1 材料与方法
1.1 试验材料
1.2 试验设计
1.3 饲养管理与饲粮
表1 基础饲粮组成及营养水平(风干基础)Table 1 Composition and nutrient levels of the basal diet (air-dry basis)% |
| 项目 Items | 含量 Content |
|---|---|
| 原料 Ingredients | |
| 玉米 Corn | 56.40 |
| 豆粕 Soybean meal | 36.59 |
| 大豆油 Soybean oil | 3.00 |
| 石粉 Limestone | 0.90 |
| 磷酸氢钙 CaHPO4 | 1.60 |
| 食盐 NaCl | 0.30 |
| DL-蛋氨酸 DL-Met | 0.11 |
| 氯化胆碱 Choline chloride | 0.10 |
| 预混料 Premix1) | 1.00 |
| 合计 Total | 100.00 |
| 营养水平 Nutrient levels2) | |
| 代谢能 ME/(MJ/kg) | 12.38 |
| 粗蛋白质 CP | 21.00 |
| 钙 Ca | 0.85 |
| 总磷 TP | 0.65 |
| 赖氨酸 Lys | 1.11 |
| 蛋氨酸 Met | 0.43 |
1)每千克预混料含有 One kilogram of the premix contained the following:VA 10 670 IU,VD3 2 670 IU,VE 53.33 mg,VK3 2.40 mg,VB1 1.98 mg,VB2 6.67 mg,VB6 3.60 mg,VB12 0.01 mg,烟酸 nicotinic acid 53.33 mg,泛酸 pantothenic acid 12.00 mg,叶酸 folic acid 0.69 mg,生物素 biotin 0.16 mg,Cu 8.33 mg,Fe 48.75 mg,Zn 41.67 mg,Mn 41.67 mg,I 1.25 mg,Se 0.38 mg,赖氨酸 Lys (78%) 240.00 g,蛋氨酸 Met (99%) 60.00 g。 2)代谢能为计算值,其余为实测值。ME was a calculated value, while the others were measured values. |
1.4 样品采集与指标测定
1.4.1 空肠形态
1.4.2 空肠屏障和炎症相关基因的表达
表2 引物序列Table 2 Primer sequences |
| 基因 Genes | 引物序列 Primer sequences (5'—3') | 登录号 Accession number |
|---|---|---|
| β-肌动蛋白 β-actin | F:CAGGTCATCACCATCGGCAACG R:GACAGCACCGTGTTGGCGTAGAGGT | NM_205518.2 |
| 密封蛋白-1 Claudin-1 | F:GGTATGGCAACAGAGTGGCT R:CAGCCAATGAAGAGGGCTGA | NM_001013611.2 |
| 闭合蛋白 Occludin | F:CAGGTGCACCCTCCAGATTG R:TATGTCGTTGCTGGGTGCAT | NM_001163647 |
| 闭锁小带蛋白-2 ZO-2 | F:CACCACCACCTGTTTCTGTG R:TTCACTCCCTTCCTCTTCCA | XM_046934792.1 |
| 白细胞介素-6 IL-6 | F:AGGGCCGTTCGCTATTTGAA R:CAGAGGATTGTGCCCGAACT | NM_204628.2 |
| 肿瘤坏死因子-α TNF-α | F:GAGCAGGGCTGACACGGAT R:CAGGCACAAAAGAGCTGATGG | XM_004945996.4 |
1.4.3 盲肠菌群分析
1.5 数据统计分析
2 结果与分析
2.1 DAI对文昌鸡空肠形态的影响
图1 文昌鸡空肠形态(比例尺=200 μm)CON:对照组 control group;DAI500:500 mg/kg DAI组 500 mg/kg DAI group;DAI1000:1 000 mg/kg DAI组 1 000 mg/kg DAI group;DAI2000:2 000 mg/kg DAI组 2 000 mg/kg DAI group;DAI4000:4 000 mg/kg DAI组 4 000 mg/kg DAI group。下图同 the same as below。 Fig.1 Jejunal morphology of Wenchang chickens (scale=200 μm) |
表3 DAI对文昌鸡空肠形态的影响Table 3 Effects of DAI on jejunal morphology of Wenchang chickens |
| 项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | DAI添加水平 DAI supplemental levels/(mg/kg) | P值 P-value | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | 1 000 | 2 000 | 4 000 | 方差分析 ANOVA | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||||||
| 绒毛高度 VH/μm | 827.15 ±96.69c | 1 091.76 ±52.54b | 1 294.59 ±187.05a | 1 059.88 ±107.63b | 986.53 ±98.42b | 0.001 | 0.166 | 0.001 | ||||||
| 隐窝深度 CD/μm | 213.90 ±86.93 | 207.08 ±65.94 | 195.52 ±31.34 | 185.36 ±84.01 | 163.60 ±47.58 | 0.594 | 0.028 | 0.092 | ||||||
| 绒隐比 VH/CD | 4.32 ±1.33b | 5.71 ±1.65ab | 7.24 ±1.17a | 7.31 ±2.91a | 6.05 ±1.50ab | 0.009 | 0.022 | 0.001 | ||||||
同行数据肩标无字母或相同小写字母表示差异不显著(P>0.05),不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。下表同。 | |
In the same row, values with no letter or the same lowercase letter superscripts mean no significant difference (P>0.05), while with different lowercase letter superscripts mean significant difference (P<0.05). The same as below. |
2.2 DAI对文昌鸡空肠屏障和炎症相关基因表达的影响
表4 DAI对文昌鸡空肠屏障和炎症相关基因表达的影响Table 4 Effects of DAI on expression of jejunal barrier and inflammation-related genes of Wenchang chickens |
| 项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | DAI添加水平 DAI supplemental levels/(mg/kg) | P值 P-value | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | 1 000 | 2 000 | 4 000 | 方差分析 ANOVA | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||||||
| 密封蛋白-1 Claudin-1 | 1.00 ±0.15 | 0.94 ±0.34 | 1.24 ±1.50 | 1.20 ±0.29 | 0.77 ±0.43 | 0.885 | 0.867 | 0.706 | ||||||
| 闭合蛋白 Occludin | 1.01 ±0.13b | 1.28 ±0.25b | 2.02 ±0.37a | 1.99 ±0.21a | 1.07 ±0.21b | 0.001 | 0.317 | 0.001 | ||||||
| 闭锁小带蛋白-2 ZO-2 | 1.01 ±0.14 | 0.97 ±0.39 | 0.77 ±0.07 | 0.95 ±0.33 | 0.84 ±0.25 | 0.679 | 0.355 | 0.578 | ||||||
| 白细胞介素-6 IL-6 | 1.01 ±0.11a | 0.57 ±0.07b | 0.53 ±0.04b | 1.04 ±0.38a | 1.19 ±0.44a | 0.009 | 0.154 | 0.006 | ||||||
| 肿瘤坏死因子-α TNF-α | 1.00 ±0.42a | 0.45 ±0.06c | 0.39 ±0.07c | 0.56 ±0.14bc | 0.87 ±0.29ab | 0.009 | 0.786 | 0.001 | ||||||
2.3 DAI对文昌鸡盲肠微生物的影响
2.3.1 盲肠微生物多样性
表5 DAI对文昌鸡盲肠微生物α多样性的影响Table 5 Effects of DAI on cecal microbiota α diversity of Wenchang chickens |
| 项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | DAI添加水平 DAI supplemental levels/(mg/kg) | P值 P-value | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | 1 000 | 2 000 | 4 000 | 方差分析 ANOVA | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||||||
| 观测物种数 Observed_species | 327.05 ±64.93 | 399.52 ±19.31 | 370.72 ±33.33 | 367.15 ±42.23 | 375.18 ±47.40 | 0.109 | 0.299 | 0.214 | ||||||
| Chao1指数 Chao1 index | 327.25 ±64.96 | 399.90 ±19.33 | 371.10 ±33.69 | 367.31 ±42.25 | 375.59 ±47.44 | 0.109 | 0.298 | 0.214 | ||||||
| Shannon指数 Shannon index | 5.68 ±0.61b | 6.85 ±0.26a | 6.46 ±0.37a | 6.34 ±0.43ab | 6.29 ±0.79ab | 0.018 | 0.425 | 0.050 | ||||||
| Simpson指数 Simpson index | 0.92 ±0.03b | 0.98 ±0.01a | 0.96 ±0.01a | 0.96 ±0.01a | 0.95 ±0.05ab | 0.045 | 0.591 | 0.029 | ||||||
| Ace指数 Ace index | 327.93 ±65.42 | 399.88 ±19.90 | 371.75 ±34.59 | 368.16 ±42.27 | 375.69 ±47.58 | 0.119 | 0.304 | 0.216 | ||||||
| 覆盖率 Coverage/% | 100.00 ±0.00 | 100.00 ±0.01 | 100.00 ±0.00 | 100.00 ±0.00 | 100.00 ±0.01 | 0.107 | 0.374 | 0.159 | ||||||
2.3.2 盲肠微生物门和属水平相对丰度
表6 DAI对文昌鸡盲肠微生物门水平相对丰度的影响Table 6 Effects of DAI on relative abundance of cecal microbiota at phylum level of Wenchang chickens% |
| 项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | DAI添加水平 DAI supplemental levels/(mg/kg) | P值 P-value | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | 1 000 | 2 000 | 4 000 | 方差分析 ANOVA | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||||||
| 厚壁菌门 Firmicutes | 61.75 ±8.78c | 76.16 ±5.94a | 73.60 ±10.57ab | 64.95 ±6.40bc | 65.42 ±10.97bc | 0.009 | 0.735 | 0.031 | ||||||
| 拟杆菌门 Bacteroidota | 30.87 ±9.30 | 20.95 ±5.43 | 21.33 ±9.84 | 26.58 ±5.38 | 28.72 ±12.04 | 0.112 | 0.899 | 0.056 | ||||||
| 变形菌门 Proteobacteria | 6.58 ±3.30a | 1.78 ±1.12b | 4.27 ±3.16ab | 4.54 ±2.73ab | 4.29 ±1.94ab | 0.017 | 0.581 | 0.172 | ||||||
| 脱硫杆菌门 Desulfobacterota | 0.79 ±0.52 | 0.88 ±0.63 | 0.65 ±0.61 | 0.61 ±0.52 | 1.31 ±0.46 | 0.165 | 0.271 | 0.121 | ||||||
| 放线菌门 Actinobacteriota | 0.10 ±0.03 | 0.16 ±0.06 | 0.14 ±0.09 | 0.41 ±0.89 | 0.18 ±0.20 | 0.697 | 0.380 | 0.593 | ||||||
| 弯曲杆菌门 Campilobacterota | 0.04 ±0.06 | 0.06 ±0.01 | 0.01 ±0.01 | 0.40 ±1.12 | 0.00 ±0.00 | 0.891 | 0.657 | 0.767 | ||||||
表7 DAI对文昌鸡盲肠微生物属水平相对丰度的影响Table 7 Effects of DAI on relative abundance of cecal microbiota at genus level of Wenchang chickens% |
| 项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | DAI添加水平 DAI supplemental levels/(mg/kg) | P值 P-value | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | 1 000 | 2 000 | 4 000 | 方差分析 ANOVA | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||||||
| 拟杆菌属 Bacteroides | 7.63 ±2.98b | 7.97 ±3.83b | 7.93 ±2.69b | 13.85 ±3.72a | 13.19 ±2.84a | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||||||
| 副拟杆菌属 Parabacteroides | 10.44 ±2.18 | 9.81 ±2.40 | 9.88 ±1.25 | 9.94 ±2.22 | 9.43 ±1.78 | 0.901 | 0.389 | 0.690 | ||||||
| 梭菌纲vadinBB60群 Clostridia_vadinBB60_ group | 7.86 ±2.64 | 10.70 ±3.90 | 10.09 ±2.86 | 7.41 ±2.93 | 9.29 ±3.80 | 0.225 | 0.910 | 0.675 | ||||||
| 粪杆菌属 Faecalibacterium | 5.10 ±2.32 | 8.21 ±3.09 | 5.84 ±1.95 | 5.36 ±2.55 | 5.43 ±3.20 | 0.149 | 0.489 | 0.418 | ||||||
| 扭链瘤胃球菌群 Ruminococcus_torques_ group | 5.97 ±3.32 | 7.91 ±2.22 | 6.52 ±1.93 | 5.20 ±1.03 | 5.35 ±0.85 | 0.084 | 0.109 | 0.132 | ||||||
| 梭菌纲UCG-014 Clostridia_UCG-014 | 3.81 ±2.13b | 6.07 ±2.88ab | 7.81 ±3.16a | 7.96 ±2.77a | 7.31 ±2.17a | 0.020 | 0.006 | 0.002 | ||||||
| 另枝菌属 Alistipes | 4.62 ±2.44 | 3.18 ±1.52 | 3.84 ±2.22 | 3.84 ±1.41 | 3.86 ±1.47 | 0.665 | 0.681 | 0.601 | ||||||
| 厌氧原体属 Anaeroplasma | 2.62 ±1.84 | 2.56 ±1.34 | 3.18 ±1.60 | 3.27 ±1.72 | 1.89 ±0.91 | 0.386 | 0.669 | 0.275 | ||||||
| UCG-005 | 2.62 ±1.25 | 2.97 ±1.31 | 2.23 ±0.73 | 2.71 ±0.86 | 2.50 ±1.11 | 0.729 | 0.681 | 0.918 | ||||||
| 埃希氏菌-志贺氏菌属 Escherichia-Shigella | 1.37 ±0.97 | 1.24 ±0.52 | 1.48 ±0.65 | 0.51 ±0.55 | 1.22 ±0.60 | 0.061 | 0.208 | 0.405 | ||||||

京公网安备 11010802041926号