反刍动物营养 Ruminant nutrition

饲粮中棉秆比例对绵羊生长性能和消化性能的影响

展开
  • 新疆畜牧科学院饲料研究所, 乌鲁木齐 830000
张俊瑜(1983-),男,河北沧州人,助理研究员,硕士,从事反刍动物营养与饲料科学的研究。E-mail:363180001@qq.com

收稿日期: 2018-02-23

  网络出版日期: 2018-09-20

基金资助

新疆维吾尔自治区公益性科研院所基本科研业务经费(KY2017003);新疆维吾尔自治区科研机构创新发展专项资金项目(2016D04018);国家现代农业肉羊产业技术体系专项资金(CARS-38)

Effects of Cotton Stalk Ratio in Diets on Growth and Digestive Performance of Sheep

Expand
  • Institute of Feed Research, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Urumqi 830000, China

Received date: 2018-02-23

  Online published: 2018-09-20

摘要

本试验旨在研究饲粮中不同比例棉秆对绵羊生长性能和营养物质表观消化率的影响及棉秆中营养物质在绵羊体内的消化代谢参数。试验采用单因素完全随机试验设计,将体重相近的50只试验羊随机分为5组,每组10只,对照组(CK组)饲喂全价颗粒基础饲粮,试验组饲粮分别以棉秆替代10%(A组)、20%(B组)、30%(C组)和40%(D组)的基础饲粮。试验全期68 d,其中预试期7 d,饲养试验53 d,消化代谢试验8 d。结果表明:1)平均日增重(ADG)随棉秆替代比例的增加而下降,表现为C组和D组极显著低于CK组(P < 0.01),显著低于A组(P < 0.05),CK组、A组和B组之间差异不显著(P>0.05);干物质采食量无显著变化(P>0.05)。2)饲粮中营养物质的表观消化率随棉秆替代比例的增加而依次下降,其中D组比CK组的干物质(DM)、有机物(OM)、粗蛋白质(CP)、粗纤维(EE)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)和酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)的表观消化率分别低17.17%(P < 0.01)、18.22%(P < 0.01)、12.14%(P < 0.01)、36.36%(P < 0.01)、26.26%(P < 0.01)和36.24%(P < 0.05)。3)棉秆中营养物质的表观消化率随替代比例的增加表现不一。当棉秆替代比例为30%时,棉秆中营养物质的表观消化率均处于较高水平。C组和D组DM和OM表观消化率极显著高于A组和B组(P<0.01);A组CP和NDF的表观消化率极显著低于B组、C组和D组(P<0.01)。本试验条件下,棉秆可以作为粗饲料用于育肥羊生产,替代比例以30%为宜。

本文引用格式

张俊瑜, 桑断疾, 张志军, 苏玲玲, 郭同军, 王文奇 . 饲粮中棉秆比例对绵羊生长性能和消化性能的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018 , 30(9) : 3535 -3542 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.09.023

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different ratios of cotton stalk in diets on growth performance and nutrient apparent digestibility of sheep, and the nutrient metabolism parameters of cotton stalks in the whole digestive tract of sheep. Fifty sheep with the similar body weight were randomly assigned to 5 groups with 10 sheep in each group by a single factor completely randomized design. Sheep in the control group were fed a basal diet, and sheep in trial groups were fed the basal diet replaced by 10%, 20%, 30% and 40% cotton stalk, respectively. The experiment lasted for 68 d including a 7-d preliminary experiment, a 53-d formal experiment and an 8-d digestion and metabolism experiment. The results showed as follows:1) the average daily gain was decreased with the increasing replacement ratio of cotton stalk, groups C and D were significantly lower than group CK (P < 0.01) and group A (P < 0.05); no significant effect on dry matter intake was found (P>0.05). 2) As the replacement ratio of cotton stalk in diets increased, nutrient apparent digestibility of diets was decreased. The apparent digestibility of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) in group D was lower than that in group CK by 17.17% (P < 0.01), 18.22% (P < 0.01), 12.14% (P < 0.01), 36.36% (P < 0.01), 26.26% (P < 0.01) and 36.24% (P < 0.05). 3) With the increasing replacement ratio of cotton stalk, the apparent digestibility of nutrients in cotton stalk had different changes. When the replacement ratio of cotton stalks was 30%, the apparent digestibility of nutrients in cotton stalk was higher. The apparent digestibility of DM and OM in groups C and D were significantly higher than that in groups A and B (P<0.01); the apparent digestibility of CP and NDF was significantly lower than that in groups B, C and D (P<0.01). Under this experimental condition, cotton stalk can be used as an roughage in fatting sheep production, and the optimal replacement ratio of cotton stalks in the basal diet is 30%.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国国家统计局[EB/OL].http://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01.

[2] 高利伟,马林,张卫峰,等.中国作物秸秆养分资源数量估算及其利用状况[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(7):173-179.

[3] 魏敏,雒秋江,潘榕,等.对棉花秸秆饲用价值的基本评价[J].新疆农业大学学报,2003,26(1):1-4.

[4] 张苏江,吾买尔江,祁成年,等.不同处理棉秆饲料在羊瘤胃中降解的动态规律[J].粮食与饲料工业,2006(1):40-42.

[5] 王文奇,罗永明,刘艳丰,等.不同棉秆水平全混合日粮对绵羊生长性能和瘤胃发酵参数的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2015,52(11):2111-2116.

[6] 李兴莲,许世新,李红军,等.棉花秸秆新饲料饲喂育肥牛试验初报[J].新疆畜牧业,2015(S1):21-22.

[7] 席琳乔,吴书奇,史卉玲,等.复合菌对棉秆木质纤维素的降解效果研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2016(4):136-139.

[8] 阿尔孜古丽·阿不力孜.纤维素分解菌筛选及在棉秆饲料上的应用[D].硕士学位论文.乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2015.

[9] 赵洁,王真,李兴莲.棉秆膨化发酵饲料的研发与推广应用[J].新疆畜牧业,2016(10):36-37.

[10] 张玉丹,杨阳,任航,等.棉秆微波预处理对生物发酵饲料的影响[J].饲料工业,2016,37(7):37-40.

[11] 魏敏,雒秋江,王东宝,等.棉花秸秆作为绵羊粗饲料的研究[J].草食家畜,2003(3):47-49.

[12] 王鹏,张英杰,刘月琴,等.全价颗粒料对羔羊育肥效果及营养物质消化的影响[J].饲料研究,2011(1):12-14.

[13] 中华人民共和国农业部.NY/T 816-2004肉羊饲养标准[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.

[14] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].2版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.

[15] 贺建华.饲料分析与检测[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008.

[16] ADEOLA O.Digestion and balance techniques in pigs[M]//LEWIS A J,SOUTHERN L L.Swine Nutrition.2nd ed.Washington,D.C.:CRC Press,2001:903-916.

[17] 杨凤.动物营养学[M].2版.北京:中国农业出版社,1993:167-168.

[18] 方雷,贾强.棉花秸秆不同部位饲用价值的评定[J].当代畜牧,2009(1):25-27.

[19] 哈丽代·热合木江,王永力,麦尔哈巴·阿不都耐毕,等.日粮中添加不同比例棉副产品对绵羊生产性能、营养物质消化率及血液生化指标的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医医,2016,43(12):3184-3192.

[20] 侯鹏霞,朱宏清,马青,等.不同精粗比日粮对滩羊生产性能及消化代谢的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2016(18):68-70.

[21] 朱芬花,冯秉福,罗永珍,等.不同精粗比日粮对奶牛产奶性能、乳品质和免疫力的影响[J].家畜生态学报,2017,38(5):74-77.

[22] 仲伟光,成文革,李子勇,等.羊草不同加工方式对肉用绵羊生长性能和内脏指数的影响.中国畜牧杂志,2016,52(23):93-97.

[23] 张立涛,李艳玲,王金文,等.不同中性洗涤纤维水平饲粮对肉羊生长性能和营养成分表观消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(2):43313,2.

[24] 程光民,徐相亭,刘洪波.饲粮精粗比对育成期杜寒杂交羊生产性能、血清生化指标及经济效益的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2017(1):125-127,134.

[25] 刁其玉,杨茁萌,陈荆芬.草颗粒饲料在牛瘤胃内的降解与饲养价值[J].草业科学,2001,18(6):43-47.

[26] 祁茹,林英庭.日粮物理有效中性洗涤纤维对奶牛营养调控的研究进展[J].粮食与饲料工业,2010(5):52-55.

[27] CLARK J H,KLUSMEYER T K,CAMERON M R.Microbial protein synthesis and flows of nitrogen fractions to the duodenum of dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75(8):2304-2323.  

[28] NOCEK J E,RUSSELL J B.Protein and energy as an integrated system.Relationship of ruminal protein and carbohydrate availability to microbial synthesis and milk production[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1988,71(8):2070-2107.  

[29] SINCLAIR L A,RICHARDSON J M,WILKINSON R G.Synchrony of nutrient supply to the rumen and dietary energy source and their effects on the growth and metabolism of lambs[J].Journal of Animal Science,2003,81(5):1332-1347.  

[30] HUUSKONEN A,KHALILI H,JOKI-TOKOLA E.Effects of three different concentrate proportions and rapeseed meal supplement to grass silage on animal performance of dairy breed bulls with TMR feeding[J].Livestock Science,2007,110(1/2):154-165.

[31] 鲁琳,夏兆刚,孟庆翔.精料与稀释率对瘤胃发酵与微生物蛋白的影响[J].饲料研究,2007(4):52-55.

[32] SINCLAIR L A,GARNSWORTH P C,NEWBOLD J R,et al.Effect of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen release on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in sheep[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1993,120(2):251-263.  

[33] 谭支良.绵羊日粮中不同碳水化合物和氮源比例对纤维物质消化动力学的影响及其组合效应评估模型研究[D].博士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,1998.

[34] 霍鲜鲜,侯先志,赵志恭.日粮不同碳水化合物比例对绵羊瘤胃内纤维物质降解率的影响[J].甘肃畜牧兽医,2004(1):6-11.

[35] 马振华.水牛瘤胃对不同粗饲料木质素降解率的研究[D].硕士学位论文.武汉:华中农业大学,2015.

[36] 孙云章,毛胜勇,姚文,等.瘤胃厌氧真菌和细菌对木质素含量不同底物的发酵特性[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2007,36(4):392-395.
文章导航

/