动物营养学报 >

2017 , Vol. 29 >Issue 11: 4058 - 4068

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.11.027

研究简报 Short Communications

大豆低聚糖及其功能组分对体外条件下肉仔鸡盲肠内容物粪臭素产量及菌群组成的影响

展开
  • 沈阳农业大学畜牧兽医学院, 沈阳 110866
杨桂芹(1966-),女,辽宁凌源人,教授,博士,从事家禽营养与饲料科学研究。E-mail:guiqiny@126.com

收稿日期: 2017-04-09

  网络出版日期: 2017-10-31

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目（31372328）

收起

Effects of Soybean Oligosaccharide and Its Functional Components on Skatole Production and Microbiota Composition of Broilers Cecal Contents in Vitro

Expand
  • College of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China

Received date: 2017-04-09

  Online published: 2017-10-31

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在研究大豆低聚糖（SBO）及其功能组分对体外条件下肉仔鸡盲肠内容物粪臭素产量及菌群组成的影响。试验采用单因素完全随机设计，以42日龄肉仔鸡盲肠内容物为菌源，将厌氧培养液分装于无菌培养瓶中，分成5个组，每组3个重复。对照组添加250 μmol/L的L-色氨酸，蔗糖（SUC）、水苏糖（STA）、棉籽糖（RAF）和SBO组分别在对照组的基础上添加1%的SUC、STA、RAF和SBO。另外，每组均设1个不加L-色氨酸但其他成分都相同的空白对照。利用ANKOM RFS体外产气系统，39℃厌氧培养24 h。采用PCR-变性梯度胶凝电泳（DGGE）技术研究了发酵液菌群组成的差异。结果表明：1） SUC、STA、SBO组24 h发酵液累积产气量极显著高于对照组和RAF组（P<0.01）；SBO、SUC和STA组吲哚浓度分别比对照组降低了98.15%、97.72%和94.17%（P<0.01），粪臭素浓度分别比对照组降低了79.04%、71.88%和70.28%（P<0.05）；SUC组乳酸浓度极显著高于其他各组（P<0.01）；对照组pH极显著高于除RAF组之外的其他各组（P<0.01）。2） SBO组菌群均匀度显著低于对照组（P<0.05）；SUC、STA、RAF、SBO组菌群丰富度显著高于对照组（P<0.05）；SBO、STA、RAF组菌群相似性高于对照组；试验组有3条特异性条带，相似菌分别为延长布劳特氏菌（Blautia producta）、迪氏副拟杆菌（Parabacteroides distasonis）、路氏乳杆菌（Lactobacillus reuteri）。综上，在本试验条件下，添加1%的SUC、STA和SBO显著降低了肉仔鸡体外盲肠内容物培养液中L-色氨酸代谢生成吲哚和粪臭素的浓度，提高了菌群丰富度，并促进了特异性菌的增殖。降低粪臭素效果优劣依次为SBO、SUC、STA。

关键词： 粪臭素; 大豆低聚糖; 盲肠菌群; 体外发酵; 肉仔鸡

本文引用格式

杨桂芹, 杨航, 刘吉喆, 刘海英, 董维国, 朱鑫 . 大豆低聚糖及其功能组分对体外条件下肉仔鸡盲肠内容物粪臭素产量及菌群组成的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2017 , 29(11) : 4058 -4068 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.11.027

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of soybean oligosaccharide (SBO) and its functional components on skatole production and microbiota composition of broilers cecal contents in vitro. This experiment used a single-factor completely randomized design, the 42 days of age broiler cecal contents was used as bacterial source, and the anaerobic culture medium was divided into sterile culture bottles, and divided into 5 groups with 3 replicates per group. The control group was added 250 μmol/L L-tryptophan, sucrose (SUC), stachyose (STA), raffinose (RAF) and SBO groups were supplemented with 1% SUC, STA group RAF and SBO on the basis of control group, respectively. In addition, each group also had a blank control which L-tryptophan was absent and the other components were the same. Microbial suspensions were anaerobically incubated at 39℃ for 24 h using ANKOM RFS gas production system in vitro. The microbiota composition in fermentation broth were analyzed by PCR-denatured gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). The results showed as follows:1) the 24 h cumulative gas production in fermentation broth in SUC, STA and SBO groups was significantly higher than that in control and RAF groups (P<0.01). Compared with the control group, the indole concentration in fermentation broth in SBO, SUC, and STA groups was significantly reduced by 98.15%, 97.72% and 94.17%, respectively (P<0.01), and the skatole concentration was significantly reduced by 79.04%, 71.88% and 70.28%, respectively (P<0.05). The lactate concentration in fermentation broth in SUC group was significantly higher than that in the other groups (P<0.01), and pH in the control group was significantly higher than that in the other groups except for the RAF group (P<0.01). 2) The microbiota evenness in fermentation broth in SBO group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and the microbiota richness in SUC, STA, RAF and SBO groups was significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05). The microbiota similarity in fermentation broth in SBO, STA and RAF groups was higher than that in control group. Three specific bands were present only in experimental groups, the similar strain were Blautia producta, Parabacteroides distasonis, and Lactobacillus reuteri, respectively. In conclusion, under the present experimental condition, addition 1% SUC, STA, and SBO in broiler cecal contents culture medium significantly decreases the concentrations of indole and skatole by metabolism of L-tryptophan, improves the microbiota richness, and promotes the proliferation of specific bacteria. The effect of skatole reduction is as follow:SBO > SUC > STA.

Key words： skatole; soybean oligosaccharide; cecal microbiota; fermentation in vitro; broilers

参考文献

[1] 刘国华,蔡辉益,常文环,等.肉鸡环保型日粮生产与应用技术研究进展[J].中国家禽,2015,37(4):40-42.

[2] BEIER R C,ANDERSON R C,KRUEGER N A,et al.Effect of nitroethane and nitroethanol on the production of indole and 3-methylindole (skatole) from bacteria in swine feces by gas chromatography[J].Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B,2009,44(6):613-620.  

[3] JENSEN R L.Feed interventions and skatole deposition[D].Copenhagen,Denmark:University of Copenhagen,2012:1-18.

[4] ZAMARATSKAIA G,SQUIRES E J.Biochemical,nutritional and genetic effects on boar taint in entire male pigs[J].Animal,2009,3(11):1508-1521.  

[5] 张沛.肉仔鸡粪臭素产生的基本规律及与肠道微生物组成的变化关系研究[D].硕士学位论文.沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2016.

[6] 胥九兵,刘海玉,李克文,等.高纯度功能性低聚糖的生产及应用[J].精细与专用化学品,2013,21(4):10-12.

[7] COON C N,LESKE K L,AKAVANICHAN O,et al.Effect of oligosaccharide-free soybean meal on true metabolizable energy and fiber digestion in adult roosters[J].Poultry Science,1990,69(5):787-793.  

[8] LI C Y,LIU J X,WANG Y Z,et al.Influence of differing carbohydrate sources on L-tryptophan metabolism by porcine fecal microbiota studied in vitro[J].Livestock Science,2009,120(1/2):43-50.

[9] 盛清凯,成建国,赵红波,等.外源L-色氨酸、果聚糖、酪蛋白对猪粪发酵液粪臭素浓度的影响[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(9):2797-2804.

[10] YANG G Q,YIN Y,LIU H Y,et al.Effects of dietary oligosaccharide supplementation on growth performance,concentrations of the major odor-causing compounds in excreta,and the cecal microflora of broilers[J].Poultry Science,2016,95(10):2342-2351.  

[11] 侯瑞.菊糖和大豆寡糖对体外条件下肉仔鸡粪臭素产量及肠道菌群的影响[D].硕士学位论文.沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2015.

[12] 姚立虎,徐茜.蒽酮比色法测食品总糖含量的简化研究[J].食品工业,1992(3):40-42.

[13] YOKOYAMA M T,CARLSON J R.Dissimilation of tryptophan and related indolic compounds by ruminal microorganisms in vitro[J].Applied Microbiology,1974,27(3):540-548.

[14] ALAM M J,JEONG C D,MAMUAD L L,et al.Bacterial community dynamics during swine in vitro fermentation using starch as a substrate with different feed additives for odor reduction[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2012,25(5):690-700.  

[15] 赵兴涛,徐桂转,刘杰博,等.气相色谱法测定厌氧发酵液中挥发性脂肪酸的研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2013,47(5):584-586,591.

[16] JENSEN B B,JØRGENSEN H.Effect of dietary fiber on microbial activity and microbial gas production in various regions of the gastrointestinal tract of pigs[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1994,60(6):1897-1904.

[17] LAN Y,WILLIAMS B A,VERSTEGEN M W A,et al.Soy oligosaccharides in vitro fermentation characteristics and its effect on caecal microorganisms of young broiler chickens[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2007,133(3/4):286-297.

[18] 易中华,朱年华,黎观红,等.肉仔鸡盲肠微生物体外发酵NDO和NSP的比较研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2012,34(2):345-350.

[19] APAJALAHTI J,VIENOLA K.Interaction between chicken intestinal microbiota and protein digestion[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2016,221:323-330.

[20] TREMAROLI V,BÄCKHED F.Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism[J].Nature,2012,489(7415):242-249.  

[21] 马曦,韩萌,李德发.猪肠道微生物代谢与思考[C]//中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第十二次动物营养学术研讨会论文集.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2016:3-14.

[22] LAN Y,WILLIAMS B A,TAMMINGA S,et al.In vitro fermentation kinetics of some non-digestible carbohydrates by the caecal microbial community of broilers[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2005,123/124:687-702.

[23] MACFARLANE G T,ALLISON C,GIBSON S A W,et al.Contribution of the microflora to proteolysis in the human large intestine[J].Journal of Applied Bacteriology,1998,64(1):37-46.

[24] HAYAKAWA K,MIZUTANI J,WADA K,et al.Effects of soybean oligosaccharides on human faecal flora[J].Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease,1990,3(6):293-303.  

[25] 王琪,管倩侽,杨桂芹,等.饲粮添加菊糖对肉仔鸡生长性能、排泄物及肠道主要臭气化合物浓度的影响[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(12):3875-3884.

[26] 胡彩虹,俞颂东,许梓荣.猪粪便细菌群作用下3-甲基吲哚(粪臭素)和吲哚形成的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2002,38(5):10-11.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2