研究简报 Short Communications

不同处理水稻秸秆对体外瘤胃发酵模式、甲烷产量和微生物区系的影响

展开
  • 东北农业大学动物科学与技术学院, 哈尔滨 150030
辛杭书(1982—),女,辽宁抚顺人,副教授,博士,主要从事反刍动物营养研究。E-mail:xinhangshu@163.com

收稿日期: 2014-12-23

  网络出版日期: 2015-05-13

基金资助

黑龙江省教育厅科技项目(12511036);东北农业大学科学研究基金(2010RCB33)

Effects of Different Treated Rice Straws on Pattern, Methane Production and Microflora of in Vitro Ruminal Fermentation

Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China

Received date: 2014-12-23

  Online published: 2015-05-13

摘要

本试验旨在研究不同处理水稻秸秆对瘤胃发酵模式、甲烷产量和微生物区系的影响。以3头安装有永久性瘤胃瘘管的健康荷斯坦奶牛作为瘤胃液供体,各处理分别以干秸秆(对照)、青贮秸秆、氨化秸秆和碱化秸秆为发酵底物,通过体外产气量法,测定培养72 h内的产气量、甲烷产量、瘤胃发酵参数及瘤胃微生物区系的变化。结果表明:青贮、氨化和碱化处理均显著增加了秸秆体外培养72 h的产气量和24 h的总挥发性脂肪酸浓度(P<0.05),碱化处理显著增加了72 h的甲烷产量(P<0.05),青贮和氨化处理显著增加了24 h的丙酸含量(P<0.05),显著降低了乙酸/丙酸(P<0.05)。各处理中以碱化秸秆的产气量(220.3 mL)和甲烷产量(43.23 mL)最高。与未处理的干秸秆相比,氨化和碱化处理显著提高了体外培养24 h培养液中琥珀酸丝状杆菌的相对数量(P<0.05),氨化处理显著降低了甲烷菌的相对数量(P<0.05),而各处理对培养液中的白色瘤胃球菌、黄色瘤胃球菌、真菌和原虫的相对数量没有显著影响(P>0.05)。由此可见,对水稻秸秆进行青贮、氨化和碱化处理,可以不同程度地改变体外瘤胃的发酵模式、甲烷生成以及瘤胃微生物区系的组成;从甲烷减排角度考虑,可选择青贮和氨化的处理方式。

本文引用格式

辛杭书, 刘凯玉, 张永根, 王明君, 李仲玉, 王志博, 潘春方, 李欣新, 刘可园 . 不同处理水稻秸秆对体外瘤胃发酵模式、甲烷产量和微生物区系的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015 , 27(5) : 1632 -1640 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.05.036

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different treated rice straws on pattern, methane production and microflora of in vitro ruminal fermentation. Three Holstein cows fitted with permanent rumen fistulas were used as the donor of rumen fluid. Untreated dry rice straw (control), rice straw silage, aminated rice straws and alkalified rice straws were used as substrates, and the changes of gas production, methane production, ruminal fermentation parameters, as well as ruminal microbes during 72 h incubation were determined using in vitro gas production method. The results showed as follows: the treatments of silage, ammoniation and alkalization significantly increased 72 h gas production and 24 h total volatile fatty acid concentration of rice straws incubated in vitro (P<0.05), the treatment of alkalization significantly increased 72 h methane production (P<0.05), and the treatments of silage and ammoniation significantly increased 24 h propionate content (P<0.05) and significantly decreased acetate/propionate (P<0.05). Among all the treatments, gas production (220.3 mL) and methane production (43.23 mL) were the highest in the treatment of alkalization (P<0.05). Compared with untreated dried rice straws, the treatments of ammoniation and alkalization significantly increased the relative number of F. succinogenes in culture medium after 24 h in vitro incubation (P<0.05), and that of ammoniation significantly decreased the relative number of Methanogens (P<0.05), however, different treatments had no significant effects on the relative number of R.albus, R.flave faciens, protozoa and fungi (P>0.05). It is concluded that treatments of rice straw, such as silage, ammoniation and alkalization can change pattern, methane production and microflora of in vitro ruminal fermentation; considering from methane production control, the treatments of silage and ammoniation are optional.

参考文献

[1] VELLINGA TH V,DE HAAN M H A,SCHILS R L M,et al.Implementation of GHG mitigation on intensive dairy farms:farmer' preferences and variation in cost effectiveness[J].Livestock Science,2011,137(1/2/3):185-195.  

[2] 张博,陈国谦,陈彬.甲烷排放与应对气候变化国家战略探析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(7):8-14.

[3] VERMEULEN S J,AGGARWAL P K,AINSLINE A,et al.Options for support to agriculture and food security under climate change[J].Environmental Science and Policy,2012,15(1):136-144.  

[4] 华金玲,张永根,王立克,等.水稻秸青贮对反刍动物甲烷排放的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2012,40(7):135-138.

[5] MENKE K H,STEINGASS H.Estimation of energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid[J].Animal Research and Development,1988,28:7-55.

[6] SCHOFIELD P,PELL A N.Measurement and kinetic analysis of the neutral detergent-soluble carbohydrate fraction of legumes and grasses[J].Journal of Animal Science,1995,73(11):3455-3463.

[7] 胡伟莲,王佳堃,吕建敏,等.瘤胃体外发酵产物中的甲烷和有机酸含量的快速测定[J].浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版,2006,32(2):217-221.

[8] BÜRGMANN H,PESARO M,WIDMER F,et al.A strategy for optimizing quality and quantity of DNA extracted from soil[J].Journal of Microbiological Methods,2001,45(1):7-20.  

[9] DENMAN S E,MCSWEENEY C S.Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen[J].FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2006,58(3):572-582.  

[10] MENKE K H,RAAB L,SALEWSKI A,et al.The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro[J].The Journal of Agriculture Science,1979,93(1):217-222.  

[11] 张文举,晏向华,龚月生,等.青贮对玉米秸营养价值及其瘤胃有效降解率的影响[J].中国草食动物,2003,23(1):8-9.

[12] 刘丹.化学处理对稻草超微结构和瘤胃微生物活力的影响[D].硕士学位论文.杭州:浙江大学,2004:15-16.

[13] 范华,裴彩霞,董宽虎.不同保存方法对秸秆营养价值的影响[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(11):24-28.

[14] 华金玲.水稻秸青贮制作、营养价值和利用效果的比较[D].博士学位论文.哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2008:72-73.

[15] BLÜMMEL M,GIVENS D I,MOSS A R.Comparison of methane produced by straw fed sheep in open-circuit respiration with methane predicted by fermentation characteristics measured by an in vitro gas procedure[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2005,123-124:379-390.

[16] CAO Y,TAKAHASHI T,HORIGUCHI K -I,et al.Effect of adding lactic acid bacteria and molasses on fermentation quality and in vitro ruminal digestion of total mixed ration silage prepared with whole crop rice[J].Japanese Society of Grassland Science,2010,56(1):19-25.  

[17] GETACHEW G,ROBINSON P H,DEPETERS E J,et al.Methane production from commercial dairy rations estimated using an in vitro gas technique[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2005,123-124:391-402.

[18] 冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.

[19] 李炯明,庄苏,王恬,等.海南霉素对人工瘤胃体外发酵调控的影响[J].家畜生态学报,2007,28(1):41-46.

[20] 李旺.瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸的作用及影响因素[J].中国畜牧杂志,2012,48(7):63-66.

[21] RUSSELL J B.The importance of pH in the regulation of ruminal acetate to propionate ratio and methane production in vitro[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1998,81(12):3222-3230.  

[22] FERNANDO S C,PURVIS H T,NAJAR F Z,et al.Rumen microbial population dynamics during adaptation to a high-grain diet[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2010,76(22):7482-7490.  

[23] 陈伟健,王翀,王佳堃,等.体外法研究氨化处理对稻草发酵特性及其微生物数量的影响[J].中国奶牛,2011(14):11-14.

[24] WANAPAT M,CHERDTHONG A.Use of Real-time PCR technique in studying rumen cellulolytic Bacteria population as affected by level of roughage in swamp buffalo[J].Current Microbiology,2009,58(4):294-299.  

[25] 池振明.现代微生物生态学[M].2版.北京:科学出版社,2010.

[26] WOOD T M,WILSON C A,MCCRAE S I,et al.A highly active extracellular cellulase from the anaerobic rumen fungus Neocallimastix frontalis[J].FEMS Microbiology Letter,1986,34(1):37-40.  

[27] 郭嫣秋,胡伟莲,刘建新.瘤胃甲烷菌及甲烷生成的调控[J].微生物学报,2005,45(1):145-148.

[28] 郭嫣秋.瘤胃产甲烷菌定量检测与微生物菌群调控研究[D].博士学位论文.杭州:浙江大学,2008:119-120.

[29] JOUANY J P,USHIDA K.The role of protozoa in feed digestion review[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,1999,12(1):113-128.  

[30] 陈丹丹,刁其玉,姜成钢,等.反刍动物甲烷的产生机理和减排技术研究进展[J].中国草食动物科学,2012,32(4):66-69.
文章导航

/