实验方法 Experimental Methods

消化酶制剂的储存温度和储存时间对仿生消化中模拟鸭肠液消化能力的影响

  • 张莉 ,
  • 赵峰 ,
  • 严峰 ,
  • 王钰明 ,
  • 刘成玲 ,
  • 张宏福
展开
  • 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所, 动物营养学国家重点实验室, 北京 100193

收稿日期: 2013-12-05

  网络出版日期: 2014-05-30

基金资助

基本科研业务费专项(2011yq-1);科技部创新方法工作专项(2009IM033100);中国农业科学院科技创新工程

Effects of Temperature and Time for Storage of Digestive Enzyme Preparation on Digestive Ability of Simulated Intestinal Fluid for Ducks in Bionic Digestion

  • ZHANG Li ,
  • ZHAO Feng ,
  • YAN Feng ,
  • WANG Yuming ,
  • LIU Chengling ,
  • ZHANG Hongfu
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Science, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2013-12-05

  Online published: 2014-05-30

摘要

本试验旨在探讨消化酶制剂的储存温度和储存时间对仿生消化中模拟鸭肠液消化能力的影响,为规范模拟消化液提供依据。采用2×9两因素完全随机设计,其中储存温度设2个水平,即4 ℃、室温;储存时间设9个水平,即0、1、2、3、4、6、8、10、12个月。试验共18个处理,测定各处理下模拟鸭肠液中胰蛋白酶、糜蛋白酶和α-淀粉酶的活性,并通过仿生消化系统测定玉米、大豆粕、小麦麸3种饲料原料的干物质消化率和酶水解物能值。结果表明:1)与4 ℃储存时相比,室温储存时模拟鸭肠液中α-淀粉酶活性显著降低(P0.05)。消化酶制剂储存0~12个月时,模拟鸭肠液中上述3种消化酶活性随着储存时间的延长而显著降低(P0.05)。3)消化酶制剂的储存时间显著地影响了模拟鸭肠液对玉米、大豆粕、小麦麸的干物质表观消化率和真消化率以及酶水解物表观能值和真能值(P<0.05)。然而,在4 ℃或室温下储存0~10个月,模拟鸭肠液对玉米、大豆粕和小麦麸的干物质真消化率和酶水解物真能值保持相对稳定(相对差值分别在1%和0.10 MJ/kg以内)。由此得出,尽管消化酶制剂的储存时间是模拟鸭肠液中消化酶活性降低的主要因素,但在4 ℃或室温下保存10个月以内的消化酶制剂制备的模拟鸭肠液对饲料原料的消化能力是稳定的。

本文引用格式

张莉 , 赵峰 , 严峰 , 王钰明 , 刘成玲 , 张宏福 . 消化酶制剂的储存温度和储存时间对仿生消化中模拟鸭肠液消化能力的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2014 , 26(6) : 1545 -1555 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2014.06.015

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of temperature and time for storage of digestive enzyme preparation on digestive ability of simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) for ducks in bionic digestion, which would provide a reference for the standardization of simulated digestive fluid. Storage temperature at 4 ℃ or room temperature and storage time at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 12 months were used in a 2×9 two-factorial completely randomized design. There were 18 treatments in this experiment. The activities of trypsin, chymotrypsin and α-amylase were determined in duck SIF from each treatment. The dry matter digestibility and enzymatic hydrolysate gross energy of corn, soybean meal and wheat bran were determined using bionic digestion system. The results showed as follows:1) the activity of α-amylase in duck SIF was significantly higher for the digestive enzyme preparation stored at 4 ℃ than stored at room temperature (P0.05). The activities of these 3 digestive enzymes in duck SIF significantly decreased as the storage time extended from 0 to 12 months for digestive enzyme preparation (P0.05). 3)The storage time of digestive enzyme preparation significantly affected the apparent digestibility and true digestibility of dry matter, and the apparent gross energy and true gross energy of enzymatic hydrolysate of corn, soybean meal and wheat bran (P<0.05). However, for the storage temperature of 4 ℃ or room temperature and the storage time extended from 0 to 10 months, the true digestibility of dry matter and the true gross energy of enzymatic hydrolysate of corn, soybean meal and wheat bran showed relatively stable (less than 1% and 0.10 MJ/kg of relative difference, respectively). In conclusion, although the storage time of digestive enzyme preparation is the main factor affecting the activities of digestive enzymes in duck SIF, however, the digestive abilities of SIF are stable for digestive enzyme preparation stored at 4 ℃ or room temperature and no more than 10 months.

参考文献

[1] BVNCHMANN N B.In vitro digestibility of protein from barley and other cereals[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1979,30(6):583-589.  
[2] GAUTHER S F,VACHON C,SAVOIE L.Enzymatic conditions of an in vitro method to study protein digestion[J].Journal of Food Science,1986,51(4):960-964.  
[3] FURUYA S,SAKAMOTO K,TAKAHASHI S.A new in vitro method for the estimation of digestibility using the intestinal fluid of the pig[J].British Poultry Science,1979,41(3):511-520.
[4] SAKAMOTO K,ASANO T,FURUYA S,et al.Estimation of in vivo digestibility with the laying hen by an in vitro method using the intestinal fluid of the pig[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1980,43(2):389-391.  
[5] VALDES E V,LEESON S.Measurement of metabolizable energy in poultry feeds by an in vitro system[J].Poultry Science,1992,71(9):1493-1503.  
[6] 张子仪,张蔚云,李文英.猪的离体消化实验方法的研究,第十一报:不同加工条件及不同保存条件下PIF冻干粉效价的变化[R]//中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所科学研究年报.北京:北京畜牧兽医研究所,1984:144-148.
[7] 郑卫宽,赵峰,张宏福.日粮类型及肠液储存条件对鸭空肠液组成与特性的影响[J].动物营养学报,2009,21(5):652-658.
[8] 赵峰,张子仪,侯水生.鸭的空肠食糜连续采集方法及其空肠套管的设计[J].畜牧兽医学报,2006,37(7):672-675.
[9] 张莉,赵峰,严峰,等.鸭空肠液中消化酶粗提纯方法的比较研究[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(10):2363-2370.
[10] 严峰,赵峰,米保民,等.模拟鸭肠液中消化酶的批次来源与活性贡献对饲料原料消化能力的影响[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(11):2181-2189.
[11] DAHLQVIST A.A method for the determination of amylase in intestinal content[J].Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation,1962,14(2):145-151.  
[12] WIRNT R.Trypsin measurement with N α-p-toluenesulfony-L-arginine methyl ester as substrate[M]//BERGMEYER H U.Methods of enzymatic analysis.Weinheinm:Verlag Chemie,1974:1021-1024.
[13] WIRNT R.Chymotrypsin measurements with N-benzoyl-L-tyrosin methyl ester as substrate[M]//BERGMEYER H U.Methods of enzymatic analysis.Weinheinm:Verlag Chemie,1974:1009-1012.
[14] 赵峰,张宏福,张子仪.单胃动物仿生消化系统操作手册[M].2版.北京:中国农业科学院,2011.
[15] 李辉,赵峰,计峰,等.仿生消化系统测定鸭饲料原料代谢能的重复性与精密度检验[J].动物营养学报,2010,22(6):1709-1716.
[16] COLIGAN J E,DUN B M,SPEICHER D W,et al.Short protocols in protein science[M].New York:Wiley,2003.
[17] WEBB J N,WEBB S D,CLELAND J L,et al.Partial molar volume,surface area,and hydration changes for equilibrium unfolding and formation of aggregation transition state:high-pressure and cosolute studies on recombinant human IFN-γ[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2001,98(13):7259-7264.  
文章导航

/