饲料营养

乳铁蛋白素B和天蚕素P1对投喂大肠杆菌断奶仔猪生长及肠道微生物区系的影响

展开
  •  
    (1.天津市畜牧兽医研究所,天津300112;2.中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所,
    长沙410125;3.德国家畜生物研究所,Dummerstorf D-18196)
侯振平(1978—),女,河南扶沟人,助理研究员,博士,主要研究方向为微生物与营养。E-mail: hzp2006@126.com

网络出版日期: 2011-09-28

基金资助

国家863项目(2008AA10Z316);国家自然科学基金面上项目(30700581);中德联合培养博士项目

Effects of Lactoferricin B and Cecropin P1 on Growth and Gut Microflora in Weaned Piglets Challenged with Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli

Expand
  • (1. Tianjin Institute of Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Tianjin 300112, China; 2. Institute of Subtropical and
    Agriculture, The Chinese Academy Sciences, Changsha 410125, China; 3. Leibniz Institute for
    Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf D-18196, Germany)

Online published: 2011-09-28

摘要

本研究旨在探讨投喂大肠杆菌后乳铁蛋白素B(Lfcin B)和天蚕素P1 (Cec P1)对断奶仔猪生长及肠道微生物区系影响。选用48头28日龄断奶的德国大白杂交二代断奶仔猪[(7.18±1.32) kg],根据体重、窝别、性别将其随机分成4组:对照组、产肠毒素组(ETEC)、乳铁蛋白素组(Lfcin B)、天蚕素组(Cec P1),每组2个重复,每个重复6头猪,试验期为12 d。结果表明,1)试验期间对照组、ETEC组、Lfcin B组、Cec P1组仔猪体重及平均日增重均差异不显著(P>0.05)。2)ETEC组仔猪腹泻率显著高于其他组(P<0.05),而其他组之间差异不显著(P>0.05)。在进行第1次攻毒后,即仔猪29日龄,ETEC组、Lfcin B组和Cec P1组仔猪的粪便干物质均显著下降(P<0.05),第2次攻毒后的第2天,即仔猪31日龄,Lfcin B组和Cec P1组的仔猪分别饲喂了Lfcin B和Cec P1,对照组仔猪的粪便干物质仍显著高于ETEC组和Lfcin B组(P<0.05),但已与Cec P1组差异不显著(P>0.05)。3)各组仔猪的肠道微生物区系差异不显著(P>0.05)。由此可知,各组仔猪生长及肠道微生物区系差异不显著,但Cec P1来源于猪肠道微生物寄生线虫,比Lfcin B更能适应肠道环境,更有利于仔猪健康。

本文引用格式

侯振平,印遇龙,王文杰,刘景喜,SOUFFRANT W B . 乳铁蛋白素B和天蚕素P1对投喂大肠杆菌断奶仔猪生长及肠道微生物区系的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2011 , 23(09) : 1536 -1544 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2011.09.012

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of lactoferricin B (Lfcin B) and cecropin P1 (Cec P1) on growth and gut microflora in weaned piglets after orally challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC). Forty-eight 28-day-old German Landrace×German Landrace weaned piglets with average body weight of (7.18±1.32) kg were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments (the control, ETEC, LfcinB, Cec P1) with two replicates per treatment and six pigs per replicate. The feeding trial lasted for 12 days. The results showed as follows: 1) there were no significant differences in body weight and average daily gain among control, ETEC, Lfcin B and Cec P1 group (P>0.05). 2) The incidence of diarrhea in ETEC group was significantly higher than that in the other groups (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference among control, Lfcin B and Cec P1 group (P>0.05). After challenged with ETEC firstly, the content of dry matter in feces of 29-day-old weaned piglets in ETEC, Lfcin B and Cec P1 group was significantly decreased (P<0.05), and after challenged with ETEC secondly, the content of dry matter in feces of 31-day-old weaned piglets in ETEC and Lfcin B group was still significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the control group and Cec P1 group. 3) There was no significant difference in gut microflora among all groups (P>0.05). In conclusion, there are no significant differences in the growth and gut microflora of weaned piglets among the control, ETEC, Lfcin B and Cec P1 group, however, because Cec P1 is separated from nematode Ascaris suum of gut microbe in pigs, it lives more easily in the gut than Lfcin B, and it is more favourable to the health of piglets.[Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2011, 23(9):1536 -1544]

参考文献

[1]温刘发,何丹林,张常明,等.抗菌肽酵母制剂的生产及其作饲料添加剂应用价值的探讨[J].广东蚕业,2001,35(2):34-36.

[2]温刘发,何丹林,张常明,等.抗菌肽酵母制剂作为饲料添加剂的应用前景[J].中国饲料,2001(23):22-23.

[3]BELLAMY W, TAKASE M, YAMAUCHI K, et al. Identification of the bactericidal domain of lactoferrin[J]. Biochimica Biophysica Acta, 1992, 1121:130-136.

[4]冯兴军,王建华,杨雅麟,等.乳铁蛋白肽(Lactoferricin)作用机制研究进展[J].中国生物工程杂志,2004,1:23-26.

[5]JONES E M, SMART A, BLOOMBERG G, et al. Lactoferricin, a new antimicrobial peptide[J]. The Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 1994, 77:206-214.

[6]VMAR DAHET M. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of small protein of Indigofera oblongifolia leaves[J]. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 1999, 64:277-282.

[7]JONES E M, SMART A, BLOOMBERG G, et al. Lactoferricin, a new antimicrobial peptide[J]. The Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 1994, 77:206-214.

[8]VLADIMIR S, KELLIE S, GREGOR R. Activity of cecropin P1 and FA-LL-37 against urogenital microflora[J]. Microbes and Infection, 2000, 2:773-777. S1286457900003592/FLA.

[9]丁兆忠,苗向阳,孙世铎,等.抗菌肽Cecropin P1基因真核表达载体的构建[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2006,6:12-14.

[10]王爱苹,汪以真,陈正贤.猪抗菌肽cecropin-P1单克隆抗体的制备[J].上海畜牧兽医通讯,2008,4:36-38.

[11]ELLISON R T, GIEHL T J. Killing of gram-negative bacteria by lactoferrin and lysozyme[J]. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1991, 88:1080-1091.

[12]PIERCE A D, COLAVIZZA M, BENAISS A, et al. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of bovine lactotransferrin[J]. European Journal of Biochemistry, 1991, 196:177-184.

[13]DIONYSIUS D A, GRIEVE P A, MILNE J M. Forms of lactoferrin: their antibacterial effect on enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1993, 76:2597-2606.

[14]BOMAN H G, AGERBERTH B, BOMAN A. Mechanisms of action on Escherichia coli of cecropin P1 and PR-39, two antibacterial peptides from pig intestine[J]. Infection and Immunity, 1993, 61(7):2978-2984.

[15]DIONYSIUS D A, MILINE J M. Antibacterial peptides of bovine lactoferrin: purification and characterization[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1997, 80:667-674.

[16]ELIASSEN L T, BERGE G, SVEINBJORNSSON B, et al. Evidence for a direct antitumor mechanism of action of bovine lactoferricin[J]. Anticancer Research, 2002, 22(5):2703-2710.

[17]李铁晶,黄占权,许岩.抗菌肽Lactoferricin基因的PCR合成及克隆载体T-Lfn的构建[J].东北农业大学学报,2008,39(1):107-111.

[18]NBEL U, ENGELEN B, FELSKE A, et al. Sequence heterogeneities of genes encoding 16S rRNAs in Paenibacillus polymyxa detected by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis[J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 1996, 178:5636-5643.

[19]FELSKE A, AKKERMANS A D, DE VOS W M. Quantification of 16S rRNA in complex bacterial communities by multiple competitive reverse transcription-PCR in temperature gradient gel electrophoresis fingerprints[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1998, 64:4581-4587.

[20]KONSTANTINVO S R, AWATI A, SMIDT H, et al. Specific response of a novel and abundant Lactobacillus amylovorus-like phylotype to dietary prebiotics in guts of weaning piglets[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004, 70:3821-3830.

[21]JANCZYK P, PIEPER R, SMIDT H, et al. Changes in the diversity of pig ilea Lactobacilli around weaning determined by means of 16S rRNA-gene amplification and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2007, 61(1):132-140. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00317.

[22]MILAUER P. Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide biometrics[M]. Netherland: Wageningen and Cˇeske. Budějovice, 2002.

[23]MAGURRAN A E. Measuring biological diversity[M]. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd., 2004.

[24]STATISTICA 6.0. StatSoft[CP/DK]. Tulsa, USA, 2005.

[25]AJITHA P, SATOSHI U, HONG Z, et al. Cecropin P1 and novel nematode cecropins: a bacteria-inducible antimicrobial peptide family in the nematode Ascaris suum[J]. Biochemistry Journal, 2005, 390:207-214. (Printed in Great Britain) doi:10.1042/BJ20050218.

[26]WANG Y Z, SHAN T Z, XU Z R, et al. Effect of lactoferrin on the growth performance, intestinal morphology, and expression of PR-39 and protegrin-1 genes in weaned piglets[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2006, 84:2636-2641. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-544.

[27]WANG Y Z, SHAN T Z, XU Z R, et al. Effects of the lactoferrin (LF) on the growth performance, intestinal microflora and morphology of weanling pigs[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2007, 135:263-272. doi:10.1016/j. anifeedsci.2006.07.013.

[28]LYNN E, HIPOLITO R B, HWANG F Y, et al. Lactoferrin protects neonatal rats from gut-related systemic infection[J]. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology, Metabolism and Gastrointestinal Physiology, 2001, 281:G1140-G1150.
文章导航

/