研究简报 Short Communications

饲料调味剂对育成期蓝狐采食量、营养物质消化率、氮代谢及生长性能的影响

展开
  • 1. 中国农业科学院特产研究所, 长春 130112;
    2. 吉林省特种经济动物分子生物学国家重点实验室, 长春 130112;
    3. 成都大帝汉克生物科技有限公司, 成都 611130
孙伟丽(1982-),女,黑龙江林口人,博士研究生,研究方向为特种经济动物营养与饲养。E-mail:tcsswl@163.com

收稿日期: 2015-09-17

  网络出版日期: 2016-03-14

基金资助

中国农业科学院科技创新工程专项;饲料风味剂对狐、貉生长发育和消化代谢的影响研究(成都大帝汉克公司资助)

Effects of Feed Flavoring Agents on Feed Intake, Nutrition Digestibility, Nitrogen Metabolism and Growth Performance of Growing Blue Foxes

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Special Animal and Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Changchun 130112, China;
    2. Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory for Molecular Biology of Special Economic Animals, Changchun 130112, China;
    3. DadHank (Chengdu) Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Chengdu 611130, China

Received date: 2015-09-17

  Online published: 2016-03-14

摘要

本试验旨在研究肝脏香、奶香、甜味剂和大肠香等4种饲料调味剂对育成期雄性蓝狐采食量、营养物质消化率、氮代谢和生长性能的影响。试验采用单因子试验设计,选取体况健康的育成期雄性蓝狐50只,随机分成5组,每组10个重复,每个重复1只。各组动物个体间体重差异不显著(P>0.05)。对照组(Ⅰ组)饲喂基础饲粮,试验组(Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ组)分别饲喂在基础饲粮中添加肝脏香、奶香、甜味剂和大肠香饲料调味剂的试验饲粮,添加量分别为500、500、120、500 mg/kg。试验期为52 d。结果表明:1)与Ⅰ组相比,Ⅱ和Ⅳ组干物质采食量极显著提高(P<0.01),Ⅲ组干物质采食量显著提高(P<0.05)。2)与Ⅰ组相比,Ⅳ组干物质排出量显著降低(P<0.05);Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ组干物质消化率分别提高了4.34%、9.07%、9.40%、5.23%,但差异不显著(P>0.05);Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ组蛋白质消化率极显著提高(P<0.01);Ⅳ组脂肪消化率显著提高(P<0.05)。3)与Ⅰ组相比,各试验组的食入氮、尿氮和蛋白质生物学价值差异不显著(P>0.05);Ⅳ组粪氮显著降低(P<0.05),氮沉积和净蛋白质利用率显著提高(P<0.05)。4)各组蓝狐体重及总增重差异均不显著(P>0.05);平均日增重各组之间差异不显著(P>0.05),但以Ⅰ组最低,Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ组分别较Ⅰ组提高了7.99%、3.27%、6.19%、7.37%;料重比从低到高顺序依次为Ⅳ、Ⅲ、Ⅱ、Ⅴ、Ⅰ组,但各组之间差异不显著(P>0.05)。在本试验条件下,饲粮中添加肝脏香、奶香、甜味剂3种调味剂均提高了蓝狐的干物质采食量和营养物质消化率,提高了饲料的利用率,其中以甜味剂效果最好。

本文引用格式

孙伟丽, 王卓, 樊燕燕, 刘峰, 孙皓然, 李光玉 . 饲料调味剂对育成期蓝狐采食量、营养物质消化率、氮代谢及生长性能的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2016 , 28(3) : 851 -857 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.03.026

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to study the effects of feed flavoring agents including the liver flavor, milk flavor, sweetener and bowel flavor on feed intake, nutrition digestibility, nitrogen metabolism and growth performance of growing male blue foxes. With the single factor designing, fifty health growing male blue foxes weighing approximately were collected and randomly allocated into five groups, each group containing ten replicates, and one fox per replicate. Foxes were fed the same basal powder diet supplemented with 0 (control group), 500 mg/kg liver flavor (group Ⅱ), 500 mg/kg milk flavor (group Ⅲ), 120 mg/kg sweetener (group Ⅳ) and 500 mg/kg (group Ⅴ) bowel flavor, respectively. The experiment lasted 52 d. The experimental results showed as follows: 1) compared with the group Ⅰ, the dry matter intake in groups Ⅱ and Ⅳ were extremely significantly increased (P<0.01), and the dry matter intake in group Ⅲ was significantly increased (P<0.05). 2) Compared with the group Ⅰ, dry matter output in group Ⅳ was significantly decreased (P<0.05), dry matter digestibility in groups Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ were increased by 4.34%, 9.07%, 9.40%, 5.23%, respectively, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). Group Ⅳ showed a significantly higher fat digestibility (P<0.05). Groups Ⅲ Ⅳ and Ⅴ showed a significantly higher protein digestibility (P<0.01). 3) In the aspect of nitrogen metabolism, nitrogen intake, urine nitrogen and the protein biological value in experimental groups were no significant differences compared with the group Ⅰ (P>0.05); significantly lower fecal nitrogen and significantly higher nitrogen deposition and net protein utilization were observed in the group Ⅳ (P<0.05). 4) Body weight, the total weight gain and average daily gain were no significant difference among all groups (P>0.05). Average daily gain in group Ⅰ was the lowest, and that in groups Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ were higher 7.99%, 3.27%, 6.19%, 7.37%, respectively. Ratio of feed to gain from low to high were groups Ⅳ, Ⅲ, Ⅱ, Ⅴ and Ⅰ, respectively, but the difference were not significant (P>0.05). In conclusion, in this experiment conditions, the feeding flavoring agents of liver flavor, milk flavor sweetener can increase the dry matter intake and nutrition digestibility, and improve the feed utilization of growing blue foxes. The effect of sweetener is the best.

参考文献

[1] 高洪芬,李华.饲料调味剂及其功能[J].中国饲料,1996(13):12-13.

[2] 沈婷.饲料风味剂的研究进展与应用[J].江苏农业科学,2007(5):156-160.

[3] 陈文,黄艳群,田伟,等.家禽味觉特性与禽用调味剂的使用[J].家禽科学,2006(1):48-50.

[4] 陈永锋.甜味剂和香味剂对仔猪生产性能的影响[J].福建畜牧兽医,2012,34(2):12-15.

[5] 孙肖明,李文聪.饲料调味剂在养殖业中的应用与展望[J].养殖与饲料,2013(9):24-26.

[6] 王常慧,杨建强.饲用调味剂的研究进展及应用注意事项[J].饲料工业,2001,22(2):24-25.

[7] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].2版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.

[8] 陈学斌.动物选择采食行为与调味剂在饲料中的应用[J].国外畜牧科技,1999,26(6):12-14.

[9] 杨雅涵,孙伟丽,徐超,等.饲料调味剂对准备配种期蓝狐采食行为和采食量的影响[J].饲料工业,2015,36(17):55-59.

[10] MENNELLA J A, BEAUCHAMP G K.Mothers'milk enhances the acceptance of cereal during weaning[J].Pediatric Research,1997,41:188-192.

[11] FORBES J M.Voluntary food intake and diet selection in farm animals[M].2nd ed.Wallingford:CAB International,2007.

[12] 吕继蓉,曾凡坤,张克英.猪乳香味剂对断奶仔猪采食行为和采食量的影响[J].动物营养学报,2011,23(5):848-853.

[13] 孙伟丽,刘峰,樊燕燕,等.饲料调味剂对育成期蓝狐采食量和采食行为的影响[J].饲料工业,2015,36(21):57-61.

[14] 杨雅涵,李光玉,徐超,等.不同浓度梯度甜味剂对准备配种期蓝狐诱食效果的研究[J].饲料工业,2014,35(15):51-54.

[15] MCLAUGHLIN C L,BAILE C A,BUCKHOLTZ L L,et al.Preferred flavors and performance of weanling pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science,1983,56(6):1287-1293.

[16] MOSER R L, PETTIGREW J E,CORNELIUS S G.Feed intake of lactating sows as affected by a feed flavor[R]//Minnesota Swine Research Reports.[S.l.] :[s.n.],1986.

[17] WELLER R F,PHIPPS R H.Preliminary studies on the effect of flavouring agents on the dry-matter intake of silage by lactating dairy cows[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1989,112(1):67-71.  

[18] SMITH J C.Microstructure of the rat's,intake of food,sucrose and saccharin in 24-hour tests[J].Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,2000,24(2):199-212.  

[19] RICHARDSON L.The influence of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners on rat taste behavior[Z].[S.l.] :[s.n.],2008:18.

[20] PLATEL K,SRINIVASAN K.Influence of dietary spices or their active principles on digestive enzymes of small intestinal mucosa in rats[J].International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition,1996,47(l):55-59.

[21] 吕继蓉.饲料风味剂对猪采食量和采食行为的影响及机理研究[D].博士学位论文.雅安:四川农业大学,2011.

[22] 张海华.日粮蛋白质和蛋氨酸水平对水貂生产性能及毛皮发育的影响[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2011.

[23] 牟永斌.色氨酸和诱食剂对仔猪营养生理效应的影响研究[D].硕士学位论文.重庆:西南大学,2008.

[24] 刘爽.几种甜味剂、香味剂和饲料颜色对仔猪增重效果的影响研究[D].硕士学位论文.杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2007.

[25] 李欣,田树军,赵国先,等.不同风味诱食剂对羔羊采食行为和生产性能的影响[J].中国饲料,2013(23):32-34.
文章导航

/