微生态制剂和复合酸化剂对哺乳母猪生产性能、血清生化和免疫指标以及乳成分的影响

汪晶晶, 任红立, 董佳琦, 金三俊, 李彦芳, 武洪志, 刁新平

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.02.034

动物营养学报 >

2018 , Vol. 30 >Issue 2: 685 - 695

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.02.034

饲料营养 Feed science and technology

微生态制剂和复合酸化剂对哺乳母猪生产性能、血清生化和免疫指标以及乳成分的影响

展开

东北农业大学动物科学技术学院, 哈尔滨 150030

汪晶晶(1991-),女,新疆奎屯人,硕士研究生,从事单胃动物营养与饲料科学研究。E-mail:kazhikazhi@163.com

收稿日期: 2017-07-11

网络出版日期: 2018-02-02

基金资助

黑龙江省科技厅对外合作攻关项目（WB13B101）

收起

Effects of Probiotics and Compound Acidifier on Performance, Serum Biochemical and Immune Indexes and Milk Composition of Lactating Sows

Expand

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China

Received date: 2017-07-11

Online published: 2018-02-02

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在探讨微生态制剂和复合酸化剂对哺乳母猪生产性能、血清生化和免疫指标以及乳成分的影响。试验采用2×2双因子随机设计，主效应分别为酸化剂（0、0.5%）、微生态制剂（0、200 mL/d）及二者互作。选择胎次和预产期相近的长白×大白母猪24头，随机分为4组（每组6头猪），分别饲喂基础饲粮（对照组）、基础饲粮+200 mL/d微生态制剂（微生态制剂组）、基础饲粮+0.5%复合酸化剂（复合酸化剂组）、基础饲粮+200 mL/d微生态制剂+0.5%复合酸化剂（混合组）。预试期7 d，正试期21 d。结果表明：1）混合组母猪平均日采食量、母猪总泌乳量、第21天仔猪平均个体重、仔猪断奶窝重均显著高于对照组（P<0.05）；与对照组相比，各添加组第1、7、14天仔猪平均个体重、断奶活仔数以及仔猪平均日增重均有升高的趋势，但差异不显著（P>0.05）。2）试验第21天，混合组血清中总胆固醇、甘油三酯、总蛋白、白蛋白、免疫球蛋白A、免疫球蛋白G的含量均显著高于对照组（P<0.05）。各添加组血清尿素氮含量均低于对照组，但各组间差异不显著（P>0.05）。3）各添加组初乳和常乳中乳脂、常乳中乳糖含量均显著高于对照组（P<0.05），乳蛋白含量也高于对照组，但差异不显著（P>0.05）。由此可见，在本试验条件下，饲粮中添加微生态制剂和复合酸化剂有提高哺乳母猪生产性能、血清生化和免疫指标的趋势，并可提高哺乳母猪的平均日采食量、总泌乳量以及血清中总胆固醇、甘油三酯、总蛋白、白蛋白、免疫球蛋白A和免疫球蛋白G的含量，二者联用可局部改善乳成分。

关键词： 微生态制剂; 复合酸化剂; 哺乳母猪; 生产性能; 血清生化和免疫指标; 乳成分

本文引用格式

汪晶晶, 任红立, 董佳琦, 金三俊, 李彦芳, 武洪志, 刁新平 . 微生态制剂和复合酸化剂对哺乳母猪生产性能、血清生化和免疫指标以及乳成分的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018 , 30(2) : 685 -695 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.02.034

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of probiotics and compound acidifier on performance, serum biochemical and immune indices and milk composition of lactating sows. The trial used a 2×2 factorial random design, the main effects were compound acidified (0 and 0.5%), probiotics (0 and 200 mL/d) and the interaction between them, respectively. Twenty-four healthy Landrace×Large White sows with good condition and similar birthday age were randomly arranged into 4 groups with 6 replicates per group, and the sows in those 6 groups were fed basal diet (control group), basal diet+200 mL/d probiotics (probiotics group), basal diet +0.5% compound acidifier (acidifier group) and basal diet+200 mL/d probiotics+0.5% compound acidifier (mixed group), respectively. The pre-experimental period lasted for 7 days, and the experimental period lasted for 21 days. The results showed follows:1) the average daily feed intake of sows, total lactation of sows, average weight of piglets at the 21st day and weaning litter weight of piglets of mixed group were significantly higher than those of control group (P<0.05). Compared with control group, the average weight of piglets at the 1st, 7th and 14st day, number of piglet alive at wean and average daily gain of piglets of addition groups had the trend of increasing, but had no significant differences (P>0.05). 2) The contents of total cholesterol, triglyceride, total protein, albumin, immunoglobulin A and immunoglobulin G in serum at the 21st day of mixed group were significantly higher than those of control group (P<0.05). The serum urea nitrogen content of addition groups was lower than that of control group, but showed no significant difference compared with each group (P>0.05). 3) The contents of milk fat in colostrum and milk and lactose in milk of addition groups were significantly higher than those of control group (P<0.05). The content of milk protein of addition groups was higher than that of control group, but showed no significant difference (P>0.05). Thus, under the conditions of this experiment, diet supplemented with probiotics and compound acidifier have the trend of improving the performance, serum biochemical and immune index trend of lactating sows, and can improve the average daily feed intake, total lactation and the contents of serum total cholesterol, triglyceride, total protein, albumin, immunoglobulin A and immunoglobulin G of lactating sows. The combination of the probiotics and compound acidifier can partially improve the milk composition.

Key words： probiotics; compound acidifier; lactating sows; performance; serum biochemical and immune indexes; milk composition

参考文献

[1] KIM Y Y,KIL D Y,OH H K,et al.Acidifier as an alternative material to antibiotics in animal feed[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2005,18(7):1048-1060.

[2] 霍永久,张艳云,施青青,等.芽孢杆菌1259制剂对生长肥育猪生产性能及猪粪氨气产生量的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2012,40(2):159-161.

[3] 陈代文,张克英,王万祥,等.酸化剂、益生素和寡糖对断奶仔猪粪中微生物菌群和免疫功能的影响及其互作效应研究[J].动物营养学报,2006,18(3):172-178.

[4] 周岭,丁雪梅,罗玉衡,等.复合酸化剂和微生态制剂对蛋鸡生产性能、血液生化指标、抗氧化指标及沙门氏菌感染的影响[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(8):2571-2580.

[5] LAWLOR P G,LYNCH P B,GARDINER G E,et al.Effect of liquid feeding weaned pigs on growth performance to harvest[J].Journal of Animal Science,2002,80(7):1725-1735.

[6] 彭艳,谢飞.酸化剂对哺乳母猪采食量的影响[J].饲料广角,2013(13):29-31.

[7] 王海峰,方心灵,朱晓彤,等.母猪饲粮中添加山梨酸对泌乳母猪和哺乳仔猪生产性能与血清生化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(1):118-125.

[8] 吕伟,魏玉明,齐明,等.几种复合微生态饲料添加剂对母猪生产和保育、育肥猪生长发育性能的影响[J].畜牧兽医杂志,2016,35(2):4-7,12.

[9] 霍军,宋予震,董青,等.日粮中添加微生态制剂对繁殖母猪生产性能的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(12):220-222.

[10] 刘爱君,尹望.复合微生态制剂对哺乳母猪乳成分和生产性能的影响[J].饲料研究,2014(19):26-28.

[11] COLE D J,BEAL R M,LUSCOMBE J R.The effect on performance and bacterial flora of lactic acid,propionic acid,calcium propionate and calcium acrylate in the drinking water of weaned pigs[J].Veterinary Record,1968,83(18):459-464.

[12] 燕富永,刘云华,曹霞,等.甜味剂和酸味剂对泌乳母猪采食量和泌乳力的影响[J].中国饲料添加剂,2010(1):20-22.

[13] 潘永荣,张俊峰,蒋运友.微生态制剂在养猪生产中的应用[J].现代畜牧兽医,2010(8):34-35.

[14] 徐刚.肉仔鸡用四种绿色饲料添加剂的应用效果及其组合效应研究[D].硕士学位论文.杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2007.

[15] LIU S T,HOU W X,CHENG S Y,et al.Effects of dietary citric acid on performance,digestibility of calcium and phosphorus,milk composition and immunoglobulin in sows during late gestation and lactation[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2014,191(5):67-75.

[16] RADECKI S V,JUHL M R,MILLER E R.Fumaric and citric acids as feed additives in starter pig diets:effect on performance and nutrient balance[J].Journal of Animal Science,1988,66(10):2598-2605.

[17] 董淑丽,王占彬,雷雪芹,等.热应激对动物血液生化指标的影响[J].家畜生态,2004,25(2):54-56.

[18] 朱孟玲,陈超,马国辅,等.有机酸对长梅断奶仔猪生长性能和血清生化指标的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(33):18861-18862,18865.

[19] WU G Y,BAZER F W,DAVIS T A,et al.Arginine metabolism and nutrition in growth,health and disease[J].Amino Acids,2009,37(1):153-168.

[20] FALLAH R,REZAEI H.Effect of dietary prebiotic and acidifier supplementation on the growth performance,carcass characteristics and serum biochemical parameters of broilers[J].Journal of Cell and Animal Biology,2013,7(2):21-24.

[21] BRZÓSKA F,S' LIWI N' SKI B,MICHALIK-RUTKOWSKA O.Effect of dietary acidifier on growth,mortality,post-slaughter parameters and meat composition of broiler chickens.[J].Annals of Animal Science,2013,13(1):85-96.

[22] 向兴.饲粮中添加酸化剂对母猪繁殖性能、乳成分及免疫指标的影响[D].硕士学位论文.雅安:四川农业大学,2015.

[23] 陈宝江,景翠,于会民,等.酸化剂对早期断奶仔猪肠黏膜形态、微生物区系及挥发性脂肪酸产生的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2011,38(10):23-26.

[24] 李瑞,侯改凤,邬理洋,等.微生态制剂对生长猪生产性能、氮磷排放量及血清免疫指标的影响[J].家畜生态学报,2013,34(6):66-71.

[25] 顾金,章世元,周维仁,等.复合微生态制剂对青脚麻鸡生长性能及部分血液生化指标的影响[J].中国家禽,2010,32(5):34-36.

[26] BOYD R D,KENSINGER R S.Metabolic precursors for milk synthesis[M]//VERSTEGEN M W,MOUGHAN P J,SCHRAMA H W,et al.The lactating sow.Netherlands:Wageningen Press,1998.

[27] ØVERLAND M,BIKKER P,FLEDDERUS J.Potassium diformate in the diet of reproducing sows:effect on performance of sows and litters[J].Livestock Science,2009,122(2/3):241-247.

[28] 王二红,吴德,方正锋,等.饲粮中添加丁酸钾对泌乳母猪繁殖性能、血液生化指标和乳成分的影响[J].动物营养学报,2010,22(5):1367-1373.

[29] 方翠林.包膜丁酸钠对母猪及后代仔猪生产性能的影响[D].硕士学位论文.杭州:浙江大学,2014.

Options

文章导航

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们