反刍动物营养 Ruminant Nutrition

代乳品能量和蛋白质水平对肉犊牛生产性能和瘤胃发酵的影响

展开
  • 1. 中国农业科学院饲料研究所, 农业部饲料生物技术重点实验室, 北京 100081;
    2. 新疆农业大学动物科学学院, 乌鲁木齐 830052;
    3. 中国农业科学院广西水牛研究所, 南宁 530001;
    4. 山东省曹县畜牧局, 曹县 274400
郭 峰(1985—),男,河南周口人,硕士,从事反刍动物生理营养研究。E-mail: 261721760@qq.com

收稿日期: 2014-12-26

  网络出版日期: 2015-06-17

基金资助

农业部公益性行业专项"南方地区幼龄草食畜禽饲养技术研究"(201303143)

Effects of Energy and Protein Levels on Growth Performance and Rumen Fermentation of Beef Calves

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
    2. College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumq 830052, China;
    3. Guangxi Buffaloes Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530001, China;
    4. Shandong Caoxian County Bureau of Animal Husbandry, Caoxian 274400, China

Received date: 2014-12-26

  Online published: 2015-06-17

摘要

本试验旨在筛选夏南牛与德国黄牛杂交肉犊牛适宜能量和蛋白质水平的代乳品。选取夏南牛与德国黄牛杂交新生犊牛40头,按日龄和体重相近的原则随机分为4组,每组10头犊牛,21日龄断母乳并饲喂4种不同能量和蛋白质水平的代乳品,分别为高能量高蛋白质组(HEHP组,消化能16 MJ/kg,粗蛋白质25%)、高能量低蛋白质组(HELP组,消化能16 MJ/kg,粗蛋白质22%)、低能量高蛋白质组(LEHP组,消化能14 MJ/kg,粗蛋白质25%)、低能量低蛋白质组(LELP组,消化能14 MJ/kg,粗蛋白质22%)。90日龄断代乳品,试验结束。结果发现:1)代乳品能量和蛋白质水平对犊牛(21~90日龄)的日增重有显著影响(P<0.05),HEHP组(524.12 g)显著高于LELP组(432.48 g)(P<0.05);2)代乳品能量和蛋白质水平对体尺的影响主要体现在胸围的发育,77和90日龄LELP组胸围显著小于HEHP组(P<0.05);3)各组瘤胃液pH,乙酸、丙酸、丁酸、戊酸含量和乙酸/丙酸未出现显著性差异(P>0.05),氨态氮浓度LEHP组显著高于LELP组和HELP组(P<0.05),HELP组和LEHP组异丁酸含量显著高于LELP组(P<0.05),LELP组异戊酸含量显著小于其他各组(P<0.05)。综合得出,高能量水平(消化能16 MJ/kg)代乳品有助于肉用犊牛生长性能发挥和瘤胃发酵,高蛋白质水平(粗蛋白质25%)代乳品能为犊牛提供充足蛋白质供其吸收利用,低能量低蛋白质水平(粗蛋白质22%,消化能14 MJ/kg)的代乳品不利于犊牛生长发育。

本文引用格式

郭峰, 屠焰, 邹彩霞, 郭群, 苗忠, 刁其玉 . 代乳品能量和蛋白质水平对肉犊牛生产性能和瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015 , 27(6) : 1681 -1689 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.06.004

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine appropriate energy and protein levels of milk replacer (MR) for German yellow×Xianan beef calves. Forty neonatal German yellow×Xianan calves were selected and assigned randomly to 4 groups (10 calves per group) according to body weight, and calves received milk replacer with different energy and protein levels, which were 16 MJ/kg digestive energy (DE) and 25% crude protein (CP) (HEHP group), 16 MJ/kg DE and 22% CP (HELP group), 14 MJ/kg DE and 25% CP (LEHP group), and 14 MJ/kg DE and 22% CP (LELP group), respectively. Calves were weaned off milk at 21 days of age and milk replacer was fed to calves till 90 days of age. The results showed as follows: 1) energy and protein levels of milk replacer significantly affected daily gain of calves (21 to 90 days of age, P<0.05), and HEHP group (524.12 g) was significantly higher compared with LELP group (432.48 g) (P<0.05); 2) main effects of energy and protein levels of milk replacer of body measurements was on heart girth development, and HEHP group at 77 and 90 days of age was significantly higher than LELP group (P<0.05); 3) there were no significant differences in rumen fluid pH, the contents of acetate, propionate, butyrate and valerate, and acetate/propionate (P>0.05), ammonia nitrogen concentration in LEHP group was significantly higher than that in LELP and HELP groups (P<0.05), the content of isobutyrate in HELP and LEHP groups was significantly higher than that in LELP group (P<0.05), and the content of isovalerate in LELP group was significantly lower than that in the other groups (P<0.05). To sum up, the high-energy (16 MJ/kg DE) milk replacer seems to be more beneficial for the growth performance and rumen fermentation of calves, high-protein (25% CP) milk replacer can provide enough protein to calves, and low-energy and low-protein levels (22% CP, 14 MJ/kg DE) of milk replacer can not meet the demand of calves.

参考文献

[1] 曹兵海,苏华维.我国南方肉牛产业现状与发展战略之我见[C]//第四届全国牛病防制及产业发展大会论文集.武汉:全国牛病大会组委会,2012:18.

[2] MILLER-CUSHON E K,MONTORO C,IPHARRAGUERRE I R,et al.Dietary preference in dairy calves for feed ingredients high in energy and protein[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2014,97(3):1634-1644.  

[3] GÓRKA P,KOWALSKI Z M,PIETRZAK P,et al.Is rumen development in newborn calves affected by different liquid feeds and small intestine development?[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2011,94(6):3002-3013.  

[4] 李辉,刁其玉,张乃锋.不同蛋白水平对犊牛生长、营养代谢及氨基酸消化率的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2008,39(11):1510-1516.

[5] 穆阿丽.肉牛生长期能量和蛋白质代谢规律及其需要量的研究[D].硕士学位论文.泰安:山东农业大学,2006.

[6] 李辉,刁其玉,张乃锋,等.不同蛋白水平对犊牛消化代谢及血清生化指标的影响[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(4):1219-1226.

[7] 张蓉,刁其玉,屠艳,等.能量水平对早期断奶犊牛消化代谢及血清指标的影响[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(3):1024-1029.

[8] 穆阿丽,杨在宾,吴乃科,等.不同能量水平下犊牛蛋白质需要量及其代谢规律的研究[J].中国牛业科学,2006,32(4):18-22.

[9] BROWN E G,VANDEHAAR M J,DANIELS K M,et al.Effect of increasing energy and protein intake on mammary development in heifer calves[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2005,88(2):595-603.  

[10] BROWN E G,VANDEHAAR M J,DANIELS K M,et al.Effect of increasing energy and protein intake on body growth and carcass composition of heifer calves[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2005,88(2):585-594.  

[11] 中华人民共和国农业部.NY/T 815-2004肉牛饲养标准[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.

[12] 王美美,李秋凤,高艳霞,等.饲喂不同营养水平代乳粉对犊牛生长性能的影响[J].中国奶牛,2013(15):17-20.

[13] 张卫兵,刁其玉,张乃锋,等.日粮蛋白能量比对中国荷斯坦犊牛生长性能及饲料利用率的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2009,36(6):5-10.

[14] HILL T M,BATEMAN H G,ALDRICH J M,et al.Effects of fat concentration of a high-protein milk replacer on calf performance[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2009,92(10):5147-5153.  

[15] 卜登攀,卢德勋,崔慰贤,等.瘤胃能氮同步释放对瘤胃微生物蛋白质合成的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2008,35(12):5-10.

[16] VAN HOUTERT M F J.The production and metabolism of volatile fatty acids by ruminants fed roughages:a review[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1993,43(3/4):189-225.

[17] PRESTON T R,LENG R A.Matching ruminant production systems with available resources in the tropics and sub-tropics[M].Armidale,Australia:Penambul Books,1987.

[18] CLARK J H,KLUSMEYER T H,CAMERON M R.Microbial protein synthesis and flows of nitrogen fractions to the duodenum of dairy cows[J].Journal of Diary Science,1992,75(8):2304-2323.  

[19] YANG W Z,BEAUCHEMIN K A,RODE L M.Effects of grain processing,forage to concentrate ratio,and forage particle size on rumen pH and digestion by dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2001,84(10):2203-2216.  

[20] NOCEK J E,TAMMINGA S.Site of digestion of starch in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows and its effect on milk yield and composition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3598-3629.  

[21] KHORASANI G R,OKINE E K,KENNELLY J J.Effects of forage source and amount of concentrate on rumen and intestinal digestion of nutrients in late-lactation cows[J].Journal of dairy Science,2001,84(5):1156-1165.  

[22] 李凌岩,何阳,汪先友,等.不同能量蛋白水平日粮对夏南牛瘤胃发酵、消化代谢及血液生理生化指标的影响[C]//2013中国反刍动物营养需要与饲料资源研讨会论文集.北京:中国畜牧兽医学会,2013:215-229.

[23] 张腾,庄苏,董文超,等.不同精粗比日粮对奶山羊瘤胃液pH值、VFA及血液VFA含量的影响[J].畜牧与兽医,2013,45(4):5-10.

[24] 翁秀秀.饲喂不同日粮奶牛瘤胃发酵和VFA吸收特性及其相关基因表达的研究[D].博士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2013.

[25] REYNOLDS C K,AIKMAN P C,LUPOLI B,et al.Splanchnic metabolism of dairy cows during the transition from late gestation through early lactation[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2003,86(4):1201-1217.  
文章导航

/