饲料营养 Feed Science and Technology

几株益生乳酸菌对Caco-2细胞的黏附及其对致病菌黏附的影响

  • 白洁 ,
  • 李卫芬 ,
  • 黄琴 ,
  • 崔志文 ,
  • 余东游 ,
  • 黄怡
展开
  • 1. 浙江大学动物科学学院, 浙江大学动物分子营养学教育部重点实验室, 杭州 310058;
    2. 广西大学动物科学技术学院, 南宁 530005

收稿日期: 2012-04-15

  网络出版日期: 2012-09-29

基金资助

国家973专项(2009CB118705);浙江省重大科技专项(2006C12086)

Several Strains of Lactic Acid Bacteria:Adhesion Ability to Caco-2 Cells and Effects on Adhesion of Pathogenic Bacteria

  • BAI Jie ,
  • LI Weifen ,
  • HUANG Qin ,
  • CUI Zhiwen ,
  • YU Dongyou ,
  • HUANG Yi
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
    2. College of Animal Science, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China

Received date: 2012-04-15

  Online published: 2012-09-29

摘要

以Caco-2细胞作为体外模型研究几株乳酸菌的黏附性能及其对大肠杆菌K88和鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的黏附抑制性能。采用荧光标记法评价这几株乳酸菌的黏附性能,并通过竞争、排斥和置换试验检测其对上述2株病原菌黏附的抑制作用。结果表明:1)除了乳酸乳球菌外,其他乳酸菌对Caco-2细胞的黏附率均高于这2株病原菌,且黏附率为乳杆菌(Lactobacillus)>肠球菌>致病菌>乳球菌。2)来源于健康鸡肠道的乳杆菌与分离于人肠道的鼠李糖乳杆菌(Lactobacillus rhamnosus)和食果糖乳杆菌(Lactobacillus fructivorans)的黏附率接近。3)大部分乳酸菌菌株能通过置换作用抑制大肠杆菌K88和鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的黏附。结果提示,这几株乳酸菌对肠上皮细胞均有较高的黏附率,尤其是乳杆菌,且它们的黏附有菌属特异性。乳酸菌抑制上述2种病原菌的黏附主要通过置换方式,但没有菌属特异性,且与其自身的黏附力也没有必然的联系。

本文引用格式

白洁 , 李卫芬 , 黄琴 , 崔志文 , 余东游 , 黄怡 . 几株益生乳酸菌对Caco-2细胞的黏附及其对致病菌黏附的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2012 , 24(10) : 1992 -1998 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2012.10.019

Abstract

Using Caco-2 cells as an in vitro model to investigate the adhesive properties of several strains of lactic acid bacteria and the inhibition effects of these strains on the adhesion of Escherichia coli K88 and S. typhimurium. The adhesion of different stains was evaluated by fluorescence labeling method, and preincubation, postincubation and coincubation tests were used to determine the inhibition to the two strains of pathogenic bacteria above. The results showed as follows:1) except for Lactococcus lactis, the adhesion rate of the other lactic acid bacteria strains was higher than that of the two pathogenic bacteria strains, and the adhesion rate was Lactobacillus>Enterococcus>pathogenic bacteria>Lactococcus. 2) The adhesion rate of Lactobacillus from healthy chicken intestines was closed to that from human intestines (Lactobacillus fructivorans). 3) Most strains of lactic acid bacteria could inhibit the adhesion of Escherichia coli K88 and S. typhimurium to Caco-2 cells through postincubation test. In conclusion, the experimental lactic acid bacteria stains possess high adhesion rate, especially Lactobacillus, and the adhesion has specificity on species. Postincubation is the main way that these strains inhibit adhesion of pathogenic bacteria, and has no specificity on species, mean while there is no certain link with the adhesion capacity of strains.

参考文献

[1] COTTER P A,MILLER J F.Triggering bacterial virulence[J].Science,1996,273:1183-1185.
[2] COLLINS J K,THORNTON G,SULLIVAN G O.Selection of probiotic strains for human applications[J].International Dairy Journal,1998,8:487-490.
[3] 范小兵,周丛,杭晓敏,等.昂立植物乳杆菌黏附肠上皮细胞的研究[J].中国微生态学杂志,2004,16(6):353-355.
[4] 王斌,李秋荣,刘放南,等.1株肠道高黏附性乳杆菌的分离鉴定[J].中国生物制品学杂志,2008,21(6):473-477.
[5] CANDELA M,PERNA F,CARNEVALI P,et al.Interaction of probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains with human intestinal epithelial cells:adhesion properties,competition against enteropathogens and modulation of IL-8 production[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology,2008,125(3):286-292.
[6] VINDEROLAĆG,MEDICI M,PERDIGN G.Relationship between interaction sites in the gut,hydrophobicity,mucosal immunomodulating capacities and cell wall protein profiles in indigenous and exogenous bacteria[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology,2004,96(2):230-243.
[7] BONAR A,CHMIELA M,RUDNICKA W,et al.Mannose-binding lectin enhances the attachment and phagocytosis of mycobacteria in vitro[J].Archivum Immunologiae et Therapia Experimentalis,2005,53:437-441.
[8] GOPAL P K,PRASAD J,SMART J,et al.In vitro adherence properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DR20 and Bifidobacterium lactis DR10 strains and their antagonistic activity against an enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology,2001,67(3):207-216.
[9] 陈臣,郭本恒,陈卫,等.三株益生菌黏附性质及机制的初步研究[J].中国微生态学杂志,2007,19(6):492-494.
[10] NISSEN L,CHINGWARU W,SGORBATI B,et al.Gut health promoting activity of new putative probiotic/protective Lactobacillus spp.strains:a functional study in the small intestinal cell model[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology,2009,135(3):288-294.
[11] 王斌.乳杆菌黏附机制的研究进展[J].国际检验医学杂志,2006,27(3):224-226.
[12] 李平兰,杨华,张篪.乳酸菌体外黏附人结肠腺癌细胞系HT-29细胞的研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2002,7(1):19-22.
[13] GUEIMONDE M,JALONEN L,HE F,et al.Adhesion and competitive inhibition and displacement of human enteropathogens by selected Lactobacilli[J].Food Research International,2006,39(4):467-471.
[14] MATIJAšIĆB B,NARAT M,PETERNEL M Z,et al.Ability of Lactobacillus gasseri K7 to inhibit Escherichia coli adhesion in vitro on Caco-2 cells and ex vivo on pigs'jejunal tissue[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology,2006,107(1):92-96.
[15] 郭彤,胥保华,马玉龙,等.嗜酸乳杆菌和两歧双歧杆菌体外黏附Caco-2细胞及其对病原菌黏附性能的影响[J].中国兽医学报,2008,28(5):527-531.
[16] TUOMOLA E M,OUWEHAND A C,SALMINEN S J.The effect of probiotic bacteria on the adhesion of pathogens to human intestinal mucus[J].FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology,1999,26(2):137-142.
[17] COLLADO M C,GUEIMONDE M,HERNNDEZ M,et al.Adhesion of selected Bifidobacterium strains to human intestinal mucus and the role of adhesion in enteropathogen exclusion[J].Journal of Food Protection,2005,68(12):2672-2678.
[18] 陈臣,郭本恒,王荫榆,等.植物乳杆菌ST-Ⅲ黏附肠上皮样细胞系Caco-2性质的研究[J].乳业科学与技术,2008,31(2):51-55.
[19] GRANATO D,BERGONZELLI G E,PRIDMORE R D,et al.Cell surface-associated elongation factor Tu mediates the attachment of Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC533 (La1) to human intestinal cells and mucins[J].Infection and Immunity,2004,72(4):2160-2169.
[20] MANGELL P,LENNERNAS P,WANG M,et al.Adhesive capability of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v is important for preventing bacterial translocation in endotoxemic rats[J].Acta Pathologica,Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica,2006,114(9):611-618.
文章导航

/