饲料资源开发 Feed Resources Development

发酵葡萄籽粕对5~12周龄五龙鹅消化生理、免疫器官指数和抗氧化指标的影响

  • 王宝维 ,
  • 隋丽 ,
  • 岳斌 ,
  • 葛文华 ,
  • 张名爱 ,
  • 张开磊 ,
  • 贾玉辉 ,
  • 史雪萍
展开
  • 青岛农业大学优质水禽研究所, 国家水禽产业技术体系营养与饲料功能研究室, 青岛 266109

收稿日期: 2015-07-08

  网络出版日期: 2016-01-22

基金资助

国家水禽产业技术体系专项基金(CARS-43-11);山东省良种工程(2014LZ19)

Effects of Zymotic Grape Seed Meal on Digestive Physiology, Immune Organ Indices and Antioxidant Indices of Wulong Geese Aged from 5 to 12 Weeks

  • WANG Baowei ,
  • SUI Li ,
  • YUE Bin ,
  • GE Wenhua ,
  • ZHANG Ming ,
  • ZHANG Kailei ,
  • JIA Yuhui ,
  • SHI Xueping
Expand
  • Institute of High Quality Waterfowl, Qingdao Agricultural University, Nutrition and Feed Laboratory of China Agriculture Research System, Qingdao 266109, China

Received date: 2015-07-08

  Online published: 2016-01-22

摘要

本试验旨在研究饲粮中不同水平发酵葡萄籽粕对5~12周龄五龙鹅消化生理、免疫器官指数和血清抗氧化指标的影响,以确定发酵葡萄籽粕使用效果和适宜添加水平。选用5周龄五龙鹅288只,随机分为6个组,每个组6个重复,每个重复8只鹅(公母各占1/2)。对照组(Ⅰ组)饲喂基础饲粮,试验组在基础饲粮中分别添加2%(Ⅱ组)、4%(Ⅲ组)、6%(Ⅳ组)、8%(Ⅴ组)、10%(Ⅵ组)的发酵葡萄籽粕。试验期8周。结果表明:1)与对照组相比,Ⅴ组十二指肠和空肠中淀粉酶、胰蛋白酶、胰脂肪酶及胰腺中淀粉酶、胰蛋白酶活性极显著提高(P<0.01),Ⅳ组胰腺中胰脂肪酶活性极显著提高(P<0.01),Ⅴ组胃蛋白酶活性显著提高(P<0.05)。2)与对照组相比,Ⅳ组肠道中大肠杆菌数量显著降低(P<0.05),Ⅴ组肠道中乳酸杆菌数量显著提高(P<0.05),Ⅳ、Ⅴ组之间差异不显著(P>0.05)。3)与对照组相比,Ⅳ组肠绒毛高度显著提高(P<0.05),Ⅳ组肌层厚度显著提高(P<0.05),Ⅴ组隐窝深度极显著降低(P<0.01)。4)各组免疫器官指数差异不显著(P>0.05)。与对照组相比,Ⅴ组血清总抗氧化能力极显著提高(P<0.01);Ⅳ组血清丙二醛含量极显著降低(P<0.01),Ⅴ组血清总超氧化物歧化酶、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶活性极显著提高(P<0.01)。由此可见,发酵葡萄籽粕能显著提高5~12周龄五龙鹅消化酶活性,优化肠道组织结构,提高鹅的抗氧化能力,对免疫器官指数没有影响。建议饲粮中发酵葡萄籽粕适宜添加水平为6%~8%。

本文引用格式

王宝维 , 隋丽 , 岳斌 , 葛文华 , 张名爱 , 张开磊 , 贾玉辉 , 史雪萍 . 发酵葡萄籽粕对5~12周龄五龙鹅消化生理、免疫器官指数和抗氧化指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2016 , 28(1) : 163 -171 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.01.022

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of dietary different zymotic grape seed meal levels on digestive physiology, immune organ indices and serum antioxidant indices of Wulong geese aged from 5 to 12 weeks, to find the appropriate supplemental level of the zymotic grape seed meal and its feed effect. A total of 288 five-week-old Wulong geese were randomly divided into 6 groups with 6 replicates per group and 8 geese per replicate (half male and half female). Geese in the control group (group Ⅰ) were fed a basal diet, and the others were fed the basal diet supplemented with 2% (group Ⅱ), 4% (group Ⅲ), 6% (group Ⅳ), 8% (group Ⅴ), 10% (group Ⅵ) zymotic grape seed meal, respectively. The experiment lasted for 8 weeks. The results showed as follows: 1) compared with the control group, the activities of amylase, trypsin, lipase in duodenum and jejunum in group Ⅴ were significantly increased (P<0.01), the activities of amylase and trypsin in pancreas in group Ⅴ were significantly increased (P<0.01); the activity of lipase in pancreas in group Ⅳ was significantly increased (P<0.01); the activity of pepsin in group Ⅴ was significantly increased (P<0.05). 2) Compared with the control group, the number of Escherichia coli in intestinal tract in group Ⅳ was significantly decreased (P<0.05), the number of Lactobacillus in intestinal tract in group Ⅴ was significantly increased (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences between group Ⅳ and group Ⅴ (P>0.05). 3) Compared with the control group, the intestinal villus height in group Ⅳ was significantly increased (P<0.05); the thickness of muscle in group Ⅳ was significantly increased (P<0.05); the crypt depth in group Ⅴ was significantly decreased (P<0.01). 4) There were no significant differences on immune organ indices among all groups (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the serum total antioxidant capacity in group Ⅴ was significantly increased (P<0.01); the serum malonaldehyde content in group Ⅳ was significantly decreased (P<0.01), the activities of total superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase in serum in group Ⅴ were significantly increased (P<0.01). In conclusion, zymotic grape seed meal can improve digestive enzyme activity, optimize the structure of intestinal tissue, improve antioxidant function of Wulong geese aged from 5 to 12 weeks, and has no effect on immune organ index, and the dietary appropriate supplemental level is 6% to 8%.

参考文献

[1] 苏绍辉.益生菌在动物生产中的应用与发展趋势[J].安徽农学通报,2007,13(3):116-117,121.

[2] 周淑兰,曹国文,戴荣国,等.混合芽孢杆菌对肉用仔鸡生产性能和盲肠微生物菌群的影响试验[J].甘肃畜牧兽医,2007,37(6):23-26.

[3] 李玲,杨桂芹.益生菌和异麦芽寡糖对肉仔鸡盲肠菌群及生产性能的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2008,44(1):32-34.

[4] 苏勇,姚文,黄瑞华,等.芽孢乳杆菌S1对断奶前后仔猪肠道乳酸菌、大肠杆菌和挥发性脂肪酸含量变化的影响[J].福建农林大学学报:自然科学版,2006,35(1):73-76.

[5] FULLER R,GIBSON G R.Modification of the intestinal microflora using probiotics and prebiotics[J].Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology,1997,32:28-31.

[6] 唐志刚,钱巧玲,侯晓莹,等.益生菌的作用机理及其在肉鸡和蛋鸡中的应用[J].家畜生态学报,2010,31(2):5-8.

[7] 陈丽艳,白凤珍,程立军.芽孢杆菌对肉仔鸡蛋白质代谢的影响[J].内蒙古民族大学学报:自然科学版,2005,20(1):86-88.

[8] 王洪瑞.豆粕发酵工艺改进及发酵物对仔猪生长性能的影响[D].硕士学位论文.泰安:山东农业大学,2012.

[9] 邱良伟.发酵对棉粕营养特性及其在肉鸡中的应用研究[D].硕士学位论文.合肥:安徽农业大学,2012.

[10] 李银平,薛雪萍,袁春龙,等.葡萄籽成分与营养评价[J].食品与发酵工业,2006,32(12):108-113.

[11] 边玲,范培红.葡萄籽提取物的化学成分及药理活性研究概况[J].食品与药品,2005,7(4A):20-22.

[12] 张乐乐.葡萄籽在动物营养中的研究进展[J].饲料工业,2009,30(19):46-48.

[13] 朱立国.肉鸭微生物发酵饲料的工艺研究及应用[D].硕士学位论文.西安:西北大学,2007.

[14] 熊峰.大豆低聚糖和纳豆芽孢杆菌制剂及其组合对肉鸡生产性能、肠道消化酶及菌群平衡的影响[D].硕士学位论文.乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2008.

[15] 刘济.发酵豆粕对AA肉鸡生长性能、免疫功能及其消化酶的影响[D].硕士学位论文.湛江:广东海洋大学,2012.

[16] 胡永娜,王之盛,李爱科.固态发酵菜籽粕对肉仔鸡生长性能、免疫功能及消化酶活性的影响[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(7):1293-1301.

[17] 杨维仁,祝平,杨在宾,等.哺乳期使用植物小肽对断奶仔猪消化酶活性、免疫功能及消化道酸度的影响[J].中国粮油学报,2008,23(2):136-141.

[18] 郭元晟,闫素梅,张和平,等.发酵乳酸杆菌对肉鸡胰腺和小肠消化酶活性及营养物质消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2011,23(7):1225-1232.

[19] 汤江武,孙宏,姚晓红,等.芽孢杆菌在肉鸡肠道内的分布及对肠道菌群、消化酶活性的影响[J].浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版,2011,37(3):319-325.

[20] GUERRA N P,BERNÁRDEZ P F,MÉNDEZ J,et al.Production of four potentially probiotic lactic acid bacteria and their evaluation as feed additives for weaned piglets[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2007,134(1/2):89-107.

[21] JUVEN B J,MEINERSMANN R J,STERN N J.Antagonistic effects of lactobacilli and pediococci to control intestinal colonization by human enteropathogens in live poultry[J].Journal of Applied Bacteriology,1991,70(2):95-103.

[22] REID G,MCGROARTY J A,ANGOTTI R,et al.Lactobacillus inhibitor production against Escherichia coli and coaggregation ability with uropathogens[J].Canadian Journal of Microbiology,1988,34(3):344-351.

[23] 黄其永.德氏乳杆菌对哺乳仔猪消化器官及消化酶活性的影响研究[D].硕士学位论文.长沙:湖南农业大学,2013.

[24] 马治宇,赵献军,张晓庆,等.乳酸菌及其培养液对肉鸡盲肠菌群的影响[J].西北农业学报,2008,17(3):33-36.

[25] 胡顺珍,张建梅,谢全喜,等.复合微生态制剂对肉鸡生产性能、肠道菌群、抗氧化指标和免疫功能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(2):334-341.

[26] 张爱忠,卢德勋,姜宁,等.酵母培养物对绒山羊机体抗氧化能力的影响[J].动物营养学报,2010,22(3):781-786.

[27] 张呈军,李建鑫.小肽的营养及其在畜禽生产上的应用[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(13):3072-3074.

[28] 祝平.植物小肽对断奶仔猪生产性能影响及其机理的研究[D].硕士学位论文.泰安:山东农业大学,2007.

[29] 陈生龙.活酵母对断奶仔猪生产性能、免疫功能和肠道微生物区系的影响[D].硕士学位论文.福州:福建农林大学,2009.
文章导航

/