律研究[D].硕士学位论文.杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2009.

[21] 许宇薇.不同微生物制剂及其组合处理对微贮稻草营养价值的影响评定[D].硕士学位论文.南昌:江西农业大学,2012.

[22] 玉柱,邓波,于艳冬,等.添加玉米秸秆对甜菜渣青贮品质和体外消化率的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报,2010,32(2):186-190.

[23] 许庆方,周禾,玉柱,等.贮藏期和添加绿汁发酵液对袋装苜蓿青贮的影响[J].草地学报,2006,14(2):129-133.

[24] 孙小凡.麦类作物青贮饲料营养价值研究[D].硕士学位论文.杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2003.

[25] 曲永利,苗树君,马龙,等.饲喂不同比例小叶章日粮对奶牛瘤胃干物质降解率的研究[J].黄牛杂志,2005,31(1):11-13.

[26] HAN K J,COLLINS M,VANZANT E S,et al.Bale density and moisture effects on alfalfa round bale silage[J].Crop Science,2004,44(3):914-919.  

[27] YAHAYA M S,KIMURA A,HARAI J,et al.Evaluation of structural carbohydrates losses and digestibility in alfalfa and orchardgrass during ensiling[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2001,14(12):1701-1704.  
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2