动物营养学报 >

2015 , Vol. 27 >Issue 5: 1468 - 1476

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.05.017

实验方法 Experimental Methods

仿生法评定抗草甘膦玉米和转Bt基因玉米的酶水解物能值的研究

展开
  • 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所, 动物营养学国家重点实验室, 北京 100193
钟儒清(1990—),男,山东枣庄人,硕士研究生,从事饲料营养价值评定研究。E-mail:ruqing_zhong@163.com

收稿日期: 2014-12-09

  网络出版日期: 2015-05-13

基金资助

国家转基因重大专项"转基因生物食用饲用安全性评价技术研究"(2014ZX08011-005);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2014M561113);中国农业科学院科技创新工程(ASTIP-IAS07)

收起

Evaluation of Enzymatic Hydrolysate Gross Energy of Glyphosate-Tolerant Corn and Transgenic Bt Corn Using Simulative Digestion System

Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2014-12-09

  Online published: 2015-05-13

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在分析抗草甘膦玉米和转Bt基因玉米原料及饲粮与同源非转基因玉米原料及饲粮体外总能消化率以及酶水解物能值,为转基因玉米的营养实质等同性仿生评定方法的研究提供参考。试验采用单因素完全随机设计,使用单胃动物仿生消化系统模拟饲料原料和饲粮在鸡胃肠道的消化过程,分析同源非转基因玉米、抗草甘膦玉米和转Bt基因玉米以及对应的3种玉米-豆粕饲粮在不同体外模拟消化阶段的干物质消化率、总能消化率和酶水解物能值的差异。结果表明:同源非转基因玉米、抗草甘膦玉米和转Bt基因玉米以及对应饲粮在常规概率成分含量上是相似的。抗草甘膦玉米及饲粮与同源非转基因玉米及饲粮相比,在干物质和能量胃消化率、全消化道消化率及酶水解物能值上均没有显著差异(P>0.05)。转Bt基因玉米全消化道总能消化率低于同源非转基因玉米(P=0.03,变异系数=0.50%),对应玉米饲粮的酶水解物能值则高于同源非转基因玉米饲粮(P=0.02,变异系数=1.12%),但均处于仿生消化系统测试的误差范围内(变异系数≤1.64%)。由此可见,抗草甘膦玉米的酶水解物能值与同源对照玉米没有差异,而转Bt基因玉米存在统计学意义上的差异,但所有的测值均处于仿生消化系统的测试误差之内。仿生法发现的差异是否具有生物学意义有待体内试验验证。仿生法可为转基因饲料营养等同性研究提供一种新方法。

关键词： 转基因玉米; 干物质消化率; 总能消化率; 酶水解物能值; 仿生消化系统

本文引用格式

钟儒清, 陈亮, 高理想, 黄庆华, 刘蕾, 张宏福 . 仿生法评定抗草甘膦玉米和转Bt基因玉米的酶水解物能值的研究[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015 , 27(5) : 1468 -1476 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.05.017

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the energy value of the glyphosate-tolerant corn and transgenic Bt corn or the glyphosate-tolerant corn diet and transgenic Bt corn diet comparing to the isogenic non-transgenic corn or diet using an in vitro digestion method with computer-controlled simulated digestion system (SDS). It would provide a reference to develop in vitro method for evaluating the nutritional substantial equivalence of genetically modified crops using the SDS. A single factorial completely randomized design with 3 corn ingredients (isogenic non-transgenic corn, glyphosate-tolerant corn, and transgenic Bt corn) and corresponding 3 corn diets (isogenic non-transgenic corn diet, glyphosate-tolerant corn diet, and transgenic Bt corn diet) was adapted. The digestion in the stomach and total tract were simulated respectively. The in vitro dry matter digestibility (DMD), in vitro gross energy digestibility (GED), and enzymatic hydrolysate gross energy (EHGE) were determined of corn ingredients and diets. The results showed that the nutrient concentration was similar between the corn ingredients and diets. As a whole, the gastric and total tract DMD, the gastric and total tract GED and the EHGH were not affected by the corn ingredient treatments (P>0.05). However, the GED of transgenic Bt corn were lower than the GED of isogenic non-transgenic corn (P=0.03, coefficient of variation=0.50%), when the EHGE of transgenic Bt corn diet were greater than the EHGE of isogenic non-transgenic corn diet (P=0.02, coefficient of variation=1.12%). But, above two coefficient of variations were all less than the coefficient of variation of feed ingredients using the SDS (coefficient of variation≤1.64%). These results suggest that in vitro gastric and total tract digestibility of dry matter and gross energy for glyphosate-tolerant corn is similar to that for isogenic non-transgenic corn, with transgenic Bt corn has some statistical differences. These differences are all within the test error of the SDS, via next animal testing test and verify. The SDS may supply a new method for evaluating the nutritional substantial equivalence of genetically modified crops.

Key words： transgenic maize; in vitro gross energy digestibility; in vitro dry matter digestibility; enzymatic hydrolysate gross energy; simulative digestion system

参考文献

[1] JAMES C.2013年全球生物技术/转基因作物商业化发展态势[J].中国生物工程杂志,2014,34(1):1-8.

[2] FLACHOWSKY G,SCHAFFT H,MEYER U.Animal feeding studies for nutritional and safety assessments of feeds from genetically modified plants:a review[J].Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit,2012,7(3):179-194.  

[3] RIZZI A,RADDADI N,SORLINI C,et al.The stability and degradation of dietary DNA in the gastrointestinal tract of mammals:implications for horizontal gene transfer and the biosafety of GMOs[J].Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition,2012,52(2):142-161.  

[4] 陈亮,黄庆华,孟丽辉,等.转基因作物的饲用安全性评价研究进展[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(6):1205-1218.

[5] YONEMOCHI C,IKEDA T,HARADA C,et al.Influence of transgenic corn (CBH 351,named Starlink) on health condition of dairy cows and transfer of Cry9C protein and cry9C gene to milk,blood,liver and muscle[J].Animal Science Journal,2003,74(2):81-88.  

[6] VAN EENENNAAM A L,YOUNG A E.Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations[J].Journal of Animal Science,2014,92(10):4255-4278.  

[7] AUMAITRE A,AULRICH K,CHESSON A,et al.New feeds from genetically modified plants:substantial equivalence,nutritional equivalence,digestibility,and safety for animals and the food chain[J].Livestock Production Science,2002,74(3):223-238.  

[8] ZHAO F,REN L Q,MI B M,et al.Developing a computer-controlled simulated digestion system to predict the concentration of metabolizable energy of feedstuffs for rooster[J].Journal of Animal Science,2014,92(4):1537-1547.  

[9] ZHAO F,ZHANG L,MI B M,et al.Using a computer-controlled simulated digestion system to predict the energetic value of corn for ducks[J].Poultry Science,2014,93(6):1410-1420.  

[10] CHEN L,GAO L X,HUANG Q H,et al.Prediction of digestible energy of feed ingredients for growing pigs using a computer-controlled simulated digestion system[J].Journal of Animal Science,2014,92(9):3887-3894.  

[11] 赵峰,张宏福,张子仪.单胃动物仿生消化系统操作手册[M].2版.北京:中国农业科学院,2011.

[12] AESCHBACHER K,MESSIKOMMER R,MEILE L,et al.Bt176 corn in poultry nutrition:physiological characteristics and fate of recombinant plant DNA in chickens[J].Poultry Science,2005,84(3):385-394.  

[13] 刘莎莎,隋晓峰,谭建庄,等.转基因作物的饲用安全性评价[J].中国畜牧杂志,2010,46(14):34-37.

[14] ZDUNCZYK Z,FREJNAGEL S,FORNAL J,et al.Biological response of rat fed diets with high tuber content of conventionally bred and transgenic potato resistant to necrotic strain of potato virus (PVYN) PartⅠ.Chemical composition of tubers and nutritional value of diets[J].Food Control,2005,16(8):761-766.

[15] WALSH M C,BUZOIANU S G,GARDINER G E,et al.Effects of short-term feeding of Bt MON810 maize on growth performance,organ morphology and function in pigs[J].British Journal of Nutrition,2012,107(3):364-371.  

[16] MCNAUGHTON J,ROBERTS M,RICE D,et al.Nutritional equivalency evaluation of transgenic maize grain from event DP-Ø9814Ø-6 and transgenic soybeans containing event DP-356Ø43-5:Laying hen performance and egg quality measures[J].Poultry Science,2011,90(2):377-389.  

[17] BÖHME H,AULRICH K,DAENICKE R,et al.Genetically modified feeds in animal nutrition.2nd communication:glufosinate tolerant sugar beets (roots and silage) and maize grains for ruminants and pigs[J].Archiv für Tierernährung,2001,54(3):197-207.  

[18] AULRICH K,BÖHME H,DAENICKE R,et al.Genetically modified feeds in animal nutrition.1st communication:Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn in poultry,pig and ruminant nutrition[J].Archiv für Tierernährung,2001,54(3):183-195.  

[19] REUTER T,AULRICH K,BERK A,et al.Investigations on genetically modified maize (Bt-maize) in pig nutrition:chemical composition and nutritional evaluation[J].Archiv für Tierernährung,2002,56(1):23-31.  

[20] 赵峰,米宝民,任立琴,等.基于单胃动物仿生消化系统的鸡仿生消化法测定饲料酶水解物能值变异程度的研究[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(6):1535-1544.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2