研究简报 Short communications

不同酶及组合处理对青贮水稻秸秆微观结构的影响

展开
  • 1. 塔里木大学动物科学学院, 阿拉尔 843300;
    2. 中国农业科学院饲料研究所, 农业部饲料生物技术重点实验室, 北京 100081
王玉荣(1992-),女,新疆昌吉人,硕士研究生,从事动物营养与饲料科学研究。E-mail:wangyurong@live.com

收稿日期: 2016-09-03

  网络出版日期: 2017-04-14

基金资助

秸秆饲料生物转化技术研究与示范项目(20120304202);国家肉羊产业技术体系建设专项资金(CARS-39)

Effect of Different Enzymes and Their Combinations on Microstructure of Rice Straw Silage

Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 2016-09-03

  Online published: 2017-04-14

摘要

本试验以水稻秸秆为研究对象,采用高效降解纤维素酶进行青贮发酵处理,分析其对水稻秸秆微观结构的影响,旨在实现农作物秸秆的高效降解,提高其营养价值。设青贮对照(S组)、复合酶制剂处理(C组)、果胶酶+漆酶处理(PL组)、复合酶制剂+果胶酶+漆酶处理(CPL组)和原料(M组),各组采用袋装真空青贮。室温贮藏45 d后取样,采用实验室检测方法、苯酚硫酸法、4,4'二羧酸-2,2'-喹啉(BCA)法、近红外光谱(FTIR)、X-射线衍射和伊红美兰法分析不同酶或酶组合处理的水稻秸秆青贮饲料的营养成分含量、发酵品质及微观结构变化。结果表明:1)与S组相比,PL组、C组及CPL组的乳酸(LA)含量显著增加(P<0.05),pH、氨态氮/总氮及乙酸、纤维素含量均显著降低(P<0.05);CPL组、C组的粗蛋白质含量显著降低(P<0.05)。2)与S组相比,PL组青贮水稻秸秆的聚合度显著降低(P<0.05),降低幅度达30.26%,分子间氢键结合力减弱,结晶度与比表面积无显著变化(P>0.05);C组青贮水稻秸秆聚合度显著降低(P<0.05),降低幅度达27.11%,分子间氢键结合力减弱,结晶度与比表面积无显著变化(P>0.05);CPL组青贮水稻秸秆的聚合度显著降低(P<0.05),降低幅度达56.32%,分子间氢键结合力减弱,有降低结晶度和增加比表面积的趋势(P>0.05)。综上,CPL组降解纤维组分的效果最理想,能有效地破解细胞壁中木质素-纤维素-半纤维素复合结构,将纤维素降解为可利用的糖,提高水稻秸秆青贮饲料的营养含量,降低聚合度及结晶度,增大比表面积,从而提高秸秆的可消化性及利用率。

本文引用格式

王玉荣, 陶莲, 马涛, 石长青, 许贵善, 刁其玉 . 不同酶及组合处理对青贮水稻秸秆微观结构的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2017 , 29(4) : 1401 -1408 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.04.039

Abstract

In order to achieve the high-efficiency degradation of crop straw and improve its nutritional value, high efficient degrading enzymes for silage fermentation were used to investigate their effects of microstructure of rice straw silage. Silage control (S group), compound enzyme preparation treated (C group), pectinase+laccase treated (PL group), compound enzyme preparation+pectinase+laccase treated (CPL group) and raw material (M group) were used and samples were packaged by vacuum packager in polyethylene bags. After storing at room temperature for 45 d, changes of the silage quality and nutrients content were analyzed using laboratory testing methods, and changes of microstructure were analyzed using phehol-suffufic acid colorimetry, bicinchoninic acid disodium salt (BCA) method, fourier transform infared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction analysis and eosin-methylene blue method. The results showed as follows:1) compared with the S group, the lactic acid (LA) content in PL, C and CPL groups was significantly increased (P<0.05), the pH, ratio of ammonia nitrogen to total nitrogen and content of acetic acid and cellulose were significantly decreased (P<0.05); the crude protein (CP) content in C and CPL groups was significantly decreased (P<0.05). 2) Compared with the S group, the polymerization degree of rice straw silage in PL group was significantly decreased (P<0.05), which was lowered by 30.26%, the intermolecular hydrogen bond binding force was faded, and specific surface area and crystallinity did not change (P>0.05); the polymerization degree of rice straw silage in C group was significantly decreased (P<0.05), which was lowered by 27.11%, the intermolecular hydrogen bond binding force was faded, and specific surface area and crystallinity did not change (P>0.05); the polymerization degree of rice straw silage in CPL group was significantly decreased (P<0.05), which was lowered by 56.32%, the intermolecular hydrogen bond binding force was faded, and specific surface area and crystallinity trend increased (P>0.05). In conclusion, CPL group has the best effect, it can effectively break the lignin-cellulose-hemicellulose composite structure and cellulose degraded into available sugar, improve the nutrient content of rice straw silage fodder, reduce the degree of polymerization and the crystallinity, increase the specific surface area, so as to improve the digestibility and utilization of the straw.

参考文献

[1] 裴继诚.植物纤维化学[M].4版.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2012.

[2] 刘卢生,索朗次仁,玉永雄,等.氨化剂和氨化条件对水稻秸秆氨化的影响[J].饲料工业,2012,33(3):51-54.

[3] DING S Y,LIU Y S,ZENG Y N,et al.How does plant cell wall nanoscale architecture correlate with enzymatic digestibility[J].Science,2012,338(6110):1055-1060.  

[4] SARITHA M,ARORA A,LATA.Biological Pretreatment of lignocellulosic substrates for enhanced delignification and enzymatic digestibility[J].Indian Journal of Microbiology,2012,52(2):122-130.  

[5] 张立霞,刁其玉,李艳玲,等.利用生物制剂破解秸秆抗营养因子的研究进展[J].饲料工业,2013,34(5):21-26.

[6] 王玉荣,陶莲,许贵善,等.秸秆木质纤维素微观结构及其裂解方法[J].中国饲料,2016(12):38-41.

[7] 崔美,黄仁亮,苏荣欣,等.木质纤维素新型预处理与顽抗特性[J].化工学报,2012,63(3):677-687.

[8] 陶莲,刁其玉.青贮发酵对玉米秸秆品质及菌群构成的影响[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(1):198-207.

[9] HAN K J,COLLINS M,VANZANT E S,et al.Bale density and moisture effects on alfalfa round bale silage[J].Crop Science,2004,44(3):914-919.  

[10] BRODERICK G A,KANG J H.Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75.  

[11] 张丽英.饲料分析及质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2002:53-56,70-74.

[12] MASUKO T,MINAMI A,IWASAKI N,et al.Carbohydrate analysis by a phenol-sulfuric acid method in microplate format[J].Analytical Biochemistry,2005,339(1):69-72.  

[13] 肖琼,肖安风,姚德恒,等.琼胶酶水解工艺条件的优化及产物分析[J].中国食品学报,2015,15(12):99-106.

[14] AN Q D,ZHANG G L,WU H T,et al.Alginate-deriving oligosaccharide production by alginase from newly isolated Flavobacterium sp. LXA and its potential application in protection against pathogens[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology,2009,106(1):161-170.  

[15] CASTOLDI R,BRACHT A,MORAIS G R D,et al.Biological pretreatment of Eucalyptus grandis sawdust with white-rot fungi:study of degradation patterns and saccharification kinetics[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2014,258:240-246.

[16] MEYER L,JACQUET N,VANDERGHEM C,et al.Effect of steam explosion pre-treatment on enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic material[C]//Cost FP0602 final Meeting/Italic 6.Viterbo:COST,2011.

[17] 赵政,李旭.乳酸菌和纤维素酶对早籼稻秸秆青贮饲料品质的试验[J].饲料工业,2010,31(17):22-25.

[18] 赵国琦,丁健,贾亚红,等.纤维素酶对大黍青贮饲料品质的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2003,39(2):9-11.

[19] 李富国,张永根,夏科,等.绿汁发酵液和脱氢乙酸钠对水稻秸青贮发酵品质的影响[J].中国饲料,2011(22):20-23.

[20] 王兴刚.添加乳酸菌与酶制剂对稻秸青贮品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.南京:南京农业大学,2013.

[21] VAN KUIJK S J A,SONNENBERG A S M,BAARS J J P,et al.Fungal treated lignocellulosic biomass as ruminant feed ingredient:a review[J].Biotechnology Advances,2015,33(1):191-202.  

[22] 吕文龙,刁其玉,闫贵龙.不同添加剂对不带穗玉米秸秆青贮发酵品质的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2010,37(3):22-26.

[23] NKOSI B D,MEESKE R,PALIC D,et al.Laboratory evaluation of an inoculant for ensiling whole crop maize in South Africa[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2009,150(1/2):144-150.

[24] 李龙兴.西藏主要农作物秸秆与牧草混合青贮的研究[D].硕士学位论文.南京:南京农业大学,2013.

[25] 王力生,齐永玲,陈芳,等.不同添加剂对笋壳青贮品质和营养价值的影响[J].草业学报,2013,22(5):326-332.

[26] ZHANG M F,QIN Y H,MA J Y,et al.Depolymerization of microcrystalline cellulose by the combination of ultrasound and Fenton reagent[J].Ultrasonics Sonochemistry,2016,31:404-408.

[27] 冯冲凌.黄孢原毛平革菌及其关键功能酶对木质纤维素降解转化特性的研究[D].博士学位论文.长沙:湖南大学,2011.

[28] 柳珊,吴树彪,张万钦,等.白腐真菌预处理对玉米秸秆厌氧发酵产甲烷影响实验[J].农业机械学报,2013,44(增刊2):124-129,142.

[29] 唐洪涛,王锋,李伟明,等.γ射线辐照与NaOH溶液协同预处理对玉米秸秆酶解产糖率及微观结构的影响[J].核农学报,2012,26(3):535-542.

[30] DAI Y Z,SI M Y,CHEN Y H,et al.Combination of biological pretreatment with NaOH/Urea pretreatment at cold temperature to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of rice straw[J].Bioresource Technology,2015,198:725-731.

[31] WANG F Q,XIE H,CHEN W,et al.Biological pretreatment of corn stover with ligninolytic enzyme for high efficient enzymatic hydrolysis[J].Bioresource Technology,2013,144:572-578.

[32] LEE J W,GWAK K S,PARK J Y,et al.Biological pretreatment of softwood Pinus densiflora by three white rot fungi[J].Journal of Microbiology,2007,45(6):485-491.

[33] PANDEY K K,PITMAN A J.Examination of the lignin content in a softwood and a hardwood decayed by a brown-rot fungus with the acetyl bromide method and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy[J].Journal of Polymer Science Part A:Polymer Chemistry,2004,42(10):2340-2346.  
文章导航

/