研究简报 Short Communications

不同粗饲料组合对宁夏滩羊生长性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所, 中国科学院亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室, 湖南省畜禽健康养殖工程技术 研究中心, 农业部中南动物营养与饲料科学观测实验站, 长沙 410125;
    2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100039;
    3. 中国科学院 遗传与发育生物学研究所, 北京 100190;
    4. 宁夏现代农业综合开发工程技术研究中心, 银川 750000;
    5. 宁夏回族自治区农业综合开发办公室, 银川 750000
马琴琴(1988—),女,宁夏固原人,硕士研究生,动物营养与分子生物专业。E-mail: 245054947@qq.com

收稿日期: 2014-12-30

  网络出版日期: 2015-06-17

基金资助

优质羊草种子繁育和种植技术示范推广(NTKJ-2013-03(1))

Effects of Different Roughage Combinations on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance and Meat Quality of Ningxia Tan Sheep

Expand
  • 1. Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South-Central, Ministry of Agriculture, Hunan Provincial Engineering Research Center of Healthy Livestock and Poultry, Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China;
    2. University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China;
    3. Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
    4. Modern Agriculture Comprehensive Development in Ningxia Engineering Technology Research Center, Yinchuan 750000, China;
    5. Ningxia Agricultural Comprehensive Development Office, Yinchuan 750000, China

Received date: 2014-12-30

  Online published: 2015-06-17

摘要

本试验旨在探讨不同粗饲料组合对宁夏滩羊生长性能、经济效益、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响。选用平均体重为(26.00±1.93) kg的宁夏母滩羊45只,按同质原则分为3组,每组3个重复,每个重复5只滩羊,3组精饲料相同,占饲粮60%,各组粗饲料分别为30%苜蓿+10%玉米秸秆(Ⅰ组)、15%苜蓿+15%"中科2号"羊草+10%玉米秸秆(Ⅱ组)、30%"中科2号"羊草+10%玉米秸秆(Ⅲ组)。试验期为60 d。结果表明,各试验组滩羊平均日增重均无显著差异(P>0.05),但Ⅱ组经济效益更高。各组屠宰性能指标亦无显著差异(P>0.05)。Ⅱ组系水力比Ⅰ组和Ⅲ组有显著的降低(P<0.05),分别下降了18.63%、19.99%;Ⅰ组剪切力最高,显著高于Ⅲ组(P<0.05),较Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组分别高出了6.41%、15.46%;肉样粗脂肪含量最高的是Ⅲ组,显著高于最低的Ⅰ组(P<0.05),分别较Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组高出了66.74%、14.06%。结果提示,"中科2号"羊草代替苜蓿饲喂滩羊,在不影响宁夏滩羊生长和屠宰性能的前提下,对滩羊肉品质的有一定程度改善,同时可以提高经济效益。

本文引用格式

马琴琴, 李铁军, 何流琴, 印遇龙, 段子渊, 蒙静, 武东坡 . 不同粗饲料组合对宁夏滩羊生长性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015 , 27(6) : 1936 -1942 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.06.033

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effects of different roughage combinations on growth performance, economic efficiency, slaughter performance and meat quality of Ningxia Tan sheep. Forty five Ningxia Tan ewes [(26.00±1.93) kg] were randomly divided into three groups with 3 replicates per group and 5 ewes per replicate according to homogeneous principle, the concentrate of different groups was the same and account for 60% in diet, and the roughage combinations were 30% alfalfa+10% maize straw (group Ⅰ), 15% alfalfa+15% Zhongke No.2 Leymus chinensis+10% maize straw (group Ⅱ) and 30% Zhongke No.2 Leymus chinensis+10% maize straw (group Ⅲ), respectively. The experiment lasted for 60 days. The results showed as follows: different roughage combinations did not cause any significant changes of average daily gain of Tan sheep (P>0.05), but the economic efficiency was the highest in group Ⅱ. The slaughter performance among three groups did not have significant difference (P>0.05). Water-holding capacity in group Ⅱ was significantly lower than that in groups Ⅰ and Ⅲ (P<0.05), and were reduced by 18.63% and 19.99%, respectively; shear force in group Ⅰ was significantly higher than that in group Ⅲ (P<0.05), and was increased by 6.41% and 15.46%, respectively, compared with that in groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ. Ether extract content in meat sample in group Ⅲ was significantly higher than that in group Ⅰ (P<0.05), and was increased by 66.74% and 14.06% respectively, compared with that in groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ. In conclusion, Zhongke No.2 Leymus chinensis replaced alfalfa to feed Ningxia Tan sheep can improve meat quality in a certain degree while improving economic efficiency without affecting growth performance and slaughter performance.

参考文献

[1] OLDHAM J D,BROSTER W H,NAPPER D J,et al.The effect of a low-protein ration on milk yield and Plasma metabolites in Friesian heifers during early lactation[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1979,42(l):149-162.

[2] 杨凤.动物营养学[M].2版.北京:中国农业出版社,1999:73-75.

[3] 马甜,王俊波,张治华,等.宁夏中部干旱带天然草地气候生产潜力研究[J].草地学报,2013,21(2):236-242.

[4] SAINI A L,KHAN B U,SINGH K.Growth performance of goats under three systems of feeding management [J].Indian Journal of Animal Sciences,1988,58:604-609.

[5] DHANADA J S.Evaluation of crossbred goat and sheep production in the tyopics[M].London:Longman Group Ltd.,2001.

[6] 贾志海,蔡青和,侯文娟,等.河北坝上地区羔羊育肥及屠宰试验[J].草地学报,2000,8(4):262-266.

[7] GALL C.Carcass composition[C]//Proceedings of the third international conference on goat production and diease.Tucson:Dairy Goat Journal Publication,1982:472-487.

[8] HOPKINS D L,FOGARTY N M,MENZIS D J.Differences in composition,muscularity,muscle:bone ratio and cut dimensions between six lamb genotypes[J].Meat Science,1997,45(4):439-450.  

[9] SANTOS-SILVA J,MENDES I A,BESSA R J B.The effect of genotype,feeding system and slaughter weight on the quality of light lambs:1.Growth,carcass composition and meat quality[J].Livestock Production Science,2002,76(1/2):17-25.

[10] 许东梅,周玉香,崔保国.宁夏黑绵羊肉质品质的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2003,39(4):32-33.

[11] 吴伟,邓波,孙飞舟,等.百日龄羔羊肉生产研究[J].吉林农业大学学报,2000,22(1):13-17.

[12] 陈韬,彭和禄,谭丽勤,等.龙陵黄山羊屠宰性能及肉质研究[J].云南农业大学学报,1996,11(3):162-167.

[13] 张克英,陈代文,罗献梅,等.饲粮理想蛋白水平对猪肉品质的影响[J].四川农业大学学报,2002,20(1):12-16.
文章导航

/