动物营养学报 >

2014 , Vol. 26 >Issue 11: 3316 - 3324

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2014.11.018

反刍动物营养 Ruminant Nutrition

不同精粗比全混合颗粒饲粮对母羊营养物质表观消化率、氮代谢和能量代谢的影响

展开
  • 1. 新疆畜牧科学院饲料研究所, 乌鲁木齐 830000;
    2. 新疆动物生物技术实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830000;
    3. 新疆畜牧科学院畜牧研究所, 乌鲁木齐 830000
王文奇(1979- )男,河南郑州人,副研究员,硕士,研究方向为反刍动物营养与饲料科学。E-mail:xjslswwq@163.com

收稿日期: 2014-05-05

  网络出版日期: 2014-11-17

基金资助

新疆维吾尔自治区科研院所基本科研业务费(KY2013017);国家肉羊产业技术体系(NYCYTX-39)

收起

Effects of Different Concentrate to Roughage Ratios of Total Mixed Pellet Diet on Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Nitrogen Metabolism and Energy Metabolism of Ewes

Expand
  • 1. Feed Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Urumqi 830000, China;
    2. Xinjiang Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Urumqi 830000, China;
    3. Animal Science Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Urumqi 830000, China

Received date: 2014-05-05

  Online published: 2014-11-17

Fold

摘要

本试验研究了不同精粗比全混合颗粒饲粮对母羊营养物质表观消化率、氮代谢和能量代谢的影响,以确定母羊饲粮适宜精粗比[或中性洗涤纤维(NDF)水平]。试验采用单因素完全随机区组设计,将30只体况良好、8月龄、体重相近的杂交母羊(萨福克羊×阿勒泰羊)随机分为6个处理,每个处理5只羊,分别饲喂6种不同精粗比(85:15、70:30、55:45、40:60、25:75、10:90)的全混合颗粒饲粮。预试期10 d,消化代谢试验18 d,呼吸测热试验2 d。结果表明:1)全混合颗粒饲粮精粗比对母羊干物质(DM)、有机物(OM)和NDF表观消化率均产生了极显著影响(P<0.01),DM和OM表观消化率随精粗比的上升而升高,精粗比为55:45的饲粮NDF表观消化率最高,与精粗比为85:15和70:30的饲粮差异不显著(P>0.05)。2)消化氮随着精粗比的上升而升高,过高或过低精粗比均不利于氮的沉积,精粗比为55:45时,母羊对氮的利用效率最高。3)消化能、代谢能、总能消化率和总能代谢率均随着精粗比的上升而出现极显著的升高(P<0.01)。在本试验条件下,母羊对精粗比为70:30和55:45(NDF水平分别为37.78%和45.80%)的全混合颗粒饲粮消化吸收较好。

关键词： 全混合颗粒饲粮; 母羊; 表观消化率; 氮代谢; 能量代谢

本文引用格式

王文奇, 侯广田, 罗永明, 刘艳丰, 卡那提·沙力克 . 不同精粗比全混合颗粒饲粮对母羊营养物质表观消化率、氮代谢和能量代谢的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2014 , 26(11) : 3316 -3324 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2014.11.018

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different concentrate to roughage ratios of total mixed pellet diet (TMPD) on nutrient apparent digestibility, nitrogen metabolism and energy metabolism of ewes, and to determine dietary optimal concentrate to roughage ratio [or neutral detergent fiber (NDF) level] of ewes. Thirty healthy crossbred ewes (Suffolk sheep×Aletai sheep) aged 8 months with similar body weight were randomly assigned to six treatments with five sheep in each treatment by a single factor completely randomized block design. Ewes in different treatments were fed TMPDs with six concentrate to roughage ratios, which were 85:15, 70:30, 55:45, 40:60, 25:75 and 10:90, respectively. The pre-test lasted for 10 days, the digestion and metabolism test lasted for 18 days, and the respiratory calorimetry test lasted for 2 days. The results showed as follows: 1) the effects of concentrate to roughage ratio of TMPD on the apparent digestibility of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and NDF were significant (P<0.01). The apparent digestibility of DM and OM were increased with the increasing of concentrate to roughage ratio. The apparent digestibility of NDF was highest in diet with concentrate to roughage ratio of 55:45, which was not significantly from diets with concentrate to roughage ratios of 85:15 and 70:30 (P>0.05). 2) Digestible nitrogen was increased with the increasing of concentrate to roughage ratio, too high or too low concentrate to roughage ratio were not conducive to nitrogen retention, and nitrogen efficiency was highest when concentrate to roughage ratio was 55:45. 3) The digestive energy, metabolizable energy, gross energy digestibility and gross energy metabolic rate were significantly increased with the increasing of concentrate to roughage ratio (P<0.01). Under the experimental condition, ewes have higher digestion and absorption of TMPDs with concentrate to roughage ratios of 70:30 and 55:45 (NDF levels are 37.78% and 45.80%, respectively).

Key words： total mixed pellet diet; ewe; apparent digestibility; nitrogen metabolism; energy metabolism

参考文献

[1] TJARDES K E,BUSKIRK D D,ALLEN M S,et al.Neutral detergent fiber concentration of corn silage and rumen inert bulk influences dry matter intake and ruminal digesta kinetics of growing steers[J].Journal of Animal Science,2002,80(3):833-840.

[2] AITCHISON E M,GILL M,DHANOA M S,et al.The effect of digestibility and forage species on the removal of digesta from the rumen and the voluntary intake of hay by sheep[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1986,56(2):463-476.  

[3] BEAUCHEMIN K A.Effects of dietary neutral detergent fiber concentration and alfalfa hay quality on chewing,rumen function,and milk production of dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(9):3140-3151.  

[4] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].3版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007.

[5] NRC.Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle[S].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,2001.

[6] 杨嘉实,冯仰廉.畜禽能量代谢[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.

[7] 祁茹,林英庭.日粮物理有效中性洗涤纤维对奶牛营养调控的研究进展[J].粮食与饲料工业,2010(5):52-55.

[8] VALDÉS C,CARRO M D,RANILLA M J,et al.Effect of forage to concentrate ratio in complete diets offered to sheep on voluntary food intake and some digestive parameters[J].Journal of Animal Science,2000,70(1):119-126.

[9] 门小明,雒秋江,唐志高,等.3种不同精粗比日粮条件下空怀小尾寒羊母羊的消化与代谢[J].中国畜牧兽医,2006,33(10):13-17.

[10] YANG W Z,BEAUCHEMIN K A,RODE L M.Effects of grain processing,forage to concentrate ratio,and forage particle size on rumen pH and digestion by dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2001,84(10):2203-2216.  

[11] 刘洁,刁其玉,赵一广,等.肉用绵羊饲料养分消化率和有效能预测模型的研究[J].畜牧兽医学报,2012,43(8):1230-1238.

[12] 张立涛,李艳玲,王金文,等.不同中性洗涤纤维水平饲粮对肉羊生长性能和营养成分表观消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(2):433-440.

[13] 王加启,冯仰廉.不同粗饲料日粮发酵规律及合成瘤胃微生物蛋白质效率研究[J].黄牛杂志,1994,20(增刊):82-87.

[14] 周汉林,莫放,李琼,等.日粮中性洗涤纤维水平对中国荷斯坦公牛营养物质消化率的影响[J].海南大学学报:自然科学版,2006,24(3):276-281.

[15] GRANT R J,MERTENS D R.Influence of buffer pH and raw com starch addition on in vitro fiber digestion kinetics[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75(10):2762-2768.  

[16] 禹爱兵,范忠军,周永康,等.不同碳水化合物结构组成日粮在徐淮白山羊消化道内降解利用的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(12):7157-7160.

[17] BECKMAN J L,WEISS W P.Nutrient digestibility of diets with different fiber to starch ratios when fed to lactating dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2005,88(3):1015-1023.  

[18] 霍鲜鲜,侯先志,赵志恭.日粮不同碳水化合物比例对绵羊瘤胃内纤维物质降解率的影响[J].甘肃畜牧兽医,2004(1):6-8.

[19] 谭支良.绵羊日粮中不同碳水化合物和氮源比例对纤维物质消化动力学的影响及其组合效应评估模型研究[D].博士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,1998:42-46.

[20] 冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:235-238.

[21] REYNOLDS C K,TYRRELL H F,REYNOLDS P J.Effects of diet forage-to-concentrate ratio and intake on energy metabolism in growing beef heifers:whole body energy and nitrogen balance and visceral heat production[J].The Journal of Nutrition,1991,121(7):994-1003.

[22] DEVANT M,FERRET A,GASA J,et al.Effects of protein concentration and degradability on performance,ruminal fermentation,and nitrogen metabolism in rapidly growing heifers fed high concentrate diets from 100 to 230 kg body weight[J].Journal of Animal Science,2000,78(6):1667-1676.

[23] 黄洁,申跃宇,姜军,等.日粮蛋白质进食量对杂交育成母牛氮代谢的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2012,48(11):52-55.

[24] 杨膺白,梁贤威,郭辉,等.山羊尿中嘌呤衍生物排出规律的研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2011(1):64-66.

[25] JETANA T,ABDULLAH N,HALIM R A,et al.Effects of energy and protein supplementation on microbial-N synthesis and Allantoin excretion in sheep fed guinea grass[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2000,84(3/4):167-181.

[26] 孔祥浩,贾志海,等.后肠道对反刍动物氮代谢的作用[J].饲料工业,2004,25(5):4-6.

[27] 冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.

[28] 王新谋.家畜粪便学[M].上海:上海交通大学出版,1997.

[29] 杨凤.动物营养学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.

[30] TYRRELL H,MOE R P W.Effect of intake on digestive efficiency[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1975,58(8):1151-1163.  

[31] 许贵善,刁其玉,纪守坤,等.不同饲喂水平对肉用绵羊能量与蛋白质消化代谢的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2012,48(17):40-44.

[32] HOLTER J B,YOUNG A J.Nutrition,feeding and calves:methane prediction in dry and lactating Holstein cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75:2165-2175.

[33] HOOVER W H,STOKES S R.Balancing carbohydrates and proteins for optimum rumen microbial yield[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3630-3644.  

[34] BEAUCHEMIN K A,MCGINN S M.Methane emissions from feedlot cattle fed barley or corn diets[J].Journal of Animal Science,2005,83(3):653-661.

[35] 王吉峰.日粮精粗比对奶牛消化代谢及乳脂肪酸成分影响的研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2004.

[36] 刘洁.肉用绵羊饲料代谢能与代谢蛋白质预测模型的研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2012.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2