动物营养学报 >

2016 , Vol. 28 >Issue 2: 436 - 443

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.02.017

反刍动物营养 Ruminant Nutrition

直接法与替代法测定羊草对肉用绵羊代谢能的比较研究

  • 赵明明 ,
  • 杨开伦 ,
  • 邓凯东 ,
  • 赵江波 ,
  • 肖怡 ,
  • 马涛 ,
  • 刁其玉
展开
  • 1. 新疆农业大学动物科学学院, 乌鲁木齐 830052;
    2. 中国农业科学院饲料研究所, 农业部饲料生物技术重点实验室, 北京 100081;
    3. 金陵科技学院动物科学与技术学院, 南京 210038

收稿日期: 2015-08-20

  网络出版日期: 2016-02-19

基金资助

秸秆饲料生物转化技术研究与示范(20120304202);国家肉羊产业技术体系(CARS-39)

收起

A Comparison on Metabolizable Energy of Leymus chinensis in Mutton Sheep Determined by Direct and Substitution Methods

  • ZHAO Mingming ,
  • YANG Kailun ,
  • DENG Kaidong ,
  • ZHAO Jiangbo ,
  • XIAO Yi ,
  • MA Tao ,
  • DIAO Qiyu
Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumchi 830052, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
    3. College of Animal Science, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 210038, China

Received date: 2015-08-20

  Online published: 2016-02-19

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在比较直接法和替代法测定羊草对肉用绵羊代谢能。选用体重约为45.00 kg的体况良好的杂交肉用羯羊30只,采用随机区组设计,分为5个处理,每个处理6个重复,每个重复1只羊,分别饲喂采用直接法的全羊草饲粮、用于替代法的基础饲粮(精粗比为1:1)和3个试验饲粮,3个试验饲粮分别以60%、40%、20%羊草替代基础饲粮。饲粮均于08:00、18:00各饲喂600 g。试验每期19 d,包括预试期10 d,正试期9 d。结果表明:干物质、有机物、总能、粗蛋白质表观消化率为基础饲粮组> 20%组> 40%组> 60%组>全羊草饲粮组,组间差异显著(P<0.05)。消化能与代谢能为基础饲粮组> 20%组> 40%组> 60%组>全羊草饲粮组,组间差异显著(P<0.05)。代谢能与消化能比各组饲粮差异不显著(P>0.05)。直接法和替代法对测定原料羊草的粗蛋白质、中性洗涤纤维表观消化率影响不显著(P>0.05)。直接法中全羊草饲粮组的羊草干物质、有机物、总能表观消化率显著高于60%组(P<0.05),而与40%组、20%组之间差异不显著(P>0.05)。全羊草饲粮组羊草的消化能和代谢能显著高于60%组(P<0.05),与40%组、20%组之间差异不显著(P>0.05)。综合得出,直接法与替代法在测定羊草的代谢能时,替代比例不同会对结果产生显著影响,在采用替代法测定羊草的代谢能时,最佳的替代比例为20%。

关键词： 直接法; 替代法; 代谢能估测; 肉用绵羊; 羊草

本文引用格式

赵明明 , 杨开伦 , 邓凯东 , 赵江波 , 肖怡 , 马涛 , 刁其玉 . 直接法与替代法测定羊草对肉用绵羊代谢能的比较研究[J]. 动物营养学报, 2016 , 28(2) : 436 -443 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.02.017

Abstract

This study aimed to compare metabolizable energy (ME) of Leymus chinensis in mutton sheep determined by direct and substitution methods. Thirty crossbreed rams weighted about 45.0 kg were used and divided into 5 treatments with 6 replicates per treatment and 1 sheep per replicate according to a randomized block design. The diets in different treatments were as follows:full Leymus chinensis diet for direct method, and a basal diet (forage:concentrate ratio was 1:1) and three experimental diets (the basal diet was replaced by Leymus chinensis at 60%, 40% and 20%) for substitution method. Diets were fed twice at 08:00 and 18:00 (600 g at each time point). Each experiment period lasted for 19 d including 10 d of pretest period and 9 d of test period. The results showed as follows:the apparent digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, gross energy and crude protein of showed that basal diet group> 20% group> 40% group> 60% group>full Leymus chinensis diet group, and significant differences were found among groups (P<0.05). The digestible energy (DE) and ME showed that basal diet group> 20% group> 40% group> 60% group> full Leymus chinensis diet group, and significant differences were found among groups (P<0.05). DM:ME had no significant difference among treatments (P>0.05). The apparent digestibility of crude protein and neutral detergent fiber had no difference between direct and substitutions methods. The apparent digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, and gross energy of Leymus chinensis in full Leymus chinensis diet group measured with direct method was significantly higher than those in 40% group (P<0.05), but had no significant difference with 20% group and 40% group (P>0.05). The DE and ME in full Leymus chinensis diet group were significantly higher than those in 60% group (P<0.05), and had no significant difference with 40% group and 20% group (P>0.05). In determination of ME of Leymus chinensis using direct and substitution methods, a significant difference is observed when the substitution proportion is different. The optimal substitution proportion is 20% when using substitution method to measure ME.

Key words： direct method; substitution method; metabolizable energy estimation; mutton sheep; Leymus chinensis

参考文献

[1] 蔡建森,刁其玉.舍饲肉羊的营养需要量[C]//2006中国羊业进展--第三届中国羊业发展大会论文集.兰州:第三届中国羊业发展大会,2006:255-259.
[2] 李婷婷.玉米DDGS营养价值预测模型研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2013.
[3] VILLAMIDE M J.Methods of energy evaluation of feed ingredients for rabbits and their accuracy[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1996,57(3):211-223.  
[4] SIBBALD I R. A bioassay for true metabolisable energy in feedingstuffs[J].Poultry Science,1976,55(1):303-308.  
[5] FARRELLD J.Rapid determination of metabolisable energy of foods using cockerels[J]. British Poultry Science,1978,19(3):303-308.  
[6] 常娟,尹清强,姜义宝,等.生物秸秆对肉鸡表观代谢能的影响及替代玉米适宜比例的研究[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(8):1557-1563.
[7] 刘德稳.生长猪常用七种饲料原料净能预测方程[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2014.
[8] 朱良.棉籽粕饲料猪DE评定及化学估测模型的研究[D].硕士学位论文.长沙:湖南农业大学,2011.
[9] NRC.Nutrient requirements of small ruminants:sheep,goats,cervids and new world camelids[S].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,2007.
[10] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2010.
[11] 杨嘉实,冯仰廉.畜禽能量代谢[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.
[12] ADEOLA O.Digestion and balance techniques in pigs[M]//LEWIS A J,SOUTHERN L L.Swine nutrition.2nd ed.Washington,D.C.:CRC Press,2001:903-916.
[13] 陶春卫.反刍动物常用粗饲料营养价值评定及其有效能值预测模型的建立[D].硕士学位论文.大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2009.
[14] 刘洁.肉用绵羊饲料代谢能与代谢蛋白质预测模型的研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2012.
[15] MCGEOUGH E J,O'KIELY P,HART K J,et al.Methane emissions feed intake performance digestibility and rumen fermentation of finishing beef cattle offered whole-crop wheat silages differing in grain content[J].Journal of Animal Science,2010,88(8):2703-2716.  
[16] ECKARD R J,GRAINGER C,DEKLEIN C A M.Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production:a review[J].Livestock Science,2010,130(1/2/3):47-56.
[17] TAMMINGA S.Nutrition management of dairy cows as a contribution to pollution control[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75(1):345-357.  
[18] 赵一广.肉用绵羊甲烷排放的测定与估测模型的建立[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2012.
[19] 张立涛.25-50 kg杜寒杂交F1代肉用绵羊日粮NDF适宜水平的研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2013.
[20] VALDÉS C,CARRO M D,RANILLA M J,et al.Effect of forage to concentrate ratio complete diets offered to sheep on voluntary food intake and some digestive parameters[J].Animal Science,2000,70(1):119-126.
[21] HILL F W,ANDERSON D L.Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determinations with growing chicks[J].The Journal of Nutrition,1958,64(4):587-603.
[22] BOLARINWA O A,ADEOLA O.Direct and regression methods do not give different estimates of digestible and metabolizable energy of wheat for pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science,2012,90(Suppl.4):390-392.
[23] 聂大娃.不同地区玉米肉仔鸡代谢能研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2008.
[24] AMMAR H,LÓPEZ S,GONZÁLEZ J S,et al.Seasonal variations in the chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of some Spanish leguminous shrub species[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2004,115(3/4):327-340.
[25] 姜芳.反刍动物常用饲料原料的营养价值评定及其变异度分析[D].硕士学位论文.杭州:浙江大学,2009.
[26] 邹彩霞,杨炳壮,罗荣太,等.应用体外产气法评定广西区内3种臂形草和2种坚尼草的营养价值[J].饲料工业,2011,32(19):45-48.
[27] 靳玲品.反刍动物常用粗饲料营养价值评定方法的比较研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2013.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2