猪与禽营养 Swine and poultry nutrition

不同生长阶段和饲粮类型下猪空肠液在纯化过程中消化酶活性回收率的差异

展开
  • 1. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所动物营养学国家重点实验室, 北京 100193;
    2. 中国农业大学动物科学技术学院动物营养学国家重点实验室, 北京 100193
王钰明(1991-),男,陕西咸阳人,博士研究生,从事饲料养分生物学效价评定的研究。E-mail:wudixiaoming@163.com

收稿日期: 2018-12-19

  网络出版日期: 2019-07-19

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31172215);中国农业科学院科研英才培育工程

Difference in Recoveries of Digestive Enzyme Activities during Purification Process for Jejunal Fluid of Pigs in Different Growth Phases and Diet Types

Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Science, Beijing 100193, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, Chinese Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2018-12-19

  Online published: 2019-07-19

摘要

本试验旨在探讨不同来源的猪空肠液在消化酶纯化过程中活性回收率的差异,为体外仿生消化酶试剂的制备提供参考。试验采用2×2两因素完全随机设计,包括2个生长阶段[生长期(60~100日龄)和育肥期(101~140日龄)]和2种饲粮类型[玉米-豆粕型饲粮和玉米-玉米干酒糟及其可溶物(DDGS)-米糠粕型饲粮]。每个生长阶段采用2×2完全交叉设计,将8头安装有空肠T型瘘管的"大×长"二元杂交去势公猪随机分为2组,每组4头猪。在每个生长阶段各进行2期试验,交叉饲喂2种饲粮,形成每个处理8头猪(重复)。每期试验包括10 d预试期和3 d空肠液收集期。待每期试验结束后将每头猪空肠液混合,然后采用无水乙醇沉淀法纯化空肠液中的消化酶,测定纯化过程中消化酶活性的损失和回收率。结果表明:1)不同来源空肠液经冰乙醇沉淀-复溶后获得的消化酶活性的回收率间无显著差异(P>0.05),且回收率均在70%以上;2)不同来源空肠液经冰乙醇沉淀-复溶-冻干后获得的消化酶活性的回收率也均无显著差异(P>0.05),且回收率均在60%以上;3)冰乙醇沉淀-复溶过程中消化酶活性的损失极显著高于冻干过程(P<0.01)。综合以上结果,不同生长阶段和饲粮类型下获得的猪空肠液在纯化过程中消化酶活性的回收率均无显著差异,且通过无水乙醇沉淀法可以获得满意的回收率。

本文引用格式

王钰明, 王亚, 党方昆, 张虎, 高庆涛, 赵峰 . 不同生长阶段和饲粮类型下猪空肠液在纯化过程中消化酶活性回收率的差异[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019 , 31(7) : 3067 -3073 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.07.017

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the difference in the recovery of digestive enzyme activity of different jejunal fluid sources during purification process in pigs, to provide reference for the preparation of digestive enzyme in vitro. Two growth phases[growing period (60 to 100 days of age) or fattening period (101 to 140 days of age)] and two diets[corn-soybean meal diet or corn-corn distillers dried grains with soluble (DDGS)-rice bran meal diet] were used in a 2×2 factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design. Eight growing crossbred barrows (Yorkshire×Landrace) surgically fitted with permanent T-cannula in the upper jejunum were randomly divided into 2 groups in a 2×2 change-over design with 4 pigs per group. Each phase contained 2 experimental periods and 2 diets were cross feeding with 8 pigs per treatment. Each experimental period lasted for 10 d acclimatization and 3 d jejunal fluid collection. The jejunal fluid was pooled of each pig after collection, and then purified by anhydrous ethanol precipitated. The loss and recovery of digestive enzyme activity were determined during the purification process. The results showed as follows:1) there was no significant difference in the recovery of digestive enzyme activity among different sources of jejunal fluid after ice ethanol precipitated-redissolved process (P>0.05), and the recovery of enzyme activity was more than 70%. 2) No significant difference was observed in the recovery of digestive enzyme activity among different sources of jejunal fluid after ice ethanol precipitated-redissolved-freeze dried process (P>0.05), and the recovery of enzyme activity was more than 60%. 3) The loss rate of digestive enzyme activity in the precipitated-redissolved process was significantly higher than that in the freeze-dried process (P<0.01). In conclusion, no significant difference in the recovery of digestive enzyme activity in the purification process of jejunal fluid observed from pigs under different growing phases and diet types, and satisfactory recovery can be obtained using anhydrous ethanol precipitation.

参考文献

[1] YEGANI M,KORVER D R.Effects of corn source and exogenous enzymes on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens[J].Poultry Science,2013,92(5):1208-1220.  

[2] GIUBERTI G,GALLO A,CERIOLI C,et al.In vitro starch digestion and predicted glycemic index of cereal grains commonly utilized in pig nutrition[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2012,174(3/4):163-173.

[3] FURUYA S,SAKAMOTO K,TAKAHASHI S.A new in vitro method for the estimation of digestibility using the intestinal fluid of the pig[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1979,41(3):511-520.  

[4] 张子仪,聂光达.猪饲料消化能值的离体测定方法及其生物学试验根据[J].中国畜牧杂志,1986(1):6-10.

[5] 胡光源.生长猪小肠仿生消化试剂设计依据的研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2010.

[6] 严峰.酶的组成及储存条件对模拟鸭肠液消化能力的影响[D].硕士学位论文.武汉:华中农业大学,2012.

[7] 张莉.基于鸭源性消化酶粉剂的模拟鸭肠液制备方法的研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2014.

[8] 刘成玲,赵峰,左建军,等.生长猪回肠末端瘘管中食糜养分流量及指示剂回收率的变异[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(11):3404-3413.

[9] NRC.Nutrient requirements of swine[S].Washington,D.C.:National Academies Press,2012.

[10] DAHLQVIST A.A method for the determination of amylase in intestinal content[J].Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation,1962,14(2):145-151.  

[11] WIRNT R.Trypsin,measurement with N-α-p-tolue-nesulfony-L-arginine methyl ester as substrate[M]//BERGMEYER H U.Methods of enzymatic analysis.Weinheinm,Germany:Verlag Chemie,1974:1021-1024.

[12] WIRNT R.Chymotrypsin,measurements with N-benzoyl-L-tyrosin methyl ester as substrate[M]//BERGMEYER H U.Methods of enzymatic analysis.Weinheinm:Verlag Chemie,1974:1009-1012.

[13] 刘婧.猪血超氧化物歧化酶的提取、性质及其化学修饰研究[D].硕士学位论文.长春:吉林大学,2011.

[14] 吴晓英,张聚宝,林影,等.胰酶制备新工艺的研究[J].广东药学院学报,2005,21(1):64-67.

[15] 安正仑,高学军,孙福忠.猪胰酶制备工艺研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2006(11):74-75.

[16] 郭兆斌,韩玲,刘亮亮,等.猪胰脏中胰酶的提取工艺优化研究[J].食品科学,2009,30(22):162-164.

[17] ZHA S H,ZHAO Q S,CHEN J J,et al.Extraction,purification and antioxidant activities of the polysaccharides from maca (Lepidium meyenii)[J].Carbohydrate Polymers,2014,111:584-587.

[18] TRENTINI M M S,TONIAZZO G,ZENI J,et al.Purification of pectinases from Aspergillus niger ATCC 9642 by ethanol precipitation[J].Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology,2015,4(3):315-320.  

[19] WANG L H,HARTMAN P A.Purification and some properties of an extracellular maltase from Bacillus subtilis[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1976,31(1):108-118.

[20] 郑先哲,汪春,贾富国.农产品干燥理论与技术[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2009.

[21] 张琪,朱庆锋,崔百元,等.喷雾干燥法制备饲用植酸酶制剂[J].吉林农业大学学报,2016,38(6):750-753.

[22] 薛菲,王凤山.蛋白质的冻干保护剂及其保护机制研究进展[J].中国药学杂志,2018,53(10):765-770.
文章导航

/