本试验旨在探讨粉碎干稻桔、干玉米秸、干豆荚作为吸收剂对甜菜渣青贮品质、有氧稳定性的影响。试验分为5组，以湿甜菜渣青贮（无添加）为阴性对照组（水分为82%），湿甜菜渣中分别添加20%（鲜重基础）的粉碎干稻秸（稻秸组）、粉碎干玉米秸（玉米秸组）、干豆荚（豆荚组）和麸皮（阳性对照组）后青贮(水分约70%)，每组10个重复，每个重复1 kg。结果表明：1）吸收剂的添加显著提高了甜菜渣青贮氨态氮/总氮（P<0.05）、乳酸含量（P<0.01）和乙酸含量（P<0.01），显著降低干物质损失率（P<0.01）和水溶性碳水化合物损失率（P<0.05），降低丁酸的含量，尤其是稻秸组和豆荚组，未检测到丁酸含量。2）吸收剂的添加并未影响甜菜渣青贮营养成分。3）吸收剂的添加显著提高了甜菜渣青贮有氧稳定性及暴露在空气中后各时间点的水溶性碳水化合物含量（P<0.05）；豆荚组有氧稳定性最高，达216 h。结果提示，添加吸收剂有助于湿甜菜渣青贮品质的提高，养分流失减少，有氧稳定性提高；综合而言，3种吸收剂中，以豆荚和稻秸作为青贮吸收剂效果较优。
The study was conducted to investigate the effects of absorbents (dry rice straw, dry corn stalk and dry pods) on the silage quality and aerobic stability of beet pulp. The treatments in this study consisted of 5 groups: wet beet pulp silage without absorbent was used as the negative control group (moisture was 82%); dry rice straw (rice straw group), dry corn stalk (corn stalk group), dry pods (pods group) and wheat bran (positive control group) were added into wet beet pulp by 20% (fresh weight basis), respectively. The mixtures (moisture was about 70%) were ensiled. There were 10 replicates in each group and 1 kg per replicate. The results showed as follows: 1) the addition of absorbents significantly increased ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3-N)/total nitrogen (P<0.05), lactic acid content (P<0.01) and acetic acid content (P<0.01), but significantly decreased loss rates of dry matter and water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) (P<0.05), as well as the content of butyric acid, especially in rice straw group and pods group, the butyric acid contents in which were unidentified. 2) The addition of absorbents didn’t affect the nutrient composition of beet pulp silage. 3) The addition of absorbents significantly increased the WSC content after different exposure time in air and the aerobic stability of beet pulp (P<0.05), the aerobic stability of pods group was 216 h, which was the highest among all groups. The results indicate that the addition of absorbents improves the silage quality, reduces the nutrient loss and improves aerobic stability of beet pulp silage; to sum up, corn stalk and pods are two kinds of optimal absorbents for silage. ［Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2011, 23（9）：1577 -1583］
［1］张增欣,邵涛.青贮添加剂研究进展[J].草业科学,2006(9):61.
[2]许庆方,韩建国,玉柱.青贮渗出液的研究进展[J].草业科学，2005(11):90-95.
[3]陈海燕,史占全,刘建新.添加稻草对大头菜青贮料发酵品质和瘤胃降解的效果[J].浙江农业学报,1998,10(4):215-219.
[4]李守东,温云,陈学俊.玉米秸秆和甜菜渣混合黄贮饲料试验报告[J].当代畜牧，2004(2):26.
[5]闰晓波，韩向敏.马铃薯渣和玉米秸秆混合青贮料对奶牛生产性能的影响[J].广东农业科学,2009(5):144-146.
[6]于苏甫，热西提.番茄渣分别与芦苇、苜蓿和玉米秸混合发酵效果研究[D].硕士学位论文.乌鲁木齐：新疆农业大学，2009.
[7]JONES D I H, JONES R. The effect of in-silo effluent absorbents on effluent production and silage quality[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research Science, 1996, 64(3):173-186.
[8]KALSCHEUR K F, GARCIA A D，HIPPEN A R, et al. Fermentation characteristics of ensiling wet corn distiller grains in combination with wet beet pulp[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2004, 87:53.
[9]MAYNE C S, STEEN R W J. Recent research on silage additives for milk and beef production[C]//The 63rd Annual Report 1989-1990. Hillsborough: Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, 1990:31-42.
[10]MCDONALD P, HENDERSON A R, MACGREGOR A W. Chemical changes and losses during the ensilage of wilted grass[J]. Journal of Food Agriculture, 1968, 19:125.
[11]SAHIN K, CERCI I H, GULER T. The effects of different silage additives on the quality of sugar beet pulp silage[J]. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 1999, 23(3):285-292.
[12]高祥照,马文奇,马常宝.中国作物秸杆资源利用现状分析[J].华中农业大学学报，2002(3):242-247.
[13]张子仪.中国饲料学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[14]杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1991.
[15]VAN SOESTP J, ROBERTSON J B, LEWIS B A. Methods for dietary fiberneutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74:3583-3592.
[16]MCDONALD P, HENDERSNM A R. Determination of watersoluble carbohydrates in grass[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1964, 15:395-398.
[17]卢定强，徐蓓，李晖，等.反相高效液相色谱法同时测定乳酸及乳酸甲酯[J].精细化工，2007（2）:206-208.
[18]刘丹丹.不同浓度绿汁发酵液和脱氢乙酸钠对青贮水稻秸品质和有氧稳定性的影响[D].硕士学位论文.哈尔滨：东北农业大学，2008.
[19]自给饲料品质评价研究会.粗饲料品质评价手册[M].东京：日本草地畜产种子协会，2001.
[20]PlEGGE S D, GOODRICH R D, HANSON S A, et al. SDA improving aerobic stability of corn or half-dried silage[J]. Feedstuffs, 1992, 64:19-26.
[21]SAS Institute. SAS user’s guide: statistics[M]. Version 7. Cary, N.C.: SAS Hrst. Inc., 1998.
[22]AROSEMENA A, DE ETERS E J, FADEL J G. Extent of variability in nutrient composition within selected by-product feedstuffs[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1995, 54:103-120.
[23]姚爱兴，冯家保.秸秆与甜菜渣混贮技术及饲喂奶牛效果[J].饲料工业，1990（12）:7-8.
[24]FRANSEN S C, STRUBI F J. Among absorbents on the reduction of grass silage effluent and silage quality[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2006, 89(8):3122-3132.
[25]BOLSEN K K, SONON R N, DALKE B, et al. Evaluation of inoculant and NPN silage additives: a summary of 26 trials and 65 farm-scale silages[C]//Cattlemen’s day, 1992. Manhattan, K.S.: Kansas State University, 1992, 651:102-103.
[26]JONES R, JONES D. The effect of in silo effluent absorbents on effluent production and silage quality[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Engineering Research, 1996, 64(3):173-186.
[27]SHIN J S, CHA Y H, LEE H H, et al. Effects of alfalfa silages with different wheat bran mixing levels on fermentation quality[J]. Journal of Korean Society of Grassland Science, 1996, 16(3):173-186.
[28]孔凡德.高水分黑麦草添加吸收剂或凋萎青贮对青贮发酵品质和营养价值的影响[D].硕士学位论文.杭州：浙江大学，2002.
[29]WOHLT J E. Use of silage inoculant to improve feeding stability and intake of a corn dilae-gain diets[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1989, 72:545-551.
京公网安备 11010802041926号