特种经济动物营养 Special Economic Animal Nutrition

饲粮中添加枯草芽孢杆菌和粪肠球菌对育成期蓝狐生长性能、营养物质消化率及氮代谢的影响

  • 贡筱 ,
  • 郭俊刚 ,
  • 吴学壮 ,
  • 刘志 ,
  • 高秀华 ,
  • 杨福合 ,
  • 邢秀梅
展开
  • 1. 中国农业科学院饲料研究所, 北京 100081;
    2. 吉林省特种经济动物分子生物学省部共建实验室, 长春 130112;
    3. 中国农业科学院特产研究所, 长春 130112

收稿日期: 2013-10-31

  网络出版日期: 2014-04-01

基金资助

公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200903014)

Effects of Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium Supplementations on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Nitrogen Metabolism of Growing Blue Foxes

  • GONG Xiao ,
  • GUO Jungang ,
  • WU Xuezhuang ,
  • LIU Zhi ,
  • GAO Xiuhua ,
  • YANG Fuhe ,
  • XING Xiumei
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Feed Research, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Special Economic Animal Molecular Biology, Changchun 130112, China;
    3. Institute of Special Animal and Plant Science, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Changchun 130112, China

Received date: 2013-10-31

  Online published: 2014-04-01

摘要

本试验旨在研究饲粮中添加枯草芽孢杆菌和粪肠球菌对育成期蓝狐生长性能、营养物质消化率及氮代谢的影响。选择(55±5)日龄健康蓝狐84只,随机分成7组,每组12个重复,每个重复1只。Ⅰ组为对照组,饲喂基础饲粮,Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ组在基础饲粮中分别添加1×108、1×109、1×1010 CFU/kg的枯草芽孢杆菌,Ⅴ、Ⅵ、Ⅶ组在基础饲粮中分别添加1×108、1×109、1×1010 CFU/kg的粪肠球菌。预试期7 d,正试期57 d。结果表明:Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ组的平均日增重显著高于对照组(P<0.05),Ⅲ、Ⅳ组的料重比显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。比较各试验组的平均日增重可知,Ⅲ、Ⅳ组显著高于Ⅶ组(P<0.05);比较各试验组的料重比可知,Ⅲ、Ⅳ组显著低于Ⅶ组(P<0.05)。Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ组的干物质排出量显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ组的干物质消化率和蛋白质消化率显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。Ⅲ、Ⅳ组的脂肪消化率极显著高于对照组(P<0.01),其余试验组与对照组相比差异不显著(P>0.05)。比较各试验组的脂肪消化率可知,Ⅲ、Ⅳ组显著高于Ⅱ组(P<0.05),极显著高于Ⅵ、Ⅶ组(P<0.01)。与对照组相比,Ⅵ、Ⅶ组的氮沉积显著降低(P<0.05),其余各试验组均有所升高,其中Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ组与对照组的差异达显著或极显著水平(P<0.05或P<0.01)。Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ组的净蛋白质利用率和蛋白质生物学价值极显著高于Ⅵ、Ⅶ组(P<0.01),且Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ组还显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结果提示,饲粮中添加1×1010 CFU/kg枯草芽孢杆菌或1×108 CFU/kg粪肠球菌时育成期蓝狐的营养物质消化率、氮沉积、净蛋白质利用率、蛋白质生物学价值较为理想,且可获得较好的生长性能。

本文引用格式

贡筱 , 郭俊刚 , 吴学壮 , 刘志 , 高秀华 , 杨福合 , 邢秀梅 . 饲粮中添加枯草芽孢杆菌和粪肠球菌对育成期蓝狐生长性能、营养物质消化率及氮代谢的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2014 , 26(4) : 1004 -1010 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2014.04.020

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium supplementations on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen metabolism of growing blue foxes. Eighty-four healthy blue foxes at the age of (55±5) days were randomly assigned into 7 groups with 12 replicates per group and 1 fox per replicate. Group Ⅰ (control group) was fed a basal diet, groups Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1×108, 1×109 and 1×1010 CFU/kg Bacillus subtilis, and groups Ⅴ, Ⅵ and Ⅶ were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1×108, 1×109 and 1×1010 CFU/kg Enterococcus faecium, respectively. The adaptation period lasted for 7 days and the formal period lasted for 57 days. The results showed as follows: the average daily gain in groups Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ was significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05), while the feed/gain in groups Ⅲ and Ⅳ was significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05). The comparison results of all experimental groups showed that the average daily gain in groups Ⅲ and Ⅳ was significantly higher than that in group Ⅶ (P<0.05), while the feed/gain in groups Ⅲ and Ⅳ was significantly lower than that in group Ⅶ (P<0.05). The output of dry matter in groups Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ was significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05), while the digestibility of dry matter and protein in groups Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ was significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05). The digestibility of fat in groups Ⅲ and Ⅳ was significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.01), while there was no significant difference between control group and other experimental groups (P>0.05). Compared with all experimental groups, the digestibility of fat in groups Ⅲ and Ⅳ was significantly higher than that in groups Ⅱ, Ⅵ and Ⅶ (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The nitrogen retention in groups Ⅵ and Ⅶ was significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05), while the nitrogen retention in other experimental groups was higher than that in control group, and the difference reached a significant level in groups Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The net protein utilization and biological value of protein in groups Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ were significantly higher than those in groups Ⅵ and Ⅶ (P<0.01), and those in groups Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ were significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05). In conclusion, the nutrient digestibility, nitrogen retention, net protein utilization, and the biological value of protein of growing blue foxes are ideal when supplementing 1×1010 CFU/kg Bacillus subtilis or 1×108 CFU/kg Enterococcus faecium in diets, meanwhile, the blue foxes can also get the optimal growth performance.

参考文献

[1] FULLER R.Probiotics in man and animals[J].Journal of Applied Bacteriology,1989,66(5):22-25.

[2] ZHANG Z F,ZHOU T X,AO X,et al.Effects of β-glucan and Bacillus subtilis on growth performance,blood profiles,relative organ weight and meat quality in broilers fed maize-soybean meal based diets[J].Livestock Science,2012,150(1/2/3):419-424.

[3] 周映华,周小玲,吴胜莲,等.枯草芽孢杆菌对断奶仔猪生产性能的影响[J].饲料研究,2012(5):71-73.

[4] GUGOLEK A,LOREK M O,ROTKIEWICZ Z,et al.Effects of probiotic bacteria on the performance of arctic foxes,pathomorphology and microflora of their alimentary tracts[J].Czech Journal of Animal Science,2004,49(6):265-270.

[5] NRC.Nutrient requirements of mink and foxes[S].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,1982.

[6] 崔虎,张铁涛,高秀华,等.饲粮蛋白质水平对育成期蓝狐生长性能及营养物质消化代谢的影响[J].动物营养学报,2011,23(8):1439-1445.

[7] 耿业业,张铁涛,高秀华,等.饲粮脂肪水平对育成期蓝狐生长性能、体脂沉积及血清生化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2011,23(9):1637-1646.

[8] 中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6435—2006饲料中水分和其他挥发性物质含量的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.

[9] 中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6433—2006饲料中粗脂肪测定方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.

[10] 中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6432—1994饲料中粗蛋白测定方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1994.

[11] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].2版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003:45-75.

[12] 黄雪泉.添加枯草芽孢杆菌制剂对仔猪生产性能的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2010,37(7):212-214.

[13] 刘虎传,张敏红,冯京海,等.益生菌制剂对早期断奶仔猪生长性能和免疫指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(6):1124-1131.

[14] 荆祎,李光玉,刘晗璐,等.不同乳酸杆菌添加剂对水貂生长性能、营养物质消化率、氮平衡及血清生化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(9):2160-2167.

[15] WIERUP M,WOLD-TROELL M,NURMI E,et al.Epidemiological evaluation of the salmonella-controlling effect of a nationwide use of a competitive exclusion culture in poultry[J].Poultry Science,1988,67(7):1026-1033.  

[16] ABE F,ISHIBASHI N,SHIMAMURA S.Effect of administration of Bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria to newborn calves and piglets[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1995,78(12):2838-2846.  

[17] 胡德朋,唐家毅,曹昱,等.枯草芽孢杆菌的分离鉴定及酶系分布的研究[J].水产科学,2008,27(2):86-88.

[18] 尹清强,李小飞,常娟,等.微生态制剂对哺乳和断奶仔猪生产性能的影响及作用机理研究[J].动物营养学报,2011,23(4):622-630.

[19] 李梓慕,姜军坡,周曙光,等.Bacillus subtilis Z-27制剂对仔猪肠道酶活及消化性能的影响[J].饲料工业,2012,33(20):41-45.

[20] HIGGINS S E,HIGGINS J P,WOLFENDEN A D,et al.Evaluation of a lactobacillus-based probiotic culture for the reduction of Salmonella enteritidis in neonatal broiler chicks[J].Poultry Science,2008,87(1):27-31.  
文章导航

/