研究简报 Short communications

饲养密度与活动空间对肉鸡免疫和应激指标的影响

  • 卢营杰 ,
  • 苗志强 ,
  • 李建慧 ,
  • 杨鹰 ,
  • 杨玉
展开
  • 1. 山西农业大学动物科技学院, 太谷 030801;
    2. 中国农业大学动物科技学院, 北京 100193

收稿日期: 2016-03-03

  网络出版日期: 2016-09-08

基金资助

“十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2012BAD39B0402-03);山西现代鸡产业技术体系(20141102);山西农业大学科技创新基金(412575)

Influence of Breeding Density and Space Allowance on Immune and Stress Indexes of Broilers

  • LU Yingjie ,
  • MIAO Zhiqiang ,
  • LI Jianhui ,
  • YANG Ying ,
  • YANG Yu
Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China;
    2. College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2016-03-03

  Online published: 2016-09-08

摘要

本试验旨在探究饲养密度与活动空间对肉鸡免疫和应激指标的影响。试验选用1日龄爱拔益加(AA)肉鸡756只,采用3×2因子设计,随机分成6个处理,每个处理6个重复。活动空间分大、小2种:2.88(2.4 m×1.2 m)和1.44 m2(2.4 m×0.6 m),密度分高、中、低3种:14、10、6只/m2。试验期42 d。结果表明:1)21日龄时,饲养密度与活动空间对平均日增重、平均体重的交互作用显著(P<0.05),大空间中密度组平均日增重、平均体重显著高于小空间中、高密度组(P<0.05)。饲养密度与活动空间对血清游离脂肪酸(FFA)含量有极显著影响(P<0.01),中密度组显著低于高、低密度组(P<0.05),并且交互作用极显著(P<0.01)。饲养密度对血清白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)含量分别有极显著和显著影响(P<0.01和P<0.05)。饲养密度对血清总抗氧化能力(T-AOC)有显著影响(P<0.05);饲养密度与活动空间对血清谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH-Px)活性的交互作用显著(P<0.05)。2)42日龄时,饲养密度与活动空间对平均日增重、料重比、平均体重的交互作用极显著(P<0.01)。大空间中、低密度组和小空间低密度组的平均日增重、平均体重显著高于其他各组(P<0.05),高密度组平均日采食量、平均日增重、平均体重显著低于中、低密度组(P<0.05),大空间组平均体重显著高于小空间组(P<0.05),大空间组平均日采食量显著低于小空间组(P<0.05),大空间中、高密度组料重比显著低于小空间中、高密度组(P<0.05)。高密度组的血清葡萄糖含量显著高于中、低密度组(P<0.05)。中密度组血清IL-1β含量显著低于高、低密度组(P<0.05)。由此可见,饲养密度与活动空间对平均日采食重、平均日增重、料重比、平均体重及血清FFA、IL-1β及IL-6含量产生了一定影响,可引起肉鸡的应激免疫反应。其中,中密度大空间组(10只/m2、2.88 m2)免疫应激最小,更适宜肉鸡生长。

本文引用格式

卢营杰 , 苗志强 , 李建慧 , 杨鹰 , 杨玉 . 饲养密度与活动空间对肉鸡免疫和应激指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2016 , 28(9) : 2927 -2935 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.09.032

Abstract

The influence of breeding density and space allowance on immune and stress indexes of broilers were investigated in this experiment. Using a 3×2 factors completely randomized design, a total of 756 one-day-old Arbor Acres (AA) broilers were randomly allotted into 6 groups with 6 replicates per group. Two kinds of space allowance were designed as 2.88 (2.4 m×1.2 m) and 1.44 m2 (2.4 m×0.6 m), three breeding densities were designed as high density (14 birds/m2), medium density (10 birds/m2) and low density (6 birds/m2). The experiment lasted for 42 day. The results showed as follows: 1) at 21 days of age, breeding density and space allowance had a significant interaction on average daily gain (ADG) and average body weight (ABW) (P<0.05). The ADG and ABW of broilers in the medium density with large space allowance group were significantly higher than those in the medium density with small space allowance group and the high density with small space allowance group (P<0.05). Breeding density and space allowance had significant effects on serum free fatty acids (FFA) content (P<0.01), also had a significant interaction (P<0.01), the serum FFA content in medium density group was significantly lower than that of high and low density groups (P<0.05). Breeding density had significant effects on the contents of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in serum (P<0.01 and P<0.05). Breeding density had significant effect on serum total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) (P<0.05). Breeding density and space allowance had a significant interaction on serum glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity (P<0.05). 2) At 42 days of age, breeding density and space allowance had a significant interaction on ADG, feed to gain (F/G) and ABW (P<0.05). The ADG and ABW of broilers in medium and low density with large space allowance group and low density with small space allowance group were significantly higher than those in other groups (P<0.05), the average daily feed intake (ADFI), ADG and ABW of broilers in high density were significantly lower than those in medium and low density group (P<0.05), the ABW of broilers in large space allowance group was significantly higher than that in small space allowance group (P<0.05), the ADFI of broilers in large space allowance group was significantly lower than that in small space allowance group (P<0.05), the F/G of broilers in medium and high density with large space allowance group was significantly lower than that in medium and high density with small space allowance group (P<0.05). The serum glucose content in high density group was significantly higher than that in medium and low density group (P<0.05). The serum IL-1β content in medium density group was significantly lower than that in high and low density group (P<0.05). In summary, breeding density and space allowance have a certain influences on ADFI, ADG, F/G, ABW and contents of FFA, Il-1β and IL-6 in serum, and cause chicken's stress and immune response. This experiment can preliminary draw the conclusion that the medium density (10 birds/m2) with large space allowance (2.88 m2) has lowest immunological stress, which is more suitable for the growth of broilers.

参考文献

[1] SØRENSEN P,SU G,KESTIN S C.Effects of age and stocking density on leg weakness in broiler chickens[J].Poultry Science,2000,79(6):864-870.  
[2] HECKERT R A,ESTEVEZ I,RUSSEK-COHEN E,et al.Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers[J].Poultry Science,2002,81(4):451-457.  
[3] GREENEJ A,MCCRAKEN R M,EVANS R T.A contact dermatitis of broilers-clinical and pathological findings[J].Avian Pathology,1985,14(1):23-38.  
[4] MCILROY S G,GOODALL E A,MCMURRAY C H.A contact dermatitis of broilers-epidemiological findings[J].Avian Pathology,1987,16(1):93-105.  
[5] 孙作为.饲养密度和饲粮营养影响肉鸡生长、胴体组成及腿部健康的研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2013:131-132.
[6] MTILENI B J,NEPHAWE K A,NESAMVUNI A E,et al.The influence of stocking density on body weight,egg weight,and feed intake of adult broiler breeder hens[J].Poultry Science,2007,86(8):1615-1619.  
[7] 冯京海.环境高温对肉鸡线粒体功能及胸肌品质的影响[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2006.
[8] 李军乔.高温环境对肉仔鸡血液生化指标、热应激蛋白(HsP72)转录及肉品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.保定:河北农业大学,2004.
[9] 范石军,李德发,胥学新,等.热应激对产蛋鸡自身及其后代机体组织的过氧化损伤以及抗氧化微营养素的调控效应[J].中国兽医学报,2001,21(2):195-199.
[10] HUGHES B O,CARMICHAEL N L,WALKER A W,et al.Low incidence of aggression in large flocks of laying hens[J].Applied Animal Behaviour Science,1997,54(2/3):215-234.
[11] NEWBERRY R C,TARAZONA A M.Behavior and welfare of laying hens and broiler chickens[J].Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias,2011,24(3):301-302.
[12] MORGAN K N,TROMBORG C T.Sources of stress in captivity[J].Applied Animal Behaviour Science,2007,102(3/4):262-302.
[13] LEONE E H,ESTÉVEZ I.Space use according to the distribution of resources and level of competition[J].Poultry Science,2008,87(1):3-13.  
[14] RAVINDRAN V,THOMAS D V,THOMAS D G,et al.Performance and welfare of broilers as affected by stocking density and zinc bacitracin supplementation[J].Animal Science Journal,2006,77(1):110-116.  
[15] 白水莉.饲养密度和环境富集材料对肉鸡福利状况、生产性能和肉品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.扬州:扬州大学,2009:80-81.
[16] 汤建平.饲养密度与饲养方式及饲粮能量对肉鸡生长的影响[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2012:58-59.
[17] 张华.不同饲养方式和密度对白羽肉鸡生产性能及生理机能的影响[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2013:42-44.
[18] 于浩,宋莎莎,丁壮.不同饲养密度和日粮生物素添加水平对肉鸡生产性能与福利状态的影响[J].中国饲料,2014(16):18-21.
[19] 杨静.不同隔离时间的急性应激对鸡血液生化指标和下丘脑CRHAVT mRNA表达的影响[J].广东饲料,2011,20(5):34-37.
[20] SIEGEL H S.Gordon memorial lecture:stress,strains and resistance[J].British Poultry Science,1995,36(1):3-22
[21] 王新谋.家畜应激与畜牧生产(续)[J].畜牧兽医杂志,1985(3):41-45.
[22] 文杰,林济华,高宇清.维生素C对热应激状态下肉仔鸡生产性能及维生素C合成能力的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2000,31(6):497-502.
[23] 刘铀,林红英,罗东君,等.热应激对肉鸡血液生化指标及内分泌机能的影响[J].湛江海洋大学学报,1999,19(1):61-64.
[24] 胡骁飞,呙于明.皮质酮应激对肉仔鸡生产性能及血液指标的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2010,46(15):48-51.
[25] 杨在宾,周佳萍,王景成.畜禽应激反应机理及防制措施的应用研究进展[J].饲料工业,2007,28(15):4-8.
[26] 魏凤仙.湿度和氨暴露诱导的慢性应激对肉仔鸡生长性能、肉品质、生理机能的影响及其调控机制[D].博士学位论文.杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012:146-147.
[27] APPELS A,BÄR F W,BÄR J,et al.Inflammation,depressive symptomatology,and coronary artery disease[J].Psychosomatic Medicine,2000,62(5):601-605.  
[28] HARTMANN G,TSCHÖP M,FISCHER R,et al.High altitude increases circulating interleukin-6,interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and c-reactive protein[J].Cytokine,2000,12(3):246-252.  
文章导航

/