饲料营养 Feed science and technology

饲粮菊糖添加水平对肉仔鸡盲肠、直肠菌群结构及主要菌群数量的影响

展开
  • 沈阳农业大学畜牧兽医学院, 沈阳 110866
杨桂芹(1966-),女,辽宁凌源人,教授,博士,从事家禽营养与饲料科学研究。E-mail:guiqiny@126.com

收稿日期: 2017-06-05

  网络出版日期: 2017-12-04

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31372328)

Effects of Inulin Supplemental Level on Microbial Community Structure and Main Microbial Populations in Cecum and Rectum of Broilers

Expand
  • College of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China

Received date: 2017-06-05

  Online published: 2017-12-04

摘要

本试验旨在研究饲粮菊糖添加水平对肉仔鸡盲肠和直肠菌群结构和主要菌群数量的影响。采用单因素完全随机化设计,选用300只1日龄爱拔益加肉仔鸡,随机分成5组,每组6个重复,每个重复10只。5组肉仔鸡分别饲喂在基础饲粮中添加0(对照组)、0.5、1.5、2.5和5.0 g/kg菊糖的试验饲粮。试验期为6周。采用PCR-变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)和定量PCR(qPCR)技术对42日龄肉仔鸡盲肠和直肠菌群结构及主要菌群数量进行测定。结果表明:1)饲粮菊糖添加水平对肉仔鸡盲肠和直肠菌群丰富度、盲肠菌群香农指数以及直肠菌群均匀度均无显著影响(P>0.05),但显著降低了盲肠菌群均匀度和直肠菌群香农指数(P<0.05)。PCR-DGGE图谱上部分优势条带序列分析表明,饲粮添加菊糖促进了肉仔鸡盲肠和直肠厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)中产粪甾醇真细菌(Eubacterium coprostanoligenes)、肠单胞球菌(Intestinimonas sp.)和盲肠肠球菌(Enterococcus cecorum)等细菌的增殖。2)饲粮菊糖添加水平显著影响了肉仔鸡盲肠、直肠总细菌和大肠杆菌数量(P<0.05)。二次曲线分析显示,当菊糖添加水平分别为2.71和2.66 g/kg时,盲肠总细菌和大肠杆菌数量最少;与对照组相比,饲粮添加1.5、2.5、5.0 g/kg菊糖显著降低了盲肠乳酸菌数量(P<0.05),饲粮添加0.5 g/kg菊糖显著增加了直肠乳酸菌数量(P<0.05);饲粮添加5.0 g/kg菊糖时肉仔鸡盲肠、直肠双歧杆菌数量及直肠产气荚膜梭菌数量均为最高,且与对照组差异显著(P<0.05)。综上,在本试验条件下,有利于改善肉仔鸡肠道菌群结构和促进有益菌增殖的菊糖添加水平为2.5~5.0 g/kg。

本文引用格式

杨桂芹, 王琪, 刘海英, 董维国, 朱鑫 . 饲粮菊糖添加水平对肉仔鸡盲肠、直肠菌群结构及主要菌群数量的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2017 , 29(12) : 4408 -4418 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.12.021

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to study the effects of inulin supplemental level on microbial community structure and main microbial populations in cecum and rectum of broilers. Three hundred 1-day-old Arbor Acres broilers were selected and randomly distributed into five groups with six replicates per group and ten broilers per replicate by single-factor completely random design. Broilers in those five groups were fed a basal diet supplemented with 0 (control group), 0.5, 1.5, 2.5 and 5.0 g/kg inulin, respectively. The experiment lasted for 6 weeks. The microbial community structure and the main microbial populations in cecum and rectum of 42-day-old broilers were measured using the PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) techniques. The results showed as follows:1) inulin supplemental level had no significant effects on the cecal and rectal microbial richness, the cecal microbial Shannon-Wiener index and the rectal microbial evenness of broilers (P>0.05), but significantly decreased the cecal microbial evenness and rectal microbial Shannon-Wiener index (P<0.05). Based on the analysis of some dominant bands in PCR-DGGE fingerprint, diet supplemented with inulin promoted the growth of Eubacterium coprostanoligenes, Intestinimonas sp., Enterococcus cecorum and so on from Firmicutes in cecum and rectum of broilers. 2) Diet supplemented with inulin significantly affected the populations of total bacteria and Escherichia coli in cecum and rectum of broilers (P<0.05). Quadratic curve analysis showed that the populations of total bacteria and Escherichia coli were the fewest in cecum of broilers when inulin supplemental levels were 2.71 and 2.66 g/kg, respectively. Compared with control group, diet supplemented with 1.5, 2.5 and 5.0 g/kg inulin significantly decreased the population of cecal Lactobacillus (P<0.05), while diet supplemented with 0.5 g/kg inulin significantly increased the population of rectal Lactobacillus (P<0.05). The populations of cecal and rectal Bifidobacteria and rectal Clostridium perfringens were the most when diet supplemented with 5.0 g/kg inulin, and the differences were significant compared with control group (P<0.05). Thus, results from the current study suggest that supplementation of 2.5 to 5.0 g/kg inulin to basal diet may have the beneficial effects on improving the microbial community and promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria in intestine of broilers under this experimental condition.

参考文献

[1] 马曦,韩萌,李德发.猪肠道微生物代谢与思考[C]//中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第十二次动物营养学术研讨会论文集.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2016:3-14.

[2] DANKOWIAKOWSKA A,KOZ?OWSKA I,BEDNARCZYK M.Probiotics,prebiotics and snybiotics in poultry-mode of action,limitation,and achievements[J].Journal of Central European Agriculture,2013,14(1):467-478.  

[3] BUC?AW M.The use of inulin in poultry feeding:a review[J].Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition,2016,100(6):1015-1022.  

[4] 孙瑞锋,步长英,李同树.菊糖和枯草芽孢杆菌对肉鸡肠道菌群数量及排泄物氨气散发量的影响[J].华北农学报,2008,23(S1):252-256.

[5] REBOLÉ A,ORTIZ L T,RODRÍGUEZ M L,et al.Effects of inulin and enzyme complex,individually or in combination,on growth performance,intestinal microflora,cecal fermentation characteristics,and jejunal histomorphology in broiler chickens fed a wheat and barley-based diet[J].Poultry Science,2010,89(2):276-286.  

[6] VHILE S G,KJOS N P,SØRUM H,et al.Feeding jerusalem artichoke reduced skatole level and changed intestinal microbiota in the gut of entire male pigs[J].Animal,2012,6(5):807-814.  

[7] REHMAN H,HELLWEG P,TARAS D,et al.Effects of dietary inulin on the intestinal short chain fatty acids and microbial ecology in broiler chickens as revealed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis[J].Poultry Science,2008,87(4):783-789.  

[8] 王琪,管倩侽,杨桂芹,等.饲粮添加菊糖对肉仔鸡生长性能、排泄物及肠道主要臭气化合物浓度的影响[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(12):3875-3884.

[9] 张沛.肉仔鸡粪臭素产生的基本规律及与肠道微生物组成的变化关系研究[D].硕士学位论文.沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2016.

[10] YANG G Q,YIN Y,LIU H Y,et al.Effects of dietary oligosaccharide supplementation on growth performance,concentrations of the major odor-causing compounds in excreta,and the cecal microflora of broilers[J].Poultry Science,2016,95(10):2342-2351.  

[11] 侯瑞.菊糖和大豆寡糖对体外条件下肉仔鸡粪臭素产量及肠道菌群的影响[D].硕士学位论文.沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2015.

[12] LOPES M,ROLL V F B,LEITE F L,et al.Quicklime treatment and stirring of different poultry litter substrates for reducing pathogenic bacteria counts[J].Poultry Science,2013,92(3):638-644.  

[13] DE PAIVA J B,LEITE J L,DA SILVA L P M,et al.Influence of the major nitrite transporter NirC on the virulence of a Swollen Head Syndrome Avian Pathogenic E. coli (APEC) strain[J].Veterinary Microbiology,2015,175(1):123-131.  

[14] HAJATI H,REZAEI M.The application of prebiotics in poultry production[J].International Journal of Poultry Science,2010,9(3):298-304.  

[15] 林晨.菊粉对断奶仔猪和肉仔鸡后肠微生物作用的研究[D].硕士学位论文.武汉:华中农业大学,2004.

[16] NABIZADEH A.The effect of inulin on broiler chicken intestinal microflora,gut morphology,and performance[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,,2012,21(4):725-734.  

[17] ZHAO P Y,WANG J P,KIM I H.Effect of dietary levan fructan supplementation on growth performance,meat quality,relative organ weight,cecal microflora,and excreta noxious gas emission in broilers[J].Journal of Animal Science,2013,91(11):5287-5293.  

[18] KAREEM K Y,LOH T C,FOO H L,et al.Effects of dietary postbiotic and inulin on growth performance, IGF1 and GHR mRNA expression,faecal microbiota and volatile fatty acids in broilers[J].BMC Veterinary Research,2016,12:163.

[19] BIGGS P,PARSONS C M,FAHEY G C.The effects of several oligosaccharides on growth performance,nutrient digestibilities,and cecal microbial populations in young chicks[J].Poultry Science,2007,86(11):2327-2336.  

[20] ABDEL-RAHEEM S M,ABD-ALLAH S M S,HASSANEIN K M A.The effects of prebiotic,probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on intestinal microbial ecology and histomorphology of broiler chickens[J].International Journal for Agro Veterinary and Medical Sciences,2012,6(4):277-289.  

[21] ABDELQADER A,AL-FATAFTAH A R,DA Ç G,et al.Effects of dietary Bacillus subtilis and inulin supplementation on performance,eggshell quality,intestinal morphology and microflora composition of laying hens in the late phase of production[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2013,179(1/2/3/4):103-111.

[22] SAMANTA A K,SENANI S,KOLTE A P,et al.Effect of prebiotic on digestibility of total mixed ration[J].Indian Veterinary Journal,2012,89(1):41-42.

[23] MIREMADI F,SHAH N P.Applications of inulin and probiotics in health and nutrition[J].International Food Research Journal,2012,19(4):1337-1350.

[24] SAMANTA A K,JAYAPAL N,SENANI S,et al.Prebiotic inulin:useful dietary adjuncts to manipulate the livestock gut microflora[J].Brazilian Journal of Microbiology,2013,44(1):1-14.  
文章导航

/