研究论文 RESEARCH PAPER

甘蔗尾或甘蔗与桑叶混合青贮对其青贮品质的影响

  • 周晓康 ,
  • 张洁 ,
  • 张男吉 ,
  • 顾啟超 ,
  • 郑一民 ,
  • 麻艳群 ,
  • 邹彩霞
展开
  • 广西大学动物科学与技术学院, 南宁 530003
周晓康(1995-),男,四川遂宁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为反刍动物营养。E-mail:xiaokangzhou2019@gmail.com

收稿日期: 2021-05-06

  网络出版日期: 2022-01-18

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31860661)

Effects of Mixed Silage of Sugarcane Top or Sugarcane and Mulberry Leaf on Its Silage Quality

  • ZHOU Xiaokang ,
  • ZHANG Jie ,
  • ZHANG Nanji ,
  • GU Qichao ,
  • ZHENG Yimin ,
  • MA Yanqun ,
  • ZOU Caixia
Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530003, China

Received date: 2021-05-06

  Online published: 2022-01-18

摘要

本试验旨在通过混合青贮的方式,探究甘蔗尾或甘蔗与桑叶混合青贮对其青贮品质的影响,为改善广西地区的非常规饲料资源利用率和混合青贮饲料的实际应用提供科学依据和技术支撑。试验1:甘蔗尾与桑叶混合青贮;试验2:甘蔗与桑叶混合青贮。2种青贮原料的混合比例分别为100:0、75:25、50:50、25:75、0:100。试验1结果表明:1)与甘蔗尾单独青贮相比,甘蔗尾与桑叶混合青贮显著增加了混合青贮饲料的粗蛋白质、乳酸、乙酸和丙酸含量(P<0.05)。2)与桑叶单独青贮相比,桑叶与甘蔗尾混合青贮对混合青贮饲料的pH和氨态氮含量的影响较弱(P>0.05),但能降低其有氧暴露后pH和酵母菌的增长速率。因此,桑叶与甘蔗尾混合青贮更倾向于提高混合青贮饲料的有氧稳定性。试验2结果表明:1)与甘蔗单独青贮相比,甘蔗与桑叶混合青贮显著增加了混合青贮饲料的干物质、粗蛋白质、乙酸和丙酸含量(P<0.05),显著降低了乙醇含量和青贮损失(P<0.05)。2)与桑叶单独青贮相比,桑叶与甘蔗混合青贮显著增加了混合青贮饲料的乳酸、乙酸含量(P<0.05),显著降低了pH、氨态氮与丁酸含量和肠杆菌数量(P<0.05),改善了混合青贮饲料的青贮品质;当25%桑叶与75%甘蔗混合青贮时,能抑制混合青贮饲料有氧暴露后的氨态氮生成,还能促进乙酸的产生,其青贮品质表现最佳。综上可知,与桑叶混合青贮时,甘蔗占比不低于25%时能改善混合青贮饲料的青贮品质;而甘蔗尾与桑叶混合青贮更倾向提高混合青贮饲料的有氧稳定性。

本文引用格式

周晓康 , 张洁 , 张男吉 , 顾啟超 , 郑一民 , 麻艳群 , 邹彩霞 . 甘蔗尾或甘蔗与桑叶混合青贮对其青贮品质的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022 , 34(1) : 500 -515 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2022.01.047

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of mixed silage of sugarcane or sugarcane top and mulberry leaf on the quality of silage through mixed silage, and provide scientific basis and technology for improving the utilization of unconventional feed resources in Guangxi and the practical application of mixed silage support. Experiment 1:mixed silage of sugarcane top and mulberry leaf; experiment 2:mixed silage of sugarcane and mulberry leaves. The mixing ratios of the two raw materials were 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75 and 0:100, respectively. The results of experiment 1 showed as follows:1) compared with the sugarcane top silage alone, sugarcane top mixed silage with mulberry leaf significantly increased the contents of crude protein, lactic acid, acetic acid and propionic acid of the mixed silage (P<0.05). 2) Compared with the mulberry leaf silage alone, mulberry leaf mixed silage with sugarcane top had a weaker effect on the pH and ammonia nitrogen content of the mixed silage (P>0.05), but it could reduce the pH and the growth rate of yeast after aerobic exposure. Therefore, the mixed silage of mulberry leaf and sugarcane top tended to improve the aerobic stability of the mixed silage. The results of experiment 1 showed as follows:1) compared with the sugarcane silage alone, sugarcane mixed silage with mulberry leaf significantly increased the contents of dry matter, crude protein, acetic acid and propionic acid of the mixed silage (P<0.05), and significantly reduced ethanol content and silage loss (P<0.05). 2) Compared with the mulberry leaf silage alone, mulberry leaf mixed silage with sugarcane significantly increased the contents of lactic acid and acetic acid of mixed silage, and significantly reduced the pH, the contents of ammonia nitrogen and butyric acid and the count of enteric bacilli (P<0.05), which improved the silage quality of mixed silage; when 25% mulberry leaf and 75% sugarcane were mixed silage, it could inhibit the ammonia nitrogen production of the mixed silage after aerobic exposure, and could also promote the production of acetic acid, and it had the best silage quality. In summary, when mixed silage with mulberry leaf, the proportion of sugarcane not less than 25% can improve the silage quality of the mixed silage; while the mixed silage of sugarcane top and mulberry leaf tends to improve the aerobic stability of the mixed silage.

参考文献

[1] GANDRA J R,OLIVEIRA E R,TAKIYA C S,et al.Chitosan improves the chemical composition,microbiological quality,and aerobic stability of sugarcane silage[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2016,214:44-52.
[2] ZHUANG Y F,CHEN X Z,DONG Z X,et al.Effects of fermented green juice and cellulase on the silage quality of sugarcane top[J].Advanced Materials Research,2012,554/556:1053-1056.
[3] 赵娜,樊启文,魏金涛,等.植物乳杆菌添加量对构树叶青贮品质的影响[J].动物营养学报,2020,32(5):2298-2305. ZHAO N,FAN Q W,WEI J T,et al.Effects of addition amount of Lactobacillus plantarum on quality of Broussonetia papyrifera leaves silage[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2020,32(5):2298-2305.(in Chinese)
[4] TRABI E B,YUAN X J,LI J F,et al.Effect of glucose and lactic acid bacteria on the fermentation quality,chemical compositions and in vitro digestibility of mulberry (Morus alba) leaf silage[J].Pakistan Journal of Zoology,2017,49(6):2271-2277.
[5] 黄峰,李浩,王坤,等.附生微生物对青贮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J].动物营养学报,2020,32(12):5976-5984. HUANG F,LI H,WANG K,et al.Effects of epiphytic microorganisms on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of silage[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2020,32(12):5976-5984.(in Chinese)
[6] WU Q L,GUO W Q,ZHENG H S,et al.Enhancement of volatile fatty acid production by co-fermentation of food waste and excess sludge without pH control:the mechanism and microbial community analyses[J].Bioresource Technology,2016,216:653-660.
[7] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003. ZHANG L Y.Feed analysis and feed quality testing technology[M].Beijing:China Agricultural University Press,2003.(in Chinese)
[8] VAN SOEST P J.Development of a comprehensive system of feed analyses and its application to forages[J].Journal of Animal Science,1967,26(1):119-128.  
[9] 叶鹏,周昱,陈鹭平.饲料中粗纤维的快速测定法[J].福建分析测试,2002,11(1):1502-1504. YE P,ZHOU Y,CHEN L P.Rapid method for determination of crude fiber in feedstuffs[J].Fujian Analysis & Testing,2002,11(1):1502-1504.(in Chinese)
[10] MURPHY R P.A method for the extraction of plant samples and the determination of total soluble carbohydrates[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1958,9(11):714-717.  
[11] 姜军,徐仁扣,赵安珍.用酸碱滴定法测定酸性红壤的pH缓冲容量[J].土壤通报,2006,37(6):1247-1248. JIANG J,XU R K,ZHAO A Z.Determination of pH buffer capacity of acid red soils by acid-base titration[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2006,37(6):1247-1248.(in Chinese)
[12] 王鹏,白春生,刘林,等.低温条件下混合乳酸菌制剂对芦苇发酵品质的影响[J].草地学报,2011,19(1):127-131. WANG P,BAI C S,LIU L,et al.Effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculant on the fermentation quality of reed grass (Phragmites australis Cav.Trin.ex Sterd.) at low temperature[J].Acta Agrectir Sinica,2011,19(1):127-131.(in Chinese)
[13] BRODERICK G A,KANG J H.Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75.  
[14] PRYCE J D.A modification of the Barker-Summerson method for the determination of lactic acid[J].Analyst,1969,94(125):1151-1152.
[15] ERWIN E S,MARCO G J,EMERY E M.Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1961,44(9):1768-1771.  
[16] 黄传书,雷霆,沈以红,等.桑叶绿茶适宜采收季节研究及桑园管理[J].蚕学通讯,2012,32(4):18-22. HUANG C S,LEI T,SHEN Y H,et al.Research on suitable harvesting season of mulberry leaf green tea and management of mulberry garden[J].Newsletter of Sericultural Science,2012,32(4):18-22.(in Chinese)
[17] OLIVEIRA A S,WEINBERG Z G,OGUNADE I M,et al.Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation,aerobic stability,and the performance of dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2017,100(6):4587-4603.  
[18] LARSEN S U,HJORT-GREGERSEN K,VAZIFEHKHORAN A H,et al.Co-ensiling of straw with sugar beet leaves increases the methane yield from straw[J].Bioresource Technology,2017,245(Pt A):106-115.
[19] WEGNER M I,BOOTH A N,BOHSTEDT G,et al.The "in vitro" conversion of inorganic nitrogen to protein by microorganisms from the cow's rumen[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1940,23(11):1123-1129.  
[20] HART E B,BOHSTEDT G,DEOBALD H J,et al.The utilization of simple nitrogenous compounds such as urea and ammonium bicarbonate by growing calves[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1939,22(10):785-798.  
[21] MUCK R E,MOSER L E,PITT R E.Postharvest factors affecting ensiling[M]//BUXTON D R,MUCK R E,HARRISON J H.Silage science and technology.Madison:American Society of Agronomy,Inc.,Crop Science Society of America,Inc.,Soil Science Society of America,Inc.,2003:251-304.
[22] BUXTON D R,MUCK R E,HARRISON J H.Silage science and technology[M].Madison:American Society of Agronomy,Inc.,Crop Science Society of America,Inc.,Soil Science Society of America, Inc.,2003.
[23] 曾黎,闫京阳,张想峰,等.苜蓿与芦苇混合青贮效果研究[J].新疆畜牧业,2011(增刊1):19-21. ZENG L,YAN J Y,ZHANG X F,et al.Study on the effect of mixed silage of alfalfa and reed[J].Xinjiang Animal Husbandry,2011(Suppl.1):19-21.(in Chinese)
[24] 董志浩,原现军,闻爱友,等.添加乳酸菌和发酵底物对桑叶青贮发酵品质的影响[J].草业学报,2016,25(6):167-174. DONG Z H,YUAN X J,WEN A Y,et al.Effect of lactic acid bacteria and fermentation substrates on the quality of mulberry (Morus alba) leaf silage[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2016,25(6):167-174.(in Chinese)
[25] 郭旭生,丁武蓉,玉柱.青贮饲料发酵品质评定体系及其新进展[J].中国草地学报,2008,30(4):100-106. GUO X S,DING W R,YU Z.The evaluation system of fermentation quality of ensiled forage and its improvement[J].Chinese Journal of Grassland,2008,30(4):100-106.(in Chinese)
[26] MERRY R J,DAVIES D R.Propionibacteria and their role in the biological control of aerobic spoilage in silage[J].Le Lait,1999,79(1):149-164.  
[27] KUNG L,Jr,STANLEY R W.Effect of stage of maturity on the nutritive value of whole-plant sugarcane preserved as silage[J].Journal of Animal Science,1982,54(4):689-696.  
[28] PAHLOW G,MUCK R E,DRIEHUIS F,et al.Microbiology of ensiling[M]//BUXTON D R,MUCK R E,HARRISON J H.Silage science and technology.Madison:American Society of Agronomy,Inc.,Crop Science Society of America,Inc.,Soil Science Society of America,Inc.,2003:31-93.
[29] BORREANI G,TABACCO E.The relationship of silage temperature with the microbiological status of the face of corn silage bunkers[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2010,93(6):2620-2629.  
[30] WILKINSON J M,NEWMAN G,ALLEN D M.Maize:producing and feeding maize silage[M].Kingston:Chalcombe Publications,1998.
文章导航

/