研究简报 Short Communications

饲粮亚油酸水平对育成期蓝狐生长性能、营养物质消化率及氮代谢的影响

  • 邢敬亚 ,
  • 钟伟 ,
  • 刘帅 ,
  • 陈明帅 ,
  • 张婷 ,
  • 孙皓然 ,
  • 樊燕燕 ,
  • 李光玉
展开
  • 中国农业科学院特产研究所, 吉林省特种经济动物分子生物学省部共建重点实验室, 长春 130112

收稿日期: 2016-01-13

  网络出版日期: 2016-07-28

基金资助

中国农业科学院科技创新工程;吉林省自然科学基金项目(20140101033JC)

Effects of Dietary Linoleic Acid Level on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Nitrogen Metabolism of Blue Foxes in Growing Period

  • XING Jingya ,
  • ZHONG Wei ,
  • LIU Shuai ,
  • CHEN Mingshuai ,
  • ZHANG Ting ,
  • SUN Haoran ,
  • FAN Yanyan ,
  • LI Guangyu
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Special Economic Animal Molecular Biology, Institute of Special Animal and Plant Sciences, Changchun 130112, China

Received date: 2016-01-13

  Online published: 2016-07-28

摘要

本试验旨在研究饲粮亚油酸水平对育成期蓝狐生长性能、营养物质消化率及氮代谢的影响。选取(90±5)日龄、体重相近的健康雄性蓝狐60只,随机分成6组,每组10个重复,每个重复1只蓝狐。6组蓝狐分别饲喂亚油酸水平为0.11%(Ⅰ组)、0.52%(Ⅱ组)、0.92%(Ⅲ组)、1.33%(Ⅳ组)、2.14%(Ⅴ组)和3.36%(Ⅵ组)的试验饲粮。预试期7 d,正试期63 d。结果表明:1)饲粮亚油酸水平极显著影响育成期蓝狐的平均日增重和料重比(P<0.01),对干物质采食量无显著影响(P>0.05)。随饲粮亚油酸水平由0.92%升高到3.36%,平均日增重逐渐升高,料重比逐渐降低,但上述指标Ⅳ和Ⅴ组间差异不显著(P>0.05)。2)饲粮亚油酸水平极显著影响育成期蓝狐的脂肪、碳水化合物及干物质消化率(P<0.01),对蛋白质消化率无显著影响(P>0.05)。脂肪和碳水化合物消化率均以Ⅵ组最高,干物质消化率以Ⅴ组最高,但上述3个指标在Ⅳ和Ⅴ组间均无显著差异(P>0.05)。3)饲粮亚油酸水平显著或极显著影响粪氮、尿氮和蛋白质生物学价值(P<0.01或P<0.05),对食入氮、氮沉积和净蛋白质利用率无显著影响(P>0.05)。粪氮以Ⅵ组最高,与Ⅱ、Ⅳ和Ⅴ组差异不显著(P>0.05)。尿氮以Ⅱ组最高,与Ⅲ、Ⅳ和Ⅴ组差异不显著(P>0.05)。Ⅵ组蛋白质生物学价值最高,显著高于Ⅱ组(P<0.05),与其他组差异不显著(P>0.05)。从降低环境污染以及保证育成期蓝狐生长性能的角度综合考虑,饲粮亚油酸水平为2.14%较适宜。

本文引用格式

邢敬亚 , 钟伟 , 刘帅 , 陈明帅 , 张婷 , 孙皓然 , 樊燕燕 , 李光玉 . 饲粮亚油酸水平对育成期蓝狐生长性能、营养物质消化率及氮代谢的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2016 , 28(7) : 2309 -2316 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.07.039

Abstract

This study was conducted to study the effects of dietary linoleic acid level on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen metabolism of blue foxes in growing period. Sixty male blue foxes aged about 90 days with similar body weight were randomly divided into 6 groups with 10 replicates per group and 1 fox per replicate. They were fed experimental diets with linoleic acid levels of 0.11% (group Ⅰ), 0.52% (group Ⅱ), 0.92% (group Ⅲ), 1.33% (group Ⅳ), 2.14% (group Ⅴ) and 3.36% (group Ⅵ), respectively. The adaptation period lasted for 7 days and the formal period lasted for 63 days. The results showed as follows: 1) dietary linoleic acid level had significant effects on the average daily gain and feed/gain (P<0.01), but had no significant effect on the dry matter intake (P>0.05). The average daily gain was gradually increased with dietary linoleic acid level increased from 0.92% to 3.36%, while the feed/gain was gradually declined, but no significant differences were found in above indices between groups Ⅳ and Ⅴ (P>0.05). 2) Dietary linoleic acid level had significant effects on the fat digestibility, carbohydrate digestibility and dry matter digestibility (P<0.01), but had no significant effect on the protein digestibility (P>0.05). The highest values of fat digestibility and carbohydrate digestibility were found in group Ⅵ, and the highest value of dry matter digestibility was found in group Ⅴ, but no significant differences were found in above indices between groups Ⅳ and Ⅴ (P>0.05). 3) Dietary linoleic acid level had significant effects on fecal nitrogen, urea nitrogen and biological value of protein (P<0.05 or P<0.01), but had no significant effects on nitrogen intake, nitrogen retention and net protein utilization (P>0.05). The fecal nitrogen in group Ⅵ was the highest, but had no significant difference compared with groups Ⅱ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ (P>0.05); the urea nitrogen in group Ⅱ was the highest, but had no significant difference compared with groups Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ (P>0.05); the biological value of protein in group Ⅵ was the highest, and was significantly higher than that in group Ⅱ (P<0.05), but had no significant difference compared with other groups (P>0.05). By a comprehensive consideration on the terms of reducing environmental pollution and maintaining growth performance, dietary optimal linoleic acid level for blue foxes in growing period is 2.14%.

参考文献

[1] 靳世厚,杨嘉实.狐的能量、蛋白质需要量及其饲料配制技术的综合研究报告[J].经济动物学报,1998,2(2):10-13.
[2] 杨凤.动物营养学[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2003:76-88.
[3] WATKINS B A.Importance of essential fatty acids and their derivatives in poultry[J].The Journal of Nutrition,1991,121(9):1475-1485.
[4] 齐广海.家禽多不饱和脂肪酸营养作用的研究进展(上)[J].国外畜牧科技,1994,21(4):11-14.
[5] 李琪玲,王武,章立新.共轭亚油酸对小鼠的减肥作用[J].食品科学,2011,32(21):229-232.
[6] 鲍建民.多不饱和脂肪酸的生理功能及安全性[J].中国食物与营养,2006(1):45-46.
[7] 李霞,袁凤来,袁丽萍,等.多不饱和脂肪酸调血脂作用研究进展[J].安徽医药,2007,11(10):867-869.
[8] NRC.Nutrient requirements of swine[S].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,1988.
[9] 马宏峰.亚油酸对高脂小鼠脂质代谢的影响及其机制研究[D].硕士学位论文.合肥:合肥工业大学,2007.
[10] IP C,CHIN S F,SCIMECA J A,et al.Mammary cancer prevention by conjugated dienoic derivative of linoleic acid[J].Cancer Research,1991,51(22):6118-6124.
[11] 回瑞华,侯冬岩,李学成,等.玉米油的制备及脂肪酸的分析[J].食品科学,2006,27(11):418-420.
[12] THIEL-COOPER R L,PARRISH F C,SPARKS J C,et al.Conjugated linoleic acid changes swine performance and carcass composition[J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,79(7):1821-1828.
[13] 金英海.日粮中添加不同水平的红花油对生长育肥猪生长性能和胴体品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.延吉:延边大学,2005.
[14] SAFAA H M,SERRANO M P,VALENCIA D G,et al.Effects of the levels of methionine,linoleic acid,and added fat in the diet on productive performance and egg quality of brown laying hens in the late phase of production[J].Poultry Science,2008,87(8):1595-1602.  
[15] 王爽,陈伟,阮栋,等.饲粮亚油酸水平对产蛋初期蛋鸭产蛋性能、蛋品质及脂类代谢的影响[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(3):731-739.
[16] 李荣刚,麻名文,王春阳,等.日粮添加亚油酸对断奶至2月龄肉兔生长性能、免疫指标及脂质代谢的影响[J].中国兽医学报,2011,31(11):1676-1680.
[17] AUSTRENG E,SKREDE A,ELDEGARD Å.Effect of dietary fat source on the digestibility of fat and fatty acids in rainbow trout and mink[J].Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica,1979,29(2):119-126.  
[18] AHMED I,KHAN M A.Dietary arginine requirement of fingerling Indian major carp,Cirrhinus mrigala (Hamilton)[J].Aquaculture Nutrition,2004,10(4):217-225.  
[19] 万春孟,张铁涛,吴学壮,等.饲粮L-精氨酸添加水平对冬毛期水貂生长性能、营养物质消化率及氮代谢的影响[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(9):2963-2969.
[20] 王圣伟,胥保华,王红芳.意大利蜜蜂工蜂幼虫饲粮中亚油酸的适宜添加水平[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(5):1440-1449.
文章导航

/