研究简报 Short Communications

硝酸钠和2-溴乙烷磺酸钠对山羊体外瘤胃发酵甲烷、氢气和挥发性脂肪酸生成的影响

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所, 长沙 410125;
    2. 湖南农业大学动物科学技术学院, 长沙 410128;
    3. 农业部规划设计研究院, 北京 100125;
    4. 湖南农业大学园艺园林学院, 长沙 410128
王荣(1990—),男,河南淮阳人,硕士研究生,从事反刍动物营养与饲料科学研究。E-mail:wangrongfd@126.com

收稿日期: 2014-11-25

  网络出版日期: 2015-05-13

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(31472133);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA05020700);"十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD14B17,2012BAD12B02);中央驻湘科研机构技术创新发展专项(2013TF3006)

Effect of Sodium Nitrate and 2-Bromoethanesulphonate on Methane, Hydrogen and Volatile Fatty Acids Production of in Vitro Ruminal Fermentation

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China;
    2. College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China;
    3. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering, Beijing 100125, China;
    4. College of Horticulture Landscape, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China

Received date: 2014-11-25

  Online published: 2015-05-13

摘要

本试验从瘤胃氢代谢生物化学过程的角度出发,研究硝酸钠和2-溴乙烷磺酸钠(BES)对瘤胃甲烷生成的抑制机制。选用2只装有永久性瘤胃瘘管的成年湘东黑山羊作为瘤胃液供体,设对照组、硝酸钠组(添加剂量分别为0.10、0.20和0.40 mg/mL)和BES组(添加剂量分别为0.63、1.26和2.52 mg/L),采用全自动体外模拟瘤胃发酵设备,进行24 h体外瘤胃发酵试验,测定产气量、氢气和甲烷的产量和含量、挥发性脂肪酸产量及组成。结果表明:与对照组相比,添加硝酸钠和BES后,甲烷产量显著降低(P<0.05),并且随添加剂量增加,呈现线性下降的变化趋势(P<0.05)。低剂量硝酸钠(≤0.20 mg/mL)对产气量、起始底物降解速率、乙酸、丙酸产量和乙丙比无显著影响(P>0.05);高剂量硝酸钠(0.40 mg/mL)显著提高了氢气产量及含量,显著降低了产气量、甲烷产量及含量、起始底物降解速率和总挥发性脂肪酸产量(P<0.05);添加BES对产气量、起始底物降解速率和总挥发性脂肪酸产量没有显著影响(P>0.05),但显著增加了氢气产量及含量(P<0.05),显著降低了乙丙比(P<0.05),发酵类型向丙酸型转变。由此可见,硝酸钠减少甲烷生成依靠其氢池和瘤胃微生物毒性作用,而BES减少甲烷生成依靠抑制甲烷产生,对气体生成和饲料的降解影响很小。

本文引用格式

王荣, 谭利伟, 王敏, 邓近平, 颜志成, 王玉诗, 谭支良 . 硝酸钠和2-溴乙烷磺酸钠对山羊体外瘤胃发酵甲烷、氢气和挥发性脂肪酸生成的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015 , 27(5) : 1586 -1595 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.05.031

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism of sodium nitrate (NaNO3) and 2-bromoethanesulphonate (BES) on methane inhibition from the biochemical aspect of ruminal hydrogen metabolism. Rumen fluid was collected from two adult Xiangdong black goats with permanent rumen fistulas. The study contained control group, NaNO3 groups (supplemental level was 0.10, 0.20 and 0.40 mg/mL, respectively) and BES groups (supplemental level was 0.63, 1.26 and 2.52 mg/mL, respectively). The 24 h in vitro ruminal incubation was performed to obtain gas production, production and contents of hydrogen and methane, and volatile fatty acids production and composition using automatic fermentation equipment. The results showed as follows: NaNO3 and BES supplementation significantly lowered methane production in comparison with control group (P<0.05), and increasing supplemental level of NaNO3 and BES linearly decreased methane production (P<0.05). The lower supplemental level of NaNO3 (≤0.20 mg/mL) had no significant effects on gas production, initial fractional rate of degradation (FRD0), acetate and propionate production and the ratio of acetate to propionate (P>0.05), while the higher supplemental level of NaNO3 (0.40 mg/mL) had significantly higher hydrogen production (P<0.05), and significantly lower gas production, methane production, FRD0 and total volatile fatty acids production in comparison with control group (P<0.05). BES had no significant effects on hydrogen production, FRD0 and total volatile fatty acids production in comparison with control group (P>0.05), but had significantly higher hydrogen production and content (P<0.05), and decreased the ratio of acetate to propionate (P<0.05). BES could alter pattern of rumen fermentation through facilitating propionate production. In conclusion, NaNO3 reduces methane production through hydrogen sink and rumen microbial toxicity, while BES reduced methane production through inhibiting the activity of methanogens, and had little effects on gas production and substrate degradation.

参考文献

[1] GOEL G,MAKKAR H P S.Methane mitigation from ruminants using tannins and saponins[J].Tropical Animal Health and Production,2012,44(4):729-739.  

[2] MURRAY R M,BRYANT A M,LENG R A.Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1976,36(1):1-14.  

[3] 刘开朗,王加启,卜登攀,等.瘤胃甲烷调控方法评述[J].中国微生态学杂志,2009,21(4):354-358.

[4] ZHOU Z M,YU Z T,MENG Q X.Effects of nitrate on methane production,fermentation,and microbial populations in vitro ruminal cultures[J].Bioresource Technology,2012,103(1):173-179.  

[5] GUO W S ,SCHAEFER D Μ,GUO XX,et al.Use of nitrate-nitrogen as a sole dietary nitrogen source to inhibit ruminal methanogenesis and to improve microbial nitrogen synthesis in vitro[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2009,22(4):542-549.  

[6] KHIAOSA A R,BRYNER S F,SCHEEDER M R,et al.Evidence for the inhibition of the terminal step of ruminal α-linolenic acid biohydrogenation by condensed tannins[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2009,92(1):177-188.  

[7] NOLLET L,DEMEYER D,VERSTRAETE W.Effect of 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid and peptostreptococcus productus ATCC 35244 addition on stimulation of reductive acetogenesis in the ruminal ecosystem by selective inhibition of methanogenesis[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1997,63(1):194-200.

[8] 张春梅.植物油及十八碳不饱和脂肪酸对瘤胃甲烷生成和微生态的影响[D].博士学位论文.杭州:浙江大学,2008.

[9] MENKE K H,RAAB L,SALEWSKI A,et al.The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,93(1):217-222.  

[10] MUETZEL S,HUNT C L,TAVENDALE M H.Brief communication:evaluating rumen fluid from sheep and cattle as inoculum in a newly developed automated in vitro rumen batch culture system[J].Proceeding of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production,2011,71:240-242.

[11] WANG M,JANSSEN P H,SUN X Z,et al.A mathematical model to describe in vitro kinetics of H2 gas accumulation[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2013,184(1/2/3/4):1-16.  

[12] WANG M,TANG S X,TAN Z L.Modeling in vitro gas production kinetics:derivation of logistic-exponential (LE) equations and comparison of models[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2011,165(3/4):137-150.

[13] WANG M,SUN X Z,TANG S X,et al.Deriving fractional rate of degradation of logistic-exponential (LE) model to evaluate early in vitro fermentation[J].Animal,2013,7(6):920-929.  

[14] PATRA A K,YU Z T.Effective reduction of enteric methane production by a combination of nitrate and saponin without adverse effect on feed degradability,fermentation,or bacterial and archaeal communities of the rumen[J].Bioresource Technology,2013,148:352-360.  

[15] ASANUMA N,IWAMOTO M,KAWTO M,et al.Numbers of nitrate-reducing bacteria in the rumen as estimated by competitive polymerase chain reaction[J].Animal Science Journal,2002,73(3):199-205.  

[16] LIN M,SCHAEFER D M,GUO W S,et al.Comparisons of in vitro nitrate reduction,methanogenesis, and fermentation acid profile among rumen bacterial,protozoal and fungal fractions[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2011,24(4):471-478.  

[17] PATRA A K,YU Z T.Combinations of nitrate,saponin,and sulfate additively reduce methane production by rumen cultures in vitro while not adversely affecting feed digestion,fermentation or microbial communities[J].Bioresource Technology,2014,155:129-135.  

[18] LEE S Y,YANG S H,LEE W S,et al.Effect of 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid on in vitro fermentation characteristics and methanogen population[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2009,22(1):42-48.  

[19] NOLLT L,DEMEYER D,VERSTRAEE W.Effect of 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid and peptostreptococcus productus ATCC 35244 addition on stimulation of reductive acetogenesis in the ruminal ecosystem by selective inhibition of methanogenesis[J].Applied and Environment Microbiology,1997,63(1):194-200.

[20] UNGERFELD E M,RUST S R,BOONE D R,et al.Effects of several inhibitors on pure cultures of ruminal methanogens[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology,2004,97(3):520-526.  

[21] TOMKINS N W,HUNTER R A.Methane mitigation in beef cattle using a patented antimethanogen[C]//ECKARD R.Proceedings of the 2nd Joint Australia and New Zealand Forum on non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture.Canberra:Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting,2003.

[22] VAN ZIJDERVELD S M,GERRITS W J J,APAJALAHTI J A,et al.Nitrate and sulfate:effective alternative hydrogen sinks for mitigation of ruminal methane production in sheep[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2010,93(12):5856-5866.  

[23] LEE S Y,YANG S H,LEE W S,et al.Effect of 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid on in vitro fermentation characteristics and methanogen population[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2009,22(1):42-48.  

[24] IWAMOTO M,ASANMA N,HINO T.Effects of pH and electron donors on nitrate and nitrite reduction in ruminal microbiota[J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,72(2):117-125.

[25] RUSSELL J B.The importance of pH in the regulation of ruminal acetate to propionate ratio and methane production in vitro[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1998,81(12):3222-3230.  

[26] LUND P,DAHL R,YANG H J,et al.The acute effect of addition of nitrate on in vitro and in vivo methane emission in dairy cows[J].Animal Production Science,2014,54(9):1432-1435.

[27] MAMVURA C I,CHO S,MBIRIRI D T,et al.Effect of encapsulating nitrate in sesame gum on in vitro rumen fermentation parameters[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2014,27(11):1577-1583.  
文章导航

/