研究简报 Short communications

青苔和大叶藻对刺参生长性能及免疫指标的影响

展开
  • 1. 河北农业大学海洋学院, 秦皇岛 066000;
    2. 河北省海洋与水产科学研究院, 河北省海洋生物资源与环境重点实验室, 秦皇岛 066000
路晶晶(1992-),女,河北衡水人,硕士研究生,研究方向为动物营养与饲料。E-mail:lujingjing928@sina.com

收稿日期: 2017-06-14

  网络出版日期: 2017-12-04

基金资助

河北省现代农业产业技术体系特种海产品创新团队

Effects of Green Algae and Sargassum on Growth Performance and Immune Indices of Sea Cucumber (Apostichopus japonicas)

Expand
  • 1. Ocean College of Hebei Agricultural University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China;
    2. Key laboratory of Marine Living Resources and Environment in Hebei Province, Ocean and Fisheries Science Research Institute of Hebei Province, Qinhuangdao 066000, China

Received date: 2017-06-14

  Online published: 2017-12-04

摘要

本试验旨在研究青苔和大叶藻对刺参生长性能及免疫指标的影响。试验选取720头平均质量为0.35 g的刺参,随机分为3个组,每个组3个重复,每个重复80头刺参。以青苔、大叶藻和海带为主要藻类蛋白质源,分别制成3种不同配合饲料饲喂刺参,海带组为对照组,青苔组及大叶藻组为试验组。试验期8周。通过评估刺参的生长性能、体壁营养成分、消化酶活性及非特异性免疫指标评价青苔和大叶藻对刺参健康生长的影响。结果表明:青苔组和大叶藻组增重率较对照组分别增加了29.15%和24.13%,饲料系数较对照组降低了10.39%和15.58%,但各组间无显著差异(P>0.05);青苔组和大叶藻组刺参脏壁比、肠重比显著低于对照组(P<0.05),体壁水分含量显著高与对照组(P<0.05);大叶藻组体壁粗灰分含量显著高于青苔组和对照组(P<0.05);青苔组和大叶藻组刺参肠道淀粉酶活性显著低于对照组(P<0.05);青苔组体腔液谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH-Px)活性显著高于对照组和大叶藻组(P<0.05),过氧化物酶(POD)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和酸性磷酸酶(ACP)活性均高于对照组和大叶藻组,但各组间无显著差异(P>0.05);大叶藻组体腔液碱性磷酸酶(ALP)活性显著低于对照组(P<0.05),与青苔组无显著差异(P>0.05)。由此可见,在本试验条件下,青苔和大叶藻作为饲料原料应用于刺参饲料中是可行的;以生长性能指标为基础,结合抗氧化及非特异性免疫指标,刺参生长效果为青苔组 > 大叶藻组 > 海带组。

本文引用格式

路晶晶, 郭冉, 赵春龙, 崔兆进, 夏辉, 解伟, 王美雪, 杨品贤 . 青苔和大叶藻对刺参生长性能及免疫指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2017 , 29(12) : 4630 -4636 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.12.046

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of green algae and Sargassum on growth performance and immune indices of sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicas). A total of 720 sea cucumber with average body weight of 0.35 g were randomly divided into 3 groups with 3 replicates per group and 80 sea cucumber per replicate. Use green algae, Sargassum and kelp as the main source of algae protein, made three different compound diets to feed the sea cucumber, including the control group (kelp group) and experiment groups (green algae group and Sargassum group). The experiment lasted for 8 weeks. The effects of green algae and Sargassum on the healthy growth of sea cucumber were evaluated by assessing the growth performance, body wall nutrient composition, digestive enzymes activities and nonspecific immune indices. The results showed that compared with the control group, the weight gain rate of green algae group and Sargassum group increased by 29.15% and 24.13%, while the feed conversion ratio decreased by 10.39% and 15.58%, and there were no significant difference among all groups (P>0.05). The ratio of intestine gut weight to body weight and the ratio of viscera to body wall of green algae group and Sargassum group were significantly lower than those of control group (P<0.05), but the body wall moisture content of green algae group and Sargassum group were significantly higher than that of control group (P<0.05). The body wall crude ash content of Sargassum group was significantly higher than that of control group and green algae group (P<0.05). The intestinal tract amylase activity of green algae group and Sargassum group was significantly lower than that of control group (P<0.05). The activity of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) in coelomic fluid of green algae group was significantly higher than that of control group and Sargassum group (P<0.05), while the activities of peroxidase activity (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), acid phosphatase (ACP) of green algae group were significantly higher than those of control group and Sargassum group (P>0.05). The activity of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in coelomic fluid was significantly lower than that of control group (P<0.05), but had no significantly difference with green algae group (P>0.05). In conclusion, under the experimental condition, the application of green algae and Sargassum in diets of sea cucumber is feasible; based on the growth performance and takes into account antioxidant and non-specific immune index, the growth effect for sea cucumber is green algae group > Sargassum group > kelp group.

参考文献

[1] 樊绘曾.海参:海中人参——关于海参及其成分保健医疗功能的研究与开发[J].中国海洋药物杂志,2001,20(4):37-44.

[2] 郭娜.不同饲料对刺参(Apostichopus japonicus)生长、消化生理和能量收支的影响[D].硕士学位论文.青岛:国海洋大学,2011.

[3] 袁成玉.海参饲料研究的现状与发展方向[J].水产科学,2005,24(12):54-56.

[4] 彭刚,严维辉,刘国兴,等.3种药物对青苔生长的抑制效果研究[J].安徽农业科学,2013,41(12):5367-5369.

[5] 马爱兵.河蟹养殖池中青苔的防除技术[J].现代农业科技,2011(10):342.

[6] 王荣林.蟹池青苔生物生态综合防治技术[J].中国水产,2007(6):42.

[7] 常巧玲,孙建义.海藻饲料资源及其在水产养殖中的应用研究[J].饲料工业,2006,27(2):62-64.

[8] 郭栋.大叶藻增殖生态学的实验研究[D].硕士学位论文.青岛:中国海洋大学,2010.

[9] 刘阳.大叶藻(Zotera marina L.)提取活性物质对仿刺参(Apostichopus japonicus)"腐皮综合症"病灶优势菌及白脊藤壶(Balanus albicostatus Pilsbry)幼体附着抑制研究[D].硕士学位论文.青岛:中国海洋大学,2009.

[10] 唐薇,王庆吉,张蕾,等.不同藻粉对刺参组织免疫性能和体壁成分的影响[J].资源开发与市场,2014,30(8):905-907,920.

[11] 李旭,章世元,陈四清,等.四种饲料原料对刺参生长、体成分及消化生理的影响[J].饲料工业,2013,34(8):36-40.

[12] 何舟,宋坚,常亚青,等.穗花狐尾藻(Myriophyllum spicatum L.)饲喂对刺参(Apostichopus japonicus)幼参生长、体成分及消化酶的影响[J].渔业科学进展,2015,36(4):122-127.

[13] 朱伟,麦康森,张百刚,等.刺参稚参对蛋白质和脂肪需求量的初步研究[J].海洋科学,2005,29(3):54-58.

[14] TIAN X L,DONG S L.The effects of thermal amplitude on the growth of Chinese shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis[J].Aquaculture,2006,251(2/3/4):516-524.

[15] ZHENG Z H,DONG S L,TIAN X L.Effects of intermittent feeding of different diets on growth of Litopenaeus vannamei[J].Journal of Crustacean Biology,2008,28(1):21-26.  

[16] 殷旭旺,李文香,白海锋,等.不同海藻饲料对刺参幼参生长的影响[J].大连海洋大学学报,2015(3):276-280.

[17] KING P A,FIVES J M,MCGRATH D.Reproduction,growth,and feeding of the dragonet Callionymus lyra (Teleostei:Callionymidae),in galway bay,Ireland[J].Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom,1994,74(3):513-526

[18] 崔龙波,董志宁,陆瑶华.仿刺参消化系统的组织学和组织化学研究[J].动物学杂志,2000,35(6):2-4.

[19] GANGADHARA B,NANDEESHA M C,VARGHESE T J,et al.Effect of varying protein and lipid levels on the growth of Rohu,Labeo rohita[J].Asian Fisheries Society,1997,10(2):139-147.

[20] COTEUR G,MELLROTH P,DE LEFORTERY C,et al.Peptidoglycan recognition proteins with amidase activity in early deuterostomes (Echinodermata)[J].Developmental & Comparative Immunology,2007,31(8):790-804.  

[21] DOLMATOVA L S,ELISEIKINA M G,ROMASHINA V V.Antioxidant enzymatic activity of coelomocytes of the far east sea cucumber Eupentacta fraudatrix[J].Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology,2004,40(2):126-135.  

[22] 王方雨,杨红生,高菲,等.刺参体腔液几种免疫指标的周年变化[J].海洋科学,2009,33(7):75-80.

[23] 方晨,王霞,张小雪.嗜水气单胞菌对黄鳝内脏器官酸性磷酸酶和碱性磷酸酶活性的影响[J].科学养鱼,2015(9):54-55.
文章导航

/