反刍动物营养 Ruminant Nutrition

限饲与营养补偿对小尾寒羊生长性能、消化代谢和瘤胃液纤维素酶活性的影响

  • 陈军强 ,
  • 丁路明 ,
  • 高强 ,
  • 龙瑞军 ,
  • 安吾 ,
  • 刘培培 ,
  • 张丽莉
展开
  • 1. 兰州大学草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室, 兰州 730060;
    2. 兰州大学草地农业科技学院, 兰州 730060;
    3. 兰州大学生命科学学院, 兰州 730000;
    4. 中国科学院兰州化学物理研究所, 兰州 730000;
    5. 甘肃省喜羊羊农牧发展有限公司, 兰州 730300

收稿日期: 2015-01-21

  网络出版日期: 2015-07-07

基金资助

国家公益性行业(农业)专项(201203007);兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费(Lzujbky-2014-96)

Effects of Dietary Restriction and Realimentation on Growth Performance, Digestion, Metabolism and Cellulase Activity in Ruminal Fluid of Small Tail Han Sheep

  • CHEN Junqiang ,
  • DING Luming ,
  • GAO Qiang ,
  • LONG Ruijun ,
  • AN Wu ,
  • LIU Peipei ,
  • ZHANG Lili
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, Lanzhou 730060, China;
    2. College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730060, China;
    3. School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
    4. Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
    5. Gansu Province Pleasant Goat Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Development Limited Company, Lanzhou 730300, China

Received date: 2015-01-21

  Online published: 2015-07-07

摘要

本试验旨在研究不同限饲水平与营养补偿对小尾寒羊生长性能、消化代谢以和瘤胃液纤维素酶活性的影响。选择体重相近的3月龄小尾寒羊公羊40只,采用单因素4水平随机设计,每组10只,正试期90 d。对照(Ⅰ)组全期自由采食;30 d限饲期内,Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ组分别按照NRC(2007)推荐的日增重500、400和300 g/d所需要的代谢能(ME)和粗蛋白质(CP)的量配制饲粮,限饲结束后,试验组自由采食60 d为营养补偿期。在24~30 d和84~90 d进行消化代谢试验。结果表明:1)限饲期,限饲水平对结束体重和平均日增重(ADG)有显著影响(P < 0.05),随限饲水平的升高,结束体重和ADG呈降低趋势,料肉比呈升高趋势。营养补偿期,各组间结束体重无显著差异(P > 0.05);Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ组体重补偿百分比分别为对照组的104.36%、101.71%、99.61%;限饲水平对ADG有显著影响(P < 0.05);随限饲水平的升高,ADG呈升高趋势,料肉比呈下降趋势。2)限饲期,限饲水平对干物质(DM)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)、酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)的表观消化率有显著影响(P < 0.05),均随限饲水平的升高而降低,而对有机物(OM)、CP的表观消化率无显著影响(P > 0.05)。营养补偿期,组间营养物质的表观消化率差异不显著(P > 0.05)。3)限饲期,限饲水平对食入氮、氮沉积、氮沉积率有显著影响(P < 0.05),均随限饲水平的升高而下降;尿氮/食入氮随限饲水平升高而升高,组间差异不显著(P > 0.05);粪氮和尿氮的变化不显著(P > 0.05)。营养补偿期,组间氮代谢指标差异不显著(P > 0.05)。4)1~30 d,试验组瘤胃液纤维素酶活性呈降低趋势,31~90 d,呈升高趋势,在90 d,试验组均高于对照组。综上所述,对小尾寒羊采用短期适度限饲,经过营养补偿可以使其生长性能、消化代谢不受影响。

本文引用格式

陈军强 , 丁路明 , 高强 , 龙瑞军 , 安吾 , 刘培培 , 张丽莉 . 限饲与营养补偿对小尾寒羊生长性能、消化代谢和瘤胃液纤维素酶活性的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015 , 27(7) : 2085 -2093 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.07.014

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore the effects of dietary restriction level and realimentation on growth performance, digestion, metabolism and cellulase activity in ruminal fluid of small tail Han sheep. Forty 3-month old small tail Han sheep with average body weight (BW) of (19.77±1.34) kg were randomly split into four groups with ten sheep in each group by a single factor four levels design. The study lasted for 90 days. Control group (group Ⅰ) was fed ad libitum during the whole period; during 30-day dietary restriction period, three experimental groups were fed diets with different metabolizable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP) levels, which were designed to meet requirements of 500 (group Ⅱ), 400 (group Ⅲ) and 300 g/d (group Ⅳ) of daily gain recommend by NRC(2007), after that, a 60-day realimentation period (ad libitum) was started. Digestion and metabolism tests were carried out on 24 to 30 days and 84 to 90 days, respectively. The results showed as follows: 1) at dietary restriction period, dietary restriction level had significant effects on final BW and average daily gain (ADG) (P < 0.05), with the increase of dietary restriction level, final BW and ADG tended to be decreased, while feed to meat ratio tended to be increased. At realimentation period, final BW was not significantly different among groups (P >0.05); the compensation percentage in BW of groups Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ was 104.36%, 101.71% and 99.61% of BW of group Ⅰ; dietary restriction level had significant effect on ADG (P<0.05); with the increase of dietary restriction level, ADG tended to be increased, while feed to meat ratio tended to be decreased. 2) At dietary restriction period, dietary restriction level had significant effects on the apparent digestibility of dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) (P<0.05), and all were decreased with the increase of dietary restriction level, but no significant differences were found for organic matter (OM) and CP apparent digestibility (P >0.05). At realimentation period, the apparent digestibility of all nutrients showed no significant difference among the four groups (P>0.05). 3) At dietary restriction period, dietary restriction level had significant effects on nitrogen intake, nitrogen retention, nitrogen retention percentage (P<0.05), and all were decreased with the increase of dietary restriction level; urinary nitrogen/nitrogen intake tended to be increased with the increase of dietary restriction level, but was not differ significantly (P>0.05). No significant differences of fecal and urinary nitrogen among the four groups were found (P>0.05). At realimentation period, there were no significant differences of the nitrogen metabolism indices among the four groups (P>0.05). 4) On 1 to 30 days, cellulase activity in ruminal fluid of experimental groups tended to be decreased, while on 31 to 90 days, tended to be increased, and on 90 days, all experimental groups were higher than group Ⅰ. The present results indicate that short-term moderate dietary restriction with a realimentation period is not harmful for the growth performance, digestion and metabolism of small tail Han sheep.

参考文献

[1] CHAOSAP C,PARR T,WISEMAN J.Effect of compensatory growth on performance,carcass composition and plasma IGF-1 in grower finisher pigs[J].Animal (Cambridge,England),2011,5(5):749-756.

[2] ISHIDA A,KYOYA T,NAKASHIMA K,et al.Nitrogen balance during compensatory growth when changing the levels of dietary lysine from deficiency to sufficiency in growing pigs[J].Animal Science Journal,2012,83(11):743-749.  

[3] 楚惠民,王富国,宫本芝.小尾寒羊繁殖性能研究[J].中国草食动物科学,2014(S1):213-216.

[4] 毕晓丹,储明星,金海国,等.小尾寒羊高繁殖力候选基因ESR的研究[J].遗传学报,2005,32(10):1060-1065.

[5] 初汉平.杜泊羊和小尾寒羊杂一代羔羊与小尾寒羊羔羊生长性能、屠宰性能及肉品品质的比较[J].畜牧与兽医,2012,44(3):46-48.

[6] 熊本海,张宏福.国内外畜禽饲养标准与饲料成分表[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2010.

[7] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].3版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007.

[8] 汪水平,王文娟.瘤胃纤维降解相关酶活性的测定[J].中国饲料,2006(11):31-32.

[9] 郭旭东,刁其玉,徐俊,等.芦丁对奶牛瘤胃内固相和液相降解纤维素相关酶活性的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2012,48(7):55-58.

[10] 杨璐玲,吕永艳,张杰杰,等.啤酒糟对瘤胃发酵参数及纤维素酶活性的影响[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(10):2414-2421.

[11] 刘彩娟,孙满吉,孙金艳,等.饲粮中添加复合益生菌对奶牛瘤胃发酵及纤维素酶活的影响[J].动物营养学报,2011,23(5):821-827.

[12] 程抒劼,郑兰娟,林俊芳,等.纤维素酶活力测定研究进展[J].食品工业科技,2009(7):334-336,342.

[13] 霍小东,贾志海,张微,等.限饲对辽宁绒山羊生产性能及消化代谢的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2012,48(23):39-43.

[14] GALVANI D B,PIRES C C,KOZLOSKI G V,et al.Protein requirements of Texel crossbred lambs[J].Small Ruminant Research,2009,81(1):55-62.  

[15] NETO S G,BEZERRA L R,MEDEIROS A N,et al.Feed restriction and compensatory growth in Guzerá females[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2011,24(6):791-799.  

[16] 钟伟,李光玉,罗国良,等.限饲对东北梅花鹿消化代谢及尿嘌呤衍生物排出量的影响[J].饲料工业,2009,30(21):44-47.

[17] 张瑛,周建伟,刘浩,等.藏羊瘤胃发酵参数对燕麦干草为饲粮限饲的响应及其氮维持需要量估测[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(2):371-379.

[18] TEIXEIRA I A M A,FILHO J M P,MURRAY P J,et al.Water balance in goats subjected to feed restriction[J].Small Ruminant Research,2006,63(1/2):20-27.

[19] 齐景伟.营养限制和补偿生长对母羊和羔羊的生长轴激素及其受体基因表达水平的影响[D].博士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2006.

[20] 许贵善,刁其玉,纪守坤,等.不同饲喂水平对肉用绵羊能量与蛋白质消化代谢的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2012,48(17):40-44.

[21] LONG R J,DONG S K,HU Z Z,et al.Digestibility,nutrient balance and urinary purine derivative excretion in dry yak cows fed oat hay at different levels of intake[J].Livestock Production Science,2004,88(1/2):27-32.

[22] 刘海斌.蛋白水平对舍饲辽宁绒山羊生产性能及消化代谢的影响[D].硕士学位论文.长春:吉林农业大学,2008.

[23] 苗志国.苏尼特母羊补偿生长能力的研究[D].硕士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2003.

[24] SINGH P,VERMA A K,SAHU D S,et al.Utilization of nutrients as influenced by different restriction levels of feed intake under sub-tropical conditions in crossbred calves[J].Livestock Science,2008,117(2/3):308-314.

[25] GEORGE S K,DIPU M T,MEHRA U R,et al.Growth of crossbred bulls affected by level of feed intake[J].Indian Journal Animal Nutrition,2005,22(2):81-84.

[26] BEZERRA L R,NETO S G,DE MEDEIROS A N,et al.Feed restriction followed by realimentation in prepubescent Zebu females[J].Tropical Animal Health and Production,2013,45(5):1161-1169.  

[27] 冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学技术出版社,2004.
文章导航

/