猪与禽营养

饲粮n-6/n-3多不饱和脂肪酸比例对鹅肌肉脂肪酸组成的影响

展开
  • 扬州大学动物科学与技术学院,扬州 225009
喻礼怀(1977—),男,江苏大丰人,博士研究生,讲师,研究方向为草食动物营养代谢与调控。E-mail: lhyu@yzu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2011-08-02

  网络出版日期: 2012-02-07

基金资助

江苏省自然基金基础研究项目(SBK201121885)

Dietary n-6/n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Ratio Affects Muscle Fatty Acid Profiles in Geese

Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China

Received date: 2011-08-02

  Online published: 2012-02-07

摘要

本文旨在探讨饲粮n-6/n-3多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA)比例对扬州鹅肌肉脂肪酸组成的影响。试验选取160只健康、体重接近的21日龄扬州鹅,随机分成4组,分别饲喂n-6/n-3 PUFA比例为12∶1、9∶1、6∶1及3∶1的饲粮,于70日龄时取胸肌和腿肌,进行脂肪酸组成的测定。结果表明:1)在胸肌中,亚油酸的含量9∶1组显著高于3∶1组(P<0.05),而与其他各组之间无显著差异(P>0.05);α-亚麻酸的含量3∶1组显著高于6∶1和9∶1组(P<0.05),极显著高于12∶1组(P<0.01)。2)在腿肌中,亚油酸的含量12∶1和6∶1组均显著高于3∶1组(P<0.05),而与9∶1组无显著差异(P>0.05);α-亚麻酸的含量3∶1组显著高于6∶1组(P<0.05),极显著高于12∶1和9∶1组(P<0.01)。综上所述,鹅肌肉中n-6/n-3 PUFA比例随饲粮中该比例的下降而下降,并以3∶1组最低,但除12∶1组的腿肌n-6/n-3 PUFA比例较高外,其他各组比例均在世界卫生组织推荐的适于人体健康的(6∶1)~(10∶1)的比例范围内。

本文引用格式

喻礼怀, 王梦芝, 万小颖, 王剑飞, 王洪荣 . 饲粮n-6/n-3多不饱和脂肪酸比例对鹅肌肉脂肪酸组成的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2012 , 24(2) : 265 -270 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2012.02.011

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to investigate the effects of dietary n-6/n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) ratio on muscle fatty acid profiles of Yangzhou geese. A total of 160 healthy Yangzhou geese with similar weight, aged 21 days, were randomly divided into 4 groups. They were fed the diets with n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios of 12∶1, 9∶1, 6∶1 and 3∶1, respectively. Then the geese were slaughtered at 70 days of age to analyze the fatty acid profiles of breast muscles and leg muscles. The results showed as follows: firstly, in breast muscles, the content of linoleic acid of 9∶1 group was significantly higher than that of 3∶1 group (P<0.05), however, no significant difference was found between 9∶1 group and 12∶1 group or 6∶1 group (P>0.05). As for the content of α-linolenic acid, 3∶1 group was significantly higher than 6∶1 group and 9∶1 group (P<0.05), and higher than 12∶1 group extremely (P<0.01). Secondly, in leg muscles, the content of linoleic acid of 12∶1 group and 6∶1 group was significantly higher than that of 3∶1 group (P<0.05), however, there was no significant difference between 12∶1 group or 6∶1 group and 9∶1 group (P>0.05). The content of α-linolenic acid of 3∶1 group was significantly higher than that of 6∶1 group (P<0.05), and remarkably higher than that of 12∶1 group and 9∶1 group (P<0.01). Taken together, the n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio in muscle of geese decreases with the decrease of the ratio in diet, and that in 3∶1 group is the lowest, but the range of n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio in muscle of geese is from 6∶1 to 10∶1, except for that in leg muscle in 12∶1 group, which matches to the human nutritional requirement recommended by WTO.

参考文献

[1] 余文三.多不饱和脂肪酸的研究概况[J].国外医学:卫生学分册,1998(6):359-362.



[2] 蒋汉明,张凤珍,翟静,等.ω-3多不饱和脂肪酸与人类健康[J].预防医学论坛,2005(1):65-69.



[3] 苏晓鸥.脂肪对鸡肉品质的影响[J].中国饲料,1995(22):22-23.



[4] SHANG X G, WANG F L, LI D F. Effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on the fatty acid composition of egg yolk, plasma and liver as well as hepatic stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase activity and gene expression in laying hens[J]. Poultry Science, 2005, 84(12):1886-1892.



[5] RESPO N, ESTEVE-GARCIA E. Nutrient and fatty acid deposition in broilers fed different dietary fatty acid profiles[J]. Poultry Science, 2002, 81(10):1533-1542.



[6] GATLIN L A, SEE M T, HANSEN J A. The effects of dietary fat sources, levels, and feeding intervals on pork fatty acid composition[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2002, 80:1606-1615.



[7] 齐珂珂.日粮ω-6/ω-3比例对肉鸡脂肪酸组成及肉品质的影响.博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2009.



[8] DE ALMEIDA J C, PERASSOLOM S, CAMARGO J L, et al. Fatty acid composition and cholesterol content of beef and chicken meat in Southern Brazil[J]. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2006, 42(1):109-117.



[9] RYMER C, GIVENS D I. n-3 fatty acid enrichment of edible tissue of poultry: a review[J]. Lipids, 2005, 40(2):121-130.  



[10] BARROETA A C. Nutritive value of poultry meat: relationship between vitamin E and PUFA[J]. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 2007, 63(6):277-284.



[11] SALAMATDOUSTNOBAR R. Turkey breast meat change of EPA and DHA fatty acids content during fed canola oil[J]. Global Veterinaria, 2010, 5(5):264-267.



[12] RYMER W C. Effects of vitamin e and fish oil inclusion in broiler diets on meat fatty acid composition and on the flavor of a composite sample of breast meat[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2010, 90(10):1628-1633.  



[13] RYMER C, GIBBS R A, GIVENS D I. Comparison of algal and fish sources on the oxidative stability of poultry meat and its enrichment with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids[J]. Poultry Science, 2010, 89:150-159.



[14] 张曼,周光宏,徐幸莲.脂肪酸对肉类品质的影响[J].肉类工业,2004,283(11):12-14.



[15] 林树茂,李海华,钟赛意.不同禽类肌肉脂肪酸组成的比较研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2004(12):18-20.



[16] 李凤娜,王继成,陈晓安,等.猪肉品质及其影响因素的研究概况[J].肉类研究,2006(7):46-50.



[17] SHAHIDI F.肉制品与水产品的风味[M].李洁,朱国斌,译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2001.



[18] 张巧娥,敖长金.影响羊肉脂肪酸组成的因素[J].畜牧与兽医,2007(3):19-21.



[19] HAROFOT C G. Lipid metbaolism in the rumen[M]//CHRISTIE W W. Lipid metabolism in ruminant animals. New York: Pergamon Press, 1981:21.
文章导航

/