研究论文 RESEARCH PAPER

菌酶联用制剂对滩羊生长性能、养分表观消化率、瘤胃发酵参数及血清生化指标的影响

  • 张腱皓 ,
  • 钟锐 ,
  • 李荫柱 ,
  • 李海海 ,
  • 雷晓青 ,
  • 寇启芳 ,
  • 张桂杰
展开
  • 1. 宁夏大学农学院, 银川 750021;
    2. 宁夏草牧业工程技术研究中心, 银川 750021;
    3. 天津云力之星生物科技有限公司, 天津 300354;
    4. 吴忠市红寺堡区天源良种羊繁育养殖有限公司, 吴忠 751900
张腱皓(2000-),男,河南辉县人,硕士研究生,研究方向为动物营养与饲料科学。E-mail:1179051152@qq.com

收稿日期: 2022-01-10

  网络出版日期: 2022-07-14

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31960672);农牧交错带牛羊牧繁农育关键技术集成示范项目(16200158-08);宁夏高等学校一流学科建设(草学学科)资助项目(NXYLXK2017A01);滩羊大理石花纹(雪花)肉生产关键技术研究与集成示范(2019BEF02001)

Effects of Bacteria-Enzyme Combined Preparation on Growth Performance, Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation Parameters and Serum Biochemical Indexes of Tan Sheep

  • ZHANG Jianhao ,
  • ZHONG Rui ,
  • LI Yinzhu ,
  • LI Haihai ,
  • LEI Xiaoqing ,
  • KOU Qifang ,
  • ZHANG Guijie
Expand
  • 1. Agricultural college of Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China;
    2. Ningxia Grassland and Animal Husbandry Engineering Technology Research Center, Yinchuan 750021, China;
    3. Winning of Tianjin Biotechnology Industry Company, Tianjin 300354, China;
    4. Hongsibu District Tianyuan Well-Bred Sheep Breeding Co., Ltd., Wuzhong 751900, China

Received date: 2022-01-10

  Online published: 2022-07-14

摘要

本试验旨在研究菌酶联用制剂对滩羊生长性能、养分表观消化率、瘤胃发酵参数及血清生化指标的影响。选用4月龄左右、体重[(19.12±1.83)kg]相近的健康去势滩羔羊48只,随机分为4组,每组3个重复,每个重复4只羊。各组分别在基础饲粮中添加0(对照组)、0.05%、0.10%、0.15%的菌酶联用制剂(酵母菌1.0×1010 CFU/g、纤维素酶10 000 IU/g、木聚糖酶1 000 IU/g和甘露聚糖酶600 IU/g)。预试期14 d,正试期134 d。结果表明:1)与对照组相比,饲粮中添加0.05%、0.10%、0.15%菌酶联用制剂显著增加了滩羊平均日采食量和终末体重(P<0.05);饲粮中添加0.10%和0.15%菌酶联用制剂显著增加了滩羊平均日增重(P<0.05),显著降低了料重比(P<0.05)。2)与对照组相比,饲粮中添加0.05%、0.10%、0.15%菌酶联用制剂显著增加了饲粮干物质、有机物、中性洗涤纤维表观消化率(P<0.05),饲粮中添加0.10%和0.15%菌酶联用制剂显著增加了饲粮粗蛋白质表观消化率(P<0.05)。3)与对照组相比,饲粮中添加0.05%、0.10%、0.15%菌酶联用制剂极显著增加了瘤胃液挥发性脂肪酸、乙酸和丙酸含量(P<0.01),显著增加了瘤胃液戊酸含量(P<0.05),显著降低了瘤胃液氨态氮含量和乙酸/丙酸(P<0.05);饲粮中添加0.10%和0.15%菌酶联用制剂显著增加了瘤胃液丁酸含量(P<0.05),显著降低了瘤胃液异戊酸含量(P<0.05)。4)与对照组相比,饲粮中添加0.05%、0.10%和0.15%菌酶联用制剂显著增加了血清总蛋白、白蛋白、球蛋白和免疫球蛋白G含量(P<0.05);饲粮中添加0.10%和0.15%菌酶联用制剂显著降低了血清尿素氮和肌酐含量(P<0.05),显著增加了血清葡萄糖和甘油三酯含量(P<0.05),极显著增加了血清免疫球蛋白M含量(P<0.01)。综上所述,饲粮中添加菌酶联用制剂能够提高滩羊饲粮养分表观消化率,改善瘤胃发酵参数和血清生化指标,进而改善滩羊生长性能,菌酶联用制剂添加量以0.10%为宜。

本文引用格式

张腱皓 , 钟锐 , 李荫柱 , 李海海 , 雷晓青 , 寇启芳 , 张桂杰 . 菌酶联用制剂对滩羊生长性能、养分表观消化率、瘤胃发酵参数及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022 , 34(7) : 4562 -4571 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2022.07.045

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of bacteria-enzyme combined preparation on growth performance, nutrient apparent digestibility, rumen fermentation parameters and serum biochemical indexes of Tan sheep. Forty-eight 4-month-old healthy castrated beach lambs with similar body weight[(19.12±1.83) kg] were randomly divided into 4 groups with 3 replicates in each group and 4 lambs in each replicate. Sheep in 4 groups were fed basal diets supplemented 0 (control group), 0.05%, 0.10% and 0.15% bacteria-enzyme combined preparation (active yeast 1.0×1010 CFU/g, cellulase 10 000 IU/g, xylanase 1 000 IU/g and mannanase 600 IU/g), respectively. The pre-test period lasted for 14 days, and the experimental period lasted for 134 days. The results showed as follows:1) compared with the control group, dietary supplemented 0.05%, 0.10% and 0.15% bacteria-enzyme combined preparation significantly increased the final body weight and average daily feed intake of Tan sheep (P<0.05); dietary supplemented 0.10% and 0.15% bacteria-enzyme combined preparation significantly increased the average daily gain of Tan sheep (P<0.05), and significantly decreased the feed to gain ratio (P<0.05). 2) Compared with the control group, dietary supplemented 0.05%, 0.10% and 0.15% bacteria-enzyme combined preparation significantly increased the apparent digestibility of dry matter, organic matter and neutral detergent fiber in diet (P<0.05), dietary supplemented 0.10% and 0.15% bacteria-enzyme combined preparation significantly increased the apparent digestibility of crude protein in diet (P<0.05). 3) Compared with the control group, dietary supplemented 0.05%, 0.10% and 0.15% bacteria-enzyme combined preparation significantly increased the contents of volatile fatty acids, acetic acid and propionic acid in rumen fluid (P<0.01), significantly increased the rumen fluid valeric acid content (P<0.05), and significantly decreased the ammonia nitrogen content and acetic acid/propionic acid in rumen fluid (P<0.05); dietary supplemented 0.10% and 0.15% bacteria-enzyme combined preparation significantly increased the rumen fluid butyric acid content (P<0.05), and significantly decreased the rumen fluid isovaleric acid content (P<0.05). 4) Compared with the control group, dietary supplemented 0.05%, 0.10% and 0.15% bacteria-enzyme combined preparation significantly increased the contents of total protein, albumin, globulin and immunoglobulin G in serum (P<0.05); dietary supplemented 0.10% and 0.15% bacteria-enzyme combined preparation significantly decreased the contents of urea nitrogen and creatinine in serum (P<0.05), significantly increased the contents of glucose and triglycerides in serum (P<0.05), and significantly increased the serum immunoglobulin M content (P<0.01). In conclusion, dietary supplementation of bacterium-enzyme combined preparation can increase the nutrient apparent digestibility, improve the rumen fermentation parameters and serum biochemical indexes, and further improve the growth performance of Tan sheep. The optimal addition amount of bacteria-enzyme combined preparation is 0.10%.

参考文献

[1] 刘亚钊,王明利,蒋年华.中国草产品贸易格局和发展趋势分析[J].草业科学,2018,35(11):2765-2772. LIU Y Z,WANG M L,JIANG N H.Analysis of trade patterns and development trends of Chinese grass products[J].Pratacultural Science,2018,35(11):2765-2772.(in Chinese)
[2] 郭婷,薛彪,白娟,等.刍议中国牧草产业发展现状——以苜蓿、燕麦为例[J].草业科学,2019,36(5):1466-1473. GUO T,XUE B,BAI J,et al.Discussion of the present situation of China forage grass industry development:an example using alfalfa and oats[J].Pratacultural Science,2019,36(5):1466-1473.(in Chinese)
[3] MOUSA K M,EL-MALKY O M,KOMONNA O F,et al.Effect of live dried yeast supplementation on digestion coefficients,some rumen fermentation,blood constituents and some reproductive and productive parameters in Rahmani sheep[J].Journal of American Science,2012,8(2):291-303.
[4] 张弦,章亭洲,瞿明仁.活性干酵母及酵母培养物在反刍动物中的研究进展与应用[J].动物营养学报,2022,34(1):20-29. ZHANG X,ZHANG T Z,QU M R.Research progress and application of active dry yeast and yeast culture in ruminants[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2022,34(1):20-29.(in Chinese)
[5] LEE J S,KACEM N,KIM W S,et al.Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii supplementation on performance and physiological traits of Holstein calves under heat stress conditions[J].Animals,2019,9(8):510.
[6] CHAUCHEYRAS-DURAND F,FONTY G.Establishment of cellulolytic bacteria and development of fermentative activities in the rumen of gnotobiotically-reared lambs receiving the microbial additive Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077[J].Reproduction,Nutrition,Development,2001,41(1):57-68.  
[7] CHAUCHEYRAS-DURAND F,FONTY G.Influence of a probiotic yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077) on microbial colonization and fermentations in the rumen of newborn lambs[J].Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease,2002,14(1):30-36.  
[8] CHAUCHEYRAS-DURAND F,WALKER N D,BACH A.Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem:past,present and future[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2008,145(1/2/3/4):5-26.
[9] 汪成,马健,胡瑞,等.活性干酵母对西门塔尔杂交牛生长性能、营养物质表观消化率、瘤胃发酵参数及血清生化和抗氧化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2021,33(7):3925-3933. WANG C,MA J,HU R,et al.Effects of active dry yeast on growth performance,nutrient apparent digestibilities,rumen fermentation parameters and serum biochemical and antioxidant indexes of Simmental crossbred cattle[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2021,33(7):3925-3933.(in Chinese)
[10] CAI L Y,YU J K,HARTANTO R,et al.Dietary supplementation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae,Clostridium butyricum and their combination ameliorate rumen fermentation and growth performance of heat-stressed goats[J].Animals,2021,11(7):2116.
[11] MENDOZA G D,LOERA-CORRAL O,PLATA-PREZ F X,et al.Considerations on the use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve forage utilization[J].The Scientific World Journal,2014,2014:247437.
[12] ABID K,JABRI J,AMMAR H,et al. Effect of treating olive cake with fibrolytic enzymes on feed intake,digestibility and performance in growing lambs[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2020,261:114405.
[13] 王红梅,屠焰,张乃锋,等.饲用酶制剂在反刍动物营养中的应用进展[J].草业学报,2017,26(3):199-213. WANG H M,TU Y,ZHANG N F,et al.Application of exogenous enzymes in ruminant nutrition[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2017,26(3):199-213.(in Chinese)
[14] WANG P,LIU C Q,CHANG J,et al.Effect of physicochemical pretreatments plus enzymatic hydrolysis on the composition and morphologic structure of corn straw[J].Renewable Energy,2019,138:502-508.
[15] 孟芳,刘立山,郎侠,等.外源纤维素酶对断奶羔羊瘤胃体外发酵特性的影响[J].动物营养学报,2020,32(6):2911-2920. MENG F,LIU L S,LANG X,et al.Effects of exogenous cellulose on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of weaner lambs[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2020,32(6):2911-2920.(in Chinese)
[16] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].3版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007:48-171. ZHANG L Y.Feed analysis and feed quality detection technology[M].3rd ed.Beijing:China Agricultural University Press,2007:48-171.(in Chinese)
[17] 王加启.反刍动物营养学研究方法[M].北京:现代教育出版社,2011:127-141. WANG J Q.Research methods of ruminant nutrition[M].Beijing:Modern Education Press,2011:127-141.(in Chinese)
[18] HOSSAIN S A,PARNERKAR S,HAQUE N,et al.Influence of dietary supplementation of live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on nutrient utilization,ruminal and biochemical profiles of Kankrej calves[J].International Journal of Applied Animal Sciences,2012,1(1):30-38.
[19] 马秀花,桂瑞麒,焦娜,等.荞麦秸秆饲粮条件下甘露寡糖对滩羊瘤胃菌群结构的影响[J].动物营养学报,2021,33(4):2365-2377. MA X H,GUI R Q,JIAO N,et al.Effect of mannan oligosaccharides on rumen bacterial flora structure of tan sheep under buckwheat straw diet condition[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2021,33(4):2365-2377.(in Chinese)
[20] IZUDDIN W I,LOH T C,SAMSUDIN A A,et al.Effects of postbiotic supplementation on growth performance,ruminal fermentation and microbial profile,blood metabolite and GHR,IGF-1 and MCT-1 gene expression in post-weaning lambs[J].BMC Veterinary Research,2019,15(1):315.
[21] PINOS-RODRÍGUEZ J M,ROBINSON P H,ORTEGA M E,et al.Performance and rumen fermentation of dairy calves supplemented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae1077 or Saccharomyces boulardii1079[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2008,140(3/4):223-232.
[22] 曾钰,谢昕廷,彭忠利,等.不同精粗比饲粮中添加酵母培养物对牦牛瘤胃体外发酵参数的影响[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(12):5582-5594. ZENG Y,XIE X T,PENG Z L,et al.Effects of yeast culture supplementation in diet with different concentrate to forage ratios on in vitro rumen fermentation parameters of yaks[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2019,31(12):5582-5594.(in Chinese)
[23] ZHU W,WEI Z H,XU N N,et al.Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on performance and rumen fermentation and microbiota in dairy cows fed a diet containing low quality forage[J].Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology,2017,8:36.
[24] ADESOGAN A T,ARRIOLA K G,JIANG Y,et al.Symposium review:technologies for improving fiber utilization[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2019,102(6):5726-5755.  
[25] OGUNADE I M,LAY J,ANDRIES K,et al.Effects of live yeast on differential genetic and functional attributes of rumen microbiota in beef cattle[J].Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology,2019,10:68.
[26] MALEKKHAHI M,TAHMASBI A M,NASERIAN A A,et al.Effects of supplementation of active dried yeast and malate during sub-acute ruminal acidosis on rumen fermentation,microbial population,selected blood metabolites,and milk production in dairy cows[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2016,213:29-43.
[27] YIANNIKOURIS A,FRANÇOIS J,POUGHON L,et al.Adsorption of zearalenone by beta-D-glucans in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall[J].Journal of food protection,2004,67(6):1195-1200.  
文章导航

/