动物营养学报 >

2020 , Vol. 32 >Issue 4: 1713 - 1720

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.04.030

反刍与草食动物营养与饲料 RUMINANT AND HERBIVORE NUTRITION AND FEED

饲粮能量水平对育肥后期锦江牛营养物质表观消化率、瘤胃发酵及血清生化指标的影响

  • 柏峻 ,
  • 李美发 ,
  • 辛均平 ,
  • 赵二龙 ,
  • 许兰娇 ,
  • 梁欢 ,
  • 杨食堂 ,
  • 杨建军 ,
  • 易中华 ,
  • 瞿明仁 ,
  • 李艳娇
展开
  • 1. 江西农业大学江西省饲料科学研究所, 动物营养重点实验室, 饲料工程研究中心, 南昌 330045;
    2. 国家肉牛产业技术体系高安试验站, 高安 330800
柏峻(1993-),男,江西瑞昌人,硕士研究生,研究方向为动物营养与饲料科学。E-mail:baijun0320@163.com

收稿日期: 2019-10-13

  网络出版日期: 2020-04-16

基金资助

国家重点研究计划（2018YFD0501804）；国家现代肉牛牦牛产业技术体系项目（CARS-37）；国家农业重大技术协同推广计划（2018-2019）

收起

Effects of Dietary Energy Level on Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation and Serum Biochemical Indexes of Jinjiang Cattle in Later Stage of Fattening

  • BAI Jun ,
  • LI Meifa ,
  • XIN Junping ,
  • ZHAO Erlong ,
  • XU Lanjiao ,
  • LIANG Huan ,
  • YANG Shitang ,
  • YANG Jianjun ,
  • YI Zhonghua ,
  • QU Mingren ,
  • LI Yanjiao
Expand
  • 1. Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Engineering Research Center of Feed Development, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China;
    2. National Beef Cattle Industrial Technology System of Gaoan Test Station, Gao'an 330800, China

Received date: 2019-10-13

  Online published: 2020-04-16

Supported by

 

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在探讨饲粮能量水平对育肥后期锦江牛营养物质表观消化率、瘤胃发酵及血清生化指标的影响。试验选取育肥后期、体重相近[（355.94±35.11）kg]的锦江牛35头，分为5组，每组4个重复，每个重复1~2头牛。按照《肉牛饲养标准》（NY/T 815-2004）中350 kg肉牛日增重（1.2 kg/d）所需净能的100%（A组）、106%（B组）、112%（C组）、118%（D组）、124%（E组）配制5种不同能量水平的饲粮，5种饲粮的综合净能（NEmf）分别为6.21、6.58、6.95、7.33、7.70 MJ/kg，粗蛋白质水平一致。预试期10 d，正试期128 d。结果表明：1）随着饲粮能量水平的提高，B组和E组平均日增重最高，但与其余各组相比差异均不显著（P>0.05）；B组平均干物质采食量最高，但各组间差异不显著（P>0.05）；与A组相比，其余组料重比均显著降低（P<0.05）。2）随着饲粮能量水平的提高，各组间营养物质表观消化率差异不显著（P>0.05）。3）与A组相比，D组和E组瘤胃液pH显著降低（P<0.05）；B组和C组瘤胃液氨态氮含量显著低于其余各组（P<0.05）；各组间瘤胃液菌体蛋白含量差异不显著（P>0.05），但B组数值最高；随着饲粮能量水平的提高，各组瘤胃液总挥发性脂肪酸含量呈上升趋势，其中B组瘤胃乙酸/丙酸显著低于A组（P<0.05）。4）B组和C组血清葡萄糖含量较A组分别显著提高了19.38%和14.72%（P<0.05）；B组、C组和D组血清尿素氮含量较A组显著降低（P<0.05），而血清谷丙转氨酶活性和高密度脂蛋白含量较A组显著升高（P<0.05）。综上所述，本试验条件下，随着饲粮综合净能水平的提高，未对各组育肥后期锦江牛的营养物质表观消化率造成显著性影响。但适宜能量水平的饲粮有助于瘤胃微生物蛋白的合成和氨态氮的利用，同时有助于提高锦江牛的生长代谢水平，从而提高生产效益。结合各项指标得出，综合净能为6.58 MJ/kg比较适宜育肥后期锦江牛的生产需要。

关键词： 锦江牛; 能量水平; 表观消化率; 瘤胃发酵; 血清生化指标

本文引用格式

柏峻 , 李美发 , 辛均平 , 赵二龙 , 许兰娇 , 梁欢 , 杨食堂 , 杨建军 , 易中华 , 瞿明仁 , 李艳娇 . 饲粮能量水平对育肥后期锦江牛营养物质表观消化率、瘤胃发酵及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020 , 32(4) : 1713 -1720 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.04.030

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of dietary energy level on apparent digestibility of nutrients, rumen fermentation and serum biochemical indexes of Jinjiang cattle in the later stage of fattening. A total of 35 cattle with a similar body weight of (355.94±35.11) kg in the later stage of fattening were divided into 5 groups with 4 replicates in each group and with 1 or 2 cattle in each replicate. Five test diets with different energy levels were prepared according to Standard of Beef Cattle Breeding (NY/T 815-2004) in the 350 kg of beef cattle daily gain of 1.2 kg/d required for 100% of the net energy (group A), 106% (group B), 112% (group C), 118% (group d), 124% (group E), the comprehensive net (NEmf) of those five test diets were 6.21, 6.58, 6.95, 7.33 and 7.70 MJ/kg, respectively, and the crude protein levels were consistent. The pretest period was 10 days and the pretest period was 128 days. The results showed as follows:1) with the increase of dietary energy level, average daily weight gain in groups B and E was the highest, but the difference was not significant compared with other groups (P>0.05); the average dry matter intake was the highest in B group, but there was no significant difference among groups (P>0.05); compared with group A, the feed/gain in other groups was significantly reduced (P<0.05). 2) With the increase of dietary energy level, there was no significant difference in nutrient apparent digestibilities among groups (P>0.05). 3) Compared with group A, the pH in groups D and E was significantly reduced (P<0.05); the content of ammoniacal nitrogen in groups B and C was significantly lower than that in other groups (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in mycoprotein content among groups (P>0.05), but the highest value was found in group B; the total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) content in each group presented an upward trend, and the acetic acid/propionic acid in group B was significantly lower than that in group A (P<0.05). 4) The serum glucose content in groups B and C increased significantly by 19.38% and 14.72%, respectively compared with the control group (P<0.05). The serum urea nitrogen content in groups B, C and D was significantly reduced compared with group A (P<0.05), while serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) content were significantly increased compared with group A (P<0.05). To sum up, under the conditions of this experiment, with the increase of dietary energy level, there is no significant effect on apparent digestibility of nutrients of Jinjiang cattle. The diet with appropriate energy level is helpful to improve synthesis of microprotein and utilization of ammonia nitrogen, improving the growth and metabolism level of Jinjiang cattle, which improve production efficiency. The NEmf of 6.58 MJ/kg is more suitable for Jinjiang cattle to be fattened in the later stage of fattening obtained by combining various indexes.

Key words： Jinjiang cattle; energy level; apparent digestibility; rumen fermentation; serum biochemical indexes

参考文献

[1] GOLDER H M,CELI P,RABIEE A R,et al.Effects of grain,fructose,and histidine on ruminal pH and fermentation products during an induced subacute acidosis protocol[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2012,95(4):1971-1982.  
[2] ZEBELI Q,ASCHENBACH J R,TAFAJ M,et al.Invited review:role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in high-producing dairy cattle[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2012,95(3):1041-1056.  
[3] 闫佰鹏,兰贵生,李发弟,等.反刍动物亚急性瘤胃酸中毒变异性的机制解析[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(5):1655-1661.
[4] 李晓蒙.日粮能量和蛋白质水平对荷斯坦奶公牛直线育肥性能及肉品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.保定:河北农业大学,2015.
[5] 杨游.高精料饲粮引起肉牛机体代谢组的变化及其营养调控效果研究[D].博士学位论文.重庆:西南大学,2018.
[6] 柏峻,赵二龙,李艳娇,等.饲粮能量水平对育肥前期锦江牛瘤胃发酵及血液生化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(5):2159-2167.
[7] 柏峻,赵二龙,李美发,等.育肥后期锦江牛能量代谢规律及需要量的研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2019,46(3):732-739.
[8] 刘道杨.湘中黑牛、夏南牛能量和蛋白质需要量研究[D].硕士学位论文.南昌:江西农业大学,2013.
[9] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].2版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.
[10] VAN SOEST P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A.Carbohydrate methodology,metabolism,and nutritional implications in dairy cattle.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74:3583-3597.
[11] 冯宗慈,高民.通过比色测定瘤胃液氨氮含量方法的改进[J].畜牧与饲料科学,2010(6):40-41.
[12] MAKKAR H P,BECKER K.Purine quantification in digesta from ruminants by spectrophotometric and HPLC methods[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1999,81(2):107.
[13] 盛英霞.肉牛育肥的主要技术[J].农技服务,2017,34(24):120.
[14] 郝怀志,董俊,何振富,等.不同营养水平日粮对西门塔尔杂交牛育肥后期生产性能影响的研究[J].中国牛业科学,2015,41(5):25-29.
[15] 云强,刁其玉,屠焰,等.开食料中粗蛋白水平对荷斯坦犊牛生长性能和血清生化指标的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2011,47(3):49-52.
[16] 冯仰廉,王加启,杨红建,等.肉牛饲养标准[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.
[17] DE SOUZA J,STRIEDER-BARBOZA C,CONTRERAS G A,et al.Effects of timing of palmitic acid supplementation during early lactation on nutrient digestibility,energy balance,and metabolism of dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2019,102(1):274-287.  
[18] 徐萍,莫放,陈瑶,等.日粮精料进食水平对肉牛消化道营养物质流量和表观消化率的影响[J].中国草食动物,2007,27(4):12-15.
[19] 柏峻,赵二龙,李美发,等.饲粮能量水平对育肥前期锦江阉牛生长性能、养分消化和能量代谢的影响[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(2):692-698.
[20] 李春芳.不同日粮营养水平对荷斯坦淘汰奶牛、奶公牛生长性能及肉品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.保定:河北农业大学,2013.
[21] STEVENSON A E,DE LANGEN H.Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep.Ⅶ.Modified wet digestion method for determination of chromic oxide in faeces[J].New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research,1960,3(2):314-319.  
[22] 杨俊.精料补充料能量水平对早期断奶舍饲犊牦牛生产性能和营养物质表观消化率的影响[D].硕士学位论文.雅安:四川农业大学,2013.
[23] FRANZOLIN R,ROSALES F P,SOARES W V B.Effects of dietary energy and nitrogen supplements on rumen fermentation and protozoa population in buffalo and zebu cattle[J].Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia,2010,39(3):549-555.  
[24] 霍路曼,曹玉凤,高艳霞,等.饲粮能量水平对荷斯坦育成牛生长性能和瘤胃发酵的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2019,50(2):332-342.
[25] BAO L,HUANG Q,CHANG L,et al.Screening and characterization of a cellulase with endocellulase and exocellulase activity from yak rumen metagenome[J].Journal of Molecular Catalysis B:Enzymatic,2011,73(1/2/3/4):104-110.
[26] SALTER D N,DANESHVAR K,SMITH R H.The origin of nitrogen incorporated into compounds in the rumen bacteria of steers given protein-and urea-containing diets[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1979,41(1):197-209.  
[27] 蔡高占.干奶期日粮能量水平对奶牛生产性能及代谢影响的研究[D].硕士学位论文.泰安:山东农业大学,2015.
[28] 陈子宁.围产前期日粮能量水平对荷斯坦奶牛产后生产性能和血液指标的影响[D].硕士学位论文.保定:河北农业大学,2015.
[29] 潘军,曹玉凤,吕超,等.菌糠对肉牛生长性能和血液生理生化指标的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(1):21-28.
[30] 卢德勋.系统动物营养学导论[M].北京:中国农业出版,2004.
[31] 刘莹莹.补饲水平对放牧杂交肉牛生产性能和血液生化指标的影响[D].硕士学位论文.长沙:湖南农业大学,2008.
[32] 陈胜昌,夏先林,PEANGKOUN P.日粮蛋白浓度对肉牛瘤胃代谢与血液尿素氮的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2011,39(8):120-124.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2