研究简报 Short Communications

抗性淀粉对饮食诱导肥胖大鼠排便状况及肠道菌群的影响

  • 王志凡 ,
  • 杨秀琳 ,
  • 陈旺盛 ,
  • 马慧
展开
  • 西北民族大学医学院, 兰州 730030

收稿日期: 2015-11-23

  网络出版日期: 2016-05-24

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(81160345)

Effects of Resistant Starch on Defecation and Intestinal Microflora of Diet Induced Obesity Rats

  • WANG Zhifan ,
  • YANG Xiuling ,
  • CHEN Wangsheng ,
  • MA Hui
Expand
  • Medical College, Northwest University for Nationalities, Lanzhou 730030, China

Received date: 2015-11-23

  Online published: 2016-05-24

摘要

本试验旨在探讨抗性淀粉(RS)对饮食诱导肥胖(DIO)大鼠排便状况及肠道菌群的影响,为合理利用RS提供依据。选用100只健康雄性SD大鼠,随机分为2组,对照组10只饲喂基础饲粮,高脂组(HF组)90只饲喂高脂饲粮,7周后根据体重从HF组筛选出DIO大鼠27只,随机分为3组,每组9只,分别为HF组(饲喂高脂饲粮)、高脂饲粮抗性淀粉组(HFRS组,饲喂含10% RS的高脂饲粮)、高脂饲粮抗性淀粉+硫酸葡聚糖(DS)组(HFRS+DS组,饲喂含10% RS的高脂饲粮),试验期间HFRS+DS组每天用5% DS 1 mL灌胃,其他组分别用蒸馏水1 mL灌胃,试验期5周。于第7、12周收集新鲜成形大便1 g,稀释后用选择性培养基进行肠球菌、肠杆菌、双歧杆菌、乳酸杆菌、类杆菌检测并计数菌落总数。结果表明:1)试验第7周时,与对照组相比,HF组大鼠粪便湿重、粪便含水率以及粪样中肠球菌、双歧杆菌、乳酸菌、类杆菌数量显著降低(P<0.05),粪便颗粒数、粪样中肠杆菌数量显著升高(P<0.05)。2)试验第12周时,与对照组相比,HF组DIO大鼠粪便湿重、粪便含水率以及粪样中肠球菌、双歧杆菌、乳酸菌、类杆菌数量显著降低(P<0.05),粪便颗粒数、粪样中肠杆菌数量显著升高(P<0.05);与HF组相比,HFRS组DIO大鼠粪便湿重、粪便干重、粪便含水率以及粪样中肠球菌、双歧杆菌、乳酸菌、类杆菌数量均显著升高(P<0.05),粪便颗粒数、粪样中肠杆菌数量显著降低(P<0.05);与HFRS组相比,HFRS+DS组DIO大鼠粪便湿重、粪便含水率以及粪样中双歧杆菌、乳酸菌、类杆菌数量显著降低(P<0.05),粪样中肠杆菌、肠球菌数量显著增加(P<0.05)。由此可见,本试验条件下,RS可改善DIO大鼠排便状况和高脂饲粮造成的肠道菌群紊乱。

本文引用格式

王志凡 , 杨秀琳 , 陈旺盛 , 马慧 . 抗性淀粉对饮食诱导肥胖大鼠排便状况及肠道菌群的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2016 , 28(5) : 1626 -1632 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.05.041

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to discuss the influence of resistant starch (RS) on defecation and intestinal microflora of diet induced obesity (DIO) rat, to provide basis for the usage of RS. A total of 100 health male SD rats were randomly divided into two groups, basal diet was given to the control group which with ten rats and the high-fat diet was given to the high-fat group (HF group) which with ninety rats for seven weeks. Then twenty-seven DIO rats were picked out on the ground of their weight from the HF group, and randomly divided into three groups with nine replicates per group. Each group was offered one of the following diets:the high-fat diet in HF group, the high-fat diet with 10% RS in high-fat and resistant starch group (HFRS group) and high-fat and resistant starch+dextran sulfate group (HFRS+DS group). The experimental period was five weeks. During period, 1 mL 5% DS was given by gavage to HFRS+DS group, while 1 mL distilled water was administrated to other two groups. One gram fresh feces was collected in the 7th and the 12th week. The number of Bacillus coli, Enterococcus, Bacillus bifidus, Lacticacid bacillus, and Bacteroid were tested using selective culture medium after dilution. The results showed as follows:1) in the 7th week, compared with the control group, wet weight and water content of feces, and the number of Enterococcus, Bacillus bifidus, Lacticacid bacillus and Bacteroid of feces in HF group were significantly decreased (P<0.05), while the pellet number and the Bacillus coli number of feces in HF group were significantly increased (P<0.05). 2) In the 12th week, compared with the control group, wet weight and water content of feces, and the number of Enterococcus, Bacillus bifidus, Lacticacid bacillus and Bacteroid of feces in HF group were significantly decreased (P<0.05), while the pellet number and the Bacillus coli number of feces in HF group were significantly increased (P<0.05). Compared with the HF group, wet weight, dry weight and water content of feces, and the number of Enterococcus, Bacillus bifidus, Lacticacid bacillus and Bacteroid of feces in HFRS group were significantly increased (P<0.05), while the pellet number and the Bacillus coli number of feces in HFRS group were significantly decreased (P<0.05).Compared with the HFRS group, wet weight and water content of feces, and the number of Bacillus bifidus, Lacticacid bacillus and Bacteroid of feces in HFRS+DS group were significantly decreased (P<0.05), while the number of the Bacillus coli and Enterococcus of feces in HFRS+DS group were significantly increased (P<0.05). In conclusion, under the condition of this experiment, RS has benefit on defecation and intestinal microflora disturbance of DIO rats caused by high-fat diet.

参考文献

[1] 朱伟云,余凯凡,慕春龙,等.猪的肠道微生物与宿主营养代谢[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(10):3046-3051.
[2] CAESAR R,FÅK F,BÄCKHED F.Effects of gut microbiota on obesity and atherosclerosis via modulation of inflammation and lipid metabolism[J].Journal of Internal Medicine,2010,268(4):320-328.  
[3] FUKUDA S,OHNO H.Gut microbiome and metabolic diseases[J].Seminars in Immunopathology,2014,36(1):103-114.  
[4] LEY R E,TURNBAUGH P J,KLEIN S,et al.Microbial ecology:human gut microbes associated with obesity[J].Nature,2006;444(7122):1022-1023.
[5] 陈杏云,曾本华,魏泓,等.高脂饮食对菌群人源化小鼠肠道菌群结构的影响[J].食品科学,2013,34(17):278-283.
[6] 周中凯,杨艳,郑排云,等.肠道微生物蛋白质的发酵与肠道健康的关系[J].食品科学,2014,35(1):303-309.
[7] 苏畅,王惠君,张兵,等.1989-2009年中国九省区膳食营养素摄入状况及变化趋势(五)1849岁成年居民膳食脂肪与胆固醇摄入状况及变化趋势[J].营养学报,2011,33(6):546-550.
[8] 相振田.饲粮不同来源淀粉对断奶仔猪肠道功能和健康的影响及机理研究[D].博士学位论文.雅安:四川农业大学,2011.
[9] WALKER A W,INCE J,DUNCAN S H,et al.Dominant and diet-responsive groups of bacteria within the human colonic microbiota[J].The ISME Journal,2011,5(2):220-230.  
[10] 方建东.抗性淀粉对小鼠肠道菌群的影响以及作用机制的研究[D].硕士学位论文.杭州:浙江工商大学,2014.
[11] AZORÍN-ORTUÑO M, URBÁN C,CERÓN J J.Effect of low inulin doses with different polymerisation degree on lipid metabolism,mineral absorption,and intestinal microbiota in rats with fat-supplemented diet[J].Food Chemistry,2009,113(4):1058-1065.  
[12] HIGGINS J A,BROWN M A.STORLIEN L H.Consumption of resistant starch decreases postprandial lipogenesis in white adipose tissue of the rat[J].Nutrition Journal,2006,5(1):25-26.  
[13] 吴银伟.双歧三联活菌胶囊对腹泻型肠易激综合征患者肠道菌群的影响及疗效观察[J].中国微生态学杂志,2014,26(4):438-440.
[14] 王竹,杨月欣,周瑞华,等.抗性淀粉的代谢及对血糖的调节作用[J].营养学报,2003,25(2):190-195.
[15] 白永亮,彭真福,陈庆发,等.香蕉粉干预对糖尿病大鼠肠道菌群调节作用研究[J].现代食品科技,2013,29(9):2110-2114.
[16] 王志凡,陈旺盛,张银霞.抗性淀粉对饮食诱导肥胖大鼠肠道发酵状况的改善作用[J].吉林大学学报:医学版,2013,39(1):42-45.
[17] 杨月欣,王竹,洪洁,等.抗性淀粉结肠内酵解对大鼠肠道健康的影响[J].世界华人消化杂志,2004,12(11):2618-2622.
[18] 张珍珍,尹富贵,黄菊,等.杂粮淀粉在仔猪体内的消化率研究[J].食品科学,2010,31(3):217-219.
[19] 张慧,洪雁,顾正彪,等.3种谷物全粉中淀粉的消化性及影响因素[J].食品与发酵工业,2012,38(11):26-31.
[20] NATIVIDAD J M,HUANG X X,SLACK E,et al.Host responses to intestinal microbial antigens in gluten-sensitive mice[J].PLoS One,2009,4(7):e6472-e6473.
[21] DIBAISE J K,ZHANG H S,CROWELL M D,et al.Gut microbiota and its possible relationship with obesity[J].Mayo Clinic Proceedings,2008,83(4):460-469.  
[22] 王志凡,马慧,陈旺盛,等.高脂饮食对SD大鼠排便状况和粪便菌群的影响及其意义[J].吉林大学学报:医学版,2014,40(4):734-738.
[23] Welloek I J.Effect of weaning age,protein nutrition and enterotoxigenic Eschericha coli challenge on the health of newly weaned Piglets[J].Livestock Science,2007,108(1):102-105.
[24] RESTA S C.Effects of probiotics and commensals on intestinal epithelial physiology:implications for nutrient handling[J].Journal of Physiology,2009,587(Pt 17):4169-4174.
[25] ATTENE-RAMOS M S,NAVA G M,MUELLNER M G,et al.DNA damage and toxicogenomic analyses of hydrogen sulfide in human intestinal epithelial FHs 74 Int Cells[J].Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis,2010,51(4):304-314.
[26] 张蓉,孙进,李亚欣,等.硫辛酸对高脂日粮小鼠肠道氧化还原状态与微生物菌群的影响[J].食品工业科技,2010,31(9):321-326,369.
文章导航

/