枯草芽孢杆菌对围产期母猪繁殖性能和子代生长的影响

韩丽, 孔祥峰, 赵越, 解培峰, 高乾坤, 章文明, 印遇龙, 王占彬

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.12.024

动物营养学报 >

2017 , Vol. 29 >Issue 12: 4440 - 4446

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.12.024

饲料营养 Feed science and technology

枯草芽孢杆菌对围产期母猪繁殖性能和子代生长的影响

展开

1. 河南科技大学, 动物科技学院, 洛阳 471003;
2. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所, 亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室, 长沙 410125;
3. 赢创德固赛(中国)投资有限公司, 北京 100600

韩丽(1992-),女,河南周口人,硕士研究生,从事动物营养与饲料科学研究。E-mail:1404082917@qq.com

收稿日期: 2017-06-30

网络出版日期: 2017-12-04

基金资助

国家重点研发计划课题（2017YFD0500503）；赢创德固赛（中国）投资有限公司横向课题

收起

Effects of Bacillus subtilis on Reproductive Performance of Sows and Growth of Their Offspring during Perinatal Period

Expand

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China;
3. Evonik Degussa(China) Co., Ltd., Beijing 100600, China

Received date: 2017-06-30

Online published: 2017-12-04

Fold

摘要

试验旨在研究枯草芽孢杆菌对围产期母猪繁殖性能和子代生长的影响。试验选用2~4胎次、预产期相近的妊娠85 d的健康大白猪40头，随机分为2组，每组20头。对照组饲喂基础饲粮，试验组在基础饲粮中添加250 g/t的枯草芽孢杆菌制剂。试验期为妊娠85 d至产后21 d。分别于母猪妊娠85、112 d和产后21 d测量母猪背膘厚并计算背膘损失。于产后1和21 d耳缘静脉采血，肝素抗凝，离心分离血浆，测定血浆生化指标。于产后1 d记录母猪的产仔数和产活仔数，并称取仔猪出生窝重。于产后21 d称取仔猪断奶窝重并计算断奶窝日增重；每天观察并记录每窝仔猪腹泻情况，计算腹泻率。结果表明：与对照组相比，饲粮添加枯草芽孢杆菌制剂对母猪繁殖性能无显著影响（P>0.05），但显著降低了仔猪1~7日龄和1~21日龄腹泻率（P<0.05），显著增加了产后21 d母猪血浆免疫球蛋白M（IgM）含量（P<0.05），且产后1 d母猪血浆白蛋白（P=0.087）和IgM（P=0.096）含量以及产后21 d背膘厚（P=0.096）均呈增加趋势。综上所述，饲粮添加枯草芽孢杆菌制剂虽然不影响母猪繁殖性能，但可增强机体对蛋白质的利用和免疫力，降低仔猪腹泻率。

关键词： 芽孢杆菌; 妊娠母猪; 哺乳仔猪; 繁殖性能; 生化指标

本文引用格式

韩丽, 孔祥峰, 赵越, 解培峰, 高乾坤, 章文明, 印遇龙, 王占彬 . 枯草芽孢杆菌对围产期母猪繁殖性能和子代生长的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2017 , 29(12) : 4440 -4446 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.12.024

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effects of Bacillus subtilis on reproductive performance of sows and growth of their offspring during perinatal period. Forty healthy Large White sows at close to 85 d of gestation during 2 to 4 parities were used and randomly allocated to 2 groups with 20 pigs per group. The sows in the control group were fed a basal diet, and others in the experiment group were fed the basal diet supplemented with 250 g/t Bacillus subtilis preparation. The trial period was from pregnancy 85 d to postpartum 21 d. The backfat thickness of sows were measured at pregnancy 85 and 112 d and postpartum 21 d, respectively, to calculate the backfat loss; at postpartum 1 and 21 d, the blood samples of sows were collected by ear vein into heparin coated-tubes, respectively, to obtain the plasma by centrifuging for analysis of plasma biochemical parameters. At postpartum 1 d, the litter size and alive litter size were recorded, as well as the litter birth weight of piglets. At postpartum 21 d, the litter weight of weaned piglets was weighed to calculate weaning daily gain per litter. The diarrhea occurrence of piglets was observed per day throughout the experiment to calculate the diarrhea rate. The results showed that compared with the control group, dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis did not affect the reproductive performance of sows (P>0.05), but significantly reduced the diarrhea rate of piglets from 1 to 7 days of age and 1 to 21 days of age (P<0.05), and significantly increased the plasma immunoglobulin M (IgM) content of sows at postpartum 21 d (P<0.05), as well as increased the contents of albumin (ALB) (P=0.087) and IgM (P=0.096) in plasma at the postpartum 1 d and backfat thickness (P=0.096) of sows at postpartum 21 d (P>0.05). Collectively, dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis preparation do not affect on reproductive performance of sows, but can enhance the utilization of protein and immunity of sows, and reduce diarrhea rate of piglets.

Key words： Bacillus subtilis; pregnant sows; suckling piglets; reproductive performance; biochemical parameters

参考文献

[1] SERENIUS T,STALDER K J.Selection for sow longevity[J].Journal of Animal Science,2006,84(13S):E166-E171.

[2] 陈雅君.母猪繁殖障碍性疾病的发病原因及防制[J].中国畜牧兽医,2008,35(4):95-96.

[3] 周根来,殷洁鑫.影响母猪繁殖性能的营养因素及调控措施[J].中国畜牧兽医,2012,39(11):90-93.

[4] 蒋宗勇,高开国,杨雪芬,等.提高母猪年生产力的关键营养技术[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(10):3003-3010.

[5] VAN DEN BRAND H,HEETKAMP M J W,SOEDE N M,et al.Energy balance of lactating primiparous sows as affected by feeding level and dietary energy source[J].Journal of Animal Science,2000,78(6):1520-1528.

[6] CHO J H,ZHAO P Y,KIM I H.Probiotics as a dietary additive for pigs:a review[J].Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances,2011,10(16):2127-2134.

[7] 侯冠彧,周汉林,施力光,等.几种常用饲料添加剂对断奶仔猪肠道菌群调控的研究进展[J].中国畜牧兽医,2016,43(11):2939-2944.

[8] 张爱武,薛军.枯草芽孢杆菌在动物生产中的应用效果[J].中国畜牧兽医,2011,38(4):234-238.

[9] 徐鹏,董晓芳,佟建明.微生物饲料添加剂的主要功能及其研究进展[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(8):1397-1403.

[10] 刘影,王春林,成廷水,等.母猪和仔猪日粮中添加枯草芽孢杆菌对仔猪生产性能的影响[J].饲料工业,2010,31(18):29-30.

[11] 肖定福,胡雄贵,罗彬,等.地衣芽胞杆菌对仔猪生产性能和猪舍氨浓度的影响[J].家畜生态学报,2008,29(5):74-77.

[12] 李春丽,崔淑贞,惠参军,等.微生态制剂对哺乳仔猪生长及免疫机能的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2005,32(5):14-15.

[13] 黎智华,李华伟,张婷,等.发酵中药渣对妊娠母猪繁殖性能、血浆生化参数和抗氧化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2017,29(7):2416-2422.

[14] 李华伟,黎智华,祝倩,等.饲粮添加中药渣和发酵中药渣对母猪繁殖性能与子代发育的影响[J].动物营养学报,2017,29(1):257-263.

[15] 查伟,孔祥峰,谭敏捷,等.饲粮添加脯氨酸对妊娠环江香猪繁殖性能和血浆生化参数的影响[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(2):579-584.

[16] JEONG J,KIM J,LEE S,et al.Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus acidophilus probiotic supplementation on reproductive performance and noxious gas emission in sows[J].Annals of Animal Science,2015,15(3):699-710.

[17] 边连全,杜欣,刘显军,等.枯草芽孢杆菌-菊糖合生元对断奶仔猪生长性能及体液免疫功能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(2):280-284.

[18] 刘柱,杨志远,李哓玉,等.分娩与断奶背膘厚度对猪繁殖性能的影响研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2014,41(6):187-190.

[19] 杨海英,杨在宾,杨维仁,等.益生素和低聚木糖对断奶仔猪生产性能、消化酶活性、血液指标和肠道微生物的影响[J].中国兽医学报,2009,29(7):914-919.

[20] 王丽凤,张和平.益生菌、胃肠道微生物和宿主之间相互作用的研究进展[J].中国食品学报,2011,11(4):147-153.

[21] 张灵启,李卫芬,余东游.芽孢杆菌制剂对断奶仔猪生长和免疫性能的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2008,(3):37-38.

[22] 王二红,吴德,方正锋,等.饲粮中添加丁酸钾对泌乳母猪繁殖性能、血液生化指标和乳成分的影响[J].动物营养学报,2010,22(5):1367-1373.

[23] CHEN Y Y,GONG X X,LI G D,et al.Effects of dietary alfalfa flavonoids extraction on growth performance,organ development and blood biochemical indexes of Yangzhou geese aged from 28 to 70 days[J].Animal Nutrition,2016,2(4):318-322.

Options

文章导航

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们