饲料营养 Feed Science and Technology

拔节期弱光胁迫对扬麦15麦秸营养成分和体外发酵的影响

展开
  • 南京农业大学动物科技学院消化道微生物实验室, 南京 210095
何香玉(1989—),女,四川成都人,硕士研究生,从事消化道微生物研究。E-mail:2012105077@njau.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2015-04-09

  网络出版日期: 2015-10-15

基金资助

公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200903003)

Effects of Shading in Filling Stage on Nutrient Composition and in Vitro Fermentation of Yangmai 15 Wheat Straw

Expand
  • Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

Received date: 2015-04-09

  Online published: 2015-10-15

摘要

本试验旨在研究拔节期弱光胁迫对扬麦15麦秸营养成分和体外发酵的影响。试验以弱筋小麦扬麦15为材料,在拔节期进行3个遮阴水平(0、50%、66%)和3个遮阴时间(2、4、8 d)的处理,小麦成熟收割时取麦秸进行营养成分分析并评定其体外降解率。结果表明:1)与0组相比,遮阴50%组和66%组显著降低了麦秸粗蛋白质含量(P<0.05),遮阴时间以及遮阴水平与遮阴时间交互作用对麦秸营养成分的影响均不显著(P>0.05)。2) 与0组相比,遮阴50%组和66%组显著降低麦秸干物质和中性洗涤纤维体外降解率(P<0.05),遮阴时间以及遮阴水平与遮阴时间交互作用对营养物质体外降解率的影响均不显著(P>0.05)。遮阴水平与遮阴时间的增加均降低了麦秸体外发酵产气量。遮阴时间的增加显著降低了总挥发性脂肪酸的产量(P<0.05),遮阴水平与遮阴时间的增加均显著降低了乙酸产量(P<0.05),且影响有交互作用(P<0.05),但对丙酸、丁酸产量和乙酸/丙酸无显著影响(P>0.05)。结果提示,拔节期遮阴处理降低了麦秸粗蛋白质含量、干物质和中性洗涤纤维体外降解率、产气量、总挥发性脂肪酸与乙酸产量,但对乙酸/丙酸没有影响;遮阴效果随时间与水平增加而增加。

本文引用格式

何香玉, 李袁飞, 成艳芬, 朱伟云 . 拔节期弱光胁迫对扬麦15麦秸营养成分和体外发酵的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015 , 27(10) : 3163 -3169 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.10.023

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of shading in filling stage on nutrient composition and in vitro fermentation of Yangmai 15 wheat straw.Yangmai 15 wheat straw was used as experimental material, and shading treatments were set as three shading levels (0, 50% and 66%) and three shading time (2, 4 and 8 d).The nutrient composition and in vitro disappearance rate of wheat straw were measured after harvested.The results showed as follows: 1) compared with 0 group, crude protein content in shading groups of 50% and 66% was significantly decreased (P<0.05).There were no significant effects of shading time and the interaction of level and time of shading on nutrient composition of wheat straw (P>0.05).2) compared with 0 group, in vitro disappearance rates of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber in shading groups of 50% and 66% were significantly decreased (P<0.05).There were no significant effects of shading time and the interaction of level and time of shading on in vitro disappearance rates of nutrients of wheat straw (P>0.05).Gas production was decreased by treatments of level and time of shading.Total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) yield was significantly decreased with the increase of shading time, acetate yield was significantly decreased with the increase of shading level and time (P<0.05), and there was significant interaction of shading level and time (P<0.05), however, propionate and butyrate yield, and acetate/propionate were not affected (P>0.05).In conclusion, with shading treatment, crude protein content, in vitro disappearance rates of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber, gas production, TVFA and acetate yield can be decreased, but acetate/propionate will not be affected; the effects enhanced with the increase of level and time of shading.

参考文献

[1] 刘建锋,杨文娟,江泽平,等.遮荫对濒危植物崖柏光合作用和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(20):5999-6004.

[2] 顾蕴倩,刘雪,张巍,等.灌浆期弱光逆境对小麦生长和产量影响的模拟模型[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(5):898-908.

[3] 郭翠花,高志强,苗果园.花后遮阴对小麦旗叶光合特性及籽粒产量和品质的影响[J].作物学报,2010,36(4):673-679.

[4] 中华人民共和国农业部.全国农作物秸秆资源调查与评价报告[J].农业工程技术:新能源产业,2011(2):3-5.

[5] 朱伟云.瘤胃微生物[M]//冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学.北京:科学出版社,2004:66-69.

[6] 冯丽肖,杜雄,张立峰.华北农牧交错带畜牧业外部经济效应解析[J].草业学报,2009,18(2):155-162.

[7] MEHREZ A Z,ØRSKOV E R.A study of artificial fibre bag technique for determining the dig estibility of feeds in the rumen[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1977,88(3):645-650.  

[8] 张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].2版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003:45-75.

[9] VAN SOEST P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597.  

[10] 马艳艳,成艳芬,朱伟云.体外发酵法评价不同产地、不同茬次苜蓿的营养价值[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(8):2421-2432.

[11] THEODOROU M K,WILLIAMS B A,DHANOA M S,et al.A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1994,48(3/4):185-197.

[12] 朱伟云,毛胜勇,王全军,等.厌氧真菌体外发酵筛选技术的研究[J].南京农业大学学报,2001,24(3):44-48.

[13] 秦为琳.应用气相色谱测定瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸方法的研究改进[J].南京农业大学学报,1982(4):110-116.

[14] 王一,杨文钰,张霞,等.不同生育时期遮阴对大豆形态性状和产量的影响[J].作物学报,2013,39(10):1871-1879.

[15] 李初英,孙祖东,陈怀珠,等.不同遮光胁迫对大豆产量性状及产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2006,25(3):294-298.

[16] 蔡昆争,骆世明.不同生育期遮光对水稻生长发育和产量形成的影响[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(2):193-196.

[17] 贾士芳,董树亭,王空军,等.弱光胁迫对玉米产量及光合特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2008,18(11):2456-2461.

[18] 张吉旺,董树亭,王空军,等.遮荫对夏玉米产量及生长发育的影响[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(4):657-662.

[19] 杨东,段留生,谢华安,等.不同生育期弱光对超级稻Ⅱ优航 2 号产量及品质的影响[J].福建农业学报,2013,28(2):107-112.

[20] 牟会荣,姜东,戴廷波,等.遮光对小麦植株氮素转运及品质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(7):1718-1724.

[21] 任万军,杨文钰,张国珍,等.弱光对杂交稻氮素积累、分配与子粒蛋白质含量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2003,9(3):288-293.

[22] GRASHOFF C,D'ANTUONO L F.Effect of shading and nitrogen application on yield,grain size distribution and concentrations of nitrogen and water soluble carbohydrates in malting spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)[J].European Journal of Agronomy,1997,6(3/4):275-293.

[23] 王祚,周传社,汤少勋,等.两种酵母对奶牛瘤胃体外发酵特性的影响[J].农业现代化研究,2014,35(2):218-224.

[24] 余苗,钟荣珍,周道玮,等.不同生育期虎尾草的体外发酵产气特性[J].草业科学,2014,31(5):956-964.

[25] 何香玉,马艳艳,成艳芬,等.体外发酵法评定不同茬次和生长年限苜蓿的营养价值[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(3):978-988.

[26] 马艳艳,李袁飞,成艳芬,等.不同化学处理对稻草体外发酵动态变化的影响[J].草业学报,2014,23(3):350-355.

[27] 冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:218-349.

[28] 汤少勋,姜海林,周传社,等.不同牧草品种对体外发酵产气特性的影响[J].草业学报,2005,14(3):72-77.

[29] NSAHLAI I V,SIAW D,OSUJI P O.The relationships between gas production and chemical composition of 23 browses of the genus Sesbania[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1994,65(1):13-20.  

[30] TAN Z L,LU D X,HU M,et al.Effect of dietary structural to nonstructural carbohydrate ratio on rumen degradability and digestibility of fiber fractions of wheat straw in sheep[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2002,15(11):1591-1598.  

[31] MAO H L,WANG J K,ZHOU Y Y,et al.Effects of addition of tea saponins and soybean oil on methane production,fermentation and microbial population in the rumen of growing lambs[J].Livestock Science,2010,129(1/2/3):56-62.

[32] DUBUC J,DUTREMBLAY D,BARIL J,et al.A field study on the effects of dietary monensin on milk production and milk composition in dairy cows[J].The Canadian Veterinary Journal,2010,51(4):375-379.

[33] TANG S X,TAN Z,ZHOU C,et al.A comparison of in vitro fermentation characteristics of different botanical fractions of mature maize stover[J].Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences,2006,15(3):505-515.

[34] KUMAR R,KAMRA D N,AGARWAL N,et al.In vitro methanogenesis and fermentation of feeds containing oil seed cakes with rumen liquor of buffalo[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2007,20(8):1196-1200.  
文章导航

/