研究简报


不同释放速度瘤胃调控剂对瘤胃亚急性酸中毒体外发酵参数的影响

展开
  • (四川农业大学动物营养研究所,动物抗病营养教育部重点实验室, 雅安625014)
董利锋(1985—),男,河南巩义人,硕士研究生,从事反刍动物营养与饲料资源开发的研究。E-mail: dunlifeng@gmail.com

网络出版日期: 2011-09-28

基金资助

现代农业(肉牛)产业技术体系专项经费资助(CARS-38)

Effect of Different Release Rate of Rumen Modulators on Fermentation Characteristics in vitro Induced by SARA

Expand
  • (Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-resistance
    Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Ya’an 625014, China)

Online published: 2011-09-28

摘要

本试验通过在体外构建瘤胃亚急性酸中毒(SARA)模型,来研究不同释放速度的瘤胃调控剂对SARA体外发酵特性及牛链球菌数量的影响。选取3头育肥期并安装永久性瘤胃瘘管的宣汉黄牛,于晨饲2 h后采集瘤胃内容物,滤液作为体外发酵液的接种物,通过添加玉米与白酒糟(1∶1)的方式诱导体外发生SARA。借助于构建成功的SARA体外模型,设置4个试验处理:对照组、6 h完全释放组、8 h完全释放组和10 h完全释放组。在诱导SARA之后的0、2、4、6、8、10、12 h取样测定瘤胃各发酵指标及牛链球菌的相对数量。结果表明,与对照顾组相比,各试验组瘤胃液pH均极显著升高(P<0.01),乙酸、丙酸、丁酸、乳酸和总挥发性脂肪酸(total volatile fatty acids, TVFA)浓度也显著降低(P<0.05)。结果显示,8 h完全释放组不仅有效提高了瘤胃液pH,缓解了SARA状态,还对稳定瘤胃液环境和促进微生物的生长有显著效果。

本文引用格式

董利锋,王之盛,杜宇 .
不同释放速度瘤胃调控剂对瘤胃亚急性酸中毒体外发酵参数的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2011
, 23(09) : 1608 -1614 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2011.09.021

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different release rate of rumen modulators on fermentation characteristics and S. bovis number in vitro by the means of induced by subacute rumen acidosis (SARA) model. Three Xuanhan steers fitted with permanent ruminal cannulas were used and SARA was induced by adding corn and fresh distilled grain(1∶1). Then this experiment was divided into 4 groups: 6 h release group, 8 h release group, 10 h release group and the control group. The samples were taken at 0,2,4,6,8,10 and 12 h after the SARA model was induced and the rumen fermentation parameters were determined and S. bovis number was quantitated using 16S rRNA oligocecleotoide probe hybridization. The results showed that pH in all trial groups were significantly increased compared with that in the control group (P<0.01), and ruminal acetate, propionate, butyrate and TVFA concentrations were significantly decreased (P<0.05), while ruminal lactate content decreased significantly (P<0.05). The results indicate 8 h release group can effectively reduce pH, promote the growth of microorganisms and improve the rumen fermentation.[Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2011, 23(9):1608 -1614]

参考文献

[1]BEVANS D W, BEAUCHEMIN K A, SCHWARTZKOPF-GENSWEIN K S, et al. Effect of rapid or gradual grain adaptation on subacute acidosis and feed intake by feedlot cattle[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2005, 83:1116-1132.

[2]EMMANUEL D G V, DUNN S M, AMETAJ B N. Feeding high proportions of barley grain stimulates an inflammatory response in dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008, 91:606-614.

[3]KHAFIPOUR E, KRAUSE D O, PLAIZIER J C. A grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis challenge causes translocation of lipopolysaccharide and triggers inflammation[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009,92:1060-1070.

[4]PATON L, BEAUCHEMIN K, VIERA D, et al. Use of sodium bicarbonate, offered free choice or blended into the ration, to reduce the risk of ruminal acidosis in cattle[J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2006, 86:429-437.

[5]MENKE K H, STEINGASS H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid[J]. Animal Research and Development, 1988, 28:7-55.

[6]赵新慧,刘陶世,段金廒.羟丙基甲基纤维素对左金胃漂浮缓释片的漂浮性能和药物释放特征的影响[J].中成药,2009,29(7):988-992.

[7]胡伟莲,王佳堃,吕建敏,等.瘤胃体外发酵产物中甲烷和有机酸含量的快速测定[J].浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版,2006,3(2):217-221.

[8]张元庆,孟庆翔.毛茛科植物提取物添加量对瘤胃微生物体外动态发酵的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2007,43(5):27-31.

[9]EHSAN K, LI S C, JAN C P, et al. Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis[J]. Applied Environment Microbiology,2009,75(22):7115-7124.

[10]COOPER R, KLOPFENSTEIN T, STOCK R, et al. Effect of rumensin and feed intake variation on ruminal pH[R].Universrty of Nebraska:Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports,1997.

[11]PLAIZIER J C. Replacing chopped alfalfa hay with alfalfa silage in barley grain and alfalfa-based total mixed rations for lactating dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2004, 87:2495-2505.

[12]BEAUCHEMIN K A, YANG W Z, RODE L M. Effects of particle size of alfalfa-based dairy cow diets on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation, and milk production[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2003, 86:630-643.

[13]BERGMAN E N. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species[J]. Physiology Review, 1990, 70:1580-1588.

[14]DARREN W B. Effect of the number of step-up diets fed during grain adaption on acidosis and feeding behavior of feedlot cattle[D]. Master thesis. Saskatoon: the University of Saskatchewan, 2005.

[15]KRAUSE K M, DHUYVETTER D V. Effect of a low-moisture buffer block on ruminal pH in lactating dairy cattle induced with subacute ruminal acidosis[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009, 92:352-364.

[16]KEUNEN J E, PLAIZIER J C, KYRIAZAKIS I, et al. Short communication: effects of subacute ruminal acidosis on free-choice intake of sodium bicarbonate in lactating cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2003, 86:954-957.

[17]肖训军,孟庆翔.反刍动物瘤胃酸中毒及其调控[J].中国畜牧杂志,2001,37(5):6-8.

[18]ASCHENBACH J R, GABEL G. Effect and absorption of histamine in sheep rumen: significance of acidotic epithelial damage[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2007, 8:464-470.
 
文章导航

/