研究简报 Short communications

山羊急性瘤胃酸中毒前后瘤胃菌群结构与组成变化分析

  • 李小玉 ,
  • 苏思毅 ,
  • 钟富超 ,
  • 黄莹莹 ,
  • 刘蕾红 ,
  • 李稳稳 ,
  • 林家辉 ,
  • 李锦春 ,
  • 刘亚 ,
  • 冯士彬 ,
  • 王希春 ,
  • 吴金节 ,
  • 孙裴 ,
  • 李玉
展开
  • 安徽农业大学动物科技学院, 合肥 230036
李小玉(1997-),女,安徽太和人,本科生,动物科学专业。E-mail:1537371098@qq.com

收稿日期: 2019-05-10

  网络出版日期: 2019-11-19

基金资助

国家重点研发计划(2018YFD0502006);国家自然科学基金项目(31873029);安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目(1804g07020187);安徽省现代农业牛羊产业技术体系(AHCYJSTX-07);安徽农业大学2018年校级质量工程项目(2018aujyxm023)

Analysis on Structure and Composition of Rumen Bacterial Flora before and after Acute Rumen Acidosis in Goats

  • LI Xiaoyu ,
  • SU Siyi ,
  • ZHONG Fuchao ,
  • HUANG Yingying ,
  • LIU Leihong ,
  • LI Wenwen ,
  • LIN Jiahui ,
  • LI Jinchun ,
  • LIU Ya ,
  • FENG Shibin ,
  • WANG Xichun ,
  • WU Jinjie ,
  • SUN Pei ,
  • LI Yu
Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China

Received date: 2019-05-10

  Online published: 2019-11-19

摘要

瘤胃微生态平衡是山羊健康的重要保障,本试验旨在利用16S rRNA测序技术,分析山羊急性瘤胃酸中毒前后瘤胃菌群结构与组成的变化。选取健康波尔山羊4只,采用自身前后对照试验设计,将造模前采集的4份瘤胃液设为健康组,造模后采集的4份瘤胃液设为瘤胃酸中毒组。通过灌服玉米面构建山羊急性瘤胃酸中毒模型,以40 g/kg BW的比例确定玉米面用量。瘤胃液的采集和玉米面灌服均采用瘤胃插管的方法进行。结果表明:在山羊发生急性瘤胃酸中毒后,瘤胃菌群多样性和相似性降低;厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)下的乳酸杆菌目(Lactobacillales)、链球菌属(Streptococcus)成为优势菌群,变形菌门(Proteobacteria)下的琥珀酸弧菌科、Mitochondria适度生长,拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)下的普雷沃氏菌属(Prevotella)的相对丰度未发生显著变化(P>0.05);LEfSe分析发现纤维杆菌门(Fibrobacteres)下的纤维杆菌科(Fibrobacteraceae)可能是造成山羊急性瘤胃酸中毒前后瘤胃菌群结构差异的影响因子之一;PICRUSt分析发现在蛋白质合成、加工与降解等功能受抑制的情况下,瘤胃菌群可能通过增加碳水化合物和氨基酸的利用,维持正常生存与繁殖。由此可见,山羊在发生急性瘤胃酸中毒后,瘤胃菌群的组成、结构与功能相较于健康状态时有较大差异。

本文引用格式

李小玉 , 苏思毅 , 钟富超 , 黄莹莹 , 刘蕾红 , 李稳稳 , 林家辉 , 李锦春 , 刘亚 , 冯士彬 , 王希春 , 吴金节 , 孙裴 , 李玉 . 山羊急性瘤胃酸中毒前后瘤胃菌群结构与组成变化分析[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019 , 31(11) : 5367 -5377 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.11.054

Abstract

Rumen microecological balance is an important guarantee for goat health. This study aimed to analyze the changes of rumen bacterial flora before and after acute rumen acidosis in goats by using 16S rRNA sequencing technology. Four healthy Boer goats were selected, and the self-designed before-after control experiment design was adopted. Four portions of tumor-producing fluid collected before modeling were set as healthy group, and four portions of tumor-producing fluid collected after modeling were set as rumen acidosis group. The goat acute rumen acidosis model was established by infusing corn flour, and the amount of corn flour was determined by the ratio of 40 g/kg BW. The method of rumen intubation was used for the collection of gastric juice and corn flour irrigation. The results showed that the diversity and similarity of rumen bacteria flora decreased after acute rumen acidosis. Streptococcus and Lactobacillales under Firmicutes became the dominant bacteria flora, Succinivibrionaceae and Mitochondria under Proteobacteria grew moderately, Prevotella under Bacteroidetes showed no significant difference in relative abundance after acute rumen acidosis (P>0.05). LEfSe analysis showed that Fibrobacteraceae under Fibrobacteres became one of the influencing factors of the difference of rumen bacterial flora composition before and after acute rumen acidosis in goats. PICRUSt analysis found that the rumen bacteria flora may maintain normal survival and reproduction by increasing the utilization of carbohydrates and amino acids when the functions of protein synthesis, processing and degradation were inhibited. It can be seen that the composition, structure and function of rumen bacteria flora have obvious changes compared with the healthy state after the induced acute rumen acidosis in goats.

参考文献

[1] 张梦玲.荷斯坦奶牛胃肠道细菌菌群组成与功能的研究[D].硕士学位论文.南京:南京农业大学,2016.
[2] NASROLLAHI S M,ZALI A,GHORBANI G R,et al.Short communication:blood metabolites,body reserves,and feed efficiency of high-producing dairy cows that varied in ruminal pH when fed a high-concentrate diet[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2019,102(1):672-677.  
[3] GRILLI D J,FLIEGEROVÁ K,KOPECNÝ J,et al.Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity of goats during shift from forage to concentrate diet[J].Anaerobe,2016,42:17-26.
[4] ISHAQ S L,ALZAHAL O,WALKER N,et al.An investigation into rumen fungal and protozoal diversity in three rumen fractions,during high-fiber or grain-induced sub-acute ruminal acidosis conditions,with or without active dry yeast supplementation[J].Frontiers in Microbiology,2017,8:1943.
[5] 闫佰鹏,兰贵生,李发弟,等.反刍动物亚急性瘤胃酸中毒变异性的机制解析[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(5):1655-1661.
[6] BOERMAN J P,POTTS S B,VANDEHAAR M J,et al.Milk production responses to a change in dietary starch concentration vary by production level in dairy cattle[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2015,98(7):4698-4706.  
[7] HATEW B,PODESTA S C,VAN LAAR H,et al.Effects of dietary starch content and rate of fermentation on methane production in lactating dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2015,98(1):486-499.  
[8] FADROSH D W,MA B,GAJER P,et al.An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform[J].Microbiome,2014,2(1):6.
[9] MAGOC T,SALZBERG S L.FLASH:fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies[J].Bioinformatics,2011,27(21):2957-2963.  
[10] EDGAR R C.UPARSE:highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads[J].Nature Methods,2013,10(10):996-998.  
[11] HUO W J,ZHU W Y,MAO S Y.Impact of subacute ruminal acidosis on the diversity of liquid and solid-associated bacteria in the rumen of goats[J].World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology,2014,30(2):669-680.  
[12] LANGILLE M G I,ZANEVELD J,CAPORASO J G,et al.Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences[J].Nature Biotechnology,2013,31(9):814-821.  
[13] 金磊,周美丽,王禄禄,等.不同能量代谢率的山羊瘤胃微生物结构与组成的差异性[J].微生物学通报,2018,45(1):91-101.
[14] 张瑞阳.组学技术研究亚急性瘤胃酸中毒对奶牛瘤胃微生物、代谢和上皮功能的影响[D].博士学位论文.南京:南京农业大学,2015.
[15] BHATT V D,DANDE S S,PATIL N V,et al.Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiome in the forestomach fluid from the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius)[J].Molecular Biology Reports,2013,40(4):3363-3371.  
[16] RUSSELL J B,DIEZ-GONZALEZ F.The effects of fermentation acids on bacterial growth[J].Advances in Microbial Physiology,1998,39:205-234.
[17] KIM M,MORRISON M,YU Z T.STATUS of the phylogenetic diversity census of ruminal microbiomes[J].FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2011,76(1):49-63.  
[18] EVANS N J,BROWN J M,MURRAY R D,et al.Characterization of novel bovine gastrointestinal tract Treponema isolates and comparison with bovine digital dermatitis treponemes[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2011,77(1):138-147.  
[19] NAGARAJA T G,TITGEMEYER E C.Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle:the current microbiological and nutritional outlook[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(Suppl.1):E17-E38.
[20] TAJIMA K,AMINOV R I,NAGAMINE T,et al.Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2001,67(6):2766-2774.  
[21] SADET S,MARTIN C,MEUNIER B,et al.PCR-DGGE analysis reveals a distinct diversity in the bacterial population attached to the rumen epithelium[J].Animal,2007,1(7):939-944.  
[22] BULYGINA E S,GALCHENKO V F,GOVORUKHINA N I,et al.Taxonomic studies on methylotrophic bacteria by 5S ribosomal RNA sequencing[J].Journal of General Microbiology,1990,136(3):441-446.  
[23] CHIQUETTE J,ALLISON M J,RASMUSSEN M A.Prevotella bryantii 25A used as a probiotic in early-lactation dairy cows:effect on ruminal fermentation characteristics,milk production,and milk composition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2008,91(9):3536-3543.  
[24] BEKELE A Z,KOIKE S,KOBAYASHI Y.Genetic diversity and diet specificity of ruminal Prevotella revealed by 16S rRNA gene-based analysis[J].FEMS Microbiology Letters,2010,305(1):49-57.  
[25] 李烨青,奚雨萌,曾涵芳,等.基于16S rRNA测序分析奶牛体外发酵中瘤胃细菌多样性的变化[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(10):4059-4070.
[26] LI Z P,LIU H L,LI G Y,et al.Molecular diversity of rumen bacterial communities from tannin-rich and fiber-rich forage fed domestic Sika deer (Cervus nippon) in China[J].BMC Microbiology,2013,13:151.
[27] ERICKSON A R,CANTAREL B L,LAMENDELLA R,et al.Integrated metagenomics/metaproteomics reveals human host-microbiota signatures of Crohn's disease[J].PLoS One,2012,7(11):e49138.
[28] LAMENDELLA R,DOMINGO J W S,GHOSH S,et al.Comparative fecal metagenomics unveils unique functional capacity of the swine gut[J].BMC Microbiology,2011,11:103.
[29] LENG R A,NOLAN J V.Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1984,67(5):1072-1089.  
[30] BACH A,CALSAMIGLIA S,STERN M D.Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2005,88(Suppl.1):E9-E21.
文章导航

/