禽营养 Poultry nutrition

前后期饲粮不同粉碎粒度组合对肉鸡生长性能的影响

展开
  • 1. 中国农业科学院饲料研究所, 北京 100081;
    2. 农业部饲料生物技术重点实验室, 北京 100081;
    3. 上海新农饲料股份有限公司, 上海 201600;
    4. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所, 北京 100193
葛春雨(1994-),女,内蒙古呼伦贝尔人,硕士研究生,从事饲料加工与动物营养研究。E-mail:gechunyucaas@163.com

收稿日期: 2017-05-12

  网络出版日期: 2017-12-04

基金资助

北京市家禽产业创新团队项目(BAIC04-2017);公益性行业(农业)科研专项"饲料高效低耗加工技术研究与示范"(201203015)

Effects of Different Diet Particle Size Combinations on Growth Performance of Broilers in Early and Later Periods

Expand
  • 1. Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
    2. The key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China;
    3. Shanghai Xinnong Feed Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201600, China;
    4. Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2017-05-12

  Online published: 2017-12-04

摘要

本试验旨在研究不同粉碎粒度对饲料加工质量的影响以及肉鸡不同粉碎粒度饲粮对不同生长阶段肉鸡生长性能的影响。选用864只1日龄白羽爱拔益加(AA)肉鸡,随机分为6组,每组8个重复,每个重复18只鸡,进行为期42 d的饲养试验,分为前期(1~21日龄)和后期(22~42日龄)2个阶段。前、后期饲粮分别采用1.5、2.0和2.5 mm筛片孔径进行粉碎,每个筛片孔径设4个重复。前期设3个组,1.5 mm组设24个重复,2.0 mm组设16个重复,2.5 mm组设8个重复;后期设6个组,将前期1.5 mm组平均分为3个组,2.0 mm组平均分为2个组,2.5 mm组不变,每组8个重复。结果表明:1)饲料的几何平均粒径随着筛片孔径的增加而增加,其中2.5 mm组的几何平均粒径显著大于1.5和2.0 mm组(P<0.05);颗粒耐久性指数(PDI)、颗粒硬度和淀粉糊化度随着筛片孔径的增加而降低,其中1.5 mm组的PDI和颗粒硬度显著大于2.0和2.5 mm组(P<0.05);随着筛片孔径的增加,各组饲料的粗蛋白质体外消化率无显著差异(P>0.05)。2)1~21日龄时,2.0 mm组的21日龄平均体重、平均日采食量和平均日增重均为最高。22~42日龄时,前期2.0 mm、后期2.5 mm组的42日龄平均体重和平均日增重最高,料重比最低;前期1.5 mm、后期2.5 mm组的平均日采食量最高。综合以上结果,前期2.0 mm、后期2.5 mm组的生长性能最好。所以,肉鸡前期饲粮采用筛片孔径为2.0 mm、后期饲粮采用筛片孔径为2.5 mm进行粉碎,生长性能最佳。

本文引用格式

葛春雨, 李军国, 段海涛, 于纪宾, 于治芹, 孙杰, 秦玉昌 . 前后期饲粮不同粉碎粒度组合对肉鸡生长性能的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2017 , 29(12) : 4342 -4348 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.12.014

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of different particle sizes on feed processing quality and growth performance of broilers at different growth stages. Eight hundred and sixty four one-day-old white feather Arbor Acres (AA) broilers were randomly divided into 6 groups with 8 replicates per group and 18 boilers per replicate. The experiment lasted for 42 days consisting of early period (1 to 21 days of age) and later period (22 to 42 days of age) two periods. The diets of early period and later period were grinded by 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mm mesh size of screen, respectively, and 4 replicates were set per mesh size of screen. Three groups were set in early period, twenty four replicates were set in 1.5 mm group, sixteen replicates were set in 2.0 mm group, and eight replicates were set in 2.5 mm group. Six groups were set in later period, 1.5 mm group was divided into 3 equal groups, 2.0 mm group was divided into 2 equal groups, and 2.5 mm group was the same, eight replicates were set per group. The results showed as follows:1) geometric mean particle size of feeds was increased with the increase of mesh size of screen, and geometric mean particle size in 2.5 mm group was significantly higher than that in 1.5 and 2.0 groups (P<0.05). Particle durability index (PDI), particle hardness and starch gelatinization degree were decreased with the increase of mesh size of screen, and PDI and particle hardness in 1.5 mm group were significantly higher than those in 2.0 and 2.5 groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in crude protein digestibility in vitro of feeds among all group with the increase of mesh size of screen (P>0.05). 2) Average body weight at 21 days of age, average daily feed intake (ADFI) and average daily gain (ADG) in 2.0 mm group were the highest from 1 to 21 days of age. Average body weight at 42 days of age and ADG in 2.0 mm in early period and 2.5 mm in later period group were the highest and the ratio of feed to gain was the lowest, and ADFI in 1.5 mm in early period and 2.5 mm in later period group was the highest from 22 to 42 days of age. The results show that growth performance in 2.0 mm in early period and 2.5 mm in later period group is the best. Thus, the diets are grinded by 2.0 mm mesh size of screen in early period and 2.5 mm mesh size of screen in later period to get the best growth performance of broilers.

参考文献

[1] 陈道仁.饲料粉碎粒度对饲料品质的影响[J].湖南饲料,2002(2):30-31.

[2] 王卫国.饲料粉碎粒度最新研究进展[J].粮食与饲料工业,2001(11):16-19.

[3] 王卫国.饲料粉碎粒度对营养价值·动物生产性能的影响及粉碎成本的控制[J].饲料工业,1999(10):9-13.

[4] NIR L,HILLEL R,PTICHI I,et al. Effect of particle size on performance:3.grinding pelleting interactions[J].Poultry Science,1995,74(5):771-783.  

[5] RIBERO A M L,MAGRO N,PENZ AM.Corn particle size on broiler grower diets and its effect on performance and metabolism[J].Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avicola,2002,4(1):47-53.  

[6] 张现玲,段海涛,倪海球,等.调质温度和粉碎粒度对肉鸡生长性能及养分表观利用率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(7):2052-2059.

[7] 中国机械工业联合会.GB/T 6971-2007饲料粉碎机试验方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.

[8] 顾君华.饲料检验化验员[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2010:89-90.

[9] 韩广振.颗粒饲料耐久性指数测试仪及其在饲料品质检测中的应用[J].饲料与畜牧:新饲料,2011(3):26-30

[10] 熊易强.饲料淀粉糊化度(熟化度)的测定[J].饲料工业,2000,21(3):30-31.

[11] 全国饲料工业标准化技术委员会.GB/T 6432-1994饲料中粗蛋白质测定方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社.1994.

[12] 王卫国,付旺宁,黄吉新,等.饲料粉碎粒度与能耗及蛋白质体外蛋白质体外消化率的研究[J].饲料工业,2001,22(10):33-37.

[13] 李忠平.粉碎粒度对饲料加工生产性能的影响[J].饲料工业,2001,22(4):5-7.

[14] 谢正军,易炳权.蒸汽与调质[J].中国饲料,2002(11):26-27,29.

[15] 段海涛,秦玉昌,于纪宾,等.粉碎粒度对生长猪颗粒饲料加工质量及其生长性能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2015,(07):2038-2043.

[16] 张亮,杨在宾,杨维仁,等.制粒温度和粉碎粒度对颗粒饲料品质的影响[J].饲料工业,2013,34(23):25-29.

[17] 王卫国,李石强,张磊,等.六种饲料原料粉碎粒度与蛋白质溶解度关系研究[J].饲料工业,2002,23(5):6-8.

[18] 程译锋,袁信华,过世东.加工对饲料蛋白质体外消化率和糊化度的影响[J].中国粮油学报,2009,24(2):125-128.

[19] 吕明斌,燕磊,安沙,等.饲料粉碎粒度和调质温度对肉鸡养分消化率及生长性能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(10):3122-3128.

[20] RENNCE F N,LOTT B D,DEATON J W.The effects of hammer mill screen size on ground corn particle size,pellet durability,and broiler performance[J].Poultry Science,1986,65(7):1257-1261.  

[21] 张惠玲,ZIGGERS D.饲料颗粒大小对蛋鸡的重要性[J].国外畜牧学,1999(5):27-28.
文章导航

/